Finland - YkkösliigaArto Tolsa AreenaData current as of 06 September 2026

KTP vs Haka: match statistics

KTP crest
KTP
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Haka crest
Haka

KTP vs Haka: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KTP played Haka in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 8 June 2026. Venue: Arto Tolsa Areena. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

KTP: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Haka: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

KTP scores 1.22 and concedes 0.78 goals per match. Haka scores 1.78 and concedes 1.11. League average: 2.17 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KTP 33%, Haka 56%. Over 2.5: KTP 33%, Haka 56%. League level: BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 38%.

xG, shots and style

KTP has higher xG: 1.85 vs 1.56. KTP: 16.7 shots per match, Haka: 12.0.

Match halves

KTP: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.78. Haka: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 1.33.

Goals by minute

KTP: 61-75 (3 goals). Haka: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 40%, Over 2.5 38%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-0. Average goals 2.67, BTTS 67%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KTP is the clear favorite: the hosts have won 5 of their last 5 matches and boast a 100% home win rate, scoring an average of 1.33 goals per home match with an average xG of 2.01. Haka have significant issues scoring away — the visitors average only 0.33 goals per away match, failed to score in 67% of away games and generate just 1.29 xG. Chance quality favors KTP: the hosts average 16.67 shots and 6 on target at home versus Haka’s 9 shots and 3.33 on target away, confirming superiority in chance creation. Defensively both teams show similar conceded-goal averages (0.33 conceded at home for KTP and 0.33 conceded away for Haka), but Haka have shipped 8 goals in their last 5 matches while KTP have conceded only 2, which further supports the hosts.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal against BTTS is the high clean sheet rate of Haka and the league as a whole: Haka have a seasonal 67% clean sheets rate, while the league average is 69%, indicating frequent shutouts. Additionally Haka score only 0.33 goals per away match on the season, and KTP have conceded an average of 0.4 goals in their last 5 matches (2 conceded in 5), so the visitors face difficulty scoring. It is true that KTP have a seasonal goals average of 2.5 and a seasonal BTTS rate of 83%, but KTP’s BTTS share in the last 5 matches dropped to 40% (2 of 5), suggesting more wins with a clean sheet. xG metrics give mixed signals: KTP xG is 1.67 versus Haka 1.29, and Haka in the last 5 matches have xG_for 1.39 and have conceded 8 goals (1.6 per game); however, considering the seasonal 0.33 away goals and the guests’ 67% clean sheets, the 'No Goal' scenario looks more likely. I estimate BTTS chances at 35% for 'BTTS - Yes' and 65% for 'No', therefore I recommend taking 'No'.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I project a total of approximately 2.55 goals: home ~1.65, away ~0.90. As a starting point I used xG and form — KTP xG 1.67 vs Haka average xG conceded 0.93 yields a baseline ~1.30 for the home side, and Haka xG 1.29 vs KTP xG conceded 1.20 yields ~1.25 for the away side; I adjusted these values accounting for KTP’s 13 average shots and 19% conversion and Haka’s 9 shots with only 4% conversion, as well as recent form over the last 5 matches (KTP 7 scored/2 conceded, Haka 5/8). Seasonal stats support KTP’s offensive edge at home: seasonOver15Percentage_home 100% and seasonOver25Percentage_home 83%, while Haka away has 0% in these categories. From a Poisson model with a mean of 2.55 the probabilities are: Over 1.5 ≈72%, Over 2.5 ≈47% and Over 3.5 ≈25%, therefore the strongest signal is over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

KTP is the clear favorite for the final result: they average 2.5 goals at home versus Haka’s 0.33 away, have higher xG (1.67 vs 1.29), average 13 shots with 5.67 on target compared to the opponent’s 9 and 3.33, and a higher conversion rate of 19% vs 4%. However, the imbalance between goals before and after the break favors scoring in the second half — the hosts average 2.5 second-half goals versus 0.33 for the visitors and have scored 6 goals in minutes 76–90, indicating late deciders. At Half-Time a draw is more likely: KTP average 0.67 goals by the break, Haka 0.0, and Haka keep a clean sheet in 67% of away matches this season, so the probability of a goalless or level HT is elevated. Given the hosts’ stronger finish, I assign the largest share to the scenario draw at the break and KTP turnaround to win the match (X/1) — 36%. Overall I give KTP a 65% chance to win (1/1 22% + X/1 36% + 2/1 7%), 20% for a full-time draw and 15% for a Haka win, reflecting KTP’s form (5 wins in their last 5 matches) and Haka’s poor away goal average of 0.33.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
KTPHaka
15Shots5
KTPHaka
3Shots on target3
KTPHaka
1.64xG0.79
KTPHaka
7Corners0
KTPHaka
67Dangerous attacks35
KTPHaka
25Fouls16
KTPHaka
3Cards4
KTPHaka

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.22Goals scored / match1.78
KTPHaka
0.78Goals conceded / match1.11
KTPHaka
51%Average possession60%
KTPHaka
4.89Shots on target / match4.89
KTPHaka

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16.67Shots per match12
KTPHaka
4.89Shots on target4.89
KTPHaka
7.3%Shot conversion14.8%
KTPHaka
51%Possession60%
KTPHaka
1.85xG for1.56
KTPHaka
1.12xG against1.12
KTPHaka

Shooting quality

KTP: AttackingHaka: Efficient finishing
KTPHaka
Accuracy (shots on target)29%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.250.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KTP is 50% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / match - KTP · 2 pts / match - Haka

KTP
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
78% W11% R11% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-1-1
2.44 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-0-0
Last 5 at home
3-0-0
WWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.96Opponent xG: 1.09BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Haka
WDWWL
Season result split
44% W33% R22% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-3-2
1.67 pts / match · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 away
1-1-1
DLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Haka is 46% better for: goals scored per match.

