Kristiansund vs HamKam: match statistics
Kristiansund vs HamKam: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kristiansund played HamKam in Eliteserien (Norway). The match was played on 3 May 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Kristiansund: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. HamKam: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kristiansund scores 1.20 and concedes 1.60 goals per match. HamKam scores 2.00 and concedes 2.20. League average: 2.94 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kristiansund 40%, HamKam 80%. Over 2.5: Kristiansund 40%, HamKam 100%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
HamKam has higher xG: 1.38 vs 1.33. Kristiansund: 11.8 shots per match, HamKam: 11.8.
Match halves
Kristiansund: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00. HamKam: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.20.
Goals by minute
Kristiansund: 46-60 (2 goals). HamKam: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Eliteserien: 2.94 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-3. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 75%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kristiansund create significantly more chances at home — averaging 13.67 shots and 5.33 on target per game — which translates into 1.67 goals scored per match and 33% clean sheets at home. HamKam away produce only 8 shots and 3 on target per game with an average of 1.00 goals scored, but their defense is catastrophic — conceding 4.00 goals away on average and recording 0% clean sheets. Results also favor the hosts — Kristiansund have won 67% of home matches and have a neutral home goal differential (goal difference 0), while HamKam have yet to win on the road (0% wins, 100% losses). xG also indicates a home advantage (xG 1.48 for Kristiansund vs 1.08 for HamKam), and despite similar shot conversion (12% vs 13%), the higher number of shots on target (5.33 vs 3) should tilt the balance toward the hosts. Therefore I assign a 65% probability to a Kristiansund win, 18% to a draw and 17% to a HamKam win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes because both teams display high seasonal indicators: Kristiansund has BTTS at 75% and HamKam 100%, versus the league average of 50%. Goal analysis shows both sides score and concede: Kristiansund averages 2.25 goals scored and 1.75 conceded per match, while HamKam this season scores 1.0 and concedes 4.0; in the last 5 matches HamKam raised their scoring average to 2.0 and conceded 2.2. Quality-of-chances metrics support this — Kristiansund xG is 1.46 against HamKam xG conceded 1.7, and HamKam xG is 1.08 versus xG conceded to Kristiansund 1.59; additionally the hosts average 4.75 shots on target against 3.0 for the visitors and conversion rates of 18% vs 13%. Confidence dampeners include Kristiansund’s poorer form in the last 5 (recent BTTS only 40%) and the fact Kristiansund kept a clean sheet in only 25% of matches while HamKam has 0% clean sheets. Considering the seasonal 75%/100% BTTS, 100% of matches over 2.5 goals for both teams and HamKam’s recent 80% BTTS, I assign the “yes” scenario a 78% probability and “no” 22%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Kristiansund scores an average of 2.25 goals at home and concedes 1.75, yielding 4.0 total goals in home matches; HamKam away averages 1.0 goals for and concedes 4.0, i.e. 5.0 goals per away match. An xG-based model gives 1.58 xG for Kristiansund (home attack xG 1.46 and HamKam defense xG 1.7 -> (1.46+1.7)/2=1.58) and 1.34 xG for HamKam ((1.08+1.59)/2=1.34), totaling an expected 2.92 goals. Additionally both teams have 100% of season matches over 2.5 goals, and the BTTS rate is 75% for Kristiansund and 100% for HamKam, which increases the probability of BTTS and a higher-scoring game. Kristiansund averages 12.75 shots and 4.75 on target per match versus HamKam’s 8.0 shots and 3.0 on target, with conversion rates of 18% versus 13%, further supporting a higher goal count. For these reasons I recommend Over on the 2.5 line: estimated probabilities are Over 1.5 at 95%, Over 2.5 at 78% and Over 3.5 at 34%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is the home side leading at the break and winning the match (1/1). Kristiansund averages 1.0 goals in the first half and have been leading at the break in 50% of matches, while HamKam concedes an average of 3.0 goals before half-time and has 0 points with a 100% loss rate this season. Over the full match the home team score an average of 2.25 goals and have won 75% of games, whereas the visitors concede on average 4.0 goals per game, which strongly favors Kristiansund. Additionally, the home xG is 1.46 versus 1.08 for the visitors and 4.75 shots on target compared to 3.0, confirming superior chance creation and efficiency for the hosts. Considering these figures I estimate about a 60% probability of the home side leading at the break and about an 80% probability of a home win, therefore I select 1/1 as the strongest HT/FT signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kristiansund | HamKam | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.26 | 0.45 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
HamKam is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Kristiansund · 1.8 pts / match - HamKam
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
HamKam is 67% better for: goals scored per match.
1.2 goals / match - Kristiansund · 2 goals / match - HamKam
Kristiansund is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.6 goals / match - Kristiansund · 2.2 goals / match - HamKam
Kristiansund scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while HamKam keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).
HamKam scores in 100% of matches (5 of 5 matches), while Kristiansund keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kristiansund
Over / Under - HamKam
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
HamKam is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.8 pts / match - Kristiansund · 1.4 pts / match - HamKam
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kristiansund - second-half results
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
HamKam - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kristiansund
HamKam
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eliteserien).
Teams vs league
| Kristiansund | Liga | HamKam | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.80 | 2.94 | ▲ 4.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 50% | ▲ 80% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 40% | 54% | ▲ 100% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 27% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 40% | 79% | • 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 77% | ▲ 80% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Kristiansund 0 - 1 - 3 HamKam. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 75% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Kristiansund vs HamKam?
The Eliteserien match finished Kristiansund 1:1 HamKam. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Kristiansund and HamKam?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Kristiansund won 0, HamKam won 3 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Kristiansund vs HamKam?
Kristiansund score 1.20 goals per game on average and HamKam 2.00. The Eliteserien average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Kristiansund's matches and 80% of HamKam's.
What form are Kristiansund and HamKam in?
Over the last 5 games Kristiansund have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and HamKam 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kristiansund vs HamKam?
The statistical background for Kristiansund vs HamKam — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.