Denmark - 1st DivisionAutocentralen ParkData current as of 31 August 2026

Kolding IF vs AB: match statistics

Kolding IF crest
Kolding IF
2 : 1half-time 2:0
AB crest
AB

Kolding IF vs AB: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kolding IF played AB in 1st Division (Denmark). The match was played on 29 August 2026. Venue: Autocentralen Park. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Kolding IF: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match. AB: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kolding IF scores 1.20 and concedes 1.60 goals per match. AB scores 1.40 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.93 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kolding IF 80%, AB 60%. Over 2.5: Kolding IF 40%, AB 40%. League level: BTTS 67%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

Kolding IF has higher xG: 1.88 vs 1.44. Kolding IF: 17.2 shots per match, AB: 11.8.

Match halves

Kolding IF: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.60. AB: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.40.

Goals by minute

Kolding IF: 16-30 (2 goals). AB: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

1st Division: 2.93 goals per match, BTTS 67%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

AB sit 7th, three places above Kolding IF, and have averaged 1.6 points per game over their last five matches compared with the hosts’ 1.0. The visitors are more clinical away from home, scoring an average of 1.67 goals with a 13% shot conversion rate, while Kolding score 1 goal per home game and have failed to find the net in 50% of their home appearances. AB’s defence concedes just 1 goal per away match and keeps a clean sheet in 33% of games, whereas Kolding concede an average of 2 goals at home and have yet to keep a clean sheet. Although the hosts create more high-quality chances, with an average xG of 1.70 compared with AB’s 1.53, both of their home matches ended in defeat. The visitors’ superior defensive organisation, efficiency and current run of 2 wins in five matches point to a slightly higher probability of an away victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - Yes pick is primarily supported by the current form of both teams, as Kolding IF and AB have recorded this outcome in 60% of their last five matches. During this period, Kolding averaged 2.6 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, while AB scored 1.4 goals per match and conceded just 0.8. The hosts have failed to keep a clean sheet in every match this season, and their high average xG against of 1.99 further strengthens AB’s chances of scoring. However, AB have kept a clean sheet in 33% of their matches, so the pick is not decisive. Nevertheless, Kolding IF’s attacking potential, confirmed by an xG of 1.85 across their last five appearances, should be enough to find the net. An additional argument is the league BTTS frequency of 67%, which is higher than the estimated probability for this fixture but still supports a scenario with goals at both ends.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In their last five matches, Kolding averaged 2.6 goals scored, while AB averaged 1.4, providing clear grounds to expect at least two goals. During this period, the hosts created chances worth 1.85 xG per match, while AB allowed opponents 1.62 xG. Both teams recorded both teams to score in 60% of their last five matches, and Kolding conceded an average of 1.4 goals. Although Kolding’s full-season profile is more conservative, 100% of their matches and 67% of AB’s games exceeded the 1.5-goal line, making Over 1.5 goals the strongest pick.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

AB have a clearly stronger first-half profile: in their last five matches, they were leading at the break in 60% of cases, while Kolding failed to lead at half-time in any of those games and were trailing at the break in 75% of them. The visitors averaged 1.2 goals scored before half-time and conceded just 0.2, compared with Kolding’s averages of 0.5 scored and 1.25 conceded. Across the season, AB average 1.67 goals per match compared with Kolding’s 1.0, and they also have the higher xG figure: 1.53 versus 1.31. Kolding can respond after the interval, having scored 0.75 goals in the second half across their last five matches, but AB conceded just 0.6 goals on average after the break, supporting the scenario of the visitors holding on to their lead until full-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
Kolding IFAB
10Shots14
Kolding IFAB
4Shots on target3
Kolding IFAB
1.19xG1.46
Kolding IFAB
4Corners11
Kolding IFAB
36Dangerous attacks50
Kolding IFAB
15Fouls10
Kolding IFAB
1Cards1
Kolding IFAB

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.2Goals scored / match1.4
Kolding IFAB
1.6Goals conceded / match1
Kolding IFAB
42%Average possession46%
Kolding IFAB
6.8Shots on target / match4.8
Kolding IFAB

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

17.2Shots per match11.8
Kolding IFAB
6.8Shots on target4.8
Kolding IFAB
7%Shot conversion11.9%
Kolding IFAB
42%Possession46%
Kolding IFAB
1.88xG for1.44
Kolding IFAB
1.41xG against1.81
Kolding IFAB

Shooting quality

Kolding IF: AttackingAB: Balanced
Kolding IFAB
Accuracy (shots on target)40%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.180.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

AB is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Kolding IF · 1.2 pts / match - AB

Kolding IF
DLDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W60% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 at home
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.88Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
AB
DDLWD
Season result split
20% W60% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 away
1-1-1
DLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AB is 17% better for: goals scored per match.

