KRC Genk II vs RWDM: match statistics
RWDM demonstrates a clear advantage over KRC Genk II in key statistics. The hosts occupy 15th place in the table with a catastrophic home record – just 22% wins at home and a staggering 67% losses, conceding an average of 2.22 goals per match. RWDM, despite being in 11th position, shows better offensive efficiency (1.56 vs 1.33 goals per match) and a more solid defense in away matches (1.67 vs 2.22 goals conceded). A key factor is also the advantage in possession (52% vs 48%) and higher accuracy in shots on target (4.33 vs 3.78). The recent form of both teams is similar (0.8 points per match each), yet RWDM's statistical advantage in away matches combined with the hosts' defensive weakness argue for a win for the visitors. KRC Genk II's goal difference in home matches stands at -8, further confirming their issues.
KRC Genk II vs RWDM: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
KRC Genk II played RWDM in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 27 January 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
KRC Genk II: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. RWDM: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
KRC Genk II scores 1.16 and concedes 2.05 goals per match. RWDM scores 1.65 and concedes 1.90. League average: 2.78 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: KRC Genk II 68%, RWDM 60%. Over 2.5: KRC Genk II 68%, RWDM 65%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.
xG, shots and style
RWDM has higher xG: 1.43 vs 1.17. KRC Genk II: 10.5 shots per match, RWDM: 12.4.
Match halves
KRC Genk II: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.47. RWDM: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.85.
Goals by minute
KRC Genk II: 31-45+ (6 goals). RWDM: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division B: 2.78 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 52%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
RWDM demonstrates a clear advantage over KRC Genk II in key statistics. The hosts occupy 15th place in the table with a catastrophic home record – just 22% wins at home and a staggering 67% losses, conceding an average of 2.22 goals per match. RWDM, despite being in 11th position, shows better offensive efficiency (1.56 vs 1.33 goals per match) and a more solid defense in away matches (1.67 vs 2.22 goals conceded). A key factor is also the advantage in possession (52% vs 48%) and higher accuracy in shots on target (4.33 vs 3.78). The recent form of both teams is similar (0.8 points per match each), yet RWDM's statistical advantage in away matches combined with the hosts' defensive weakness argue for a win for the visitors. KRC Genk II's goal difference in home matches stands at -8, further confirming their issues.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| KRC Genk II | RWDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
RWDM is 42% better for: goals scored per match.
1.16 goals / match - KRC Genk II · 1.65 goals / match - RWDM
RWDM is 8% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.05 goals / match - KRC Genk II · 1.9 goals / match - RWDM
KRC Genk II scores in 68% of matches (13 of 19 matches), while RWDM keeps a clean sheet in 15% (3 of 20 matches).
RWDM scores in 75% of matches (15 of 20 matches), while KRC Genk II keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KRC Genk II
Over / Under - RWDM
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
RWDM is 31% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.11 pts / match - KRC Genk II · 1.45 pts / match - RWDM
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KRC Genk II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 21%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
RWDM - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 25%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
KRC Genk II
RWDM
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| KRC Genk II | Liga | RWDM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.21 | 2.78 | ▲ 3.55 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 68% | 54% | ▲ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 68% | 52% | ▲ 65% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 26% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 84% | 73% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | • 79% | 79% | ▲ 95% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: KRC Genk II 0 - 1 - 0 RWDM. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of KRC Genk II vs RWDM?
The First Division B match finished KRC Genk II 0:2 RWDM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before KRC Genk II vs RWDM?
KRC Genk II score 1.16 goals per game on average and RWDM 1.65. The First Division B average is 2.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 68% of KRC Genk II's matches and 60% of RWDM's.
What form are KRC Genk II and RWDM in?
Over the last 5 games KRC Genk II have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and RWDM 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KRC Genk II vs RWDM?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KRC Genk II vs RWDM: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.