Kuching FA vs PDRM: match statistics
Kuching FA vs PDRM: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kuching FA played PDRM in Super League (Malaysia). The match was played on 12 April 2026. Final score: 4:1.
Current form
Kuching FA: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. PDRM: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kuching FA scores 1.74 and concedes 0.47 goals per match. PDRM scores 0.74 and concedes 3.05. League average: 3.19 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kuching FA 26%, PDRM 47%. Over 2.5: Kuching FA 32%, PDRM 74%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 58%.
xG, shots and style
Kuching FA has higher xG: 1.59 vs 0.93. Kuching FA: 13.6 shots per match, PDRM: 6.8.
Match halves
Kuching FA: half-time lead 58%, second-half goals 0.74. PDRM: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.42.
Goals by minute
Kuching FA: 31-45+ (8 goals). PDRM: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Super League: 3.19 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 58%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Kuching FA are clear favorites for this fixture: they sit 4th in the table, win 78% of home matches and have a season record of 33 goals scored/9 conceded, while PDRM are 13th with just 14 scored and 58 conceded. At home Kuching average 2.11 goals scored and concede only 0.22 per match, whereas PDRM on the road average 0.56 goals scored and concede 3.11, yielding a decisive advantage in both offense and defense. The quality-of-chances differential is confirmed by the numbers: Kuching average 15.56 shots and 5.22 on target at home with xG 1.75, while PDRM away average 5.78 shots and 2.11 on target with xG 0.74; additionally PDRM fail to score in 56% of away matches versus 11% for Kuching. Form trends also favor the hosts — Kuching have scored 5 and conceded 2 in their last 5 (averaging 2 points/match), whereas PDRM in the same sample have scored 3 and conceded 16 (0.8 points/match); therefore I predict a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal indicators are mixed: Kuching have BTTS in 60% of matches, PDRM only 33%, with the league average at 46%. In the last 5 matches Kuching scored 5 goals (1.0 per match) and conceded 2 (0.4 per match), while PDRM scored 3 (0.6 per match) and conceded as many as 16 (3.2 per match), suggesting the home side are likely to score and the visitors are struggling for efficiency. xG analysis confirms Kuching's superiority: home xG_for 1.11 versus away xG_against 2.49 indicates many created chances, whereas PDRM have xG_for 0.74 against Kuching's xG_against 2.05, reducing the probability of an away goal. Although seasonal clean sheet percentages are low (10% and 11%), Kuching's recent defensive form (0.4 conceded per match in the last 5) is a strong signal that PDRM may fail to respond with a goal. On this basis I tip BTTS — No as more likely: 65% vs 35% for Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals: I calculate 1.80 for Kuching and 1.40 for PDRM (total 3.20), using the average of the team’s xG_for and the opponent’s xG_against as the base ((1.11+2.49)/2=1.80 and (0.74+2.05)/2=1.40). Seasonal metrics show both teams frequently play high-scoring games: Kuching has 70% of matches Over 2.5 and 80% Over 1.5, PDRM has 78% and 89% respectively, and Over 0.5 occurs in 90% and 100% of their matches. Additionally, PDRM conceded 16 goals in the last 5 matches (3.2 per match), while Kuching scored 5 and conceded 2 in their last 5, indicating greater goal risk from the away side alongside home productivity. A Poisson model for total xG=3.20 yields roughly an 83% chance of Over 1.5, 62% for Over 2.5 and 41% for Over 3.5; however, seasonal Over 2.5 rates of 70–78% push my probability for Over 2.5 higher. As a result I recommend backing the Over on the 2.5 line as the strongest signal (I estimate Over 2.5 at 72% chance), while Over 1.5 also looks strong (86%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistical analysis indicates an advantage for Kuching FA: their xG is 1.11 versus PDRM's 0.74, average shots 7.9 versus 5.78 and 3.2 shots on target versus 2.11, demonstrating greater home pressure. In the last five matches Kuching led at the break in 60% of games and averaged 0.8 goals before half-time, while PDRM conceded an average of 1.75 goals before the break in those five games, increasing the likelihood of a home goal at half-time. The visitors concede on average 3.11 goals per game season-to-date and 2.33 after the break, and their form 'ldwll' with only a 20% win rate in the last five matches reduces the chances of a meaningful turnaround in the second half. Therefore the most likely scenario is Kuching leading at half-time and winning full-time (1/1) — I assign this 40%, with alternatives X/1 18% and 2/1 11% as secondary scenarios.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kuching FA | PDRM | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kuching FA is 200% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Kuching FA · 0.8 pts / match - PDRM
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kuching FA is 135% better for: goals scored per match.
1.74 goals / match - Kuching FA · 0.74 goals / match - PDRM
Kuching FA is 549% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.47 goals / match - Kuching FA · 3.05 goals / match - PDRM
Kuching FA scores in 89% of matches (17 of 19 matches), while PDRM keeps a clean sheet in 11% (2 of 19 matches).
PDRM scores in 53% of matches (10 of 19 matches), while Kuching FA keeps a clean sheet in 63% (12 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kuching FA
Over / Under - PDRM
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kuching FA is 143% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.16 pts / match - Kuching FA · 0.89 pts / match - PDRM
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kuching FA - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 58% of matches and wins 63%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
PDRM - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 11%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -11 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -13 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kuching FA
PDRM
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Kuching FA | Liga | PDRM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.21 | 3.19 | ▲ 3.79 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 26% | 47% | • 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 32% | 58% | ▲ 74% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 63% | 29% | ▼ 11% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 68% | 78% | ▼ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 74% | 81% | ▲ 89% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Kuching FA 1 - 0 - 0 PDRM. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Kuching FA vs PDRM?
The Super League match finished Kuching FA 4:1 PDRM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kuching FA vs PDRM?
Kuching FA score 1.74 goals per game on average and PDRM 0.74. The Super League average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 26% of Kuching FA's matches and 47% of PDRM's.
What form are Kuching FA and PDRM in?
Over the last 5 games Kuching FA have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and PDRM 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kuching FA vs PDRM?
The statistical background for Kuching FA vs PDRM — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


