Kazakhstan - Kazakhstan Premier LeagueStadion KarasayData current as of 19 September 2026

Kyzyl-Zhar vs Kaisar: match statistics

Kyzyl-Zhar crest
Kyzyl-Zhar
1 : 1half-time 1:0
Kaisar crest
Kaisar

Kyzyl-Zhar vs Kaisar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Kyzyl-Zhar played Kaisar in Kazakhstan Premier League (Kazakhstan). The match was played on 18 September 2026. Venue: Stadion Karasay. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Kyzyl-Zhar: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. Kaisar: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Kyzyl-Zhar scores 1.08 and concedes 1.52 goals per match. Kaisar scores 0.84 and concedes 1.28. League average: 2.49 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Kyzyl-Zhar 52%, Kaisar 56%. Over 2.5: Kyzyl-Zhar 56%, Kaisar 36%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Kyzyl-Zhar: 10.8 shots per match, Kaisar: 11.0.

Match halves

Kyzyl-Zhar: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.76. Kaisar: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.28.

Goals by minute

Kyzyl-Zhar: 76-90+ (11 goals). Kaisar: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Kazakhstan Premier League: 2.49 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 1.33, BTTS 33%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Kyzyl-Zhar have a clear home advantage: they average 1.54 goals per match at home, while Kaisar score just 0.73 away from home. The hosts also create slightly better chances, as reflected by an average xG of 1.39 compared with the visitors’ 1.28, and register 4.92 shots on target per game versus 3.73 for their opponents. Kaisar fail to score in as many as 55% of their away matches, while Kyzyl-Zhar draw a blank at home in 23% of games. Both teams are in poor recent form, with the hosts failing to win any of their last 5 matches and the visitors losing 4 of their last 5. However, Kyzyl-Zhar’s attacking edge and Kaisar’s weaker away defence, which concedes an average of 1.55 goals, point towards a narrow home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for BTTS - Yes is not weak, as both teams have recorded this scenario in 60% of their last 5 matches, while their current average xG stands at 1.45 and 1.63, respectively. However, the key argument against it is their limited finishing efficiency: Kyzyl-Zhar score an average of 0.93 goals per match, compared with just 0.73 for Kaisar, with shot conversion rates of 8% and 7%, respectively. Kaisar have failed to score in 55% of their matches this season, while Kyzyl-Zhar have kept a clean sheet in 36% of games, significantly increasing the risk that the visitors will remain scoreless. Although the hosts have conceded an average of 2.0 goals in their last 5 appearances, they have scored only 4 goals themselves during this period, making the outcome in which at least one team fails to score more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The seasonal profiles of both teams point to a moderate number of goals: Kyzyl-Zhar average 0.93 goals scored, while Kaisar average 0.73, although the visitors concede as many as 1.55 goals per match. In their last five games, both defenses have clearly declined, with the hosts conceding 10 goals and the visitors 11, raising the forecast to around 2.55 goals. At the same time, both teams have exceeded the 2.5-goal line in only 36% of their matches this season, well below the league average of 48%. The strongest signal comes from the 3.5 line: Kyzyl-Zhar matches have finished below it in 86% of cases, while Kaisar matches have done so in as many as 91%. Even with both teams showing improved attacking form recently, a result with a maximum of three goals remains more likely than an open game producing four or more goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most logical starting point: Kyzyl-Zhar were level at the break in 50% of their home matches, while Kaisar recorded a half-time draw in 36% of their away fixtures. The first half should be low-scoring, as the hosts average 0.64 goals scored and 0.43 conceded before the break, while the visitors score 0.45 goals. After the interval, however, the form advantage shifts towards Kaisar: across their last five matches, they averaged 1.0 goals after half-time, while Kyzyl-Zhar conceded 1.6 goals during the same period. The hosts have failed to win any of their last five matches, losing three of them, whereas Kaisar won the second half in 40% of this sample, compared with just 0% for Kyzyl-Zhar. Therefore, the most likely scenario is a level score at half-time, followed by a slight shift in the result in favour of the visitors.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

42Possession (%)58
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
10Shots13
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
4Shots on target4
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
1.12xG1.42
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
4Corners8
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
29Dangerous attacks45
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
-1Fouls-1
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
2Cards1
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.08Goals scored / match0.84
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
1.52Goals conceded / match1.28
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
44%Average possession46%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
4.08Shots on target / match3.8
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.76Shots per match10.96
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
4.08Shots on target3.8
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
10%Shot conversion7.7%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
44%Possession46%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
1.25xG for1.25
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
1.54xG against1.54
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar

Shooting quality

Kyzyl-Zhar: BalancedKaisar: Balanced
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
Accuracy (shots on target)38%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.22

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Kaisar is 50% better for: last-5 form.

0.4 pts / match - Kyzyl-Zhar · 0.6 pts / match - Kaisar

Kyzyl-Zhar
DDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
24% W24% D52% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-13
0.96 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-6
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
LDWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Kaisar
LLLLW
Season result split
16% W44% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-11-10
0.92 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.60BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kyzyl-Zhar is 29% better for: goals scored per match.

