Nigeria - NPFLData current as of 13 September 2026

Kun Khalifat vs Wikki Tourist: match statistics

Kun Khalifat crest
Kun Khalifat
3 : 1half-time 1:1
Wikki Tourist crest
Wikki Tourist

Kun Khalifat vs Wikki Tourist: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kun Khalifat played Wikki Tourist in NPFL (Nigeria). The match was played on 24 May 2026. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Kun Khalifat: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Wikki Tourist: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kun Khalifat scores 1.05 and concedes 1.14 goals per match. Wikki Tourist scores 0.86 and concedes 1.14. League average: 2.00 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kun Khalifat 49%, Wikki Tourist 42%. Over 2.5: Kun Khalifat 35%, Wikki Tourist 31%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 33%.

xG, shots and style

Wikki Tourist has higher xG: 1.34 vs 1.20. Kun Khalifat: 4.9 shots per match, Wikki Tourist: 5.3.

Match halves

Kun Khalifat: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.57. Wikki Tourist: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.36.

Goals by minute

Kun Khalifat: 76-90+ (8 goals). Wikki Tourist: 31-45+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NPFL: 2.00 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 33%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win (Kun Khalifat): in the last 5 matches they scored 9 goals and won 4 times, while Wikki Tourist have only 1 win and 7 goals in the same period. At home Kun Khalifat average 11.31 shots and 3.54 on target per match with a 12% conversion, whereas the visitors average 7.56 shots and 2.22 on target away with roughly a 3% conversion, giving the hosts a clear advantage in quality of chances. Defensively the hosts concede 0.89 goals per home match and keep 39% clean sheets, while Wikki Tourist concede 1.44 goals away and have only 17% clean sheets. xG differences also favour the hosts: home xG for the hosts is 1.35 versus 0.96 xG for the visitors on the road, and xG against is 1.15 vs 1.51, indicating the visitors are more exposed defensively. Considering the 2.6 points average earned by the hosts in the last 5 matches versus 0.8 points for the visitors, and the fact the hosts failed to score in only 17% of home games compared to 56% of away games for the visitors, I estimate probabilities of approximately 72% for a Kun Khalifat win, 18% draw and 10% Wikki Tourist win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I assess that the more likely scenario is BTTS - No, because Wikki Tourist averages only 0.56 goals per match this season, just 2.22 shots on target per match and a conversion rate of only 3%. Kun Khalifat have conceded only 2 goals in their last 5 matches (0.4 per match) and have a 44% clean sheet rate this season; they also scored 9 goals in those five games, indicating current form and defensive stability. The home side creates more chances: xG 1.63, 11.5 shots per match, including 4.58 on target, versus the visitors’ xG 0.96, 7.56 shots and 2.22 on target; efficiency 11% versus 3% further supports Kun Khalifat being the primary source of goals. Although Wikki have had BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches and scored 7 goals in that period, the season-long BTTS rate for the visitors is only 33% (league average 38%), so I rate the edge to BTTS - No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate the home team to score about 1.37 goals and the away team about 0.75, for a total of roughly 2.12 goals. The base is xG data: home xG 1.63 and xG against the visitors 1.51 (average 1.57 for Kun Khalifat), which after balancing with the home seasonal goals average of 1.17 yields about 1.37; similarly for Wikki Tourist xG 0.96 and the home defense xG against 0.92 (average 0.94) after adjustment with the seasonal average 0.56 gives 0.75. With a mean of 2.12, a Poisson distribution implies approximately a 63% chance of Over 1.5, ~36% for Over 2.5 and ~17% for Over 3.5, therefore Under 2.5 (64% probability) is the strongest signal. Additionally, the home side averages 4.58 shots on target versus 2.22 for the visitors and has a better shot conversion 11% vs 3%, which increases expected goals for Kun, but seasonally Over 2.5 occurs in only 33% of home matches and 28% of away matches. Considering form (Kun scored 9 and conceded 2 in the last 5; Wikki scored 7 and conceded 10) and the low seasonal frequency of Over 2.5, I recommend backing Under 2.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time appears most likely — the home side draws in 67% of their home matches, while the away team are level at the break in 39% of their away fixtures; home teams led at half-time in 28% of matches versus 11% for visitors. Nevertheless, the home side hold the advantage at full-time: they win 39% of matches compared to only 11% for the away team, with average xG of 1.63 versus 0.96 for the visitors, and average shots on target of 4.58 vs 2.22 with conversion rates of approximately 11% vs 3%. Form confirms this tendency — in their last five matches the home team have won 80%, while the away side have lost 60% of their last five, suggesting HT draws are frequently overturned in the second half in favour of the home side. Therefore I assign the highest probability to the Half-Time draw / Home win scenario (X/1 — 36%); second preference is Home/Home (1/1 — 20%) and then Draw/Draw (X/X — 18%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
-1Shots-1
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
-1Shots on target-1
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
0xG0
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
-1Corners-1
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
0Dangerous attacks0
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
-1Fouls-1
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
-1Cards-1
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
1.05Goals scored / match0.86
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
1.14Goals conceded / match1.14
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
29%Average possession28%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
1.35Shots on target / match1.67
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

4.92Shots per match5.31
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
1.35Shots on target1.67
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
21.4%Shot conversion16.2%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
29%Possession28%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
1.2xG for1.34
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
1.27xG against1.17
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist

Shooting quality

Kun Khalifat: Counter-attackingWikki Tourist: Counter-attacking
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
Accuracy (shots on target)27%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.240.25
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.780.51

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kun Khalifat is 225% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Kun Khalifat · 0.8 pts / match - Wikki Tourist

Kun Khalifat
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
32% W27% D41% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-10-15
1.24 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-3-6
Last 5 at home
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.11BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Wikki Tourist
DWLLL
Season result split
25% W33% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-12-15
1.08 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-12
Last 5 away
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kun Khalifat is 22% better for: goals scored per match.

