Belgium - First Division BData current as of 11 September 2026

KRC Genk II vs AS Eupen: match statistics

KRC Genk II crest
KRC Genk II
2 : 0half-time 0:0
AS Eupen crest
AS Eupen
125%(3.30)
X25%(3.57)
250%(1.92)

AS Eupen appears to be the decided favorite for this encounter. KRC Genk II sits in 15th place in the table with a disastrous home record – 70% losses at home and barely 20% wins. The hosts are in fatal form, having not won any of their last 5 matches and conceding an average of 2.2 goals per game at home. AS Eupen (7th place) presents significantly higher quality, especially in away matches, where they achieve 36% wins and only 9% of matches without scoring goals. The visitors have better effectiveness (16% vs 11%), a higher xG average (1.11 vs 1.17 for the hosts, but with significantly better defense), and maintain 36% clean sheets on the road. Considering the goal difference (-10 for the hosts, +2 for the visitors in their matches) and the recent results of both teams, a victory for AS Eupen is the most probable scenario.

KRC Genk II vs AS Eupen: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KRC Genk II played AS Eupen in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 30 January 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

KRC Genk II: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. AS Eupen: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

KRC Genk II scores 1.10 and concedes 2.05 goals per match. AS Eupen scores 1.43 and concedes 1.19. League average: 2.76 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KRC Genk II 65%, AS Eupen 62%. Over 2.5: KRC Genk II 65%, AS Eupen 52%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

KRC Genk II has higher xG: 1.21 vs 1.17. KRC Genk II: 10.8 shots per match, AS Eupen: 9.9.

Match halves

KRC Genk II: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.45. AS Eupen: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.71.

Goals by minute

KRC Genk II: 31-45+ (6 goals). AS Eupen: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.76 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

AS Eupen appears to be the decided favorite for this encounter. KRC Genk II sits in 15th place in the table with a disastrous home record – 70% losses at home and barely 20% wins. The hosts are in fatal form, having not won any of their last 5 matches and conceding an average of 2.2 goals per game at home. AS Eupen (7th place) presents significantly higher quality, especially in away matches, where they achieve 36% wins and only 9% of matches without scoring goals. The visitors have better effectiveness (16% vs 11%), a higher xG average (1.11 vs 1.17 for the hosts, but with significantly better defense), and maintain 36% clean sheets on the road. Considering the goal difference (-10 for the hosts, +2 for the visitors in their matches) and the recent results of both teams, a victory for AS Eupen is the most probable scenario.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
20Shots14
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
4Shots on target2
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
1.93xG1.23
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
9Corners5
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
55Dangerous attacks29
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
13Fouls15
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
0Cards2
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
1.1Goals scored / match1.43
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
2.05Goals conceded / match1.19
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
48%Average possession52%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
3.65Shots on target / match3.95
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.8Shots per match9.86
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
3.65Shots on target3.95
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
10.2%Shot conversion14.5%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
48%Possession52%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
1.21xG for1.17
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
1.81xG against1.67
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

Shooting quality

KRC Genk II: BalancedAS Eupen: Efficient finishing
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
Accuracy (shots on target)34%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

AS Eupen is 400% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - KRC Genk II · 1 pts / match - AS Eupen

KRC Genk II
DLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
20% W20% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-12
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-7
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
AS Eupen
WDLLD
Season result split
38% W33% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
8-7-6
1.48 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-3-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
LDWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.92BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

AS Eupen is 30% better for: goals scored per match.

1.1 goals / match - KRC Genk II · 1.43 goals / match - AS Eupen

AS Eupen is 72% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.05 goals / match - KRC Genk II · 1.19 goals / match - AS Eupen

KRC Genk II scoring profile: strong

KRC Genk II scores in 65% of matches (13 of 20 matches), while AS Eupen keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 matches).

AS Eupen scoring profile: very strong

AS Eupen scores in 90% of matches (19 of 21 matches), while KRC Genk II keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 20 matches).

22Goals scored (season)30
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
41Goals conceded (season)25
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
3.15Average goals in match2.62
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
4Goals scored (last 5)7
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
12Goals conceded (last 5)8
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

How often they score at least...

65%1 goal90%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
30%2 goals43%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
15%3 goals10%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
0%4 goals0%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

How often they concede at least...

90%1 goal67%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
65%2 goals38%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
25%3 goals14%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
20%4 goals0%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

30%BTTS at half-time14%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
5%BTTS in both halves5%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
20%Scored in both halves14%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS48%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
60%BTTS - last 580%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
45%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AS Eupen is 25% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.1 pts / match - KRC Genk II · 1.38 pts / match - AS Eupen

KRC Genk II - half-time state
25% leading35% draw40% trailing
AS Eupen - half-time state
33% leading38% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.1Points per match (1st half)1.38
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
0.65Goals scored (1st half)0.71
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
0.9Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
1.55Average goals (1st half)1.33
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
35%Clean sheet before half-time57%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
55%No goal before half-time52%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

After half-time (2nd half)

0.65Points per match (2nd half)1.62
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)0.71
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
1.15Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1.29
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
30%Clean sheet after half-time57%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen
60%No goal after half-time43%
KRC Genk IIAS Eupen

KRC Genk II - second-half results

10% W35% D55% L
22
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.10
PPG before half-time
Lead holding80%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 20%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

AS Eupen - second-half results

43% W33% D24% L
29
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.38
PPG before half-time
Lead holding115%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KRC Genk II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.20
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.81.6
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference-1-7
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
AS Eupen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.80
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KRC Genk II
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
2
4
16-30
6
9
31-45
2
6
46-60
5
7
61-75
2
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

AS Eupen
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
6
6
16-30
7
6
31-45
7
2
46-60
6
5
61-75
2
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+4%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KRC Genk II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
151%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
9% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
9%

AS Eupen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.74
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
86%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
7% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
7%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

KRC Genk IILigaAS Eupen
Average goals in match 3.152.76 2.62
Both teams scored 65%53% 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 65%51% 52%
Clean sheets 10%27% 33%
Goal before half-time 80%72% 76%
Goal after half-time 80%78% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.76
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.36
Away goals / match
+2%
Home attack advantage
+2%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AS EupenYellow cardIsaac Nuhu
  2. AS EupenSubstitutionOn: Nathan BitumazalaOff: Logan Delaurier-Chaubet
  3. KRC Genk IISubstitutionOn: Alpha Amadou BarryOff: Emmanuel Jeriel Sarfo
  4. AS EupenYellow cardGabriel Bares
  5. KRC Genk IIGoalJonathan CoenenAssist: Myung-Jun Kim

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Anaik JacobyMatches officiated: 19
4Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 232%Home wins26%Draws42%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: KRC Genk II 0 - 0 - 1 AS Eupen. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

KAS Eupen
2 : 1
Jong KRC Genk

FAQ

What was the result of KRC Genk II vs AS Eupen?

The First Division B match finished KRC Genk II 2:0 AS Eupen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KRC Genk II vs AS Eupen?

KRC Genk II score 1.10 goals per game on average and AS Eupen 1.43. The First Division B average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 65% of KRC Genk II's matches and 62% of AS Eupen's.

What form are KRC Genk II and AS Eupen in?

Over the last 5 games KRC Genk II have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and AS Eupen 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KRC Genk II vs AS Eupen?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KRC Genk II vs AS Eupen: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.