1.08 goals / match - Kyzyl-Zhar · 0.84 goals / match - Kaisar

Kaisar is 19% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.52 goals / match - Kyzyl-Zhar · 1.28 goals / match - Kaisar

Kyzyl-Zhar scoring profile: strong

Kyzyl-Zhar scores in 60% of matches (15 of 25 matches), while Kaisar keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 matches).

Kaisar scoring profile: strong

Kaisar scores in 60% of matches (15 of 25 matches), while Kyzyl-Zhar keeps a clean sheet in 16% (4 of 25 matches).

27Goals scored (season)21
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
38Goals conceded (season)32
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
2.6Average goals in match2.12
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
4Goals scored (last 5)6
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
10Goals conceded (last 5)10
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal60%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
32%2 goals24%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
12%3 goals0%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
4%4 goals0%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar

How often they concede at least...

84%1 goal76%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
48%2 goals36%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
16%3 goals16%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
4%4 goals0%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

16%BTTS at half-time24%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
0%BTTS in both halves12%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
16%Scored in both halves16%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS32%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
60%BTTS - last 560%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

44%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
16%Min. 2 goals before half-time32%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time12%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar

2nd half

84%Min. 1 goal after half-time64%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
68%Min. 2 goals after half-time28%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
32%Min. 3 goals after half-time8%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kaisar is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.08 pts / match - Kyzyl-Zhar · 1.28 pts / match - Kaisar

Kyzyl-Zhar - half-time state
12% leading72% draw16% trailing
Kaisar - half-time state
28% leading44% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.08Points per match (1st half)1.28
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.56
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
0.36Goals conceded (1st half)0.56
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
0.68Average goals (1st half)1.12
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
68%Clean sheet before half-time56%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
72%No goal before half-time52%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar

After half-time (2nd half)

0.92Points per match (2nd half)0.84
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.28
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
1.16Goals conceded (2nd half)0.72
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
1.92Average goals (2nd half)1
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
32%Clean sheet after half-time48%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar
52%No goal after half-time72%
Kyzyl-ZharKaisar

Kyzyl-Zhar - second-half results

20% W32% D48% L
27
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.08
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kaisar - second-half results

12% W48% D40% L
32
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.28
PPG before half-time
Lead holding57%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 16%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kyzyl-Zhar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.20
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.6
Average goals in match0.82.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0-6
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Kaisar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match1.61.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Kyzyl-Zhar
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
2
0
16-30
5
4
31-45
5
6
46-60
3
7
61-75
11
16
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

Kaisar
ScoredConceded
6
7
0-15
1
5
16-30
7
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
4
6
61-75
2
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.36
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
95%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
54%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-44%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
36%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Kyzyl-Zhar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.02
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
75%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
145%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
41% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
41%

Kaisar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
89%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
10% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
10%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kazakhstan Premier League).

Teams vs league

Kyzyl-ZharLigaKaisar
Average goals in match 2.602.49 2.12
Both teams scored 52%53% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%48% 36%
Clean sheets 16%27% 24%
Goal before half-time 44%67% 68%
Goal after half-time 84%74% 64%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.49
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.44
Home goals / match
1.05
Away goals / match
+37%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Kyzyl-ZharAssistJóannes BjartalíðGoal: Stefan Bukorac
  2. KaisarYellow cardErsultan Kaldybekov
  3. Kyzyl-ZharSubstitutionOn: Yuriy PertsukhOff: Stéphane Cédric Bahoken
  4. KaisarSubstitutionOn: Nurdaulet AgzambayevOff: Ramazan Bagdat
  5. KaisarSubstitutionOn: Agostinho Azevedo MagalhãesOff: Imoh Ezekiel
  6. Kyzyl-ZharYellow cardLiridon Latifi
  7. Kyzyl-ZharSubstitutionOn: Gleb ValgushevOff: Aybol Abiken
  8. Kyzyl-ZharYellow cardArtem Cheredinov

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Kyzyl-Zhar 1 - 1 - 1 Kaisar. Average goals 1.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.

Kaisar
0 : 0
Kyzyl-Zhar
FK Kaisar Kyzylorda
1 : 0
FK Kyzyl-Zhar SK Petropavlovsk
FK Kyzyl-Zhar SK Petropavlovsk
2 : 1
FK Kaisar Kyzylorda

FAQ

What was the result of Kyzyl-Zhar vs Kaisar?

The Kazakhstan Premier League match finished Kyzyl-Zhar 1:1 Kaisar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Kyzyl-Zhar and Kaisar?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Kyzyl-Zhar won 1, Kaisar won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Kyzyl-Zhar vs Kaisar?

Kyzyl-Zhar score 1.08 goals per game on average and Kaisar 0.84. The Kazakhstan Premier League average is 2.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Kyzyl-Zhar's matches and 56% of Kaisar's.

What form are Kyzyl-Zhar and Kaisar in?

Over the last 5 games Kyzyl-Zhar have a 0-2-3 record (0.40 points per game) and Kaisar 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kyzyl-Zhar vs Kaisar?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.