Kolding IF vs Hvidovre: match statistics
Kolding IF vs Hvidovre: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kolding IF played Hvidovre in 1st Division (Denmark). The match was played on 3 May 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Kolding IF: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Hvidovre: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kolding IF scores 1.19 and concedes 1.19 goals per match. Hvidovre scores 1.44 and concedes 1.07. League average: 2.76 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kolding IF 52%, Hvidovre 63%. Over 2.5: Kolding IF 48%, Hvidovre 52%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Kolding IF has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.41. Kolding IF: 12.8 shots per match, Hvidovre: 12.5.
Match halves
Kolding IF: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.59. Hvidovre: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.63.
Goals by minute
Kolding IF: 31-45+ (9 goals). Hvidovre: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
1st Division: 2.76 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-2. Average goals 1.33, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the away win (Hvidovre) based on table superiority and stronger season metrics. Hvidovre sit 2nd versus Kolding IF’s 5th, with 11 wins and 39 goals scored compared to the hosts’ 9 wins and 32 goals. Kolding show poor form — last 5: 0 wins, 1 draw, 4 losses, scoring only 3 and conceding 9 (avg 0.2 points), while Hvidovre in that period average 1.0 point, scoring 5 and conceding 6. Match stats indicate Kolding have a slightly higher home xG (1.60 vs 1.42), greater possession (54% vs 47%) and more shots (14 vs 12.54), but Hvidovre are more efficient in finishing (conversion 11% vs 9%) and keep clean sheets away more often (38% vs 31%), which tips the balance in the final assessment.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The 'both teams to score' scenario looks more likely because Kolding posts a season BTTS of 79% (60% in the last 5 matches), while Hvidovre has 46% for the season but 80% in the last 5. Scoring potential is confirmed by xG: season xG are 1.40 for Kolding and 1.42 for Hvidovre (total 2.82), and in the last 5 matches 1.56 and 1.52 (total 3.08). Additionally, both teams concede goals — Kolding concedes 1.14 on average in the season and 1.8 in the last 5 (9 conceded in the last 5), Hvidovre 1.0 in the season and 1.2 in the last 5 (6 conceded) — which increases the likelihood that both sides will find the net. Against this are clean sheet stats: Hvidovre has 38% matches without conceding versus 21% for Kolding, and a season BTTS for Hvidovre of only 46%, which introduces some risk of a 'No Goal' outcome. Considering the dominant signals (Kolding 79% BTTS, Hvidovre 80% in last 5, combined xG around 2.82–3.08 and league BTTS 55%), I prefer a 'BTTS - Yes' bet.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
A model combining both teams' xG (xG 1.40 for Kolding and 1.42 for Hvidovre with opposing xG 1.37/1.29) yields expected goals of 1.39 for the home side and 1.35 for the visitors, totaling 2.74 goals. Seasonal percentages of matches over 1.5 are 86% for Kolding and 69% for Hvidovre (average 77.5%), and the league records 2.76 goals/match — hence a high probability for Over 1.5 (82%). The 2.5 line is more balanced: season Over 2.5 stands at 50% (Kolding) and 54% (Hvidovre), and the projected 2.74 goals implies a slightly above 50% chance for Over 2.5 (55%). Over 3.5 is less likely: Kolding 43% vs Hvidovre 23% for Over 3.5, so with 2.74 goals I prefer Under 3.5 (69%). Additionally, averages of 3.86 and 4.15 shots on target per match, conversion rates of 12% vs 11% and BTTS rates of 79% for Kolding and 46% for Hvidovre reinforce the expectation of at least two goals, therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistics indicate an advantage for Hvidovre: the visitors win 54% of matches versus Kolding’s 29%, and in the last 5 fixtures the hosts were trailing at half-time in 4 of 5 (80%), while Hvidovre led at the break in 3 of 5 (60%). Seasonally Kolding has better half-time numbers (on average 1.0 goals at half-time and 1.57 goals in home matches versus 0.62 and 1.0 for Hvidovre), but in short-term form Kolding score only 0.2 goals at half-time across the last 5 games while Hvidovre score 0.8, reversing the seasonal trend. The visitors are stronger after the break: they average 1.38 goals in the second half and earn 1.46 points after half-time versus the hosts’ 1.07 goals and 1.0 point, and Hvidovre have scored 7 goals in minutes 76–90 compared to Kolding’s 3, which increases the likelihood of a late decision in favor of the visitors. On that basis the most secure scenario is HT/FT 2/2 (Hvidovre leading at half-time and winning), with alternatives X/2 (draw at half-time and visitors win) and 1/2 (hosts leading at half-time, visitors complete a turnaround).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kolding IF | Hvidovre | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Hvidovre is 400% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Kolding IF · 1 pts / match - Hvidovre
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Hvidovre is 21% better for: goals scored per match.
1.19 goals / match - Kolding IF · 1.44 goals / match - Hvidovre
Hvidovre is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.19 goals / match - Kolding IF · 1.07 goals / match - Hvidovre
Kolding IF scores in 74% of matches (20 of 27 matches), while Hvidovre keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 matches).
Hvidovre scores in 81% of matches (22 of 27 matches), while Kolding IF keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kolding IF
Over / Under - Hvidovre
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Hvidovre is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.41 pts / match - Kolding IF · 1.7 pts / match - Hvidovre
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kolding IF - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 33%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Hvidovre - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 41%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kolding IF
Hvidovre
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1st Division).
Teams vs league
| Kolding IF | Liga | Hvidovre | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.37 | 2.76 | ▼ 2.52 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 52% | 55% | ▲ 63% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 48% | 54% | ▼ 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 30% | 26% | ▲ 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 70% | 73% | • 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 79% | ▼ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Kolding IF 0 - 1 - 2 Hvidovre. Average goals 1.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Kolding IF vs Hvidovre?
The 1st Division match finished Kolding IF 1:1 Hvidovre. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Kolding IF and Hvidovre?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Kolding IF won 0, Hvidovre won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Kolding IF vs Hvidovre?
Kolding IF score 1.19 goals per game on average and Hvidovre 1.44. The 1st Division average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Kolding IF's matches and 63% of Hvidovre's.
What form are Kolding IF and Hvidovre in?
Over the last 5 games Kolding IF have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Hvidovre 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kolding IF vs Hvidovre?
The statistical background for Kolding IF vs Hvidovre — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


