KTP vs Haka: match statistics
KTP vs Haka: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
KTP played Haka in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 8 June 2026. Venue: Arto Tolsa Areena. Final score: 0:2.
Current form
KTP: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Haka: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
KTP scores 1.22 and concedes 0.78 goals per match. Haka scores 1.78 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: KTP 33%, Haka 56%. Over 2.5: KTP 33%, Haka 56%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
KTP has higher xG: 1.85 vs 1.56. KTP: 16.7 shots per match, Haka: 12.0.
Match halves
KTP: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.78. Haka: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 1.33.
Goals by minute
KTP: 61-75 (3 goals). Haka: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ykkösliiga: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
KTP is the clear favorite: the hosts have won 5 of their last 5 matches and boast a 100% home win rate, scoring an average of 1.33 goals per home match with an average xG of 2.01. Haka have significant issues scoring away — the visitors average only 0.33 goals per away match, failed to score in 67% of away games and generate just 1.29 xG. Chance quality favors KTP: the hosts average 16.67 shots and 6 on target at home versus Haka’s 9 shots and 3.33 on target away, confirming superiority in chance creation. Defensively both teams show similar conceded-goal averages (0.33 conceded at home for KTP and 0.33 conceded away for Haka), but Haka have shipped 8 goals in their last 5 matches while KTP have conceded only 2, which further supports the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal against BTTS is the high clean sheet rate of Haka and the league as a whole: Haka have a seasonal 67% clean sheets rate, while the league average is 69%, indicating frequent shutouts. Additionally Haka score only 0.33 goals per away match on the season, and KTP have conceded an average of 0.4 goals in their last 5 matches (2 conceded in 5), so the visitors face difficulty scoring. It is true that KTP have a seasonal goals average of 2.5 and a seasonal BTTS rate of 83%, but KTP’s BTTS share in the last 5 matches dropped to 40% (2 of 5), suggesting more wins with a clean sheet. xG metrics give mixed signals: KTP xG is 1.67 versus Haka 1.29, and Haka in the last 5 matches have xG_for 1.39 and have conceded 8 goals (1.6 per game); however, considering the seasonal 0.33 away goals and the guests’ 67% clean sheets, the 'No Goal' scenario looks more likely. I estimate BTTS chances at 35% for 'BTTS - Yes' and 65% for 'No', therefore I recommend taking 'No'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project a total of approximately 2.55 goals: home ~1.65, away ~0.90. As a starting point I used xG and form — KTP xG 1.67 vs Haka average xG conceded 0.93 yields a baseline ~1.30 for the home side, and Haka xG 1.29 vs KTP xG conceded 1.20 yields ~1.25 for the away side; I adjusted these values accounting for KTP’s 13 average shots and 19% conversion and Haka’s 9 shots with only 4% conversion, as well as recent form over the last 5 matches (KTP 7 scored/2 conceded, Haka 5/8). Seasonal stats support KTP’s offensive edge at home: seasonOver15Percentage_home 100% and seasonOver25Percentage_home 83%, while Haka away has 0% in these categories. From a Poisson model with a mean of 2.55 the probabilities are: Over 1.5 ≈72%, Over 2.5 ≈47% and Over 3.5 ≈25%, therefore the strongest signal is over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
KTP is the clear favorite for the final result: they average 2.5 goals at home versus Haka’s 0.33 away, have higher xG (1.67 vs 1.29), average 13 shots with 5.67 on target compared to the opponent’s 9 and 3.33, and a higher conversion rate of 19% vs 4%. However, the imbalance between goals before and after the break favors scoring in the second half — the hosts average 2.5 second-half goals versus 0.33 for the visitors and have scored 6 goals in minutes 76–90, indicating late deciders. At Half-Time a draw is more likely: KTP average 0.67 goals by the break, Haka 0.0, and Haka keep a clean sheet in 67% of away matches this season, so the probability of a goalless or level HT is elevated. Given the hosts’ stronger finish, I assign the largest share to the scenario draw at the break and KTP turnaround to win the match (X/1) — 36%. Overall I give KTP a 65% chance to win (1/1 22% + X/1 36% + 2/1 7%), 20% for a full-time draw and 15% for a Haka win, reflecting KTP’s form (5 wins in their last 5 matches) and Haka’s poor away goal average of 0.33.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| KTP | Haka | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.25 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
KTP is 50% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / match - KTP · 2 pts / match - Haka
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Haka is 46% better for: goals scored per match.
1.22 goals / match - KTP · 1.78 goals / match - Haka
KTP is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.78 goals / match - KTP · 1.11 goals / match - Haka
KTP scores in 89% of matches (8 of 9 matches), while Haka keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 matches).
Haka scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 67% (6 of 9 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - KTP
Over / Under - Haka
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KTP is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / match - KTP · 1 pts / match - Haka
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
KTP - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 78%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Haka - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
KTP
Haka
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| KTP | Liga | Haka | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.00 | 2.17 | ▲ 2.89 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 40% | ▲ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 38% | ▲ 56% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 67% | 34% | • 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 44% | 56% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 67% | 65% | ▲ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): KTP 2 - 1 - 0 Haka. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of KTP vs Haka?
The Ykkösliiga match finished KTP 0:2 Haka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between KTP and Haka?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches KTP won 2, Haka won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before KTP vs Haka?
KTP score 1.22 goals per game on average and Haka 1.78. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 33% of KTP's matches and 56% of Haka's.
What form are KTP and Haka in?
Over the last 5 games KTP have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Haka 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KTP vs Haka?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


