Poland - 3 Liga Group 4Miejski Stadion SportowyData current as of 16 October 2026

KSZO vs KS Hetman Zamosc: match statistics

KSZO crest
KSZO
1 : 2half-time 0:0
KS Hetman Zamosc crest
KS Hetman Zamosc

KSZO vs KS Hetman Zamosc: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KSZO played KS Hetman Zamosc in 3 Liga Group 4 (Poland). The match was played on 27 September 2026. Venue: Miejski Stadion Sportowy. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

KSZO: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. KS Hetman Zamosc: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

KSZO scores 1.56 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. KS Hetman Zamosc scores 1.78 and concedes 1.89. League average: 2.94 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KSZO 33%, KS Hetman Zamosc 78%. Over 2.5: KSZO 44%, KS Hetman Zamosc 67%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

KS Hetman Zamosc has higher xG: 2.97 vs 1.73. KSZO: 10.3 shots per match, KS Hetman Zamosc: 3.6.

Match halves

KSZO: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 0.67. KS Hetman Zamosc: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.89.

Goals by minute

KSZO: 31-45+ (6 goals). KS Hetman Zamosc: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

3 Liga Group 4: 2.94 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KSZO remain unbeaten this season, with a record of 5 wins and 4 draws, and have collected 11 points from their last five matches, recording 3 wins and 2 draws. The hosts are particularly solid defensively: at home, they concede just 0.8 goals per game on average and keep a clean sheet in 60% of their matches, while Hetman concede as many as 2.75 goals per away game and have failed to keep a clean sheet. The visitors’ recent form clearly weakens their prospects, having lost 3 of their previous 5 matches and conceded 13 goals in the process, while averaging just 0.8 points per game. Hetman do create plenty of chances, posting an average away xG of 2.97 and 13 shots on target, but their conversion rate is only 7%. Therefore, KSZO are more likely to capitalize on home advantage and their opponents’ defensive weaknesses.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

KSZO’s season-long BTTS rate stands at 60%, while Hetman Zamość’s is as high as 100%, both clearly above the league average of 56%. Hetman have kept no clean sheets and concede an average of 2.75 goals per match, strongly supporting the prospect of the home side scoring, especially as KSZO average 1.80 goals per game. The visitors are also dangerous in attack, scoring an average of 1.75 goals, while KSZO, despite their strong defensive form in their last five matches, still have only a 20% clean-sheet rate for the season. The main argument against the BTTS signal is KSZO’s significant defensive improvement: they have conceded just 0.4 goals per match across their last five fixtures, meaning the BTTS scenario does not have a substantial edge. Nevertheless, Hetman’s weak defence and their record of 100% of matches featuring goals for both teams make BTTS - Yes the most likely outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

KSZO score an average of 1.80 goals per match, while Hetman Zamość concede as many as 2.75, clearly increasing the hosts’ scoring potential. The visitors average 1.75 goals and register as many as 13 shots on target per game, whereas KSZO keep a clean sheet in only 20% of matches. At least 2 goals were scored in 80% of KSZO’s games and in all of Hetman’s matches, while both teams went over the 2.5-goal line in 60% and 75% of cases, respectively. The last five games further highlight the visitors’ defensive weaknesses: Hetman conceded 13 goals, averaging 2.60 per match, while scoring 9. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 goals, as the profile of both teams points to a high probability of at least two goals, even in a more cautious match scenario.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

KSZO have been clearly more stable over their last five matches: they have won 60% of their games, remain unbeaten, and conceded just 0.4 goals per match on average, while Hetman lost 60% of their outings and allowed opponents to score 2.6 goals per game. The hosts led at the break in 60% of their recent matches, whereas Hetman went into half-time trailing in as many as 67%; additionally, KSZO conceded just 0.2 goals per match before the interval, compared with 1.0 for the visitors. This advantage should persist after the restart, as KSZO conceded only 0.2 goals on average in the second half of their recent matches, while Hetman conceded 1.67. Although the visitors generate a high 2.97 xG and average 13 shots on target, this has not translated into results: they have a 0% win rate and average just 0.5 points per match. Therefore, the most likely scenario is KSZO leading at half-time and securing the victory at full-time: 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
28Shots9
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
5Shots on target3
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
2.43xG0.98
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
15Corners2
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
46Dangerous attacks27
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
-1Fouls-1
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
-1Cards-1
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
1.56Goals scored / match1.78
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
0.67Goals conceded / match1.89
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
34%Average possession12%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
3.33Shots on target / match1
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.33Shots per match3.56
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
3.33Shots on target1
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
15.1%Shot conversion50%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
34%Possession12%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
1.73xG for2.97
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
1.44xG against0.8
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc

