Kozármisleny vs Kecskeméti TE: match statistics
Kozármisleny vs Kecskeméti TE: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kozármisleny played Kecskeméti TE in NB II (Hungary). The match was played on 3 May 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Kozármisleny: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Kecskeméti TE: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kozármisleny scores 1.19 and concedes 1.37 goals per match. Kecskeméti TE scores 1.70 and concedes 1.22. League average: 2.51 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kozármisleny 44%, Kecskeméti TE 52%. Over 2.5: Kozármisleny 44%, Kecskeméti TE 56%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
Kecskeméti TE has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.21. Kozármisleny: 9.6 shots per match, Kecskeméti TE: 13.2.
Match halves
Kozármisleny: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.74. Kecskeméti TE: half-time lead 30%, second-half goals 0.89.
Goals by minute
Kozármisleny: 61-75 (7 goals). Kecskeméti TE: 61-75 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
NB II: 2.51 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kecskeméti TE sits 3rd with 15 wins and 46 goals scored this season; in the last 5 matches they scored 13 goals and won 4 of 5, averaging 2.4 points per game. Kozármisleny are 7th with 10 wins and 32 goals this season; in their last 5 fixtures they scored 7 goals and remain unbeaten (3 wins, 2 draws), averaging 2.2 points per game. In chance quality Kecskeméti have the higher xG (1.49 vs 1.40) and marginally more shots on target per game (4.23 vs 4.15), but both teams share an identical goals-per-game average of 1.23. The hosts’ recent defensive form speaks in their favour: Kozármisleny concede 1.23 goals at home on average, have conceded only 3 goals in their last five matches and record clean sheets in 31% of games, whereas Kecskeméti concede 1.69 goals away, have just 15% clean sheets and conceded 8 goals in their last 5. Considering both teams’ similar offensive tempo, the visitors’ slightly higher xG but the hosts’ better recent defense, the most sensible selection appears to be a draw.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS indicators favor "yes": the away side has a seasonal BTTS of 62% versus the home team’s 43%, and in the last 5 matches both teams recorded BTTS in 60% of games, providing a strong, recent signal for mutual scoring. The away form is particularly convincing — they scored 13 goals in their last 5 matches (2.6 per game) with an average xG_for of 1.54 over that period, so they both create and convert chances. The home team also poses a threat: seasonally they score 2.14 goals per game and have xG 1.75, while the away defense records xG_against 1.32 and concedes 1.69 goals seasonally, so the home side has a realistic chance to score. A counterpoint is that Kozármisleny has 43% clean sheets in home matches and conceded only 3 goals in the last 5 (0.6 per game), but the away attack strength and high seasonal BTTS of 62% prevail. I therefore rate BTTS 'yes' 65% vs 35% and recommend the 'yes' selection as the strongest signal from the data.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model based on xG and opponent defenses yields an expected 1.54 goals for Kozármisleny and 1.21 for Kecskeméti (calculated as home xG_for 1.75 and away xG_against 1.32: (1.75+1.32)/2 ≈ 1.54; and (1.49+0.92)/2 ≈ 1.21), totaling 2.75 goals. The hosts average 2.14 goals per match this season versus 1.23 for the visitors, and they generate more shots (14.43 vs 11.92) and more shots on target (5.86 vs 4.23), which strengthens the goals signal. Season percentages over 1.5 are 86% for Kozármisleny and 77% for Kecskeméti (average 81.5%), and the Poisson distribution for λ=2.75 yields ~76% chance of over 1.5 goals, so the adjusted probability for over 1.5 is 82%. For the 2.5 line signals are mixed: seasonally 64% (home) vs 46% (away) gives an average 55% for Over 2.5, Poisson suggests ~52% — a moderate signal. The 3.5 line favors the Under (seasonal 29%/23% average 26% and Poisson ~30%), therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest market to play.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is the home side leading at half-time and ultimately winning (1/1). Hosts lead at the break in 46% of matches and win 71% of fixtures this season, with an average of 2.14 goals scored versus 1.23 for the visitors, which supports their dominance. Additionally, the home team has a higher xG (1.75 vs 1.49), more shots on target (5.86 vs 4.23) and scores on average 0.92 goals before the break while conceding only 0.38, increasing the chances of a lead at the 45-minute mark. Although the away team are in good recent form over the last five matches (80% wins and 75% leads at half-time in that period), they concede an average of 1.00 goals in the second half and 1.69 per match on the season, which makes it more likely the hosts will maintain or reclaim the lead. For these reasons I assign the highest probability to the 1/1 scenario (39%), with a significant secondary signal of X/1 (23%) indicating a draw at half-time followed by a home win after the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kozármisleny | Kecskeméti TE | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kecskeméti TE is 9% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Kozármisleny · 2.4 pts / match - Kecskeméti TE
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kecskeméti TE is 43% better for: goals scored per match.
1.19 goals / match - Kozármisleny · 1.7 goals / match - Kecskeméti TE
Kecskeméti TE is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.37 goals / match - Kozármisleny · 1.22 goals / match - Kecskeméti TE
Kozármisleny scores in 70% of matches (19 of 27 matches), while Kecskeméti TE keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 matches).
Kecskeméti TE scores in 81% of matches (22 of 27 matches), while Kozármisleny keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kozármisleny
Over / Under - Kecskeméti TE
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kecskeméti TE is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.26 pts / match - Kozármisleny · 1.37 pts / match - Kecskeméti TE
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kozármisleny - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 37%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Kecskeméti TE - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 30% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kozármisleny
Kecskeméti TE
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NB II).
Teams vs league
| Kozármisleny | Liga | Kecskeméti TE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.56 | 2.51 | ▲ 2.93 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 44% | 47% | ▲ 52% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 44% | 44% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | • 30% | 30% | • 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 74% | 69% | ▼ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 78% | 80% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Kozármisleny 0 - 0 - 1 Kecskeméti TE. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Kozármisleny vs Kecskeméti TE?
The NB II match finished Kozármisleny 2:1 Kecskeméti TE. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kozármisleny vs Kecskeméti TE?
Kozármisleny score 1.19 goals per game on average and Kecskeméti TE 1.70. The NB II average is 2.51 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Kozármisleny's matches and 52% of Kecskeméti TE's.
What form are Kozármisleny and Kecskeméti TE in?
Over the last 5 games Kozármisleny have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Kecskeméti TE 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kozármisleny vs Kecskeméti TE?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


