Slovenia - 2. SNLStadion PortovalData current as of 03 November 2026

Krka vs Dekani: match statistics

Krka crest
Krka
1 : 2half-time 1:1
Dekani crest
Dekani

Krka vs Dekani: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Krka played Dekani in 2. SNL (Slovenia). The match was played on 20 September 2026. Venue: Stadion Portoval. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Krka: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Dekani: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Krka scores 1.17 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Dekani scores 0.50 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.96 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Krka 33%, Dekani 0%. Over 2.5: Krka 50%, Dekani 17%. League level: BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Krka has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.29. Krka: 12.7 shots per match, Dekani: 9.8.

Match halves

Krka: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.50. Dekani: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.17.

Goals by minute

Krka: 0-15 (2 goals). Dekani: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. SNL: 2.96 goals per match, BTTS 44%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Krka are showing significantly better current form: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 11 goals in that span, while Dekani have scored just 5 and won only one game. At home, the hosts create considerably more danger, averaging 15.33 shots and 6 on target per match, with an xG of 1.87, compared with 9 shots, 2 shots on target and an xG of 1.19 for the visitors away from home. However, the key factor is Dekani’s lack of attacking efficiency on the road: they have scored no goals in these matches, failed to find the net in 100% of their appearances and have not recorded an away win. Dekani do defend solidly, conceding an average of 0.5 goals away from home and keeping a clean sheet in 50% of matches, which increases the likelihood of a draw. Krka concede an average of 1 goal at home, but keep clean sheets in 67% of matches, making a narrow home win the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal points to BTTS - No, as Dekani have yet to score away from home despite averaging 9.0 shots and 2.0 shots on target per match. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in 75% of their home fixtures, while the visitors have failed to score in 100% of their away matches, clearly increasing the likelihood that at least one side will remain goalless. This season, neither team has recorded a match in which both teams scored, whereas the league BTTS average stands at 43%. The last five matches provide slightly stronger support for a Dekani goal, with their xG at 1.36; however, they have still averaged only 1.0 goal scored and conceded just 0.6, making a low-scoring outcome with one team failing to score the more likely scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The season profiles of both teams clearly point towards a low-scoring outcome: Krka have recorded under 3.5 goals in 100% of their matches, while Dekani also have 100% of games finishing below this line. Dekani average 0.0 goals, have failed to score in 100% of their appearances, and manage only 2 shots on target per match, limiting the visitors’ attacking potential. Krka keep a clean sheet in 75% of their matches, while the hosts’ average xG of 1.30 and the visitors’ 1.19 suggest a game more likely to finish around two goals than develop into an open, high-scoring contest. Although 60% of Krka’s last five matches have produced Over 2.5 goals, Dekani’s defensive consistency and the absence of any matches involving either team with at least four goals provide the strongest betting edge for Under 3.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Krka were leading at half-time in 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 1.2 goals before the break and conceding just 0.4, while Dekani had a half-time lead only once. The hosts are also in significantly better current form: they have won 60% of their last five matches, compared with just 20% for Dekani, who have recorded draws in 60% of their games. Across their entire record so far, Dekani have yet to score away from home, while Krka have kept a clean sheet in 75% of their home matches. Krka’s edge in chance quality is moderate but noticeable: their average xG stands at 1.30 versus 1.19 for their opponents, while the hosts register 3 shots on target per match compared with Dekani’s 2. The most likely scenario is therefore that Krka will take the lead at the break and hold on to it until full-time, making the HT/FT pick 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
KrkaDekani
10Shots21
KrkaDekani
3Shots on target7
KrkaDekani
1.19xG2.23
KrkaDekani
2Corners3
KrkaDekani
48Dangerous attacks59
KrkaDekani
17Fouls6
KrkaDekani
0Cards0
KrkaDekani

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.17Goals scored / match0.5
KrkaDekani
1.5Goals conceded / match0.5
KrkaDekani
47%Average possession49%
KrkaDekani
4.17Shots on target / match2.67
KrkaDekani

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.67Shots per match9.83
KrkaDekani
4.17Shots on target2.67
KrkaDekani
9.2%Shot conversion5.1%
KrkaDekani
47%Possession49%
KrkaDekani
1.57xG for1.29
KrkaDekani
1.25xG against1.1
KrkaDekani

Shooting quality

Krka: BalancedDekani: Balanced
KrkaDekani
Accuracy (shots on target)33%27%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.19

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Krka is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Krka · 0.6 pts / match - Dekani

Krka
LLLWW
Season result split
33% W17% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-3
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 at home
1-1-1
DLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.40Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Dekani
LLDDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
17% W50% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 away
0-1-1
LD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Krka is 134% better for: goals scored per match.

