Komárno vs Tatran Prešov: match statistics
Komárno vs Tatran Prešov: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Komárno played Tatran Prešov in Super Liga (Slovakia). The match was played on 16 May 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Komárno: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Tatran Prešov: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Komárno scores 1.06 and concedes 1.48 goals per match. Tatran Prešov scores 0.94 and concedes 1.35. League average: 2.85 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Komárno 65%, Tatran Prešov 48%. Over 2.5: Komárno 52%, Tatran Prešov 48%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 58%.
xG, shots and style
Komárno has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.36. Komárno: 13.4 shots per match, Tatran Prešov: 12.2.
Match halves
Komárno: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.81. Tatran Prešov: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.45.
Goals by minute
Komárno: 76-90+ (12 goals). Tatran Prešov: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Super Liga: 2.85 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 58%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-3-0. Average goals 0.67, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (1). Komárno at home averages xG 1.72, 5.33 shots on target and 14.73 attempts per game, translating to 1.07 goals scored per match and only 20% of games without scoring. Tatran Prešov away posts xG 1.34, 3.53 shots on target and 12.07 attempts per game, averages 0.67 goals and fails to score in 53% of away fixtures. Defensively Tatran concedes fewer goals on average (1.13 away vs. 1.53 conceded by Komárno at home), but the xG against for the visitors away is 1.62, higher than the 1.38 xG against Komárno in their home matches, which suggests the visitors often allow dangerous situations. Despite Tatran’s better form over the last 5 matches (1.4 points and 2 wins vs. the home side’s 0.6 points and 1 win), Komárno’s superiority in chance creation and higher shots-on-target rate (5.33 vs 3.53) and lower share of matches without a goal (20% vs 53%) favor a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Komárno has BTTS at 56% for the season and as high as 80% in the last 5 matches, while Tatran has 40% for the season and 60% in the last 5, which creates a strong, recently rising signal for BTTS. Both teams generate similar xG values: Komárno xG for 1.39 versus Tatran 1.34, while xG against are 1.46 and 1.62 respectively, suggesting they both create and concede goal-scoring opportunities. Over the season Komárno scored 33 and conceded 46, and Tatran scored 29 and conceded 42; in the last 5 Komárno conceded 9 goals (avg 1.8) and Tatran scored 7 (1.4), confirming both sides’ tendency toward goal-deciding matches. Additionally both teams register a similar number of shots (12.38 vs 12.07) and shots on target (3.88 vs 3.53); Komárno has a conversion rate of 10% versus Tatran’s 6%, and Tatran’s xG for 1.34 against a seasonal goals average of 0.67 suggests Tatran may have room to improve finishing. Considering the league BTTS average of 54% and the above figures, I assign the 'yes' scenario a 70% probability and select BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG and defensive data I calculated expected goals: Komárno 1.51 (attacking xG 1.39 vs 1.62 xG typically conceded by Tatran), Tatran 1.40 (attacking xG 1.34 vs 1.46 xG typically conceded by Komárno), total ≈2.91 goals. From the Poisson distribution with λ=2.91 the probability of over 1.5 goals is ~79% (P≥2 ≈78.7%), for the 2.5 line about 56% (P≥3 ≈55.6%), and for 3.5 about 33% (P≥4 ≈33.3%). Seasonal stats confirm the trend: Komárno has 69% of matches over 1.5 and 63% over 2.5, Tatran 40% and 33% respectively, and the league average for Over 2.5 is 57%. Additionally Komárno converts shots more efficiently (conversion rate 10% vs 6% for Tatran), both teams have a high share of matches with at least one goal (Over 0.5: 81% and 80%), and in the last 5 matches Komárno’s xG was 1.76 versus Tatran’s 1.53, which supports a higher-scoring scenario. As a result the strongest and most certain pick is Over 1.5, while Over 2.5 is moderately likely and Over 3.5 is too risky.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Komárno has a clear first-half advantage: on average 0.75 goals at the break versus 0.20 for Tatran Prešov, and the home side led at the break in 31% of matches compared to 13% for the visitors. However, late phases favor Prešov — the visitors scored 5 goals in minutes 76–90, while Komárno conceded 5 goals in those minutes, which, together with the fact that both teams score in 54% of league matches, increases the chance of a turnaround after the break. Additionally, draws are frequent this season: the home team drew in 38% of matches and the visitors in 40%, therefore a draw at full-time is more likely than a decisive away win. On this basis I project a Half-Time/Full-Time scenario of Komárno leading at the break and a draw after 90 minutes (1/X) at approximately 22%, with alternatives X/X at ~17% and 2/2 at ~16%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Komárno | Tatran Prešov | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.24 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Tatran Prešov is 133% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Komárno · 1.4 pts / match - Tatran Prešov
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Komárno is 13% better for: goals scored per match.
1.06 goals / match - Komárno · 0.94 goals / match - Tatran Prešov
Tatran Prešov is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.48 goals / match - Komárno · 1.35 goals / match - Tatran Prešov
Komárno scores in 81% of matches (25 of 31 matches), while Tatran Prešov keeps a clean sheet in 26% (8 of 31 matches).
Tatran Prešov scores in 55% of matches (17 of 31 matches), while Komárno keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 31 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Komárno
Over / Under - Tatran Prešov
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tatran Prešov is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.84 pts / match - Komárno · 0.97 pts / match - Tatran Prešov
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Komárno - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Tatran Prešov - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 19%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Komárno
Tatran Prešov
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super Liga).
Teams vs league
| Komárno | Liga | Tatran Prešov | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.55 | 2.85 | ▼ 2.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 54% | ▼ 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 52% | 58% | ▼ 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 26% | • 26% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 61% | 74% | ▼ 71% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 75% | ▼ 61% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Komárno 0 - 3 - 0 Tatran Prešov. Average goals 0.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Komárno vs Tatran Prešov?
The Super Liga match finished Komárno 1:0 Tatran Prešov. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Komárno and Tatran Prešov?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Komárno won 0, Tatran Prešov won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 0.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Komárno vs Tatran Prešov?
Komárno score 1.06 goals per game on average and Tatran Prešov 0.94. The Super Liga average is 2.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Komárno's matches and 48% of Tatran Prešov's.
What form are Komárno and Tatran Prešov in?
Over the last 5 games Komárno have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Tatran Prešov 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Komárno vs Tatran Prešov?
The statistical background for Komárno vs Tatran Prešov — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


