Japan - J1 LeagueData current as of 03 September 2026

Kyoto Sanga vs Mito Hollyhock: match statistics

Kyoto Sanga crest
Kyoto Sanga
1 : 3half-time 0:2
Mito Hollyhock crest
Mito Hollyhock

Kyoto Sanga vs Mito Hollyhock: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kyoto Sanga played Mito Hollyhock in J1 League (Japan). The match was played on 22 August 2026. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Kyoto Sanga: 0-1-1, 0.50 points/match. Mito Hollyhock: 0-1-1, 0.50 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kyoto Sanga scores 1.50 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Mito Hollyhock scores 1.00 and concedes 1.50. League average: 3.33 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kyoto Sanga 100%, Mito Hollyhock 100%. Over 2.5: Kyoto Sanga 100%, Mito Hollyhock 50%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 67%.

xG, shots and style

Mito Hollyhock has higher xG: 1.58 vs 1.29. Kyoto Sanga: 11.5 shots per match, Mito Hollyhock: 16.5.

Match halves

Kyoto Sanga: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.50. Mito Hollyhock: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Kyoto Sanga: 46-60 (3 goals). Mito Hollyhock: 16-30 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

J1 League: 3.33 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 67%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kyoto Sanga are showing clearly better current form: they have collected 7 points from their last five matches, thanks to 2 wins and a draw, while Mito Hollyhock have managed just 1 point and lost 4 games. The hosts scored 7 goals during this period, more than twice as many as the visitors’ 3, highlighting their greater attacking potential. Mito have particular problems away from home, having lost 100% of their matches so far, conceding an average of 2 goals per game and failing to keep a clean sheet. The visitors are capable of creating chances, as their away xG stands at 1.58 with 16 shots per match, but a conversion rate of just 6% and an average of 1 goal scored limit their actual attacking strength. Kyoto’s defence is also far from stable, having conceded 10 goals in their last five appearances, so a draw remains a realistic scenario; however, the better form gives the hosts the edge.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have recorded BTTS in 100% of their matches so far this season, and neither has kept a clean sheet yet. Kyoto concede an average of 1.0 goal per match, while Mito concede as many as 2.0, which strengthens the chances of both sides finding the net. In their last five matches, the BTTS rate stands at 60% for each team, with Kyoto conceding an average of 2.0 goals and Mito 1.6. Their attacking potential is supported by the xG figures: Kyoto create an average of 1.63 xG, while Mito produce 1.44, whereas their defences allow 1.62 and 1.70 xG respectively. Mito’s weaker current finishing, with an average of 0.6 goals scored in their last five appearances, limits confidence in the pick; however, the lack of clean sheets and the high quality of chances still provide clearer support for BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Kyoto scored an average of 1.4 goals and conceded 2.0 in their last five matches, resulting in a high 3.4 total goals per game. Mito managed just 0.6 goals per match during this period, while their opponents averaged 1.6, and Mito’s average xG stood at 1.44. The hosts generate an average of 1.63 xG, while the visitors’ defense allows opponents 1.70 xG, strongly supporting at least two goals for Kyoto. Both teams scored in both directions in 60% of their last five matches, while the league averages 3.35 goals and 70% of matches with at least three goals. However, the strongest selection remains Over 1.5, as the projected 2.95 goals provide a clear safety margin even if Mito’s finishing is less effective.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Kyoto Sanga win at full-time, as the hosts have averaged 1.2 goals after the break in their last five matches, compared with just 0.4 for Mito. Kyoto won the second half in 80% of this sample, while Mito achieved that outcome in only 20% of matches and failed to score after the break in 60% of cases. The opening phase may be more cautious: both teams averaged just 0.2 goals before half-time in their last five appearances, and Kyoto did not lead at the break in any of them. The hosts’ advantage in the full-time result is also supported by their clearly superior current form: Kyoto have averaged 1.4 points per match, whereas Mito have managed just 0.2 and lost 80% of their recent fixtures. Mito concede an average of 1.6 goals per match, so Kyoto’s increasing attacking efficiency after the interval should be enough to produce a turnaround in the hosts’ favour.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
15Shots15
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
4Shots on target6
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
1.6xG1.58
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
1Corners7
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
51Dangerous attacks29
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
9Fouls4
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
0Cards0
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
1.5Goals scored / match1
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
2Goals conceded / match1.5
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
51%Average possession40%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
4.5Shots on target / match3.5
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.5Shots per match16.5
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
4.5Shots on target3.5
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
13%Shot conversion6.1%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
51%Possession40%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
1.29xG for1.58
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
1.94xG against1.63
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock

