Kolding IF vs Horsens: match statistics
Kolding IF vs Horsens: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kolding IF played Horsens in 1st Division (Denmark). The match was played on 17 April 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Kolding IF: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Horsens: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kolding IF scores 1.29 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. Horsens scores 1.13 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.70 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kolding IF 54%, Horsens 38%. Over 2.5: Kolding IF 50%, Horsens 46%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
Kolding IF has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.33. Kolding IF: 12.8 shots per match, Horsens: 11.7.
Match halves
Kolding IF: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.67. Horsens: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.46.
Goals by minute
Kolding IF: 31-45+ (8 goals). Horsens: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1st Division: 2.70 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (Kolding IF). Kolding has noticeably better offensive form recently: 7 goals in the last 5 matches versus Horsens’ 2 in the same period. At home Kolding averages 1.42 goals with 4.42 shots on target and xG 1.59, while Horsens away records only 0.92 goals, 3.92 shots on target and xG 1.35, indicating superior chance creation by the hosts. Defensively Horsens looks solid on the road — conceding 0.58 goals on average and keeping clean sheets in 58% of away matches — but the visitors fail to score in 50% of their away games, whereas Kolding fail to score at home in only 17% of matches, which neutralises the opponent’s defensive edge. Additionally Kolding have earned 1.6 points per game in their last 5 fixtures versus Horsens’ 1.0, and seasonally 31 goals scored and 27 conceded compared to Horsens’ 27–24, so I assign Kolding a 55% chance to win, 25% for a draw and 20% for an away victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Kolding has a seasonal BTTS rate of 50% and 60% in the last 5 matches, while Horsens only 25% seasonally and 20% in the last 5, giving a clear home advantage in propensity for Goal/Goal games. Horsens keep a clean sheet in 58% of matches versus 42% for Kolding, and the season average goals conceded is 0.58 for Horsens and 1.42 for Kolding, which strongly reduces the probability of BTTS. In the short term Kolding creates more chances (last 5 matches xG 1.61 vs 0.78 for Horsens) and scores on average 1.4 goals versus 0.4 for Horsens, so the home side is the primary source of goals. Additionally, Horsens’ low efficiency and number of shots on target (conversion rate 8% and 3.92 shots on target) reduce the likelihood that the visitors will reply with a goal; given these figures I assess No Goal as more likely (No 64%, BTTS - Yes 36%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Home season xG is 1.31 and Horsens season xG is 1.35; however, in the last 5 matches Kolding has xG 1.61 and scored 7 goals (avg 1.4), while Horsens has xG 0.78 and scored 2 goals in the last 5 (avg 0.4). Season goals averages are 1.33 for Kolding and 0.92 for Horsens, and the league averages 2.72 goals per match; Kolding’s home profile shows 58% of matches over 2.5 goals this season (60% in the last 5), whereas Horsens away has 33% (40% in the last 5). Kolding averages 11.75 shots and 4.33 shots on target versus Horsens 11.67 and 3.92, and Kolding has a higher conversion rate 11% vs 8%; the percentage of matches with both teams scoring is 50% for Kolding and 25% for Horsens. Taking these figures into account, I estimate expected goals of 1.48 for Kolding and 1.22 for Horsens, totaling 2.70 expected goals. A Poisson model with λ=2.70 produces roughly 75% probability for Over 1.5, 51% for Over 2.5 and 29% for Over 3.5, therefore the strongest and most justified market to play is OVER 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is 1/1 (Kolding leading at the break and ultimately winning), because Kolding led at the break in 6 of 12 home matches (50%) and scores an average of 0.83 goals in the first half, while Horsens concedes only 0.25 goals on average to the break away from home. Additionally, 83% of Kolding’s home games have seen at least one goal before half-time, which increases the chance of a home goal, but Horsens keeps a clean sheet at half-time in 75% of away matches, which mitigates that advantage. In the second half Kolding is active — they scored 5 goals in minutes 46–60 — which helps them maintain the lead, yet there is a risk of late concessions, as the hosts conceded as many as 6 goals in minutes 76–90, and Horsens scored 3 goals in 61–75 and 2 goals in 76–90. At full-time Kolding has a 42% home win rate compared to Horsens’s 33% away win rate and similar xG (1.31 vs 1.35), so I favor 1/1 (30%) as the strongest signal, with significant alternatives 1/X and X/1 due to the possibility of late equalizers.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kolding IF | Horsens | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kolding IF is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Kolding IF · 1 pts / match - Horsens
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kolding IF is 14% better for: goals scored per match.
1.29 goals / match - Kolding IF · 1.13 goals / match - Horsens
Horsens is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.13 goals / match - Kolding IF · 1 goals / match - Horsens
Kolding IF scores in 79% of matches (19 of 24 matches), while Horsens keeps a clean sheet in 50% (12 of 24 matches).
Horsens scores in 63% of matches (15 of 24 matches), while Kolding IF keeps a clean sheet in 33% (8 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kolding IF
Over / Under - Horsens
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Horsens is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.54 pts / match - Kolding IF · 1.63 pts / match - Horsens
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kolding IF - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 38%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Horsens - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 38%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kolding IF
Horsens
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1st Division).
Teams vs league
| Kolding IF | Liga | Horsens | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.42 | 2.70 | ▼ 2.13 |
| Both teams scored | • 54% | 54% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 52% | ▼ 46% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 27% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | • 71% | 72% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 79% | ▼ 58% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Kolding IF 0 - 0 - 2 Horsens. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Kolding IF vs Horsens?
The 1st Division match finished Kolding IF 0:1 Horsens. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Kolding IF and Horsens?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Kolding IF won 0, Horsens won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Kolding IF vs Horsens?
Kolding IF score 1.29 goals per game on average and Horsens 1.13. The 1st Division average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Kolding IF's matches and 38% of Horsens's.
What form are Kolding IF and Horsens in?
Over the last 5 games Kolding IF have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Horsens 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kolding IF vs Horsens?
The statistical background for Kolding IF vs Horsens — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


