Kazakhstan - Kazakhstan Premier LeagueData current as of 06 September 2026

Kyzyl-Zhar vs Altay: match statistics

Kyzyl-Zhar crest
Kyzyl-Zhar
1 : 2half-time 0:0
Altay crest
Altay

Kyzyl-Zhar vs Altay: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kyzyl-Zhar played Altay in Kazakhstan Premier League (Kazakhstan). The match was played on 17 May 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Kyzyl-Zhar: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Altay: 0-3-2, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kyzyl-Zhar scores 1.22 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Altay scores 0.33 and concedes 0.78. League average: 2.05 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kyzyl-Zhar 44%, Altay 33%. Over 2.5: Kyzyl-Zhar 56%, Altay 11%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

xG, shots and style

Kyzyl-Zhar has higher xG: 1.13 vs 1.08. Kyzyl-Zhar: 9.7 shots per match, Altay: 9.7.

Match halves

Kyzyl-Zhar: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 1.11. Altay: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.22.

Goals by minute

Kyzyl-Zhar: 46-60 (4 goals). Altay: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kazakhstan Premier League: 2.05 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 34%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back a Kyzyl-Zhar win. The hosts average 1.8 goals per home match and convert 19% of shots into goals with 4.4 on-target shots per game, while Altay score only 0.5 goals away and have a 5% conversion rate. xG indicates similar creative output (Kyzyl-Zhar xG 1.17 at home vs Altay 1.22 away), but the visitors fail to turn that into goals — they keep a 0-goal return in 50% of away matches, whereas the hosts fail to score in only 20% of cases. Defensively the hosts concede 1.2 goals at home on average and Altay concede 1.0 away, yet Kyzyl-Zhar have a positive home goal difference (+3) and 20% clean sheets versus 0% for Altay on the road. Although Altay have 1.2 points per game in their last five matches compared to 0.6 for the hosts, Kyzyl-Zhar’s attacking efficiency and Altay’s poor away conversion lead me to rate the hosts with higher win probability.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Primary signals favor No BTTS: Kyzyl-Zhar averages only 0.2 goals per home game and keeps a clean sheet in 60% of home matches. Altay has a season BTTS rate of 50% and 0% clean sheets on the road, but their away scoring average is only 0.5, which limits the likelihood of both teams scoring simultaneously. xG data indicate moderate scoring chances: home xG 0.98 vs. away 1.22, and the league has a low goals-per-game average of 2.05 with a high clean sheet rate of 64%. Although Kyzyl-Zhar registered BTTS in 60% of their last 5 matches and conceded an average of 1.6 goals, this appears to be a short-term anomaly compared to the season-long 20% BTTS and 60% home clean sheets. Additionally, low shot and conversion numbers (home 2.4 shots on target and 2% conversion, away 3.5 shots on target and 5% conversion) confirm limited attacking efficiency, so I favor 'No' (No BTTS) as more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The model projects expected goals of 1.15 for home side Kyzyl-Zhar and 1.22 for away side Altay, totaling 2.37 goals. The calculation is based on xG: home attack xG 0.98, away attack xG 1.22, and xG against of 1.22 (Kyzyl-Zhar) and 1.31 (Altay), which yields these expected values. Altay clearly has the superior attacking quality: on average 11.0 shots and 3.5 shots on target with a 5.0% conversion rate, versus 8.6 shots, 2.4 shots on target and a 2.0% conversion for the hosts, increasing the likelihood of goals from the visitors. Seasonal metrics show few matches over 2.5 goals (Kyzyl-Zhar 20%, Altay 0%), but the last 5 matches produced 4 goals for the home team and 5 for the away, so the Poisson model translates the 2.37 expected goals into approximately a 69% chance of Over 1.5, 42% for Over 2.5 and 22% for Over 3.5. Given the xG advantage and higher volume of shooting opportunities, the best betting signal is Over 1.5 (over).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I project a half-time draw and a full-time draw (X/X) as the most likely scenario. Kyzyl-Zhar averages only 0.2 goals per match versus Altay’s 0.5, with xG of 0.98 for the home side and 1.22 for the visitors, indicating low goal output from both teams. The hosts have 60% clean sheets this season and 80% of halves without conceding at the break, and they draw 60% of their matches, so a high incidence of draws and low half-time scores is justified. Altay creates more opportunities (11.0 shots and 3.5 on target per match vs. the home side’s 8.6 and 2.4), so an alternative scenario is a half-time draw and an away turnaround to win (X/2), but their shot conversion rate of 5.0% does not provide a strong shift in momentum. Considering recent form over the last five matches (hosts: 'lwlll' = 1 win, 4 losses; visitors: 'dwldd' = 1 win, 3 draws, 1 loss), the strongest signal remains X/X.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
10Shots10
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
3Shots on target4
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
1.26xG1.17
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
4Corners2
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
58Dangerous attacks36
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
23Fouls10
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
3Cards1
Kyzyl-ZharAltay

