Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 06 September 2026

KuPS vs HJK: match statistics

KuPS crest
KuPS
1 : 1half-time 1:0
HJK crest
HJK

KuPS vs HJK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KuPS played HJK in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 26 April 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

KuPS: 3-1-0, 2.50 points/match. HJK: 2-0-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

KuPS scores 2.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. HJK scores 2.00 and concedes 0.33. League average: 2.46 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KuPS 75%, HJK 0%. Over 2.5: KuPS 50%, HJK 67%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

KuPS has higher xG: 1.84 vs 1.62. KuPS: 14.5 shots per match, HJK: 13.3.

Match halves

KuPS: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.25. HJK: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 1.33.

Goals by minute

KuPS: 76-90+ (3 goals). HJK: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.46 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-0. Average goals 2.25, BTTS 25%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win for KuPS. KuPS has 8 goals this season and is creating significantly more attacking opportunities: averaging 19 shots and 8 on target at home versus HJK’s 9 shots and 5 on target away (HJK 6 goals this season). KuPS posts higher expected goals: xG 2.26 vs 1.39 for HJK, indicating superior chance quality, while HJK’s reported average of 3 goals away with a 33% conversion may be a short-term anomaly. Defensively KuPS concedes on average 1 goal at home with xG against 1.16 and keeps a clean sheet in 50% of matches, whereas HJK records 0 goals conceded on the road and 100% clean sheets, although HJK conceded 4 goals in the last 5 matches compared to KuPS’s 9 conceded in the same period. Considering KuPS’s 64% possession, 2.0 points per game for KuPS over the last 5 matches vs 1.8 for HJK, and the advantage in xG and shot volume, I favor KuPS to win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I assess the “No” (No Goal / clean sheet expected) scenario as more likely because HJK averages 3.0 goals scored per season while conceding 0.0, maintaining 100.0% clean sheets, which significantly reduces the probability of BTTS - Yes. Season BTTS rates for both clubs are 0.0% (KuPS 0.0%, HJK 0.0%) versus a league BTTS average of 50.0%, so individual profiles favor no mutual scoring. A counterargument is KuPS form — in the last 5 matches KuPS has BTTS 60.0%, scored 8 and conceded 9 (avg 1.6 for, 1.8 against), showing they can concede. Still, HJK is highly efficient and defensively stable: a conversion rate of 33.0% with an average of 9.0 shots and xG_for 1.39 vs xG_against 0.76 suggests HJK will likely score while their defense limits opponents’ chances. Considering HJK’s 100.0% clean sheets, season 0.0% BTTS for both teams and relatively low HJK xG_against, I rate “No” as the stronger signal (75% vs 25%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

An xG-based model projects 1.25 goals for KuPS (attacking xG 1.74 vs HJK defensive xG 0.76) and 1.25 for HJK (attacking xG 1.39 vs KuPS defense 1.11), totaling 2.50 expected goals. A Poisson distribution with λ=2.50 yields ~71% probability for Over 1.5 goals (P(0 or 1) ≈ 28.7%), ~46% for Over 2.5 and ~24% for Over 3.5. Additionally, HJK has a seasonal away average of 3.0 goals and a shot conversion rate of 33% versus KuPS’s 10%, and in the last 5 matches Over 2.5 rates are ~60% for KuPS and 80% for HJK, which supports at least two goals. KuPS generates significantly more shots (15.5 vs 9.0) and has 50% clean sheets at home, which limits the likelihood of a very high scoreline above 3.5 (~24%), therefore the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistics clearly favor HJK: the away team averages 3.0 goals per away match with 0.0 conceded, has a 100% away-win rate and led at the break in 100% of their games, which suggests a strong advantage already after 45 minutes. KuPS at home averages 1.5 goals scored and 0.5 conceded, led at the break in 50% of matches, and despite a higher xG (1.74 versus 1.39) has lower shot conversion (10% vs 33%), so the xG advantage does not translate into goals. In second halves HJK records on average 2.0 goals scored and 0.0 conceded, which increases the likelihood of maintaining or extending a lead. Based on this I rate the HT/FT 2/2 outcome as most likely. I assign it a 51% probability; alternatives are X/2 (9%) and 1/2 (10%), and I assess remaining scenarios collectively at about 30%.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
KuPSHJK
17Shots6
KuPSHJK
5Shots on target3
KuPSHJK
1.93xG0.9
KuPSHJK
14Corners2
KuPSHJK
72Dangerous attacks42
KuPSHJK
13Fouls11
KuPSHJK
1Cards2
KuPSHJK

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match2
KuPSHJK
1Goals conceded / match0.33
KuPSHJK
61%Average possession56%
KuPSHJK
6.75Shots on target / match4.67
KuPSHJK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14.5Shots per match13.33
KuPSHJK
6.75Shots on target4.67
KuPSHJK
13.8%Shot conversion15%
KuPSHJK
61%Possession56%
KuPSHJK
1.84xG for1.62
KuPSHJK
1.29xG against0.99
KuPSHJK

Shooting quality

KuPS: DominantHJK: Efficient finishing
KuPSHJK
Accuracy (shots on target)47%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.43

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KuPS is 25% better for: last-5 form.

