Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 06 September 2026

KuPS vs SJK: match statistics

KuPS crest
KuPS
0 : 0half-time 0:0
SJK crest
SJK

KuPS vs SJK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

KuPS played SJK in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 8 May 2026. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

KuPS: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. SJK: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

KuPS scores 1.50 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. SJK scores 1.00 and concedes 1.40. League average: 2.26 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: KuPS 67%, SJK 40%. Over 2.5: KuPS 33%, SJK 40%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

KuPS has higher xG: 1.74 vs 1.60. KuPS: 13.8 shots per match, SJK: 13.0.

Match halves

KuPS: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.83. SJK: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

KuPS: 0-15 (3 goals). SJK: 46-60 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.26 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 3-1-0. Average goals 2.25, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

KuPS at home shows strong metrics: on average they score 1.67 goals per match with xG 2.15, register 7 shots on target, have a 67% home win rate and have not yet lost at home (0% defeats). SJK have clear away issues: on average 0 goals scored per away match and 100% of away fixtures without scoring, while conceding 2.5 goals away on average and having no away wins (0%). Quality of chances favors KuPS — home xG 2.15 versus SJK away xG 1.18, average shots 18.33 versus 8 and shot accuracy 9% versus 0% for the visitors away, indicating a higher volume and quality of opportunities for the hosts. Additionally, KuPS concede 1.0 goal at home on average and keep a clean sheet in 33% of matches, whereas SJK have kept no clean sheets away (0%), amplifying the hosts’ defensive edge. In summary: 67% home wins and no home defeats for KuPS versus 100% away defeats and 0 goals away for SJK suggest a KuPS victory as the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I recommend BTTS - Yes based on clear attacking indicators from both teams: in the last 5 matches KuPS had BTTS in 60% of games and SJK in 80%, providing a strong signal for both teams to score. KuPS generates xG 1.89 with an average of 16.33 shots and 5.0 shots on target per game, while SJK concedes an average xG 1.76 and on the season concedes 2.5 goals per game, which favors goals for the home side. SJK scored 14 goals in the last 5 matches (2.8 avg) and has a recent attacking xG of 2.28, whereas KuPS conceded 6 goals in those five matches (1.2 avg), so the visitors have a real chance to score. Season-long KuPS BTTS rate is 67% and they keep a clean sheet in 33% of home matches, while the league average BTTS is 50%, further supporting a both-teams-to-score scenario. Considering 60% vs 80% in the last 5 matches, xG 1.89 vs 1.76 and SJK’s offensive 2.8 goals per game, I assess BTTS probability at 78% versus 22% No BTTS.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I estimate a total of 2.94 goals: KuPS 1.83 and SJK 1.11 — values derived from xG (KuPS xG_for 1.89 vs SJK xG_against 1.76 → ~1.83 for the home side; SJK xG_for 1.18 vs KuPS xG_against 1.04 → ~1.11 for the visitors). Both teams have a season share of matches over 1.5 goals equal to 100% (KuPS 100%, SJK 100%), which is the strongest statistical signal and supports the OVER on the 1.5 line. The 2.5 line has mixed backing: season OVER 2.5 is 33% for KuPS and 50% for SJK, but the expected 2.94 goals and SJK’s last 5 matches averaging 2.8 goals with last5 xG_for 2.28 raise the probability of OVER 2.5 to around 60%. OVER 3.5 appears unlikely (seasonOver35 0% for both teams, and the league average is 2.34), so I rate OVER 3.5 as low probability.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

KuPS has a clear advantage in chance creation: average xG at home is 1.89 versus 1.18 for SJK away, and average shots are 16.33 versus 8.0, indicating KuPS pressure especially in the second half. However, KuPS more often trails at the break — in 2 of 3 home matches (67%) — but shows a strong reaction after the interval: it has won all second halves (100%) and scores on average 1.33 goals after the break. SJK struggles with away efficiency: season average goals scored on the road is 0.0 and shot conversion rate 0.0, while conceding an average of 2.5 away goals, so it will be hard for them to hold a lead. Goal-minute data show KuPS scores mainly after the break (2 goals in 46–60 min and 2 goals in 76–90 min), supporting a turnaround scenario. Considering a 40% share of guest leads at half-time in the last five matches, KuPS’s superiority in xG and shots and its second-half scoring (1.33 goals after the break), the most likely scenario is SJK leading at the break and KuPS winning after 90 minutes (HT/FT 2/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

64Possession (%)36
KuPSSJK
18Shots8
KuPSSJK
6Shots on target3
KuPSSJK
2.04xG1.01
KuPSSJK
6Corners7
KuPSSJK
66Dangerous attacks40
KuPSSJK
7Fouls12
KuPSSJK
1Cards6
KuPSSJK

