Kyzyl-Zhar vs Tobol: match statistics
Kyzyl-Zhar vs Tobol: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Kyzyl-Zhar played Tobol in Kazakhstan Premier League (Kazakhstan). The match was played on 18 July 2026. Venue: Stadion Karasay. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Kyzyl-Zhar: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Tobol: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Kyzyl-Zhar scores 1.00 and concedes 1.47 goals per match. Tobol scores 1.12 and concedes 1.47. League average: 2.26 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Kyzyl-Zhar 41%, Tobol 59%. Over 2.5: Kyzyl-Zhar 53%, Tobol 53%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 42%.
xG, shots and style
Tobol has higher xG: 1.55 vs 1.13. Kyzyl-Zhar: 9.5 shots per match, Tobol: 13.3.
Match halves
Kyzyl-Zhar: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.76. Tobol: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.59.
Goals by minute
Kyzyl-Zhar: 76-90+ (6 goals). Tobol: 0-15 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Kazakhstan Premier League: 2.26 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 42%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-3. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Tobol holds a clear form advantage: in the last 5 matches they have won 3, lost 2 and scored 9 goals, averaging 1.8 points per match, whereas Kyzyl-Zhar have lost all 5 recent fixtures, scoring only 2 goals and conceding 12 (an average of 2.4 goals conceded per match) and collecting 0 points in that period. At home Kyzyl-Zhar averages 1.67 goals and xG 1.26 with 4.56 shots on target and a conversion rate of 16%, but also concedes 1.67 goals per match; the visitors on the road generate a similar xG of 1.33 and more attempts (11.89 shots), yet score only 0.56 goals per match on average and have a low conversion of 5%. Tobol additionally maintains higher possession (53% vs 48%) and has been earning more points recently (1.8 vs 0 points per match), which translates into better game control and chance creation. On the other hand Kyzyl-Zhar have a lower share of home matches without scoring (22% vs 44% for Tobol away) and a better home conversion, but a run of 5 straight losses and 12 goals conceded is a significant burden. Considering Tobol’s momentum (9 vs 2 goals over 5 matches) and the hosts’ dreadful run, I tip the away win; therefore I assign 55% probability to Tobol, 25% to a draw and 20% to Kyzyl-Zhar.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have seasonal BTTS rates of 63% (Kyzyl-Zhar) and 56% (Tobol), giving a base around 60% and exceeding the league average of 50%. Home xG is 1.84 with xG against 1.47, while the visitors have 1.33 xG and 1.55 xG against; both sides also generate 4.88 and 3.33 average shots on target per match, which favors goal situations. The main counter-risk is the home form — in the last 5 matches Kyzyl-Zhar scored only 2 goals (0.4 per match) and had BTTS in 20% of games, so their scoring ability is recently limited. Tobol scored 9 goals in their last 5 matches (1.8 per match) and recorded BTTS in 60% of those games, although seasonally the visitors failed to score in 44% of matches, introducing instability. Overall, weighting seasonal 63%+56%, solid xG and the advantage in chance creation, I favour the BTTS "Yes" scenario with an estimated 65% vs 35% for "No".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG and defensive metrics, I estimate ~1.70 goals for Kyzyl‑Zhar (home xG 1.84 vs Tobol average conceded 1.55) and 1.40 for Tobol (away xG 1.33 vs home conceded 1.47), totaling ~3.10 goals. Season shares of matches over 1.5 goals are 88% for the home side and 67% for the away side, supporting a high probability for Over 1.5; with an expected total of 3.10 this yields an estimated ~82% for Over 1.5. For the 2.5 line, the home team records Over2.5 in 63% of matches, the away team 44%, and our calculations place Over2.5 at about 60% (above the league average of 42%). The 3.5 line has weaker support: seasonally 38% (home) vs 11% (away), and calculated Over3.5 is ~38% (under 62%). I select Over 1.5 as the best pick due to the high 82% probability, expected total of 3.10, both teams' strong BTTS rates (63% and 56%), and the home side averaging 15 shots with a 12% conversion rate.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seasonal statistics show a clear advantage for Kyzyl-Zhar: the home side averages 1.75 goals per match with an xG of 1.84 and a 63% win rate, whereas Tobol manages only 0.56 goals per match and a 0% win rate (xG 1.33). At Half-Time Kyzyl-Zhar are level in 75% of their games and score an average of 0.63 goals by the break, while Tobol have 0.44 first-half goals, which raises the probability of a draw at Half-Time. In the second half the hosts are proactive: they have scored 5 goals in minutes 46–60 and average 1.13 goals after the break, whereas Tobol have 0 goals in that segment, favoring turnarounds after Half-Time. Additionally, Kyzyl-Zhar register on average 4.88 shots on target with a 12% conversion rate versus 3.33 and 5% for the visitors, and points per game stand at 2.13 for the hosts versus 0.11 for Tobol, so the qualitative superiority and second-half efficiency favor the home team. The strongest scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a home victory at Full-Time (X/1): I assign it a 42% probability, with 21% for 1/1 and 21% for X/X.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Kyzyl-Zhar | Tobol | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tobol is 12% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Kyzyl-Zhar · 1.12 goals / match - Tobol
Kyzyl-Zhar scores in 53% of matches (9 of 17 matches), while Tobol keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 matches).
Tobol scores in 71% of matches (12 of 17 matches), while Kyzyl-Zhar keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Kyzyl-Zhar
Over / Under - Tobol
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tobol is 22% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.06 pts / match - Kyzyl-Zhar · 1.29 pts / match - Tobol
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Kyzyl-Zhar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Tobol - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -10 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Kyzyl-Zhar
Tobol
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kazakhstan Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Kyzyl-Zhar | Liga | Tobol | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.47 | 2.26 | ▲ 2.59 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 41% | 50% | ▲ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 42% | ▲ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 24% | 31% | ▼ 12% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 35% | 61% | ▼ 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 82% | 69% | ▲ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Other recorded players
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Kyzyl-Zhar 0 - 0 - 3 Tobol. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Kyzyl-Zhar vs Tobol?
The Kazakhstan Premier League match finished Kyzyl-Zhar 1:1 Tobol. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Kyzyl-Zhar and Tobol?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Kyzyl-Zhar won 0, Tobol won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Kyzyl-Zhar vs Tobol?
Kyzyl-Zhar score 1.00 goals per game on average and Tobol 1.12. The Kazakhstan Premier League average is 2.26 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Kyzyl-Zhar's matches and 59% of Tobol's.
What form are Kyzyl-Zhar and Tobol in?
Over the last 5 games Kyzyl-Zhar have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Tobol 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Kyzyl-Zhar vs Tobol?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