1.05 goals / match - Kun Khalifat · 0.86 goals / match - Wikki Tourist

Kun Khalifat scoring profile: strong

Kun Khalifat scores in 73% of matches (27 of 37 matches), while Wikki Tourist keeps a clean sheet in 31% (11 of 36 matches).

Wikki Tourist scoring profile: strong

Wikki Tourist scores in 61% of matches (22 of 36 matches), while Kun Khalifat keeps a clean sheet in 30% (11 of 37 matches).

39Goals scored (season)31
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
42Goals conceded (season)41
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
2.19Average goals in match2
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
9Goals scored (last 5)7
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
2Goals conceded (last 5)10
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal61%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
27%2 goals25%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
5%3 goals0%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
0%4 goals0%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal69%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
32%2 goals33%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
8%3 goals11%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
3%4 goals0%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time25%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
3%BTTS in both halves8%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
11%Scored in both halves19%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist

BTTS and goal count

30%Min. 3 goals and BTTS28%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
40%BTTS - last 580%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time56%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kun Khalifat is 7% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.19 pts / match - Kun Khalifat · 1.11 pts / match - Wikki Tourist

Kun Khalifat - half-time state
24% leading46% draw30% trailing
Wikki Tourist - half-time state
19% leading53% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.19Points per match (1st half)1.11
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
0.49Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
0.51Goals conceded (1st half)0.61
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
1Average goals (1st half)1.11
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
59%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
59%No goal before half-time56%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per match (2nd half)1.11
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
0.57Goals scored (2nd half)0.36
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
0.54Goals conceded (2nd half)0.53
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
1.11Average goals (2nd half)0.89
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
54%Clean sheet after half-time64%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist
57%No goal after half-time64%
Kun KhalifatWikki Tourist

Kun Khalifat - second-half results

35% W35% D30% L
44
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
52
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Wikki Tourist - second-half results

19% W53% D28% L
40
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.11
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kun Khalifat - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.20
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3+4
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Wikki Tourist - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kun Khalifat
ScoredConceded
6
9
0-15
5
5
16-30
7
8
31-45
7
5
46-60
6
4
61-75
8
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Wikki Tourist
ScoredConceded
3
6
0-15
4
7
16-30
11
9
31-45
5
10
46-60
4
0
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.09
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kun Khalifat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.15
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
197%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.36
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Wikki Tourist

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
148%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.28
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).

Teams vs league

Kun KhalifatLigaWikki Tourist
Average goals in match 2.192.00 2.00
Both teams scored 49%38% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 35%33% 31%
Clean sheets 30%37% 31%
Goal before half-time 65%60% 67%
Goal after half-time 73%64% 56%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.00
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / match
0.58
Away goals / match
+145%
Home attack advantage
+59%
Home defence advantage
+51%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
60%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Substitutes

2Michael Akanoon 1'
8Ebetomame Oghenetegaon 1'
11Adamu Mohammadon 1'
13Christogonus Ibeon 1'
14Chinonso Charleson 1'
21Chijioke Ejioguon 1'
24Kelechi Victoron 1'
33Stanley Nnanna Otuon 1'

Away team

Starting lineup

1Godswill Utum
5Abba Musa
8Nasiru Jibril
9Bala Imamu
22Saifullahi Yusuf
23Aliyu Mamuda
24Usman Ibrahim
28Hassan Musa32Jephtaph Mairiga⚽ 1
35Solomon Gabriel

Substitutes

7Idris Dantataon 1'
15Haruna Aliyuon 1'
25Sadeeq Abdullahion 1'
30Chizoba Okohon 1'
34Sadeeq Abubakaron 1'

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Wikki TouristGoalJephtaph Mairiga
  2. Kun KhalifatGoalUchechukwu Onuoha
  3. Kun KhalifatGoalUchechukwu Onuoha

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Kun Khalifat 0 - 1 - 0 Wikki Tourist. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Kun Khalifat vs Wikki Tourist?

The NPFL match finished Kun Khalifat 3:1 Wikki Tourist. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kun Khalifat vs Wikki Tourist?

Kun Khalifat score 1.05 goals per game on average and Wikki Tourist 0.86. The NPFL average is 2.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 49% of Kun Khalifat's matches and 42% of Wikki Tourist's.

What form are Kun Khalifat and Wikki Tourist in?

Over the last 5 games Kun Khalifat have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Wikki Tourist 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kun Khalifat vs Wikki Tourist?

The statistical background for Kun Khalifat vs Wikki Tourist — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.