1.22 goals / match - KTP · 1.78 goals / match - Haka

KTP is 42% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.78 goals / match - KTP · 1.11 goals / match - Haka

KTP scoring profile: very strong

KTP scores in 89% of matches (8 of 9 matches), while Haka keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 matches).

Haka scoring profile: mixed

Haka scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 67% (6 of 9 matches).

11Goals scored (season)16
KTPHaka
7Goals conceded (season)10
KTPHaka
2Average goals in match2.89
KTPHaka
7Goals scored (last 5)9
KTPHaka
2Goals conceded (last 5)7
KTPHaka

How often they score at least...

89%1 goal78%
KTPHaka
33%2 goals44%
KTPHaka
0%3 goals22%
KTPHaka
0%4 goals22%
KTPHaka

How often they concede at least...

33%1 goal67%
KTPHaka
11%2 goals33%
KTPHaka
11%3 goals11%
KTPHaka
11%4 goals0%
KTPHaka

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time22%
KTPHaka
11%BTTS in both halves11%
KTPHaka
22%Scored in both halves22%
KTPHaka

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS44%
KTPHaka
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
KTPHaka
40%BTTS - last 580%
KTPHaka

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

44%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
KTPHaka
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
KTPHaka
11%Min. 3 goals before half-time22%
KTPHaka

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
KTPHaka
22%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
KTPHaka
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
KTPHaka

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KTP is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / match - KTP · 1 pts / match - Haka

KTP - half-time state
22% leading67% draw11% trailing
Haka - half-time state
22% leading33% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)1
KTPHaka
0.44Goals scored (1st half)0.44
KTPHaka
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
KTPHaka
0.78Average goals (1st half)1.11
KTPHaka
78%Clean sheet before half-time44%
KTPHaka
56%No goal before half-time67%
KTPHaka

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)1.89
KTPHaka
0.78Goals scored (2nd half)1.33
KTPHaka
0.44Goals conceded (2nd half)0.44
KTPHaka
1.22Average goals (2nd half)1.78
KTPHaka
78%Clean sheet after half-time67%
KTPHaka
33%No goal after half-time33%
KTPHaka

KTP - second-half results

56% W33% R11% P
12
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding355%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 78%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Haka - second-half results

44% W56% R0% P
9
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KTP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.20
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Haka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KTP
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
0
3
31-45
2
2
46-60
3
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Haka
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
1
0
16-30
2
2
31-45
3
1
46-60
3
2
61-75
6
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.45
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
113%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
69%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KTP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.73
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.63
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
81%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
18% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
18%

Haka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
185%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.9
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

KTPLigaHaka
Average goals in match 2.002.17 2.89
Both teams scored 33%40% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%38% 56%
Clean sheets 67%34% 33%
Goal before half-time 44%56% 67%
Goal after half-time 67%65% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.17
Average goals per match
40%
Both teams scored
38%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.21
Home goals / match
0.96
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
56%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. HakaSubstitutionOn: Aaro TiihonenOff: Niklas Friberg
  2. KTPYellow cardMatias Paavola
  3. HakaYellow cardJesper Karlsson
  4. KTPSubstitutionOn: Mustapha CokerOff: Roni Polat
  5. HakaYellow cardAaron Keto-Diyawa
  6. KTPSubstitutionOn: Foday MannehOff: Derrick Atta Agyei
  7. KTPYellow cardMustapha Coker
  8. HakaYellow cardAnton Lepola
  9. HakaYellow cardValentin Purosalo
  10. HakaSubstitutionOn: Thomas LahdensuoOff: Kevin Nurmi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): KTP 2 - 1 - 0 Haka. Average goals 2.67, both teams scored in 67% matches.

Valkeakosken Haka
1 : 2
Kotkan Työväen Palloilijat
Valkeakosken Haka
2 : 3
Kotkan Työväen Palloilijat
Kotkan Työväen Palloilijat
0 : 0
Valkeakosken Haka

FAQ

What was the result of KTP vs Haka?

The Ykkösliiga match finished KTP 0:2 Haka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KTP and Haka?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches KTP won 2, Haka won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KTP vs Haka?

KTP score 1.22 goals per game on average and Haka 1.78. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 33% of KTP's matches and 56% of Haka's.

What form are KTP and Haka in?

Over the last 5 games KTP have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Haka 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KTP vs Haka?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.