Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 06 September 2026

Lahti vs HJK: match statistics

Lahti crest
Lahti
2 : 0half-time 1:0
HJK crest
HJK

Lahti vs HJK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lahti played HJK in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 11 July 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Lahti: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. HJK: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lahti scores 1.14 and concedes 1.07 goals per match. HJK scores 1.79 and concedes 1.21. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lahti 50%, HJK 43%. Over 2.5: Lahti 36%, HJK 57%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

HJK has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.40. Lahti: 12.4 shots per match, HJK: 13.6.

Match halves

Lahti: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.43. HJK: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 1.14.

Goals by minute

Lahti: 0-15 (4 goals). HJK: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the away win (HJK) because their offensive metrics and recent form are clearly superior: HJK have scored 25 goals this season versus Lahti’s 16 and have 14 goals in the last 5 matches compared to 4 for the hosts. The visitors average 2 points in their last 5 games, while Lahti average 1 point with a 1-2-2 record in that period. HJK show higher shooting efficiency at 16% versus Lahti’s 11% and score 2.14 goals per away match compared to Lahti’s 1.5 at home; xG are similar (1.58 for HJK vs 1.54 for Lahti), suggesting an edge for the visitors in finishing. Lahti, however, defend solidly at home — average xG against 1.07, only 1 goal conceded per game and 38% clean sheets, but HJK are less likely to be shut out (14% matches without scoring for HJK vs 25% for Lahti). Given the clearer goal production and superior recent form, I assign HJK a 58% chance to win, 22% for a draw and 20% for a Lahti win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I pick BTTS - Yes as the more likely scenario because HJK scores on average 2.14 goals per season and 2.8 goals in the last 5 matches, while Lahti scores 1.43 goals per season and only 0.8 goals in their last five matches. As the away team HJK has a season BTTS rate of 57% and 60% in the last 5, whereas Lahti at home has BTTS only 29% seasonally and 40% in the last 5, which gives mixed signals but the visitors’ offensive advantage is clear. Looking at xG, Lahti generates 1.6 xG per match against HJK’s xG conceded of 1.42, so Lahti has a realistic chance to score; simultaneously HJK has 1.69 xG in the last 5 matches versus 1.34 xG conceded by Lahti, suggesting the visitors are also likely to find the net. Both teams average around 13.7 shots and 4.43 on target per match, but HJK converts better (16% vs 10%) and has 25 goals scored in the season versus Lahti’s 16; Lahti keeps a clean sheet in 43% of matches and HJK in 29%, meaning Lahti more often doesn’t concede, but this does not neutralize HJK’s offensive edge. Considering the league BTTS level of 53% and the fact HJK concedes on average 2.0 goals in the last 5 matches (Lahti concedes 1.0), I estimate the probability of BTTS at 65% versus 35% for No Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on offensive and defensive data I estimate expected goals at 1.51 for Lahti (xG attack 1.60 vs opponent xG defense 1.42) and 1.61 for HJK (xG attack 1.58 vs opponent xG defense 1.63), giving total xG ≈ 3.12. From the distribution for a mean of 3.12, the probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) is about 82%, at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) about 60%, and at least 4 goals (Over 3.5) about 38%. Season metrics confirm the attacking potential: both teams have 57% of matches over 2.5 goals, and HJK has 100% of matches over 2.5 in the last 5, which boosts the chances of more goals. Shots are similar (avg 13.71 for Lahti vs 13.57 for HJK) and both average 4.43 shots on target per match, with HJK having a higher conversion rate 16% versus Lahti’s 10% — this increases the likelihood of chances being converted. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 (82%), so I recommend the over side on the 1.5 line as the most likely and safest choice; Over 2.5 (~60%) can be an additional, higher-risk option.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistics favor the visitors: HJK averages 2.14 goals scored per match versus Lahti's 1.43, while HJK concedes 1.00 goal per match and Lahti 1.43. Despite similar xG (Lahti 1.60 vs HJK 1.58), HJK converts chances into goals significantly better (conversion rate 16% vs 10%), which boosts their efficiency. HJK led at half-time in 43% of their season matches, Lahti only in 29%, and half-time points are 11 for HJK versus 8 for Lahti (averages 1.57 vs 1.14), so a lead at the break for the visitors after 45 minutes is a meaningful signal. At least one goal is scored before half-time in 86% of both teams' matches, and in the last 5 games HJK have won 60% of matches compared to Lahti's 20%, therefore the strongest pick is HT/FT 2/2 with X/2 as the second most likely outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

49Possession (%)51
LahtiHJK
8Shots7
LahtiHJK
2Shots on target3
LahtiHJK
0.91xG1
LahtiHJK
6Corners3
LahtiHJK
35Dangerous attacks47
LahtiHJK
10Fouls13
LahtiHJK
2Cards0
LahtiHJK

