Japan - J1 LeagueData current as of 23 October 2026

Kyoto Sanga vs Kashiwa Reysol: match statistics

Kyoto Sanga crest
Kyoto Sanga
2 : 3half-time 2:0
Kashiwa Reysol crest
Kashiwa Reysol

Kyoto Sanga vs Kashiwa Reysol: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kyoto Sanga played Kashiwa Reysol in J1 League (Japan). The match was played on 11 September 2026. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

Kyoto Sanga: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Kashiwa Reysol: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kyoto Sanga scores 1.17 and concedes 1.83 goals per match. Kashiwa Reysol scores 1.67 and concedes 1.33. League average: 3.00 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kyoto Sanga 83%, Kashiwa Reysol 50%. Over 2.5: Kyoto Sanga 67%, Kashiwa Reysol 50%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

Kashiwa Reysol has higher xG: 1.61 vs 1.25. Kyoto Sanga: 11.3 shots per match, Kashiwa Reysol: 13.5.

Match halves

Kyoto Sanga: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 1.00. Kashiwa Reysol: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Kyoto Sanga: 46-60 (3 goals). Kashiwa Reysol: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

J1 League: 3.00 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kashiwa Reysol sit 3rd, while Kyoto Sanga are only 15th, with their season win tallies standing at 4 and 1 respectively. The visitors are also more effective at creating chances away from home, averaging 15 shots and 4.67 on target per match, with an xG of 1.76, compared with Kyoto’s 11.5 shots, 3.5 on target and xG of 1.24 at home. The defensive difference is equally important, as Kyoto concede an average of 2 goals at home and allow opponents an xG of 1.86, whereas Kashiwa concede just 1 goal away from home, with an xG against of 1.12. Kyoto average 1.5 goals scored at home and have not failed to score in any home match, which increases the likelihood of a closely contested game. Nevertheless, Kashiwa have won 3 of their last 5 matches and have collected more points over that period, 1.8 compared with 1.4, so the superior chance quality points to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The scenario in which both teams score is slightly more likely, as Kyoto have kept a clean sheet in 0% of matches, while Kashiwa average 1.33 goals per game. The visitors are also creating solid chances, with an average xG of 1.76 and 4.67 shots on target per match, whereas Kyoto have allowed opponents an xG of 1.86 across their last five appearances. The hosts average 1.46 xG and have scored 2.00 goals per game this season, giving them a case against Kashiwa’s defence, which concedes an average xG of 1.12. The moderately positive signal is supported by the BTTS figures: 67% for Kyoto and 60% in their last five matches, although Kashiwa’s 33% across the season lowers confidence in the pick. The risk of a BTTS No outcome is genuine, as Kashiwa have kept a clean sheet in 33% of matches; however, the attacking quality of both sides points towards BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal points to Over 1.5 goals: Kyoto have scored at least 2 goals in 100% of their league matches so far, compared with 67% for Kashiwa. The hosts have yet to keep a clean sheet and concede an average of 1.67 goals, which favors the visitors’ attacking potential, especially as their average xG is a high 1.76. Kyoto create chances worth an average of 1.46 xG, while Kashiwa allow opponents 1.12 xG, making a home goal a realistic prospect as well. The teams’ last five matches produced an average of 2.4 goals each, while the Japanese league averages 3.0 goals per match. The 2.5 line is more evenly balanced, as only 40% of each team’s last five matches ended with three goals, so Over 1.5 remains the clearly safer choice.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Kyoto Sanga has the clearer first-half profile: it led at the break in 2 of 3 matches, scoring an average of 1.00 goals and conceding only 0.33, while Kashiwa has not led at half-time and scored just 0.33 goals on average. The hosts are also effective from the outset, scoring twice between the 1st and 15th minutes while conceding none during that period. However, a second-half advantage is not certain, as Kyoto concedes an average of 1.33 goals after the break, whereas Kashiwa averages 2.00 points per match in second halves and concedes only 0.33 goals during them. Nevertheless, Kyoto has won 67% of its matches so far, and its shot conversion rate stands at 17% compared with 9% for its opponents, reinforcing the scenario of maintaining an early lead. The 1/1 HT/FT pick is therefore the most likely, although Kashiwa's high xG value—1.76 compared with the hosts' 1.46—limits its advantage over draw or second-half turnaround scenarios.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 3
2nd half

Match statistics

44Possession (%)56
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
15Shots18
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
5Shots on target6
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
0xG0
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
7Corners5
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
0Dangerous attacks0
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
13Fouls14
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
3Cards2
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
1.17Goals scored / match1.67
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
1.83Goals conceded / match1.33
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
45%Average possession60%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
4.17Shots on target / match4.5
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.33Shots per match13.5
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
4.17Shots on target4.5
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
10.3%Shot conversion12.3%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
45%Possession60%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
1.25xG for1.61
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
1.89xG against1.18
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol

Shooting quality

Kyoto Sanga: BalancedKashiwa Reysol: Balanced
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
Accuracy (shots on target)37%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kashiwa Reysol is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Kyoto Sanga · 1.8 pts / match - Kashiwa Reysol

Kyoto Sanga
DLWDL
Season result split
17% W33% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-3
0.83 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
LW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.93BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Kashiwa Reysol
WWWLL
Season result split
67% W0% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-0-2
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 away
2-0-1
WWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.66Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kashiwa Reysol is 43% better for: goals scored per match.

