Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildData current as of 06 September 2026

KR vs Fram: match statistics

KR crest
KR
2 : 2half-time 1:1
Fram crest
Fram

KR vs Fram: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KR played Fram in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match was played on 17 May 2026. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

KR: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Fram: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

KR scores 4.17 and concedes 1.83 goals per match. Fram scores 3.00 and concedes 1.83. League average: 3.85 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KR 100%, Fram 83%. Over 2.5: KR 100%, Fram 83%. League level: BTTS 73%, Over 2.5 73%.

xG, shots and style

KR has higher xG: 2.55 vs 2.13. KR: 20.7 shots per match, Fram: 17.8.

Match halves

KR: half-time lead 83%, second-half goals 2.00. Fram: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 2.00.

Goals by minute

KR: 0-15 (5 goals). Fram: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Úrvalsdeild: 3.85 goals per match, BTTS 73%, Over 2.5 73%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KR holds a clear home advantage: 100% wins at their stadium (6-0-0), averaging 4.0 goals scored per match, 10.67 shots on target and 66% possession. Fram on the road averages 2.0 goals, only 5.0 shots on target and fails to score in 50% of away matches (FTS 50%), which materially reduces their realistic chances. KR also posts a higher shooting accuracy of 21% versus Fram’s 11%, with a similar volume of shots (19.33 vs 19), translating into 25 goals for KR compared to 18 for Fram. In xG terms the home side has 2.38 versus 2.2 for the visitors, and xG against is 1.02 vs 1.28, indicating KR creates better and safer chances; both teams average 2.4 points in their last 5 matches. Considering the perfect home record, significant edge in shots on target and conversion, I forecast a home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal in favor of BTTS - Yes comes from KR: they have a season BTTS rate of 100% and 100% in the last 5 matches, while Fram has 80% BTTS in the last 5 and 50% for the season, which favors a both-teams-to-score scenario. KR’s attack averages 3.5 goals per game (3.6 in the last 5) with xG 2.09, whereas Fram scores 2.0 goals on average (3.0 in the last 5) with xG 2.20 — both teams generate about 2.1 xG and have realistic scoring opportunities. At the same time, defenses rarely keep a clean sheet: KR concede 1.75 goals on average (1.8 in the last 5), and Fram 2.0 (1.6 in the last 5), and both teams have 0% season clean sheets. The league has a high BTTS share at 72% and an average of 4.0 goals per match, and KR have played 100% of matches with over 2.5 goals and 100% of matches with at least 3 goals and both teams scoring, which reinforces the expectation of goal exchange. Considering these numbers and KR’s superior finishing efficiency (conversion rate 20% versus Fram’s 11%), I assess the probability of BTTS - Yes at about 85% versus 15% for No Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

KR at home averages 3.5 goals per match (25 goals this season), Fram scores 2.0 goals away (18 goals), and both teams have 0% clean sheets this season. xG shows 2.09 for KR and 2.20 for Fram, while defenses concede 1.33 and 1.28 xG respectively, translating to a forecast of 1.69 xG for the home side and 1.76 xG for the visitors, a total of 3.45 expected goals. Additionally, KR has a high conversion rate of 20% and averages 6.5 shots on target per match, which increases the likelihood of converting xG into actual goals. With λ=3.45 the Poisson distribution yields roughly an 86% probability for Over 1.5, ~67% for Over 2.5 and ~45% for Over 3.5; seasonal stats (league 4.0 goals/match, KR: 100% of matches over 2.5) confirm a propensity for high-scoring games. The strongest and most reliable signal is Over 1.5 (≈86%), therefore I recommend betting Over 1.5 as the primary pick; Over 2.5 (67%) can be considered as a secondary option.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

KR has a clear advantage: they average 3.5 goals per match versus Fram’s 2.0, win 75% of home games and have collected 8 points at half-time compared to Fram’s 1 point (averaging 2.0 pts vs 0.5 pts). At the break KR score on average 1.25 goals while Fram only 0.5, and the hosts led at the break in 2 of 4 matches (50%) whereas Fram did not lead at half-time in any (0%). Fram concedes on average 1.5 goals before the break, making them more susceptible to conceding in the first half. Although Fram’s xG is slightly higher (2.2 vs 2.09), KR have a markedly better conversion rate (shot efficiency 20% vs 11%) and more shots on target (6.5 vs 5.0), which translates into a higher actual goal return. Additionally KR scored 6 goals in minutes 76–90 versus 0 for Fram, suggesting that if KR holds a lead at half-time they have a strong chance to maintain and extend it — therefore the most likely HT/FT outcome is 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
KRFram
11Shots16
KRFram
5Shots on target7
KRFram
1.48xG1.94
KRFram
4Corners11
KRFram
59Dangerous attacks60
KRFram
7Fouls16
KRFram
2Cards2
KRFram

