Finland - YkkösliigaArto Tolsa AreenaData current as of 06 September 2026

KTP vs PK-35: match statistics

KTP crest
KTP
0 : 1half-time 0:0
PK-35 crest
PK-35

KTP vs PK-35: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KTP played PK-35 in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The match was played on 18 July 2026. Venue: Arto Tolsa Areena. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

KTP: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. PK-35: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

KTP scores 1.79 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. PK-35 scores 1.71 and concedes 0.57. League average: 2.49 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KTP 43%, PK-35 36%. Over 2.5: KTP 43%, PK-35 43%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 45%.

xG, shots and style

KTP has higher xG: 1.79 vs 1.47. KTP: 15.5 shots per match, PK-35: 11.7.

Match halves

KTP: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.14. PK-35: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.14.

Goals by minute

KTP: 61-75 (8 goals). PK-35: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ykkösliiga: 2.49 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 45%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KTP has the home-field advantage: on average 2.29 goals scored and xG 1.91 per home match, while PK-35 averages 1.57 goals away with xG 1.40 — this gives the hosts an edge in chance creation. The hosts register significantly more shots (avg. 15.43) and more shots on target (6.29) than the visitors (11.29 shots and 3.86 on target), with similar conversion rates 15% versus 14%, which supports KTP in maintaining offensive dominance. However, PK-35’s away defense is exceptionally strong: only 0.14 goals conceded per match and 86% of away matches with a clean sheet, and in the last 5 matches the visitors conceded just 3 goals versus 7 conceded by KTP, which substantially limits the hosts’ attacking efficiency. Additionally, PK-35 have 4 wins and 1 draw in their last 5 matches, averaging 2.6 points per game, while KTP have 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, averaging 2.0 points per game, giving the visitors a slight form advantage. Considering KTP’s higher xG and number of shots on target (1.91 xG and 6.29 SoT at home) versus PK-35’s extraordinarily low goals conceded (0.14 per match), I forecast a narrow home victory; pick 1, with probabilities 45% home, 30% draw and 25% away.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

PK-35 has a seasonal goals conceded average of just 0.14 and keeps a clean sheet in 86% of matches, with a seasonal BTTS for PK-35 at 0% — the strongest signal against BTTS - Yes. KTP has a seasonal BTTS of 71%, scores 1.86 goals per game and has xG 1.54, with season goals 25 vs 24 for PK-35, so the home side consistently creates offense. In the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in 60% of cases and each team scored 14 goals in that period; however PK-35 concedes only 0.6 goals on average across those five games. Comparison of shot counts and xG (12.14 and xG 1.54 for KTP vs 11.29 and xG 1.4 for PK-35) shows balanced attacking output, but PK-35’s dominant defensive resilience (86% clean sheets, 0.14 goals conceded) prevails, therefore I tip No Goal / against BTTS.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG-based model projects 1.43 expected goals for KTP (xG attack 1.54 vs xG conceded to PK-35 1.32) and 1.34 for PK-35 (xG attack 1.40 vs xG conceded to KTP 1.28), totaling 2.77. With this mean, a Poisson distribution estimates ~76% probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~52% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and ~30% for at least 4 goals (Over 3.5). KTP averages 12.14 shots and 4.29 on target, PK-35 11.29 and 3.86, with conversion rates of 15% and 14% — supporting chance conversion; in the last 5 matches both teams averaged 2.8 goals each. PK-35 concedes only 0.14 goals away on the season, but their xG against of 1.32 indicates some degree of luck in results, increasing the risk they concede. The strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (76%), therefore I recommend backing the Over side at the 1.5 line as the best bet.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

PK-35 has an exceptionally strong defense: on average 0.14 goals conceded per match and 86% clean sheets, with a 71% away win rate (seasonConcededAVG_away = 0.14; seasonCSPercentage_away = 86%; winPercentage_away = 71%). KTP at home creates more chances and scores on average 1.86 goals per match and 0.71 goals by half-time (seasonScoredAVG_home = 1.86; scoredAVGHT_home = 0.71), but 71% of their home matches are level at the break (drawingAtHTPercentage_home = 71%). xG indicates similar attacking potential (xG for KTP 1.54 vs xG for PK-35 1.40), so defense is decisive — PK-35 practically do not concede (seasonBTTSPercentage_away = 0.0; conceded_2hg_avg_away = 0.0). Second-half data show goals frequently occur after the interval (last5_over05_2hg_percentage_overall_home = 100% and last5_over05_2hg_percentage_overall_away = 100%), therefore a half-time draw and an away-side turnaround by full-time (X/2) appears most likely.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

66Possession (%)34
KTPPK-35
12Shots11
KTPPK-35
2Shots on target2
KTPPK-35
1.44xG1.24
KTPPK-35
10Corners2
KTPPK-35
75Dangerous attacks57
KTPPK-35
12Fouls12
KTPPK-35
4Cards3
KTPPK-35

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.79Goals scored / match1.71
KTPPK-35
1Goals conceded / match0.57
KTPPK-35
50%Average possession45%
KTPPK-35
5.29Shots on target / match4.07
KTPPK-35