Shooting quality

KSZO: Counter-attackingKS Hetman Zamosc: Counter-attacking
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
Accuracy (shots on target)32%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.170.83
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.471.78

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KSZO is 175% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - KSZO · 0.8 pts / match - KS Hetman Zamosc

KSZO
WWDWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
56% W44% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-0
2.11 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WWWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.82Opponent xG: 0.91BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
KS Hetman Zamosc
LLWLD
Season result split
22% W44% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-4-3
1.11 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-2
Last 5 away
0-2-2
DDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KS Hetman Zamosc is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

1.56 goals / match - KSZO · 1.78 goals / match - KS Hetman Zamosc

KSZO is 182% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.67 goals / match - KSZO · 1.89 goals / match - KS Hetman Zamosc

KSZO scoring profile: very strong

KSZO scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while KS Hetman Zamosc keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 matches).

KS Hetman Zamosc scoring profile: mixed

KS Hetman Zamosc scores in 89% of matches (8 of 9 matches), while KSZO keeps a clean sheet in 67% (6 of 9 matches).

14Goals scored (season)16
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
6Goals conceded (season)17
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
2.22Average goals in match3.67
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
8Goals scored (last 5)9
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
2Goals conceded (last 5)13
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal89%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
44%2 goals67%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
22%3 goals22%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
11%4 goals0%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc

How often they concede at least...

33%1 goal89%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
33%2 goals44%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
0%3 goals33%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
0%4 goals22%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time11%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
11%BTTS in both halves11%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
33%Scored in both halves22%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS56%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
20%BTTS - last 580%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time44%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc

2nd half

56%Min. 1 goal after half-time56%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KSZO is 137% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.11 pts / match - KSZO · 0.89 pts / match - KS Hetman Zamosc

KSZO - half-time state
56% leading44% draw0% trailing
KS Hetman Zamosc - half-time state
11% leading56% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.11Points per match (1st half)0.89
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
0.89Goals scored (1st half)0.22
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
0.11Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
1Average goals (1st half)0.78
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
89%Clean sheet before half-time67%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
33%No goal before half-time78%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc

After half-time (2nd half)

1.22Points per match (2nd half)1.33
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
0.67Goals scored (2nd half)0.89
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
0.56Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
1.22Average goals (2nd half)1.56
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
67%Clean sheet after half-time56%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc
56%No goal after half-time44%
KSZOKS Hetman Zamosc

KSZO - second-half results

22% W56% D22% L
19
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KS Hetman Zamosc - second-half results

22% W67% D11% L
8
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.89
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KSZO - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.40
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+3+3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
KS Hetman Zamosc - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KSZO
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
6
0
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
2
61-75
3
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

KS Hetman Zamosc
ScoredConceded
7
7
0-15
1
3
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
3
46-60
4
0
61-75
3
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.95
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KSZO

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.60
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.77
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
50%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

KS Hetman Zamosc

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+2.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-2.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
133%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 44% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 4).

Teams vs league

KSZOLigaKS Hetman Zamosc
Average goals in match▼ 2.222.94▲ 3.67
Both teams scored▼ 33%57%▲ 78%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 44%54%▲ 67%
Clean sheets▲ 67%25%▼ 11%
Goal before half-time▲ 67%58%▼ 44%
Goal after half-time▼ 56%65%▼ 56%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.94
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
25%
Clean sheets
1.61
Home goals / match
1.34
Away goals / match
+20%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+15%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Maciej Gorski⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KSZOGoalMaciej Gorski

FAQ

What was the result of KSZO vs KS Hetman Zamosc?

The 3 Liga Group 4 match finished KSZO 1:2 KS Hetman Zamosc. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KSZO vs KS Hetman Zamosc?

KSZO score 1.56 goals per game on average and KS Hetman Zamosc 1.78. The 3 Liga Group 4 average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 33% of KSZO's matches and 78% of KS Hetman Zamosc's.

What form are KSZO and KS Hetman Zamosc in?

Over the last 5 games KSZO have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and KS Hetman Zamosc 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KSZO vs KS Hetman Zamosc?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KSZO vs KS Hetman Zamosc: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.