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.5Goals scored / match1
KuPSSJK
1.17Goals conceded / match1.4
KuPSSJK
62%Average possession54%
KuPSSJK
5.33Shots on target / match4.4
KuPSSJK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.83Shots per match13
KuPSSJK
5.33Shots on target4.4
KuPSSJK
10.8%Shot conversion7.7%
KuPSSJK
62%Possession54%
KuPSSJK
1.74xG for1.6
KuPSSJK
1.21xG against1.33
KuPSSJK

Shooting quality

KuPS: BalancedSJK: Balanced
KuPSSJK
Accuracy (shots on target)39%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

KuPS is 60% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / match - KuPS · 1 pts / match - SJK

KuPS
WDWDL
Season result split
50% W33% R17% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-1
1.83 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-0
Last 5 at home
2-1-0
WWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.78Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
SJK
LWLDD
Season result split
20% W40% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.60Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

KuPS is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - KuPS · 1 goals / match - SJK

KuPS is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.17 goals / match - KuPS · 1.4 goals / match - SJK

KuPS scoring profile: very strong

KuPS scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while SJK keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).

SJK scoring profile: strong

SJK scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while KuPS keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

9Goals scored (season)5
KuPSSJK
7Goals conceded (season)7
KuPSSJK
2.67Average goals in match2.4
KuPSSJK
6Goals scored (last 5)5
KuPSSJK
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
KuPSSJK

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal60%
KuPSSJK
33%2 goals20%
KuPSSJK
33%3 goals20%
KuPSSJK
0%4 goals0%
KuPSSJK

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal80%
KuPSSJK
33%2 goals40%
KuPSSJK
0%3 goals20%
KuPSSJK
0%4 goals0%
KuPSSJK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time0%
KuPSSJK
17%BTTS in both halves0%
KuPSSJK
33%Scored in both halves20%
KuPSSJK

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
KuPSSJK
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS40%
KuPSSJK
60%BTTS - last 540%
KuPSSJK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
KuPSSJK
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
KuPSSJK
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
KuPSSJK

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
KuPSSJK
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
KuPSSJK
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
KuPSSJK

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

KuPS is 122% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / match - KuPS · 0.6 pts / match - SJK

KuPS - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing
SJK - half-time state
20% leading0% draw80% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)0.6
KuPSSJK
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.2
KuPSSJK
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
KuPSSJK
1.17Average goals (1st half)1
KuPSSJK
50%Clean sheet before half-time20%
KuPSSJK
50%No goal before half-time80%
KuPSSJK

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per match (2nd half)1.8
KuPSSJK
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
KuPSSJK
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.6
KuPSSJK
1.5Average goals (2nd half)1.4
KuPSSJK
33%Clean sheet after half-time60%
KuPSSJK
33%No goal after half-time40%
KuPSSJK

KuPS - second-half results

50% W17% R33% P
8
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

SJK - second-half results

60% W0% R40% P
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.60
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

KuPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
SJK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.80
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

KuPS
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
2
31-45
2
1
46-60
0
2
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

SJK
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
2
2
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.54
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-11%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

KuPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

SJK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.67
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.60
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
111%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

KuPSLigaSJK
Average goals in match 2.672.26 2.40
Both teams scored 67%47% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%35% 40%
Clean sheets 17%29% 20%
Goal before half-time 83%76% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%76% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.26
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
1.00
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
24%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SJKYellow cardSalim Giabo Yussif
  2. SJKYellow cardKelvin Spencer Pires
  3. SJKYellow cardOlatoundji Tessilimi
  4. KuPSSubstitutionOn: Saku HeiskanenOff: Niilo Kujasalo
  5. KuPSSubstitutionOn: Saku SavolainenOff: Taneli Hämäläinen
  6. SJKSubstitutionOn: Danila BulgakovOff: Muhammed Suso
  7. KuPSYellow cardArttu Lötjönen
  8. SJKRed cardRoope Paunio
  9. KuPSSubstitutionOn: Arttu HeinonenOff: Valentín Román Gasc

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): KuPS 3 - 1 - 0 SJK. Average goals 2.25, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Seinäjoen Jalkapallokerho
0 : 1
Kuopion Palloseura
Kuopion Palloseura
3 : 2
Seinäjoen Jalkapallokerho
Seinäjoen Jalkapallokerho
1 : 1
Kuopion Palloseura
Kuopion Palloseura
1 : 0
Seinäjoen Jalkapallokerho

FAQ

What was the result of KuPS vs SJK?

The Veikkausliiga match finished KuPS 0:0 SJK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between KuPS and SJK?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches KuPS won 3, SJK won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.25 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before KuPS vs SJK?

KuPS score 1.50 goals per game on average and SJK 1.00. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 67% of KuPS's matches and 40% of SJK's.

What form are KuPS and SJK in?

Over the last 5 games KuPS have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and SJK 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for KuPS vs SJK?

The statistical background for KuPS vs SJK — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.