Kongsvinger vs Moss: match statistics
Kongsvinger vs Moss: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kongsvinger play Moss in First Division (Norway). The match date is 18 April 2026 at 14:00. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Kongsvinger: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Moss: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kongsvinger scores 2.57 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Moss scores 1.64 and concedes 2.29. League average: 3.75 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kongsvinger 79%, Moss 79%. Over 2.5: Kongsvinger 86%, Moss 86%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.
xG, shots and style
Kongsvinger has higher xG: 1.77 vs 1.69. Kongsvinger: 14.7 shots per match, Moss: 14.6.
Match halves
Kongsvinger: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 1.50. Moss: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Kongsvinger: 46-60 (11 goals). Moss: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division: 3.75 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 73%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 2-0-0. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 50%.
Match description
Kongsvinger has a clear home advantage: won 100% of home matches (2/2), averaging 3.0 goals per home game and has not conceded yet (0.0 goals conceded per game) with 100% clean sheets. Moss, however, shows a strong away attack — averaging 16 shots and 8 shots on target per away game and away xG 2.05 versus hosts’ 1.62, indicating the visitors generate more high-quality chances. Kongsvinger’s home finishing is more efficient (27% conversion vs 19% for Moss), but in the last 5 matches the hosts scored 10 and conceded 8 (record 2-1-2), while Moss scored 8 and conceded 6 (record 3-1-1) and averages 2.0 points per game in their last 5. Defensively the hosts hold the edge at their stadium (0.0 goals conceded per home game vs Moss’s 2.0 goals conceded away) and enjoy higher possession (59% vs 51%), so given the moderate strength of the visitors’ attack I forecast a home win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kongsvinger | Moss | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.41 | 0.31 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kongsvinger is 150% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Kongsvinger · 0.8 pts / match - Moss
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kongsvinger is 57% better for: goals scored per match.
2.57 goals / match - Kongsvinger · 1.64 goals / match - Moss
Kongsvinger is 53% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - Kongsvinger · 2.29 goals / match - Moss
Kongsvinger scores in 93% of matches (13 of 14 matches), while Moss keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 14 matches).
Moss scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while Kongsvinger keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Kongsvinger
Over / Under — Moss
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kongsvinger is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.43 pts / match - Kongsvinger · 1.07 pts / match - Moss
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kongsvinger - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Moss - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 3.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kongsvinger
Moss
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Kongsvinger | Liga | Moss | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.07 | 3.75 | ▲ 3.93 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 79% | 60% | ▲ 79% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 86% | 73% | ▲ 86% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 21% | ▼ 7% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 93% | 77% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 93% | 88% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Kongsvinger 2 - 0 - 0 Moss. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Kongsvinger vs Moss?
The First Division match finished Kongsvinger 2:1 Moss. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Kongsvinger and Moss?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Kongsvinger won 2, Moss won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 6.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Kongsvinger vs Moss?
Kongsvinger score 2.57 goals per game on average and Moss 1.64. The First Division average is 3.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 79% of Kongsvinger's matches and 79% of Moss's.
What form are Kongsvinger and Moss in?
Over the last 5 games Kongsvinger have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Moss 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kongsvinger vs Moss?
The statistical background for Kongsvinger vs Moss — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.