Shooting quality

Kyoto Sanga: Efficient finishingMito Hollyhock: Attacking
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
Accuracy (shots on target)39%21%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.10
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kyoto Sanga
LD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W50% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.94BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Mito Hollyhock
LD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W50% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.5xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 50%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kyoto Sanga is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Kyoto Sanga · 1 goals / match - Mito Hollyhock

Mito Hollyhock is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - Kyoto Sanga · 1.5 goals / match - Mito Hollyhock

Kyoto Sanga scoring profile: very strong

Kyoto Sanga scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Mito Hollyhock keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

Mito Hollyhock scoring profile: very strong

Mito Hollyhock scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Kyoto Sanga keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

3Goals scored (season)2
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
4Goals conceded (season)3
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
3.5Average goals in match2.5
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
3Goals scored (last 5)2
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
4Goals conceded (last 5)3
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
50%2 goals0%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
0%3 goals0%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
0%4 goals0%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
100%2 goals50%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
0%3 goals0%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
0%4 goals0%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
0%Scored in both halves0%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
100%BTTS - last 5100%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kyoto Sanga - half-time state
0% leading0% draw100% trailing
Mito Hollyhock - half-time state
50% leading0% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0Points per match (1st half)1.5
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
0Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
1.5Goals conceded (1st half)1
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
1.5Average goals (1st half)1.5
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
0%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
100%No goal before half-time50%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock

After half-time (2nd half)

3Points per match (2nd half)1.5
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
1.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
2Average goals (2nd half)1
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock
0%No goal after half-time50%
Kyoto SangaMito Hollyhock

Kyoto Sanga - second-half results

100% W0% R0% P
0
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-1.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mito Hollyhock - second-half results

50% W0% R50% P
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.5

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kyoto Sanga - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.003.00
Goals scored / match0.01.5
Goals conceded / match1.50.5
Average goals in match1.52.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals50%50%
3 goals0%50%
Clean sheet0%50%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference-3+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Mito Hollyhock - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.501.50
Goals scored / match0.50.5
Goals conceded / match1.00.5
Average goals in match1.51.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals50%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal50%50%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 50% leading - 0% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 0% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kyoto Sanga
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
3
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Mito Hollyhock
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
100%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kyoto Sanga

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.65
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Mito Hollyhock

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.45
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.58
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).

Teams vs league

Kyoto SangaLigaMito Hollyhock
Average goals in match 3.503.33 2.50
Both teams scored 100%63% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%67% 50%
Clean sheets 0%21% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%79% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%83% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.33
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.67
Home goals / match
1.67
Away goals / match
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defence advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
58%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Mito HollyhockGoalTakumi MaseAssist: Yu Funabashi
  2. Mito HollyhockGoalYasuki KimotoAssist: Yu Funabashi
  3. Mito HollyhockSubstitutionOn: Chihiro KatoOff: Arata Watanabe
  4. Mito HollyhockGoalChihiro KatoAssist: Taishi Semba
  5. Kyoto SangaGoalRyuma NakanoAssist: Shun Nagasawa
  6. Mito HollyhockSubstitutionOn: Shota YamashitaOff: Yu Funabashi
  7. Mito HollyhockSubstitutionOn: Akinari KawazuraOff: Kaito Taniguchi
  8. Kyoto SangaSubstitutionOn: Fuchi HondaOff: João Pedro Mendes Santos

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Kyoto Sanga vs Mito Hollyhock?

The J1 League match finished Kyoto Sanga 1:3 Mito Hollyhock. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kyoto Sanga vs Mito Hollyhock?

Kyoto Sanga score 1.50 goals per game on average and Mito Hollyhock 1.00. The J1 League average is 3.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Kyoto Sanga's matches and 100% of Mito Hollyhock's.

What form are Kyoto Sanga and Mito Hollyhock in?

Over the last 5 games Kyoto Sanga have a 0-1-1 record (0.50 points per game) and Mito Hollyhock 0-1-1 (0.50 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kyoto Sanga vs Mito Hollyhock?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.