Slovenia - PrvaLigaStadion Rajko ŠtolfaData current as of 03 November 2026

Koper vs Nafta: match statistics

Koper crest
Koper
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Nafta crest
Nafta

Koper vs Nafta: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Koper played Nafta in PrvaLiga (Slovenia). The match was played on 19 September 2026. Venue: Stadion Rajko Štolfa. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Koper: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Nafta: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Koper scores 1.00 and concedes 0.89 goals per match. Nafta scores 1.89 and concedes 1.56. League average: 2.66 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Koper 33%, Nafta 67%. Over 2.5: Koper 22%, Nafta 67%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Nafta has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.37. Koper: 11.0 shots per match, Nafta: 11.3.

Match halves

Koper: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.78. Nafta: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 1.33.

Goals by minute

Koper: 76-90+ (5 goals). Nafta: 46-60 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

PrvaLiga: 2.66 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Koper sit higher in the table in 2nd place and have won 4 of their last five matches, but their home performances are clearly weaker: they are yet to win at home, drawing 67% of their matches and conceding an average of 1.67 goals. Nafta win 50% of their away matches, score an average of 1.5 goals and concede just 0.75, giving them a significant defensive advantage over the hosts. The visitors are also more clinical in front of goal, averaging 4.5 shots on target per match compared with Koper’s 3, while converting 13% of their attempts versus 8% for the hosts. Koper do create more high-quality chances at home, with an average xG of 1.63 compared with Nafta’s 1.44, but a very high 2.13 xG against the visitors suggests that the hosts should create opportunities. Nafta’s better organisation away from home and greater efficiency nevertheless point towards a narrow away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Koper have recorded BTTS in 80% of their matches, compared with 50% for Nafta and a league average of 52%, giving a moderate edge to the Goal/Goal scenario. The hosts have not kept a single clean sheet and conceded an average of 2.2 goals, while Nafta scored an average of 1.5 goals per match. Nafta do have a 25% clean-sheet rate, but their average xG against is as high as 2.13, while Koper create chances worth 1.50 xG. Koper’s recent form has been more defensive, with the team conceding just 0.8 goals across five matches and BTTS landing in 40% of those games; therefore, the advantage for BTTS - Yes is not strong. Nevertheless, Nafta scored 12 goals during this period, averaging 2.4 per match, which increases the likelihood of them exploiting the hosts’ defensive weaknesses.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Koper’s home profile is clearly goal-oriented: its matches average 4.4 goals, with at least 2 goals scored in every game. The hosts score an average of 2.2 goals but have not kept a single clean sheet, conceding an average of 2.2 goals, which increases Nafta’s chances of contributing to the scoreline. Nafta averages 1.5 goals scored, while its last five matches have produced as many as 2.4 goals per game; at the same time, Koper’s opponents create an average of 1.91 xG. Although 100% of Nafta’s matches have finished Under 3.5 goals, the 1.5 line is significantly safer, as Over 1.5 goals has landed in 100% of Koper’s matches and 75% of Nafta’s games.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Koper win at full-time (X/1), as the hosts were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches and did not trail at half-time in any of them. Koper’s recent form is very strong: the team won 4 of its last 5 matches, scoring an average of 1.4 goals and conceding just 0.8, while Nafta lost 2 of its last 5 outings and allowed opponents to score 1.2 goals per match. The opening phase should be cautious, as both teams recorded a half-time draw in 60% of their recent matches, while the average number of first-half goals was just 0.8 for Koper and 1.0 for Nafta. After the break, however, Koper has the arguments to tilt the result in its favour: the hosts average 1.4 goals in second halves, while Nafta conceded 0.8 goals in the second half across its last five matches.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
KoperNafta
19Shots14
KoperNafta
6Shots on target2
KoperNafta
1.95xG1.26
KoperNafta
3Corners4
KoperNafta
47Dangerous attacks33
KoperNafta
-1Fouls-1
KoperNafta
1Cards1
KoperNafta

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match1.89
KoperNafta
0.89Goals conceded / match1.56
KoperNafta
55%Average possession40%
KoperNafta
2.78Shots on target / match5.67
KoperNafta

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11Shots per match11.33
KoperNafta
2.78Shots on target5.67
KoperNafta
9.1%Shot conversion16.7%
KoperNafta
55%Possession40%
KoperNafta
1.37xG for1.47
KoperNafta
1.41xG against2.01
KoperNafta

Shooting quality

Koper: BalancedNafta: Counter-attacking
KoperNafta
Accuracy (shots on target)25%50%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Koper is 67% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Koper · 1.2 pts / match - Nafta

Koper
DWWWL
Season result split
44% W33% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-2
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-2-1
Last 5 at home
0-2-1
DDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Nafta
LLLWW
Season result split
44% W11% D44% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-4
1.44 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-1
Last 5 away
2-1-1
WDLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.95BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Nafta is 89% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Koper · 1.89 goals / match - Nafta

Koper is 75% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.89 goals / match - Koper · 1.56 goals / match - Nafta

Koper scoring profile: very strong

Koper scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while Nafta keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 matches).

