Komárno vs Skalica: match statistics
Komárno vs Skalica: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Komárno played Skalica in Super Liga (Slovakia). The match was played on 25 April 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
Komárno: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Skalica: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Komárno scores 1.07 and concedes 1.46 goals per match. Skalica scores 1.00 and concedes 1.46. League average: 2.84 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Komárno 64%, Skalica 50%. Over 2.5: Komárno 50%, Skalica 43%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Komárno has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.29. Komárno: 13.3 shots per match, Skalica: 11.4.
Match halves
Komárno: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.79. Skalica: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.64.
Goals by minute
Komárno: 76-90+ (11 goals). Skalica: 61-75 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Super Liga: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Komárno holds the edge and I forecast their win. At home they generate average xG of 1.75 versus Skalica’s 1.33 on the road and score 1.14 goals per match compared to 0.86 for away sides. The hosts produce more shots (14.71 per match, 5.5 on target) with a conversion rate around 8%, while Skalica averages only 12.21 shots and 3.29 on target with ~7% conversion. Defensively Komárno is stronger — conceding 1.5 goals at home with xG against 1.41, versus Skalica conceding 1.86 goals away with xG against 1.79; the hosts register 29% clean sheets against 7% for the visitors. Form slightly shifts the picture: Skalica have scored 7 goals in their last 5 matches, with 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, averaging 1.4 points per game, whereas Komárno have only 3 goals, 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, averaging 0.2 points per game. Considering superior quality of chances (xG 1.75 vs 1.33), a higher share of shots on target and a much lower share of matches without a goal for the hosts (14% vs 50%), I assign Komárno a 52% chance, a draw 26% and a Skalica win 22%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have 50% BTTS in the season, and in the last 5 matches the BTTS rate rose to 60% for both sides against a league BTTS level of 54%, signaling Goal/Goal. Skalica concedes on average 1.86 goals per match and has only 7% clean sheets (meaning in about 93% of matches they do not keep a clean sheet), which greatly increases the likelihood the opponent will score. Komárno scores on average 1.14 goals (xG 1.25), while Skalica has seasonally 0.86 goals (xG 1.33); both teams allow a lot of chances — xG against is 1.57 for Komárno and 1.79 for Skalica — so opportunities exist on both sides. Although Komárno has scored only 3 goals in the last 5 matches (0.6 per match, form 'dllll'), their recent xG 1.79 indicates chance creation, and Skalica has 7 goals in the last 5 (1.4 per match), therefore the BTTS scenario looks stronger. Considering the above numbers and trends, I back BTTS - Yes with an estimated 65% vs 35% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
To estimate expected goals I used the teams’ offensive xG and opponent xG against: Komárno has xG_for 1.25 versus Skalica’s xG_against 1.79, yielding 1.52 expected goals; Skalica has xG_for 1.33 versus Komárno’s xG_against 1.57, yielding 1.45, for a combined 2.97. A Poisson model with λ=2.97 gives roughly an 80% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), about 57% for Over 2.5 and about 35% for Over 3.5. Seasonal indicators confirm a scoring tendency: Komárno has 57% of matches with over 1.5 goals, Skalica 79%; Over 0.5 occurs in 86% and 93% of matches, and BTTS is 50% for both teams; the league averages 2.84 goals per match, and our forecast of 2.97 is consistent with that. Additionally, Skalica concedes on average 1.86 goals away and has xG_against 1.79, while Komárno in the last 5 matches generated xG_for 1.79 but scored only 0.6 goals on average (3 in 5), suggesting potential for more goals if finishing improves. Therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (backing the Over side at the 1.5 line) as the best combination of high probability (80%) and an xG advantage over current finishing.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest signal indicates a home lead at half-time with the home team maintaining the win by full-time: Komárno led at half-time in 7 matches (50%), while Skalica never led at half-time (0%). In the first half Komárno averages 0.57 goals scored and concedes 0.43, whereas Skalica averages only 0.14 scored and concedes 1.21 at the break (scoredAVGHT_home = 0.57, concededAVGHT_home = 0.43; scoredAVGHT_away = 0.14, concededAVGHT_away = 1.21), hence a clear home advantage on HT. After the break Komárno scores on average 0.57 and concedes 0.64 goals (scored_2hg_avg_home = 0.57 vs conceded_2hg_avg_home = 0.64), which slightly reduces the chance of maintaining the lead but does not eliminate the advantage. Additionally, the home side has a season win rate of 36% and 43% draws, while Skalica has only 7% wins and 79% losses (winPercentage_home = 36%, winPercentage_away = 7%), so I assess the most likely scenario as 1/1 (29%), followed by 1/X (17%) and 1/2 (11%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Komárno | Skalica | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Skalica is 600% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - Komárno · 1.4 pts / match - Skalica
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Komárno is 7% better for: goals scored per match.
1.07 goals / match - Komárno · 1 goals / match - Skalica
Komárno scores in 82% of matches (23 of 28 matches), while Skalica keeps a clean sheet in 18% (5 of 28 matches).
Skalica scores in 57% of matches (16 of 28 matches), while Komárno keeps a clean sheet in 25% (7 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Komárno
Over / Under - Skalica
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Skalica is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.89 pts / match - Komárno · 1.04 pts / match - Skalica
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Komárno - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Skalica - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 21%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Komárno
Skalica
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super Liga).
Teams vs league
| Komárno | Liga | Skalica | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.54 | 2.84 | ▼ 2.46 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 54% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 57% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 25% | 27% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 61% | 74% | ▼ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 74% | ▼ 61% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Komárno 1 - 1 - 1 Skalica. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Komárno vs Skalica?
The Super Liga match finished Komárno 0:2 Skalica. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Komárno and Skalica?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Komárno won 1, Skalica won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Komárno vs Skalica?
Komárno score 1.07 goals per game on average and Skalica 1.00. The Super Liga average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Komárno's matches and 50% of Skalica's.
What form are Komárno and Skalica in?
Over the last 5 games Komárno have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Skalica 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Komárno vs Skalica?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