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.22Goals scored / match0.33
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
1Goals conceded / match0.78
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
46%Average possession45%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
3.67Shots on target / match2.89
Kyzyl-ZharAltay

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.67Shots per match9.67
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
3.67Shots on target2.89
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
12.6%Shot conversion3.4%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
46%Possession45%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
1.13xG for1.08
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
1.26xG against1.26
Kyzyl-ZharAltay

Shooting quality

Kyzyl-Zhar: Counter-attackingAltay: Balanced
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
Accuracy (shots on target)38%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.11

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kyzyl-Zhar is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Kyzyl-Zhar · 0.6 pts / match - Altay

Kyzyl-Zhar
WWLLL
Season result split
33% W22% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-4
1.22 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.94Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Altay
LDDLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W56% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-5-4
0.56 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-3-2
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-2-2
Last 5 away
0-2-2
DLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.14Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kyzyl-Zhar is 270% better for: goals scored per match.

1.22 goals / match - Kyzyl-Zhar · 0.33 goals / match - Altay

Altay is 28% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Kyzyl-Zhar · 0.78 goals / match - Altay

Kyzyl-Zhar scoring profile: strong

Kyzyl-Zhar scores in 67% of matches (6 of 9 matches), while Altay keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 matches).

Altay scoring profile: mixed

Altay scores in 33% of matches (3 of 9 matches), while Kyzyl-Zhar keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 matches).

11Goals scored (season)3
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
9Goals conceded (season)7
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
2.22Average goals in match1.11
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
7Goals scored (last 5)2
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
Kyzyl-ZharAltay

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal33%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
33%2 goals0%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
11%3 goals0%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
11%4 goals0%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal67%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
33%2 goals11%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
0%3 goals0%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
0%4 goals0%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time11%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
11%Scored in both halves0%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS11%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
40%BTTS - last 540%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

44%Min. 1 goal before half-time56%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time11%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time44%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kyzyl-Zhar is 59% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.89 pts / match - Kyzyl-Zhar · 0.56 pts / match - Altay

Kyzyl-Zhar - half-time state
11% leading56% draw33% trailing
Altay - half-time state
0% leading56% draw44% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.89Points per match (1st half)0.56
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
0.11Goals scored (1st half)0.11
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
0.44Average goals (1st half)0.67
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
67%Clean sheet before half-time44%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
89%No goal before half-time89%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay

After half-time (2nd half)

1.44Points per match (2nd half)1.22
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
1.11Goals scored (2nd half)0.22
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)0.22
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
1.78Average goals (2nd half)0.44
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
56%Clean sheet after half-time78%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay
33%No goal after half-time78%
Kyzyl-ZharAltay

Kyzyl-Zhar - second-half results

33% W44% R22% P
8
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.89
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Altay - second-half results

22% W56% R22% P
5
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.56
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kyzyl-Zhar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.21.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.42.0
1 goal40%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Altay - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.20
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match0.80.4
1 goal60%40%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kyzyl-Zhar
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
4
2
46-60
2
1
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Altay
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
4
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.67
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
81%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
39%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
22%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kyzyl-Zhar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

Altay

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.75
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
40%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
67% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
67%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kazakhstan Premier League).

Teams vs league

Kyzyl-ZharLigaAltay
Average goals in match 2.222.05 1.11
Both teams scored 44%47% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%34% 11%
Clean sheets 33%32% 33%
Goal before half-time 44%58% 56%
Goal after half-time 78%68% 44%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.05
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
34%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.24
Home goals / match
0.82
Away goals / match
+51%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Kyzyl-ZharYellow cardNikita Gubarev
  2. AltaySubstitutionOn: Sergey IvanovOff: Dmitriy Shmidt
  3. Kyzyl-ZharYellow cardDamjan Krajišnik
  4. Kyzyl-ZharSubstitutionOn: Demiyat SlambekovOff: Olzhas Kerymzhanov
  5. AltaySubstitutionOn: Elisey GorshunovOff: Dragan Stoisavljević
  6. AltaySubstitutionOn: Jannur KökeevOff: Ibragim Dadayev
  7. AltayYellow cardNikola Jambor
  8. AltaySubstitutionOn: Denis MitrofanovOff: Nikola Jambor
  9. Kyzyl-ZharYellow cardDemiyat Slambekov

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Kyzyl-Zhar vs Altay?

The Kazakhstan Premier League match finished Kyzyl-Zhar 1:2 Altay. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Kyzyl-Zhar vs Altay?

Kyzyl-Zhar score 1.22 goals per game on average and Altay 0.33. The Kazakhstan Premier League average is 2.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Kyzyl-Zhar's matches and 33% of Altay's.

What form are Kyzyl-Zhar and Altay in?

Over the last 5 games Kyzyl-Zhar have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Altay 0-3-2 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kyzyl-Zhar vs Altay?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Kyzyl-Zhar vs Altay: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.