1.2 goals / match - Kolding IF · 1.4 goals / match - AB

AB is 60% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.6 goals / match - Kolding IF · 1 goals / match - AB

Kolding IF scoring profile: very strong

Kolding IF scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while AB keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

AB scoring profile: very strong

AB scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Kolding IF keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 5 matches).

6Goals scored (season)7
Kolding IFAB
8Goals conceded (season)5
Kolding IFAB
2.8Average goals in match2.4
Kolding IFAB
6Goals scored (last 5)7
Kolding IFAB
8Goals conceded (last 5)5
Kolding IFAB

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal80%
Kolding IFAB
40%2 goals40%
Kolding IFAB
0%3 goals20%
Kolding IFAB
0%4 goals0%
Kolding IFAB

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal80%
Kolding IFAB
40%2 goals20%
Kolding IFAB
20%3 goals0%
Kolding IFAB
0%4 goals0%
Kolding IFAB

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

60%BTTS at half-time20%
Kolding IFAB
20%BTTS in both halves20%
Kolding IFAB
40%Scored in both halves20%
Kolding IFAB

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
Kolding IFAB
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
Kolding IFAB
80%BTTS - last 560%
Kolding IFAB

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Kolding IFAB
60%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
Kolding IFAB
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
Kolding IFAB

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Kolding IFAB
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time20%
Kolding IFAB
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Kolding IFAB

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AB is 300% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.4 pts / match - Kolding IF · 1.6 pts / match - AB

Kolding IF - half-time state
0% leading40% draw60% trailing
AB - half-time state
40% leading40% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.4Points per match (1st half)1.6
Kolding IFAB
0.6Goals scored (1st half)1
Kolding IFAB
1.2Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
Kolding IFAB
1.8Average goals (1st half)1.4
Kolding IFAB
0%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Kolding IFAB
40%No goal before half-time40%
Kolding IFAB

After half-time (2nd half)

1.6Points per match (2nd half)1
Kolding IFAB
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
Kolding IFAB
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
Kolding IFAB
1Average goals (2nd half)1
Kolding IFAB
80%Clean sheet after half-time40%
Kolding IFAB
40%No goal after half-time60%
Kolding IFAB

Kolding IF - second-half results

40% W40% R20% P
2
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.40
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.8

Defence stays stable across the full match.

AB - second-half results

20% W40% R40% P
8
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kolding IF - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.60
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match1.20.4
Average goals in match1.81.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet0%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3
AB - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kolding IF
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
2
2
16-30
0
4
31-45
1
2
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

AB
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
89%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kolding IF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.87
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.68
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

AB

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.77
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.81
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.6
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1st Division).

Teams vs league

Kolding IFLigaAB
Average goals in match 2.802.93 2.40
Both teams scored 80%67% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%57% 40%
Clean sheets 0%18% 20%
Goal before half-time 100%73% 80%
Goal after half-time 60%77% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.93
Average goals per match
67%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
18%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.53
Away goals / match
+-8%
Home attack advantage
+-9%
Home defence advantage
+-7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Kolding IFGoalHans HöllsbergAssist: Gustav Friberg
  2. Kolding IFYellow cardLasse Laursen
  3. Kolding IFGoalIsak Frederik TånnanderAssist: Gustav Friberg
  4. ABYellow cardSøren Ilsøe
  5. ABSubstitutionOn: Serigne DiopOff: Casper Grening
  6. Kolding IFSubstitutionOn: Aksel Emil HalsgaardOff: Tobias Augustinus-Jensen

FAQ

What was the result of Kolding IF vs AB?

The 1st Division match finished Kolding IF 2:1 AB. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kolding IF vs AB?

Kolding IF score 1.20 goals per game on average and AB 1.40. The 1st Division average is 2.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 80% of Kolding IF's matches and 60% of AB's.

What form are Kolding IF and AB in?

Over the last 5 games Kolding IF have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and AB 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kolding IF vs AB?

The statistical background for Kolding IF vs AB — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.