KRC Genk II vs Lokeren-Temse: match statistics
KRC Genk II vs Lokeren-Temse: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
KRC Genk II played Lokeren-Temse in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 3 April 2026. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
KRC Genk II: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Lokeren-Temse: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
KRC Genk II scores 1.28 and concedes 1.86 goals per match. Lokeren-Temse scores 1.52 and concedes 1.41. League average: 2.81 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: KRC Genk II 62%, Lokeren-Temse 72%. Over 2.5: KRC Genk II 62%, Lokeren-Temse 55%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Lokeren-Temse has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.43. KRC Genk II: 12.9 shots per match, Lokeren-Temse: 12.9.
Match halves
KRC Genk II: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.62. Lokeren-Temse: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.90.
Goals by minute
KRC Genk II: 31-45+ (9 goals). Lokeren-Temse: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division B: 2.81 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Lokeren-Temse are favorites: they sit 9th vs 15th for KRC Genk II and have 10 wins, 9 draws and 10 losses this season, while the hosts have 7 wins, 7 draws and 15 losses. Visitors scored 44 goals this season and 11 in the last 5 matches; hosts have 37 and 6 respectively — a +7 season goal difference and +5 over the last five. Defence clearly favors Lokeren-Temse — Genk II concedes 1.79 goals at home on average (54 this season), whereas the visitors concede 1.21 on the road (41 this season), about 0.58 fewer goals per match. Hosts create more chances at home (13.86 shots and 4.93 shots on target on average vs visitors’ 12.93 and 4.21) and have a slightly higher home xG (1.55 vs 1.46), but their clean-sheet rate at home is 36% versus 21% for visitors away, which reduces the value of those chances. Considering the better win record (10 vs 7), higher goal return this season and in the last 5 matches, and a higher average points in the last 5 (visitors 1.2 ppg vs hosts 1.0), I forecast a Lokeren-Temse win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams show a strong trend toward both teams to score: KRC Genk II has a season BTTS of 80% and Lokeren-Temse 64%, versus the league average of 55%. Clean sheets are unlikely — percentage of matches without conceding is only 13% for the home side and 14% for the away side, while average goals conceded are 1.6 and 1.21 per match. Offenses are comparable: home xG 1.51 versus away xG 1.46, shots 12.87 vs 12.93 and shots on target 4.27 vs 4.21, indicating both teams regularly create goal-scoring opportunities. In the last 5 matches Lokeren-Temse averages 2.2 goals versus 1.2 for KRC Genk II and has 80% BTTS in this sample (home side 60%), which further confirms the likelihood of both teams scoring. In light of these figures I recommend BTTS = Yes with an estimated probability of 80% vs 20%, because attacking signals dominate and clean sheet indicators are low.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model projects a total expected goals figure of 2.98 (1.51 for KRC Genk II and 1.47 for Lokeren-Temse), translating to roughly an 80% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5). Season-long data confirm an offensive bias: Genk has Over 1.5 in 87% of matches, Lokeren-Temse in 64%, and BTTS occurs in 80% of home matches and 64% of away matches. In the last 5 matches Lokeren-Temse average 2.2 goals (11 goals in 5), while Genk average 1.2 goals (6 goals in 5), increasing the likelihood of at least two goals in the game. Balance in xG and shots (xG: 1.51 vs 1.46; shots: 12.87 vs 12.93; on target: 4.27 vs 4.21) and a higher conversion rate for the home side (14% vs 9%) suggest chances will be converted, so the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (approximate probabilities: Over 2.5 ~57%, Over 3.5 ~35%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
At half-time KRC Genk II led in 3 of 15 matches (20%), drew in 4 (27%) and trailed in 8 (53%), so the highest probability is for the away side to hold the lead at the break. By full-time the home side have 27% wins and as many as 47% draws, while Lokeren-Temse records 43% victories and averages 1.43 points per match versus the hosts’ 1.27, which favors the away team or a draw at 90 minutes. xG and shots are very similar (xG 1.51 vs 1.46; shots 12.87 vs 12.93; shots on target 4.27 vs 4.21), but the hosts convert better (14% vs 9%), whereas at half-time the hosts concede on average 0.87 goals compared to 0.50 conceded by the away side, which supports a Lokeren-Temse lead before the break. Considering a 53% probability of the hosts trailing at half-time and a 43% win rate for the away team, the most consistent scenario is the away side leading at half-time and winning at full-time (HT/FT 2/2 ~37%), with lower probabilities for 2/X (13%) and X/X (16%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| KRC Genk II | Lokeren-Temse | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Lokeren-Temse is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - KRC Genk II · 1.2 pts / match - Lokeren-Temse
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lokeren-Temse is 19% better for: goals scored per match.
1.28 goals / match - KRC Genk II · 1.52 goals / match - Lokeren-Temse
Lokeren-Temse is 32% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.86 goals / match - KRC Genk II · 1.41 goals / match - Lokeren-Temse
KRC Genk II scores in 69% of matches (20 of 29 matches), while Lokeren-Temse keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 29 matches).
Lokeren-Temse scores in 83% of matches (24 of 29 matches), while KRC Genk II keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KRC Genk II
Over / Under - Lokeren-Temse
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KRC Genk II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Lokeren-Temse - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 0% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
KRC Genk II
Lokeren-Temse
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| KRC Genk II | Liga | Lokeren-Temse | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.14 | 2.81 | ▲ 2.93 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 62% | 54% | ▲ 72% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 62% | 53% | ▲ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 17% | 26% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 76% | 71% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 76% | 78% | • 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: KRC Genk II 0 - 1 - 0 Lokeren-Temse. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of KRC Genk II vs Lokeren-Temse?
The First Division B match finished KRC Genk II 2:2 Lokeren-Temse. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before KRC Genk II vs Lokeren-Temse?
KRC Genk II score 1.28 goals per game on average and Lokeren-Temse 1.52. The First Division B average is 2.81 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 62% of KRC Genk II's matches and 72% of Lokeren-Temse's.
What form are KRC Genk II and Lokeren-Temse in?
Over the last 5 games KRC Genk II have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Lokeren-Temse 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KRC Genk II vs Lokeren-Temse?
The statistical background for KRC Genk II vs Lokeren-Temse — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.