LA Galaxy II vs Colorado Rapids II: match statistics
LA Galaxy II vs Colorado Rapids II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
LA Galaxy II played Colorado Rapids II in MLS Next Pro (United States). The match was played on 14 June 2026. Venue: HDC University Field 1. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
LA Galaxy II: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Colorado Rapids II: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
LA Galaxy II scores 1.73 and concedes 1.47 goals per match. Colorado Rapids II scores 0.77 and concedes 2.31. League average: 3.24 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: LA Galaxy II 67%, Colorado Rapids II 62%. Over 2.5: LA Galaxy II 60%, Colorado Rapids II 54%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 65%.
xG, shots and style
LA Galaxy II has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.39. LA Galaxy II: 13.5 shots per match, Colorado Rapids II: 11.0.
Match halves
LA Galaxy II: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.13. Colorado Rapids II: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.15.
Goals by minute
LA Galaxy II: 61-75 (7 goals). Colorado Rapids II: 31-45+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
MLS Next Pro: 3.24 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 65%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 5.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win. LA Galaxy II score an average of 2.14 goals per home match and concede 1.57, while Colorado Rapids II average just 0.5 goals away and concede 2.17. In the last 5 fixtures the hosts have scored 10 goals and average 1.4 points per match, whereas the visitors have scored 2 goals and collect only 0.2 points per match, clearly illustrating the form gap. Chance quality also favors the hosts: their home xG is 1.87 versus the visitors’ 1.37 xG, and shot conversion is 14% vs 5% for Rapids; additionally the hosts record 6.57 shots on target per match vs 4.33 for the opponents. On top of that Rapids have 0% away wins and 67% of away matches without scoring, while the hosts convert 57% of home matches into wins, giving LA Galaxy II a clear advantage.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes because LA Galaxy II have a seasonal BTTS rate of 86% and have recorded no clean sheets (0%), meaning 86% of their home matches saw both teams score. Colorado Rapids II, while showing a seasonal BTTS of only 33% and averaging 0.5 goals per game (10 goals in the season), concede an average of 2.17 goals per game and in their last 5 matches have xG_for 1.56, so they create chances they don’t always finish. xG analysis shows the hosts with xG_for 1.41 against a seasonal conceded average of 2.43 and xG_against 2.08, while the visitors have xG_for 1.37 and xG_against 1.59; these values, together with 4.71 shots on target per game for the hosts and 4.33 SOT for the visitors, point to scoring opportunities from both sides. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 10 goals (2.0 per game) and the visitors only 2 (0.4 per game), which increases the likelihood of the hosts scoring, while Colorado’s low conversion rate (5%) may be offset by their xG ~1.37. In summary, a strong BTTS signal from the hosts (86% seasonally, 80% in the last 5) and a lack of clean sheets for both teams leads me to rate 70% on 'yes' and 30% on 'no'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project 1.50 goals for LA Galaxy II and 1.73 for Colorado Rapids II, totaling 3.23 goals. The calculation is based on the average xG of the home attack 1.41 and xG conceded by Rapids 1.59 (->1.50), and xG of the Rapids attack 1.37 and xG conceded by the hosts 2.08 (->1.73). Both teams have 100% of their season matches with over 1.5 goals, while the league average is 3.21, therefore I rate Over 1.5 very highly (96%). Over 2.5 also has solid chances: the hosts have 71% of matches >2.5 (last 5: 80%), the visitors 33% (last 5: 20%), which combined with the xG total of 3.23 suggests roughly a 64% probability for Over 2.5. I price Over 3.5 at about 41% due to high average goals conceded (hosts 2.43, visitors 2.17) but limited visitor finishing (5% shot conversion and 0.4 goals in the last 5 matches), therefore the best selection is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is 1/1 (home team leads at Half-Time and wins at Full-Time), because LA Galaxy II led at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches (60%), while Colorado Rapids II did not lead in any of those five (0%). The home side average 0.71 goals by Half-Time versus 0.5 for the visitors, and over the last 5 matches they have a goals-per-game average of 2.0 compared to 0.4 for their opponents, which, combined with xG of 1.41 for LA versus 1.37 for Colorado, indicates an offensive advantage for the hosts. Although the hosts concede a high volume of opponent chances (xG against 2.08) and in 86% of their home games both teams have scored, the first-half metrics and superior recent form over the last 5 matches (average first-half points 2.0 for the home team vs 0.4 for the visitors) support maintaining the lead at the break and through to full-time. Therefore the strongest signal from the data is 1/1, with a lower probability of a draw or a turnaround by the visitors.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| LA Galaxy II | Colorado Rapids II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.17 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
LA Galaxy II is 600% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - LA Galaxy II · 0.2 pts / match - Colorado Rapids II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
LA Galaxy II is 125% better for: goals scored per match.
1.73 goals / match - LA Galaxy II · 0.77 goals / match - Colorado Rapids II
LA Galaxy II is 57% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.47 goals / match - LA Galaxy II · 2.31 goals / match - Colorado Rapids II
LA Galaxy II scores in 87% of matches (13 of 15 matches), while Colorado Rapids II keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 13 matches).
Colorado Rapids II scores in 62% of matches (8 of 13 matches), while LA Galaxy II keeps a clean sheet in 27% (4 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - LA Galaxy II
Over / Under - Colorado Rapids II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
LA Galaxy II is 53% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.53 pts / match - LA Galaxy II · 1 pts / match - Colorado Rapids II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
LA Galaxy II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Colorado Rapids II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
LA Galaxy II
Colorado Rapids II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS Next Pro).
Teams vs league
| LA Galaxy II | Liga | Colorado Rapids II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.20 | 3.24 | ▼ 3.08 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 62% | • 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 60% | 65% | ▼ 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 27% | 21% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 75% | ▲ 85% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 87% | 83% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: LA Galaxy II 1 - 0 - 0 Colorado Rapids II. Average goals 5.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of LA Galaxy II vs Colorado Rapids II?
The MLS Next Pro match finished LA Galaxy II 1:1 Colorado Rapids II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before LA Galaxy II vs Colorado Rapids II?
LA Galaxy II score 1.73 goals per game on average and Colorado Rapids II 0.77. The MLS Next Pro average is 3.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 67% of LA Galaxy II's matches and 62% of Colorado Rapids II's.
What form are LA Galaxy II and Colorado Rapids II in?
Over the last 5 games LA Galaxy II have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Colorado Rapids II 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for LA Galaxy II vs Colorado Rapids II?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