1.17 goals / match - Krka · 0.5 goals / match - Dekani

Dekani is 200% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - Krka · 0.5 goals / match - Dekani

Krka scoring profile: mixed

Krka scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Dekani keeps a clean sheet in 67% (4 of 6 matches).

Dekani scoring profile: more difficult

Dekani scores in 17% of matches (1 of 6 matches), while Krka keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 matches).

7Goals scored (season)3
KrkaDekani
9Goals conceded (season)3
KrkaDekani
2.67Average goals in match1
KrkaDekani
7Goals scored (last 5)0
KrkaDekani
9Goals conceded (last 5)3
KrkaDekani

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal17%
KrkaDekani
50%2 goals17%
KrkaDekani
0%3 goals17%
KrkaDekani
0%4 goals0%
KrkaDekani

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal33%
KrkaDekani
50%2 goals17%
KrkaDekani
50%3 goals0%
KrkaDekani
0%4 goals0%
KrkaDekani

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time0%
KrkaDekani
17%BTTS in both halves0%
KrkaDekani
33%Scored in both halves17%
KrkaDekani

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
KrkaDekani
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
KrkaDekani
40%BTTS - last 50%
KrkaDekani

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
KrkaDekani
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
KrkaDekani
17%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KrkaDekani

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time33%
KrkaDekani
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
KrkaDekani
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
KrkaDekani

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Krka is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / match - Krka · 1 pts / match - Dekani

Krka - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing
Dekani - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per match (1st half)1
KrkaDekani
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.33
KrkaDekani
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
KrkaDekani
1Average goals (1st half)0.67
KrkaDekani
67%Clean sheet before half-time67%
KrkaDekani
50%No goal before half-time83%
KrkaDekani

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per match (2nd half)1.17
KrkaDekani
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.17
KrkaDekani
1.17Goals conceded (2nd half)0.17
KrkaDekani
1.67Average goals (2nd half)0.33
KrkaDekani
50%Clean sheet after half-time83%
KrkaDekani
50%No goal after half-time83%
KrkaDekani

Krka - second-half results

33% W17% D50% L
10
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Dekani - second-half results

17% W67% D17% L
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Krka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Dekani - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.80
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.40.2
1 goal40%20%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Krka
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
2
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Dekani
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.83
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
62%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
17%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+118%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
11%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
27%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 4 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Krka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.65
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.25
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Dekani

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.79
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.60
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
43%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
28%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.40
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. SNL).

Teams vs league

KrkaLigaDekani
Average goals in match▼ 2.672.96▼ 1.00
Both teams scored▼ 33%44%▼ 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 50%56%▼ 17%
Clean sheets▲ 50%34%▲ 67%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%69%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▲ 83%79%▼ 33%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.96
Average goals per match
44%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.79
Home goals / match
1.17
Away goals / match
+53%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defence advantage
+35%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Krka 1 - 0 - 1 Dekani. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

NK Jadran Dekani
4 : 3
NK Krka
NK Krka
1 : 0
NK Jadran Dekani

FAQ

What was the result of Krka vs Dekani?

The 2. SNL match finished Krka 1:2 Dekani. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Krka and Dekani?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Krka won 1, Dekani won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Krka vs Dekani?

Krka score 1.17 goals per game on average and Dekani 0.50. The 2. SNL average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Krka's matches and 0% of Dekani's.

What form are Krka and Dekani in?

Over the last 5 games Krka have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Dekani 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Krka vs Dekani?

The statistical background for Krka vs Dekani — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.