Nigeria - NPFLIlorin Township StadiumData current as of 07 October 2026

Kwara United vs Ranchers Bees: match statistics

Kwara United crest
Kwara United
3 : 1half-time 0:1
Ranchers Bees crest
Ranchers Bees

Kwara United vs Ranchers Bees: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kwara United played Ranchers Bees in NPFL (Nigeria). The match was played on 4 October 2026. Venue: Ilorin Township Stadium. Final score: 3:1.

Current form

Kwara United: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Ranchers Bees: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kwara United scores 1.17 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Ranchers Bees scores 1.33 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.40 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kwara United 33%, Ranchers Bees 50%. Over 2.5: Kwara United 50%, Ranchers Bees 67%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 42%.

xG, shots and style

Ranchers Bees has higher xG: 1.13 vs 0.57. Kwara United: -0.2 shots per match, Ranchers Bees: 4.7.

Match halves

Kwara United: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.83. Ranchers Bees: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.83.

Goals by minute

Kwara United: 46-60 (2 goals). Ranchers Bees: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

NPFL: 2.40 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 42%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kwara United are favourites based on their home form: they have won 2 of their 3 home matches, while Ranchers Bees have lost all 3 of their away games. The hosts score an average of 2.33 goals per home match and concede 1, whereas the visitors score 0.67 goals and concede 2.33 on the road. The contrast is also reflected in their goal differences in these matches: +4 for Kwara compared with -5 for Ranchers Bees. In their last 5 matches overall, the visitors have scored 7 goals to the hosts’ 5, but their away xG is just 0.92, while they allow 1.83 xG at the other end. This gap between overall form and the visitors’ three consecutive away defeats points to a Kwara United win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest indicator against both teams scoring is Kwara United’s defensive record: they concede an average of 0.33 goals at home and keep a clean sheet in 67% of matches. Ranchers Bees score an average of just 0.67 goals away from home, with an xG of 0.92 compared with 1.75 for the hosts. Kwara United score an average of 2.0 goals at home, while the visitors concede 2.33 away, making a home goal more likely than an away response. A counterpoint is that both teams scored in 67% of Ranchers Bees’ away matches; however, over their last five matches, the rate was 40% for the visitors and 20% for the hosts. Therefore, the more likely scenario is that at least one team fails to score (BTTS - No).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal is for Over 1.5 goals: both teams have gone over this line in 67% of their matches, while Kwara United average 2.0 goals at home and Ranchers Bees concede 2.33 goals away. The hosts generate an average of 1.75 xG, while the visitors allow opponents 1.83 xG, further supporting at least two goals. Higher lines are less reliable, as Kwara United keep a clean sheet in 67% of their home matches, and Ranchers Bees score just 0.67 goals per away game. Therefore, with a forecast of 2.60 goals, Over 1.5 is a stronger pick than Over 2.5 or Over 3.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time followed by a Kwara United win is the most likely outcome: the hosts were level at the break in 2 of their 3 home matches, while Ranchers Bees kept a clean sheet in 4 of the first halves across their last 5 matches. Although the visitors were trailing at half-time in 2 of their 3 away games, Kwara United have averaged only 0.67 goals before the break at home, making a home lead after 45 minutes a close alternative. The hosts should have a clearer edge after the break: they average 1.33 goals in second halves at home, exactly matching the number the visitors concede on the road. Across the full match, Kwara United average 2.00 goals at home, compared with Ranchers Bees’ 0.67 away, while their xG stands at 1.75 versus 0.92 for their opponents. The forecast should nevertheless be treated with caution, as the home and away statistics are based on just 3 matches each.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
-1Shots-1
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
-1Shots on target-1
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
0xG0
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
-1Corners-1
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
0Dangerous attacks0
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
-1Fouls-1
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
-1Cards-1
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
1.17Goals scored / match1.33
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
1Goals conceded / match1.33
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
13%Average possession31%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
-0.5Shots on target / match1.67
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

-0.17Shots per match4.67
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
-0.5Shots on target1.67
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
-700%Shot conversion28.6%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
13%Possession31%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
0.57xG for1.13
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
1.65xG against1.59
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees

Shooting quality

Kwara United: BalancedRanchers Bees: Counter-attacking
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
Accuracy (shots on target)0%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.000.24
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.80

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Ranchers Bees is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Kwara United · 1.4 pts / match - Ranchers Bees

Kwara United
LWLWL
Season result split
33% W17% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-3
1.17 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-0
Last 5 at home
2-1-0
DWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.57Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%
Ranchers Bees
WLWLD
Season result split
33% W17% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-3
1.17 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-3
Last 5 away
0-0-3
LLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.50BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ranchers Bees is 14% better for: goals scored per match.

1.17 goals / match - Kwara United · 1.33 goals / match - Ranchers Bees

Kwara United is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Kwara United · 1.33 goals / match - Ranchers Bees

Kwara United scoring profile: mixed

Kwara United scores in 50% of matches (3 of 6 matches), while Ranchers Bees keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).

Ranchers Bees scoring profile: very strong

Ranchers Bees scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Kwara United keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

7Goals scored (season)8
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
6Goals conceded (season)8
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
2.17Average goals in match2.67
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
5Goals scored (last 5)7
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
4Goals conceded (last 5)5
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal67%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
50%2 goals33%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
17%3 goals17%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
0%4 goals17%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal67%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
17%2 goals33%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
0%3 goals33%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
0%4 goals0%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

45%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
33%Scored in both halves17%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
20%BTTS - last 540%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ranchers Bees is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.83 pts / match - Kwara United · 1 pts / match - Ranchers Bees

Kwara United - half-time state
17% leading33% draw50% trailing
Ranchers Bees - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.83Points per match (1st half)1
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
0.83Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
1.17Average goals (1st half)1
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
33%Clean sheet before half-time67%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
67%No goal before half-time67%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees

After half-time (2nd half)

1.83Points per match (2nd half)1.17
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
0.17Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
1Average goals (2nd half)1.67
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
83%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees
50%No goal after half-time50%
Kwara UnitedRanchers Bees

Kwara United - second-half results

50% W33% D17% L
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.7

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ranchers Bees - second-half results

33% W17% D50% L
6
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kwara United - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.40.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Ranchers Bees - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kwara United
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
0
3
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
0
46-60
2
1
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Ranchers Bees
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
2
16-30
2
1
31-45
2
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kwara United

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.60
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.65
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.03
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Ranchers Bees

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
173%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (NPFL).

Teams vs league

Kwara UnitedLigaRanchers Bees
Average goals in match▼ 2.172.40▲ 2.67
Both teams scored▼ 33%45%▲ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%42%▲ 67%
Clean sheets▼ 17%33%• 33%
Goal before half-time▲ 83%70%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▼ 67%72%▲ 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.40
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.63
Home goals / match
0.77
Away goals / match
+112%
Home attack advantage
+53%
Home defence advantage
+48%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Kwara United vs Ranchers Bees?

The NPFL match finished Kwara United 3:1 Ranchers Bees. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kwara United vs Ranchers Bees?

Kwara United score 1.17 goals per game on average and Ranchers Bees 1.33. The NPFL average is 2.40 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Kwara United's matches and 50% of Ranchers Bees's.

What form are Kwara United and Ranchers Bees in?

Over the last 5 games Kwara United have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Ranchers Bees 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kwara United vs Ranchers Bees?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.