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.5Shots per match11.71
KTPPK-35
5.29Shots on target4.07
KTPPK-35
11.5%Shot conversion14.6%
KTPPK-35
50%Possession45%
KTPPK-35
1.79xG for1.47
KTPPK-35
1.13xG against1.3
KTPPK-35

Shooting quality

KTP: AttackingPK-35: Counter-attacking
KTPPK-35
Accuracy (shots on target)34%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.42

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

PK-35 is 30% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - KTP · 2.6 pts / match - PK-35

KTP
LWWDW
Season result split
71% W14% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-2-2
2.29 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-1
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WLWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
PK-35
DWWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
64% W21% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-3-2
2.14 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-1-1
Last 5 away
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.72Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KTP is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

1.79 goals / match - KTP · 1.71 goals / match - PK-35

PK-35 is 75% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - KTP · 0.57 goals / match - PK-35

KTP scoring profile: strong

KTP scores in 86% of matches (12 of 14 matches), while PK-35 keeps a clean sheet in 50% (7 of 14 matches).

PK-35 scoring profile: mixed

PK-35 scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while KTP keeps a clean sheet in 50% (7 of 14 matches).

25Goals scored (season)24
KTPPK-35
14Goals conceded (season)8
KTPPK-35
2.79Average goals in match2.29
KTPPK-35
14Goals scored (last 5)14
KTPPK-35
7Goals conceded (last 5)3
KTPPK-35

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal71%
KTPPK-35
50%2 goals43%
KTPPK-35
21%3 goals36%
KTPPK-35
14%4 goals14%
KTPPK-35

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal50%
KTPPK-35
21%2 goals7%
KTPPK-35
14%3 goals0%
KTPPK-35
7%4 goals0%
KTPPK-35

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time14%
KTPPK-35
14%BTTS in both halves7%
KTPPK-35
36%Scored in both halves29%
KTPPK-35

BTTS and goal count

43%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
KTPPK-35
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
KTPPK-35
60%BTTS - last 560%
KTPPK-35

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
KTPPK-35
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
KTPPK-35
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
KTPPK-35

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time64%
KTPPK-35
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
KTPPK-35
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
KTPPK-35

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

PK-35 is 21% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.36 pts / match - KTP · 1.64 pts / match - PK-35

KTP - half-time state
29% leading50% draw21% trailing
PK-35 - half-time state
36% leading57% draw7% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per match (1st half)1.64
KTPPK-35
0.64Goals scored (1st half)0.57
KTPPK-35
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.21
KTPPK-35
1.21Average goals (1st half)0.79
KTPPK-35
57%Clean sheet before half-time79%
KTPPK-35
50%No goal before half-time57%
KTPPK-35

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)1.79
KTPPK-35
1.14Goals scored (2nd half)1.14
KTPPK-35
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.36
KTPPK-35
1.57Average goals (2nd half)1.5
KTPPK-35
71%Clean sheet after half-time64%
KTPPK-35
29%No goal after half-time43%
KTPPK-35

KTP - second-half results

57% W29% R14% P
19
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding245%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 71%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

PK-35 - second-half results

43% W50% R7% P
23
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding178%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 64%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KTP - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.00
Goals scored / match1.01.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match2.02.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference0+7
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
PK-35 - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.20
Goals scored / match0.82.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match1.02.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+3+8
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KTP
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
2
2
16-30
3
4
31-45
4
3
46-60
8
1
61-75
4
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

PK-35
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
2
1
31-45
8
2
46-60
1
0
61-75
7
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.54
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-61%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
61%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KTP

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.66
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
131%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

PK-35

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.97
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.73
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
153%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
42%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.46
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).

Teams vs league

KTPLigaPK-35
Average goals in match 2.792.49 2.29
Both teams scored 43%45% 36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 43%45% 43%
Clean sheets 50%31% 50%
Goal before half-time 64%60% 50%
Goal after half-time 79%74% 64%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.49
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
45%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.37
Home goals / match
1.12
Away goals / match
+22%
Home attack advantage
+18%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. KTPYellow cardMustapha Coker
  2. PK-35SubstitutionOn: Ayuub Ahmed-NurOff: Emu Kawakita
  3. KTPSubstitutionOn: Roni PolatOff: Arttu Tulehmo
  4. PK-35SubstitutionOn: Liam LokakeOff: Joona Tapani
  5. KTPYellow cardOnni Hänninen
  6. PK-35SubstitutionOn: Tuukka AndbergOff: Jasper Pikkuhookana
  7. PK-35Yellow cardShunta Uchiyama
  8. KTPYellow cardMaksym Zhuk
  9. KTPYellow cardMatias Paavola
  10. PK-35Yellow cardAyuub Ahmed-Nur
  11. PK-35Yellow cardLiam Lokake

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: KTP 1 - 0 - 0 PK-35. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of KTP vs PK-35?

The Ykkösliiga match finished KTP 0:1 PK-35. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KTP vs PK-35?

KTP score 1.79 goals per game on average and PK-35 1.71. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 43% of KTP's matches and 36% of PK-35's.

What form are KTP and PK-35 in?

Over the last 5 games KTP have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and PK-35 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KTP vs PK-35?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KTP vs PK-35: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.