2.5 pts / match - KuPS · 2 pts / match - HJK

KuPS
WWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
75% W25% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-1-0
2.50 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-0
2.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 at home
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.84Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 75%Over 2.5: 50%
HJK
WLW
Season result split
67% W0% R33% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.3xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 0.99BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 67%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

HJK is 203% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - KuPS · 0.33 goals / match - HJK

KuPS scoring profile: strong

KuPS scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while HJK keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 matches).

HJK scoring profile: strong

HJK scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while KuPS keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

8Goals scored (season)6
KuPSHJK
4Goals conceded (season)1
KuPSHJK
3Average goals in match2.33
KuPSHJK
8Goals scored (last 5)6
KuPSHJK
4Goals conceded (last 5)1
KuPSHJK

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal67%
KuPSHJK
50%2 goals67%
KuPSHJK
50%3 goals67%
KuPSHJK
0%4 goals0%
KuPSHJK

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal33%
KuPSHJK
25%2 goals0%
KuPSHJK
0%3 goals0%
KuPSHJK
0%4 goals0%
KuPSHJK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time0%
KuPSHJK
25%BTTS in both halves0%
KuPSHJK
50%Scored in both halves67%
KuPSHJK

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
KuPSHJK
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS67%
KuPSHJK
75%BTTS - last 50%
KuPSHJK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
KuPSHJK
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
KuPSHJK
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KuPSHJK

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
KuPSHJK
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
KuPSHJK
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
KuPSHJK

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

HJK is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / match - KuPS · 2 pts / match - HJK

KuPS - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing
HJK - half-time state
67% leading0% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per match (1st half)2
KuPSHJK
0.75Goals scored (1st half)0.67
KuPSHJK
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
KuPSHJK
1.25Average goals (1st half)1
KuPSHJK
50%Clean sheet before half-time67%
KuPSHJK
50%No goal before half-time33%
KuPSHJK

After half-time (2nd half)

2.5Points per match (2nd half)2.33
KuPSHJK
1.25Goals scored (2nd half)1.33
KuPSHJK
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0
KuPSHJK
1.75Average goals (2nd half)1.33
KuPSHJK
50%Clean sheet after half-time100%
KuPSHJK
0%No goal after half-time33%
KuPSHJK

KuPS - second-half results

75% W25% R0% P
5
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

HJK - second-half results

67% W33% R0% P
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KuPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.252.50
Goals scored / match0.81.3
Goals conceded / match0.50.5
Average goals in match1.31.8
1 goal75%100%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals0%25%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal50%0%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 25% leading - 50% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 75% won - 25% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 3
HJK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.33
Goals scored / match0.71.3
Goals conceded / match0.30.0
Average goals in match1.01.3
1 goal100%67%
2 goals0%67%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet67%100%
No goal33%33%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 67% leading - 0% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 67% won - 33% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KuPS
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
2
31-45
2
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

HJK
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
0
31-45
2
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-16%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KuPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.55
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.16
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
155%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

HJK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.63
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.66
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
171%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
26%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

KuPSLigaHJK
Average goals in match 3.002.46 2.33
Both teams scored 75%50% 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 50%46% 67%
Clean sheets 25%29% 67%
Goal before half-time 75%71% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%83% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.46
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.29
Home goals / match
1.17
Away goals / match
+10%
Home attack advantage
+9%
Home defence advantage
+21%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
25%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. HJKYellow cardMihajlo Bogićević
  2. HJKYellow cardMatej Marković
  3. HJKSubstitutionOn: Mads BorchersOff: Martin Kirilov
  4. KuPSYellow cardBob Nii Armah
  5. HJKSubstitutionOn: David EzehOff: Liam Möller
  6. KuPSSubstitutionOn: Gustav EngvallOff: Bob Nii Armah
  7. HJKSubstitutionOn: Antton NylundOff: Lucas Lingman

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): KuPS 3 - 1 - 0 HJK. Average goals 2.25, both teams scored in 25% matches.

Helsingin Jalkapalloklubi
0 : 2
Kuopion Palloseura
Kuopion Palloseura
3 : 1
Helsingin Jalkapalloklubi
Kuopion Palloseura
3 : 0
Helsingin Jalkapalloklubi
Helsingin Jalkapalloklubi
0 : 0
Kuopion Palloseura

FAQ

What was the result of KuPS vs HJK?

The Veikkausliiga match finished KuPS 1:1 HJK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KuPS and HJK?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches KuPS won 3, HJK won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KuPS vs HJK?

KuPS score 2.00 goals per game on average and HJK 2.00. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.46 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 75% of KuPS's matches and 0% of HJK's.

What form are KuPS and HJK in?

Over the last 5 games KuPS have a 3-1-0 record (2.50 points per game) and HJK 2-0-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KuPS vs HJK?

The statistical background for KuPS vs HJK — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.