Finland - VeikkausliigaSavon Sanomat AreenaData current as of 06 September 2026

KuPS vs Lahti: match statistics

KuPS crest
KuPS
2 : 1half-time 2:1
Lahti crest
Lahti

KuPS vs Lahti: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KuPS played Lahti in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 23 May 2026. Venue: Savon Sanomat Areena. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

KuPS: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Lahti: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

KuPS scores 1.44 and concedes 0.89 goals per match. Lahti scores 0.86 and concedes 1.14. League average: 2.38 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KuPS 56%, Lahti 57%. Over 2.5: KuPS 33%, Lahti 29%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 40%.

xG, shots and style

KuPS has higher xG: 1.87 vs 1.28. KuPS: 15.1 shots per match, Lahti: 11.1.

Match halves

KuPS: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.78. Lahti: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.14.

Goals by minute

KuPS: 76-90+ (4 goals). Lahti: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.38 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 40%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KuPS holds a clear advantage in chance creation and control: at home they average xG 2.0, 17 shots and 6.4 shots on target per match with 61% possession, whereas Lahti away averages xG 1.3, 11.67 shots and 3.67 shots on target with 51% possession. Hosts score 1.6 goals at home and concede 0.6, with 60% clean sheets and 0% home losses, while Lahti score 0.67 goals away and concede 1.0 with 67% away losses. The efficiency gap confirms KuPS’s edge — they convert 9% of shots at home versus Lahti’s 6% away, and the share of matches without scoring is 20% vs 33%. Lahti have 9 goals in their last 5 matches compared to KuPS’s 6, giving them an offensive impulse, but that form does not clearly translate into away results. Considering the superior xG (2.0 vs 1.3), better shots on target (6.4 vs 3.67) and the hosts’ stable defense, I predict a KuPS win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I predict BTTS - Yes with a probability of 65% vs No 35%. Lahti had BTTS in 80% of their last 5 matches (4/5), scoring on average 1.8 goals and conceding 1.2, indicating consistent goal exchanges. KuPS has a season BTTS rate of 75% (13 scored and 8 conceded), but their BTTS in the last 5 matches has dropped to 20% with averages of 1.2 scored and 0.6 conceded, meaning their defense has improved short-term. Both teams have generated high xG in the last 5 matches: KuPS 1.93 xG vs Lahti 1.96 xG, and the league averages 2.35 goals per game, which supports goals from both sides. Considering Lahti’s strong recent signal (80% in last 5) and KuPS’s season offensive BTTS potential (75%), I prefer Yes as the more likely outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I project 1.31 goals for KuPS and 1.18 for Lahti (total 2.49), calculated from home xG 1.26 and away defense xG conceded 1.35, and correspondingly 1.30 and 1.06 for Lahti. Seasonal figures are mixed: KuPS at home has 100% of matches with over 1.5 total goals and scored 13 goals at home, while Lahti away has only 33% of such matches and 6 goals scored. In the last 5 matches xG was 1.93 for KuPS and 1.96 for Lahti, and the teams scored 6 and 9 goals respectively in that period, which supports the probability of at least two goals. A Poisson model with expected total 2.49 gives about a 71% chance for Over 1.5, ~45% for Over 2.5 and ~24% for Over 3.5, therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Additionally, KuPS at home has no clean sheets (0% clean sheets), and their home matches featured both teams scoring in 75% of cases, which further increases the likelihood of Over 1.5, hence the recommendation to play the Over 1.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

KuPS led at the break in 2 of 4 home matches (50%) and scored on average 1.0 goals in the first half while conceding only 0.25, whereas Lahti on the road lost their lead in 2 of 3 games (67%) and scored an average of 0.33 goals by half-time. Based on this I assess the probability of KuPS leading at the break at around 60%. Over the full match KuPS averages 2.25 goals per home game versus Lahti’s 1.67 and has collected 8 points by half-time compared to the visitors’ 3 points, indicating greater control by the hosts after the break. The teams’ xG is practically even (1.26 versus 1.30), so the absence of a clear expected-goals advantage for Lahti supports the scenario of the home side maintaining the lead. Given these specific figures the strongest signal is 1/1 (KuPS leading at Half-Time and winning Full-Time), therefore that is my selection.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
KuPSLahti
17Shots9
KuPSLahti
3Shots on target4
KuPSLahti
1.74xG1.04
KuPSLahti
9Corners2
KuPSLahti
64Dangerous attacks26
KuPSLahti
13Fouls12
KuPSLahti
0Cards4
KuPSLahti

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.44Goals scored / match0.86
KuPSLahti
0.89Goals conceded / match1.14
KuPSLahti
62%Average possession54%
KuPSLahti
5.89Shots on target / match3.43
KuPSLahti