Nafta scoring profile: mixed

Nafta scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while Koper keeps a clean sheet in 56% (5 of 9 matches).

9Goals scored (season)17
KoperNafta
8Goals conceded (season)14
KoperNafta
1.89Average goals in match3.44
KoperNafta
4Goals scored (last 5)8
KoperNafta
3Goals conceded (last 5)9
KoperNafta

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal78%
KoperNafta
22%2 goals56%
KoperNafta
0%3 goals33%
KoperNafta
0%4 goals11%
KoperNafta

How often they concede at least...

44%1 goal89%
KoperNafta
33%2 goals44%
KoperNafta
11%3 goals22%
KoperNafta
0%4 goals0%
KoperNafta

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time33%
KoperNafta
0%BTTS in both halves22%
KoperNafta
11%Scored in both halves33%
KoperNafta

BTTS and goal count

22%Min. 3 goals and BTTS56%
KoperNafta
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
KoperNafta
20%BTTS - last 580%
KoperNafta

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

56%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
KoperNafta
11%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
KoperNafta
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
KoperNafta

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
KoperNafta
22%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
KoperNafta
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
KoperNafta

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Koper is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.11 pts / match - Koper · 1 pts / match - Nafta

Koper - half-time state
22% leading44% draw33% trailing
Nafta - half-time state
22% leading33% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.11Points per match (1st half)1
KoperNafta
0.22Goals scored (1st half)0.56
KoperNafta
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.78
KoperNafta
0.67Average goals (1st half)1.33
KoperNafta
67%Clean sheet before half-time44%
KoperNafta
78%No goal before half-time56%
KoperNafta

After half-time (2nd half)

1.89Points per match (2nd half)1.78
KoperNafta
0.78Goals scored (2nd half)1.33
KoperNafta
0.44Goals conceded (2nd half)0.78
KoperNafta
1.22Average goals (2nd half)2.11
KoperNafta
78%Clean sheet after half-time22%
KoperNafta
33%No goal after half-time33%
KoperNafta

Koper - second-half results

56% W22% D22% L
10
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Nafta - second-half results

56% W11% D33% L
9
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Koper - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.21.2
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Nafta - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.40
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.22.2
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Koper
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
2
46-60
1
2
61-75
5
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Nafta
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
1
3
16-30
3
2
31-45
7
1
46-60
2
2
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-25%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Koper

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
56% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
56%

Nafta

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.87
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.45
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
134%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
125%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (PrvaLiga).

Teams vs league

KoperLigaNafta
Average goals in match▼ 1.892.66▲ 3.44
Both teams scored▼ 33%52%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 22%48%▲ 67%
Clean sheets▲ 56%28%▼ 11%
Goal before half-time▼ 56%70%▼ 67%
Goal after half-time▼ 78%82%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.66
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.25
Home goals / match
1.41
Away goals / match
+-11%
Home attack advantage
+-13%
Home defence advantage
+-9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
23%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
9%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KoperGoalKamil Manseri
  2. NaftaYellow cardKimi Lavrencic
  3. KoperYellow cardBrice Negouai
  4. KoperSubstitutionOn: Robert BeričOff: Leo Rimac
  5. NaftaSubstitutionOn: Umar Olasunkanmi JamiuOff: Aleks Pihler
  6. KoperSubstitutionOn: Bassirou M'Backé N'DiayéOff: Kamil Manseri

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Koper 1 - 0 - 0 Nafta. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Koper vs Nafta?

The PrvaLiga match finished Koper 2:0 Nafta. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Koper vs Nafta?

Koper score 1.00 goals per game on average and Nafta 1.89. The PrvaLiga average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Koper's matches and 67% of Nafta's.

What form are Koper and Nafta in?

Over the last 5 games Koper have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Nafta 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Koper vs Nafta?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Koper vs Nafta: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.