Nigeria - NPFLData current as of 23 July 2026

Kun Khalifat vs Ikorodu City: match statistics

Kun Khalifat crest
Kun Khalifat
2 : 2half-time 1:1
Ikorodu City crest
Ikorodu City
155%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
215%(0.00)

Kun Khalifat shows solid form at home with 47% of home matches won and a positive goal difference (+4). The hosts average 1.13 goals per match at home with only 20% of matches without scoring, which indicates offensive efficiency. Ikorodu City has serious problems in away matches - only 13% wins, a negative goal difference (-9), and as many as 53% of matches ending in defeat. The visitors fail to score in 53% of away matches, and their average xG (0.87) is significantly lower than the hosts' xGA (1.27). Considering Kun Khalifat's home advantage and Ikorodu City's poor away form, I expect a home win, although their lower league position (20th place) and inconsistent form (lwdwl) could make the match more balanced than the home statistics suggest.

Kun Khalifat vs Ikorodu City: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kun Khalifat play Ikorodu City in NPFL (Nigeria). The match date is 22 March 2026 at 16:00. Final score: 2:2.

Current form

Kun Khalifat: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Ikorodu City: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kun Khalifat scores 1.11 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. Ikorodu City scores 1.13 and concedes 1.03. League average: 2.02 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kun Khalifat 50%, Ikorodu City 39%. Over 2.5: Kun Khalifat 37%, Ikorodu City 34%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Ikorodu City has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.20. Kun Khalifat: 4.8 shots per match, Ikorodu City: 7.0.

Match halves

Kun Khalifat: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.61. Ikorodu City: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.55.

Goals by minute

Kun Khalifat: 76-90+ (9 goals). Ikorodu City: 16-30 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NPFL: 2.02 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Kun Khalifat shows solid form at home with 47% of home matches won and a positive goal difference (+4). The hosts average 1.13 goals per match at home with only 20% of matches without scoring, which indicates offensive efficiency. Ikorodu City has serious problems in away matches - only 13% wins, a negative goal difference (-9), and as many as 53% of matches ending in defeat. The visitors fail to score in 53% of away matches, and their average xG (0.87) is significantly lower than the hosts' xGA (1.27). Considering Kun Khalifat's home advantage and Ikorodu City's poor away form, I expect a home win, although their lower league position (20th place) and inconsistent form (lwdwl) could make the match more balanced than the home statistics suggest.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

65Possession (%)35
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
16Shots9
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
6Shots on target3
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
2.19xG1.21
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
6Corners3
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
106Dangerous attacks59
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
-1Fouls-1
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
0Cards2
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
1.11Goals scored / match1.13
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
1.13Goals conceded / match1.03
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
28%Average possession37%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
1.29Shots on target / match2.32
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

4.76Shots per match6.95
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
1.29Shots on target2.32
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
23.2%Shot conversion16.3%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
28%Possession37%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
1.2xG for1.37
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
1.27xG against1.22
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City

Shooting quality

Kun Khalifat: Counter-attackingIkorodu City: Counter-attacking
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
Accuracy (shots on target)27%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.250.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.860.49

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kun Khalifat is 117% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Kun Khalifat · 1.2 pts / match - Ikorodu City

Kun Khalifat
WDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
34% W26% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-10-15
1.29 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-3-6
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WDWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Ikorodu City
WLWLL
Season result split
42% W26% R32% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-10-12
1.53 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-6-11
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LDLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 0.92BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ikorodu City is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.13 goals / match - Kun Khalifat · 1.03 goals / match - Ikorodu City

Kun Khalifat scoring profile: strong

Kun Khalifat scores in 74% of matches (28 of 38 matches), while Ikorodu City keeps a clean sheet in 47% (18 of 38 matches).

Ikorodu City scoring profile: very strong

Ikorodu City scores in 74% of matches (28 of 38 matches), while Kun Khalifat keeps a clean sheet in 29% (11 of 38 matches).

42Goals scored (season)43
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
43Goals conceded (season)39
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
2.24Average goals in match2.16
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
11Goals scored (last 5)9
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
3Goals conceded (last 5)9
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City

How often they score at least...

74%1 goal74%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
29%2 goals29%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
8%3 goals8%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
0%4 goals3%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal53%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
32%2 goals26%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
8%3 goals13%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
3%4 goals11%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time16%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
3%BTTS in both halves5%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
13%Scored in both halves16%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City

BTTS and goal count

32%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
60%BTTS - last 580%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

66%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City

2nd half

74%Min. 1 goal after half-time55%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
32%Min. 2 goals after half-time26%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ikorodu City is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.18 pts / match - Kun Khalifat · 1.37 pts / match - Ikorodu City

Kun Khalifat - half-time state
24% leading47% draw29% trailing
Ikorodu City - half-time state
32% leading42% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.18Points per match (1st half)1.37
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.58
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.58
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
1.03Average goals (1st half)1.16
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
58%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
58%No goal before half-time55%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City

After half-time (2nd half)

1.45Points per match (2nd half)1.42
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
0.61Goals scored (2nd half)0.55
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.42
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
1.13Average goals (2nd half)0.97
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
55%Clean sheet after half-time68%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City
55%No goal after half-time55%
Kun KhalifatIkorodu City

Kun Khalifat - second-half results

37% W34% R29% P
45
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
55
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding142%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ikorodu City - second-half results

29% W55% R16% P
52
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
54
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.37
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kun Khalifat - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.20
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+3+5
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Ikorodu City - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match1.00.8
Goals conceded / match1.20.6
Average goals in match2.21.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals60%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kun Khalifat
ScoredConceded
6
10
0-15
6
5
16-30
7
8
31-45
7
5
46-60
7
4
61-75
9
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Ikorodu City
ScoredConceded
6
8
0-15
8
10
16-30
8
5
31-45
8
5
46-60
6
5
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.20
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kun Khalifat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.14
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
195%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Ikorodu City

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
195%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
72%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).

Teams vs league

Kun KhalifatLigaIkorodu City
Average goals in match 2.242.02 2.16
Both teams scored 50%38% 39%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 37%34% 34%
Clean sheets 29%37% 47%
Goal before half-time 66%61% 66%
Goal after half-time 74%64% 55%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.02
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
0.58
Away goals / match
+148%
Home attack advantage
+60%
Home defence advantage
+52%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Kun Khalifat 0 - 0 - 1 Ikorodu City. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Ikorodu City
2 : 0
Kun Khalifat

FAQ

What was the result of Kun Khalifat vs Ikorodu City?

The NPFL match finished Kun Khalifat 2:2 Ikorodu City. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kun Khalifat vs Ikorodu City?

Kun Khalifat score 1.11 goals per game on average and Ikorodu City 1.13. The NPFL average is 2.02 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Kun Khalifat's matches and 39% of Ikorodu City's.

What form are Kun Khalifat and Ikorodu City in?

Over the last 5 games Kun Khalifat have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Ikorodu City 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kun Khalifat vs Ikorodu City?

The statistical background for Kun Khalifat vs Ikorodu City — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.