Kun Khalifat vs Wikki Tourist: match statistics
Kun Khalifat vs Wikki Tourist: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kun Khalifat played Wikki Tourist in NPFL (Nigeria). The match was played on 24 May 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Kun Khalifat: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Wikki Tourist: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kun Khalifat scores 1.05 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. Wikki Tourist scores 0.86 and concedes 1.14. League average: 2.00 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kun Khalifat 49%, Wikki Tourist 42%. Over 2.5: Kun Khalifat 35%, Wikki Tourist 31%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 33%.
xG, shots and style
Wikki Tourist has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.20. Kun Khalifat: 4.9 shots per match, Wikki Tourist: 5.3.
Match halves
Kun Khalifat: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.57. Wikki Tourist: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.36.
Goals by minute
Kun Khalifat: 76-90+ (8 goals). Wikki Tourist: 31-45+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
NPFL: 2.00 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 33%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win (Kun Khalifat): in the last 5 matches they scored 9 goals and won 4 times, while Wikki Tourist have only 1 win and 7 goals in the same period. At home Kun Khalifat average 11.31 shots and 3.54 on target per match with a 12% conversion, whereas the visitors average 7.56 shots and 2.22 on target away with roughly a 3% conversion, giving the hosts a clear advantage in quality of chances. Defensively the hosts concede 0.89 goals per home match and keep 39% clean sheets, while Wikki Tourist concede 1.44 goals away and have only 17% clean sheets. xG differences also favour the hosts: home xG for the hosts is 1.35 versus 0.96 xG for the visitors on the road, and xG against is 1.15 vs 1.51, indicating the visitors are more exposed defensively. Considering the 2.6 points average earned by the hosts in the last 5 matches versus 0.8 points for the visitors, and the fact the hosts failed to score in only 17% of home games compared to 56% of away games for the visitors, I estimate probabilities of approximately 72% for a Kun Khalifat win, 18% draw and 10% Wikki Tourist win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I assess that the more likely scenario is BTTS - No, because Wikki Tourist averages only 0.56 goals per match this season, just 2.22 shots on target per match and a conversion rate of only 3%. Kun Khalifat have conceded only 2 goals in their last 5 matches (0.4 per match) and have a 44% clean sheet rate this season; they also scored 9 goals in those five games, indicating current form and defensive stability. The home side creates more chances: xG 1.63, 11.5 shots per match, including 4.58 on target, versus the visitors’ xG 0.96, 7.56 shots and 2.22 on target; efficiency 11% versus 3% further supports Kun Khalifat being the primary source of goals. Although Wikki have had BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches and scored 7 goals in that period, the season-long BTTS rate for the visitors is only 33% (league average 38%), so I rate the edge to BTTS - No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate the home team to score about 1.37 goals and the away team about 0.75, for a total of roughly 2.12 goals. The base is xG data: home xG 1.63 and xG against the visitors 1.51 (average 1.57 for Kun Khalifat), which after balancing with the home seasonal goals average of 1.17 yields about 1.37; similarly for Wikki Tourist xG 0.96 and the home defense xG against 0.92 (average 0.94) after adjustment with the seasonal average 0.56 gives 0.75. With a mean of 2.12, a Poisson distribution implies approximately a 63% chance of Over 1.5, ~36% for Over 2.5 and ~17% for Over 3.5, therefore Under 2.5 (64% probability) is the strongest signal. Additionally, the home side averages 4.58 shots on target versus 2.22 for the visitors and has a better shot conversion 11% vs 3%, which increases expected goals for Kun, but seasonally Over 2.5 occurs in only 33% of home matches and 28% of away matches. Considering form (Kun scored 9 and conceded 2 in the last 5; Wikki scored 7 and conceded 10) and the low seasonal frequency of Over 2.5, I recommend backing Under 2.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time appears most likely — the home side draws in 67% of their home matches, while the away team are level at the break in 39% of their away fixtures; home teams led at half-time in 28% of matches versus 11% for visitors. Nevertheless, the home side hold the advantage at full-time: they win 39% of matches compared to only 11% for the away team, with average xG of 1.63 versus 0.96 for the visitors, and average shots on target of 4.58 vs 2.22 with conversion rates of approximately 11% vs 3%. Form confirms this tendency — in their last five matches the home team have won 80%, while the away side have lost 60% of their last five, suggesting HT draws are frequently overturned in the second half in favour of the home side. Therefore I assign the highest probability to the Half-Time draw / Home win scenario (X/1 — 36%); second preference is Home/Home (1/1 — 20%) and then Draw/Draw (X/X — 18%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kun Khalifat | Wikki Tourist | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.24 | 0.25 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.78 | 0.51 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Kun Khalifat is 225% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / match - Kun Khalifat · 0.8 pts / match - Wikki Tourist
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kun Khalifat is 22% better for: goals scored per match.
1.05 goals / match - Kun Khalifat · 0.86 goals / match - Wikki Tourist
Kun Khalifat scores in 73% of matches (27 of 37 matches), while Wikki Tourist keeps a clean sheet in 31% (11 of 36 matches).
Wikki Tourist scores in 61% of matches (22 of 36 matches), while Kun Khalifat keeps a clean sheet in 30% (11 of 37 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kun Khalifat
Over / Under - Wikki Tourist
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Kun Khalifat is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.19 pts / match - Kun Khalifat · 1.11 pts / match - Wikki Tourist
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kun Khalifat - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Wikki Tourist - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kun Khalifat
Wikki Tourist
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).
Teams vs league
| Kun Khalifat | Liga | Wikki Tourist | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.19 | 2.00 | • 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 49% | 38% | ▲ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 35% | 33% | ▼ 31% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 30% | 37% | ▼ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 65% | 60% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 73% | 64% | ▼ 56% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Kun Khalifat 0 - 1 - 0 Wikki Tourist. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Kun Khalifat vs Wikki Tourist?
The NPFL match finished Kun Khalifat 3:1 Wikki Tourist. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Kun Khalifat vs Wikki Tourist?
Kun Khalifat score 1.05 goals per game on average and Wikki Tourist 0.86. The NPFL average is 2.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 49% of Kun Khalifat's matches and 42% of Wikki Tourist's.
What form are Kun Khalifat and Wikki Tourist in?
Over the last 5 games Kun Khalifat have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Wikki Tourist 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kun Khalifat vs Wikki Tourist?
The statistical background for Kun Khalifat vs Wikki Tourist — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