1.17 goals / match - Kyoto Sanga · 1.67 goals / match - Kashiwa Reysol

Kashiwa Reysol is 38% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.83 goals / match - Kyoto Sanga · 1.33 goals / match - Kashiwa Reysol

Kyoto Sanga scoring profile: very strong

Kyoto Sanga scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while Kashiwa Reysol keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

Kashiwa Reysol scoring profile: very strong

Kashiwa Reysol scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Kyoto Sanga keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 6 matches).

7Goals scored (season)10
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
11Goals conceded (season)8
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
3Average goals in match3
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
6Goals scored (last 5)8
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
9Goals conceded (last 5)7
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol

How often they score at least...

83%1 goal67%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
33%2 goals50%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
0%3 goals33%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
0%4 goals17%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal83%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
67%2 goals50%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
17%3 goals0%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
0%4 goals0%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time17%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
17%Scored in both halves33%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol

BTTS and goal count

67%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
80%BTTS - last 540%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time83%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
83%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
17%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kashiwa Reysol is 60% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.83 pts / match - Kyoto Sanga · 1.33 pts / match - Kashiwa Reysol

Kyoto Sanga - half-time state
17% leading33% draw50% trailing
Kashiwa Reysol - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.83Points per match (1st half)1.33
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
0.17Goals scored (1st half)0.67
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
0.83Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
1Average goals (1st half)1.17
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
83%No goal before half-time50%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
1Goals scored (2nd half)1
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.83
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
2Average goals (2nd half)1.83
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
17%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol
17%No goal after half-time50%
Kyoto SangaKashiwa Reysol

Kyoto Sanga - second-half results

33% W50% D17% L
5
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kashiwa Reysol - second-half results

50% W0% D50% L
8
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding203%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kyoto Sanga - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.20
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match0.82.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%100%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Kashiwa Reysol - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.80
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kyoto Sanga
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
0
2
31-45
3
0
46-60
2
5
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Kashiwa Reysol
ScoredConceded
3
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
3
46-60
3
2
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
100%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+33%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kyoto Sanga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.64
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.08
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
131%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Kashiwa Reysol

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
119%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 30% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).

Teams vs league

Kyoto SangaLigaKashiwa Reysol
Average goals in match• 3.003.00• 3.00
Both teams scored▲ 83%60%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 67%57%▼ 50%
Clean sheets▼ 0%23%▼ 17%
Goal before half-time▼ 67%72%▲ 83%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%83%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.00
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.60
Home goals / match
1.40
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
72%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Kyoto SangaGoalRafael Elias da SilvaAssist: Ryuma Nakano
  2. Kyoto SangaYellow cardShimpei Fukuoka
  3. Kashiwa ReysolYellow cardTaiyo Koga
  4. Kyoto SangaGoalRafael Elias da SilvaAssist: Kyo Sato
  5. Kyoto SangaYellow cardTemma Matsuda
  6. Kashiwa ReysolGoalTojiro KuboAssist: Masaki Watai
  7. Kashiwa ReysolYellow cardMasaki Watai
  8. Kyoto SangaSubstitutionOn: Haruki AraiOff: Alex Aparecido de Souza Alcântara
  9. Kashiwa ReysolGoalYusuke SegawaAssist: Masaki Watai
  10. Kashiwa ReysolGoalYusuke SegawaAssist: Yoshio Koizumi
  11. Kashiwa ReysolSubstitutionOn: Hinata YamauchiOff: Masaki Watai
  12. Kashiwa ReysolSubstitutionOn: Kenshin YubaOff: Keita Endo
  13. Kyoto SangaSubstitutionOn: Hisashi Appiah TawiahOff: Kodai Nagata
  14. Kyoto SangaYellow cardRafael Elias da Silva
  15. Kashiwa ReysolSubstitutionOn: Yudai KonishiOff: Nobuteru Nakagawa

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Kyoto Sanga 0 - 2 - 0 Kashiwa Reysol. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Kashiwa Reysol
3 : 3
Kyoto Sanga FC
Kyoto Sanga FC
1 : 1
Kashiwa Reysol

FAQ

What was the result of Kyoto Sanga vs Kashiwa Reysol?

The J1 League match finished Kyoto Sanga 2:3 Kashiwa Reysol. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Kyoto Sanga and Kashiwa Reysol?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Kyoto Sanga won 0, Kashiwa Reysol won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Kyoto Sanga vs Kashiwa Reysol?

Kyoto Sanga score 1.17 goals per game on average and Kashiwa Reysol 1.67. The J1 League average is 3.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 83% of Kyoto Sanga's matches and 50% of Kashiwa Reysol's.

What form are Kyoto Sanga and Kashiwa Reysol in?

Over the last 5 games Kyoto Sanga have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Kashiwa Reysol 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kyoto Sanga vs Kashiwa Reysol?

The statistical background for Kyoto Sanga vs Kashiwa Reysol — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.