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

4.17Goals scored / match3
KRFram
1.83Goals conceded / match1.83
KRFram
63%Average possession53%
KRFram
10.33Shots on target / match6
KRFram

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

20.67Shots per match17.83
KRFram
10.33Shots on target6
KRFram
20.2%Shot conversion16.8%
KRFram
63%Possession53%
KRFram
2.55xG for2.13
KRFram
1.18xG against1.31
KRFram

Shooting quality

KR: DominantFram: Attacking
KRFram
Accuracy (shots on target)50%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.400.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KR is 25% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / match - KR · 2.4 pts / match - Fram

KR
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +14
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-0
Last 5 at home
3-0-0
WWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 4.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 2.72Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Fram
WLWWW
Season result split
67% W17% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-1
2.17 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 away
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 2.20Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KR is 39% better for: goals scored per match.

4.17 goals / match - KR · 3 goals / match - Fram

KR scoring profile: very strong

KR scores in 100% of matches (6 of 6 matches), while Fram keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 matches).

Fram scoring profile: very strong

Fram scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while KR keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 matches).

25Goals scored (season)18
KRFram
11Goals conceded (season)11
KRFram
6Average goals in match4.83
KRFram
22Goals scored (last 5)15
KRFram
9Goals conceded (last 5)8
KRFram

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal83%
KRFram
100%2 goals83%
KRFram
100%3 goals83%
KRFram
67%4 goals33%
KRFram

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
KRFram
83%2 goals50%
KRFram
0%3 goals33%
KRFram
0%4 goals0%
KRFram

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time33%
KRFram
0%BTTS in both halves0%
KRFram
67%Scored in both halves67%
KRFram

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS83%
KRFram
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
KRFram
100%BTTS - last 580%
KRFram

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
KRFram
83%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
KRFram
33%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
KRFram

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
KRFram
83%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
KRFram
83%Min. 3 goals after half-time67%
KRFram

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KR is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.5 pts / match - KR · 1.5 pts / match - Fram

KR - half-time state
83% leading0% draw17% trailing
Fram - half-time state
33% leading50% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.5Points per match (1st half)1.5
KRFram
2.17Goals scored (1st half)1
KRFram
0.67Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
KRFram
2.83Average goals (1st half)1.83
KRFram
67%Clean sheet before half-time67%
KRFram
17%No goal before half-time33%
KRFram

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)2.17
KRFram
2Goals scored (2nd half)2
KRFram
1.17Goals conceded (2nd half)1
KRFram
3.17Average goals (2nd half)3
KRFram
33%Clean sheet after half-time33%
KRFram
17%No goal after half-time17%
KRFram

KR - second-half results

50% W50% R0% P
15
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+9
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding120%

Leads at half-time in 83% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Fram - second-half results

67% W17% R17% P
9
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding203%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KR - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.402.20
Goals scored / match2.42.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match3.23.0
1 goal100%80%
2 goals100%80%
3 goals40%80%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+8+5
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 12
Fram - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.602.40
Goals scored / match1.21.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match2.22.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+1+6
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KR
ScoredConceded
5
1
0-15
4
0
16-30
4
3
31-45
3
1
46-60
4
2
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Fram
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
1
31-45
4
3
46-60
2
2
61-75
6
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

5.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
3.0 : 2.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
141%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
92%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-45%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
83%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KR

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.97
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.62
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.65
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
203%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Fram

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.82
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.87
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
167%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

KRLigaFram
Average goals in match 6.003.85 4.83
Both teams scored 100%73% 83%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%73% 83%
Clean sheets 0%15% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%83% 67%
Goal after half-time 83%90% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.85
Average goals per match
73%
Both teams scored
73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
15%
Clean sheets
2.05
Home goals / match
1.80
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+-3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
13%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
90%
1 goal
60%
2 goals
40%
3 goals
18%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. FramYellow cardKennie Chopart
  2. FramSubstitutionOn: Róbert HaukssonOff: Atli Þór Jónasson
  3. FramYellow cardSimon Tibbling
  4. KRYellow cardHjalti Sigurðsson
  5. FramSubstitutionOn: Freyr SigurðssonOff: Simon Tibbling
  6. KRYellow cardAmin Cosic

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): KR 1 - 0 - 1 Fram. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Fram Reykjavík
0 : 1
KR Reykjavík
KR Reykjavík
2 : 3
Fram Reykjavík

FAQ

What was the result of KR vs Fram?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished KR 2:2 Fram. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KR and Fram?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches KR won 1, Fram won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KR vs Fram?

KR score 4.17 goals per game on average and Fram 3.00. The Úrvalsdeild average is 3.85 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 100% of KR's matches and 83% of Fram's.

What form are KR and Fram in?

Over the last 5 games KR have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Fram 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KR vs Fram?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KR vs Fram: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.