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15.11Shots per match11.14
KuPSLahti
5.89Shots on target3.43
KuPSLahti
9.6%Shot conversion7.7%
KuPSLahti
62%Possession54%
KuPSLahti
1.87xG for1.28
KuPSLahti
1.07xG against1.18
KuPSLahti

Shooting quality

KuPS: DominantLahti: Balanced
KuPSLahti
Accuracy (shots on target)39%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KuPS is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - KuPS · 1 pts / match - Lahti

KuPS
DLDDW
Season result split
44% W44% R11% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-1
1.78 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.89Opponent xG: 0.89BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Lahti
LWLDD
Season result split
29% W29% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-3
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-2
Last 5 away
1-0-2
WLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KuPS is 67% better for: goals scored per match.

1.44 goals / match - KuPS · 0.86 goals / match - Lahti

KuPS is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.89 goals / match - KuPS · 1.14 goals / match - Lahti

KuPS scoring profile: very strong

KuPS scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while Lahti keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 matches).

Lahti scoring profile: strong

Lahti scores in 71% of matches (5 of 7 matches), while KuPS keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 matches).

13Goals scored (season)6
KuPSLahti
8Goals conceded (season)8
KuPSLahti
2.33Average goals in match2
KuPSLahti
5Goals scored (last 5)4
KuPSLahti
4Goals conceded (last 5)6
KuPSLahti

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal71%
KuPSLahti
33%2 goals14%
KuPSLahti
33%3 goals0%
KuPSLahti
0%4 goals0%
KuPSLahti

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal86%
KuPSLahti
22%2 goals29%
KuPSLahti
0%3 goals0%
KuPSLahti
0%4 goals0%
KuPSLahti

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time14%
KuPSLahti
11%BTTS in both halves0%
KuPSLahti
33%Scored in both halves0%
KuPSLahti

BTTS and goal count

22%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
KuPSLahti
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
KuPSLahti
40%BTTS - last 560%
KuPSLahti

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

78%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
KuPSLahti
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
KuPSLahti
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KuPSLahti

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time57%
KuPSLahti
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
KuPSLahti
11%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
KuPSLahti

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lahti is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.44 pts / match - KuPS · 1.57 pts / match - Lahti

KuPS - half-time state
33% leading44% draw22% trailing
Lahti - half-time state
43% leading29% draw29% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.44Points per match (1st half)1.57
KuPSLahti
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.71
KuPSLahti
0.44Goals conceded (1st half)0.43
KuPSLahti
1.11Average goals (1st half)1.14
KuPSLahti
56%Clean sheet before half-time57%
KuPSLahti
44%No goal before half-time43%
KuPSLahti

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per match (2nd half)0.57
KuPSLahti
0.78Goals scored (2nd half)0.14
KuPSLahti
0.44Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
KuPSLahti
1.22Average goals (2nd half)0.86
KuPSLahti
56%Clean sheet after half-time43%
KuPSLahti
44%No goal after half-time86%
KuPSLahti

KuPS - second-half results

44% W33% R22% P
13
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Lahti - second-half results

0% W57% R43% P
11
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.57
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 29%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KuPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.00
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal40%80%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Lahti - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.40
Goals scored / match0.80.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference+2-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KuPS
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
3
3
31-45
3
1
46-60
0
2
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Lahti
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
2
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
3
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KuPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.80
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.58
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Lahti

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
86%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.6
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

KuPSLigaLahti
Average goals in match 2.332.38 2.00
Both teams scored 56%52% 57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%40% 29%
Clean sheets 33%27% 14%
Goal before half-time 78%79% 86%
Goal after half-time 78%73% 57%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.38
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
1.00
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+27%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LahtiYellow cardOtso Koskinen
  2. LahtiYellow cardVäinö Vehkonen
  3. LahtiYellow cardRomain Sans
  4. KuPSGoalOtto Ruoppi
  5. LahtiSubstitutionOn: Daniel HeikkinenOff: Romaric Yapi
  6. LahtiYellow cardDaniel Heikkinen
  7. KuPSSubstitutionOn: Niilo KujasaloOff: Petteri Pennanen

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of KuPS vs Lahti?

The Veikkausliiga match finished KuPS 2:1 Lahti. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before KuPS vs Lahti?

KuPS score 1.44 goals per game on average and Lahti 0.86. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.38 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 56% of KuPS's matches and 57% of Lahti's.

What form are KuPS and Lahti in?

Over the last 5 games KuPS have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Lahti 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KuPS vs Lahti?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for KuPS vs Lahti: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.