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.14Goals scored / match1.79
LahtiHJK
1.07Goals conceded / match1.21
LahtiHJK
56%Average possession52%
LahtiHJK
4.07Shots on target / match4.43
LahtiHJK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.43Shots per match13.64
LahtiHJK
4.07Shots on target4.43
LahtiHJK
9.2%Shot conversion13.1%
LahtiHJK
56%Possession52%
LahtiHJK
1.4xG for1.59
LahtiHJK
1.26xG against1.52
LahtiHJK

Shooting quality

Lahti: BalancedHJK: Efficient finishing
LahtiHJK
Accuracy (shots on target)33%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

HJK is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Lahti · 2 pts / match - HJK

Lahti
LLDDW
Season result split
29% W29% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-6
1.14 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.52Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
HJK
WWDWL
Season result split
43% W29% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-4-4
1.57 pts / match · goal difference +8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-2
Last 5 away
2-1-2
DLLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.84Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

HJK is 57% better for: goals scored per match.

1.14 goals / match - Lahti · 1.79 goals / match - HJK

Lahti is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.07 goals / match - Lahti · 1.21 goals / match - HJK

Lahti scoring profile: strong

Lahti scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while HJK keeps a clean sheet in 36% (5 of 14 matches).

HJK scoring profile: very strong

HJK scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Lahti keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).

16Goals scored (season)25
LahtiHJK
15Goals conceded (season)17
LahtiHJK
2.21Average goals in match3
LahtiHJK
4Goals scored (last 5)13
LahtiHJK
5Goals conceded (last 5)9
LahtiHJK

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal79%
LahtiHJK
21%2 goals43%
LahtiHJK
7%3 goals36%
LahtiHJK
7%4 goals14%
LahtiHJK

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal64%
LahtiHJK
29%2 goals36%
LahtiHJK
7%3 goals14%
LahtiHJK
0%4 goals7%
LahtiHJK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time29%
LahtiHJK
7%BTTS in both halves14%
LahtiHJK
14%Scored in both halves43%
LahtiHJK

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS29%
LahtiHJK
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS29%
LahtiHJK
40%BTTS - last 540%
LahtiHJK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
LahtiHJK
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time29%
LahtiHJK
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
LahtiHJK

2nd half

64%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
LahtiHJK
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
LahtiHJK
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
LahtiHJK

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lahti - half-time state
29% leading50% draw21% trailing
HJK - half-time state
36% leading29% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per match (1st half)1.36
LahtiHJK
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.64
LahtiHJK
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.64
LahtiHJK
1.14Average goals (1st half)1.29
LahtiHJK
64%Clean sheet before half-time50%
LahtiHJK
50%No goal before half-time36%
LahtiHJK

After half-time (2nd half)

0.93Points per match (2nd half)1.79
LahtiHJK
0.43Goals scored (2nd half)1.14
LahtiHJK
0.64Goals conceded (2nd half)0.57
LahtiHJK
1.07Average goals (2nd half)1.71
LahtiHJK
50%Clean sheet after half-time64%
LahtiHJK
64%No goal after half-time43%
LahtiHJK

Lahti - second-half results

14% W50% R36% P
19
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
13
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

HJK - second-half results

50% W29% R21% P
19
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Lahti - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.41.4
1 goal20%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
HJK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.802.40
Goals scored / match0.62.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.62.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%80%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-2+6
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lahti
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
3
1
16-30
3
4
31-45
3
2
46-60
3
3
61-75
0
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

HJK
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
3
4
16-30
5
2
31-45
5
3
46-60
4
3
61-75
7
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.60
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-62%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lahti

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.14
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

HJK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.51
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.31
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
158%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.43
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
28% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
28%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

LahtiLigaHJK
Average goals in match 2.212.67 3.00
Both teams scored 50%53% 43%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 36%47% 57%
Clean sheets 29%26% 36%
Goal before half-time 64%74% 86%
Goal after half-time 64%79% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.13
Away goals / match
+36%
Home attack advantage
+27%
Home defence advantage
+27%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LahtiYellow cardJosé Claro Müller
  2. LahtiGoalOtso KoskinenAssist: Mamodou Sarr
  3. LahtiYellow cardNicolas Gianini Dantas
  4. LahtiSubstitutionOn: Erik AnderssonOff: Otso Koskinen
  5. HJKSubstitutionOn: Lassi LappalainenOff: Liam Möller
  6. LahtiYellow cardRomaric Yapi
  7. LahtiSubstitutionOn: Amir BelabidOff: Martim Augusto Ferreira
  8. HJKSubstitutionOn: Pyry MentuOff: Lucas Lingman
  9. LahtiSubstitutionOn: Joel LehtonenOff: Romaric Yapi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Lahti 0 - 0 - 1 HJK. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Lahti vs HJK?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Lahti 2:0 HJK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lahti vs HJK?

Lahti score 1.14 goals per game on average and HJK 1.79. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Lahti's matches and 43% of HJK's.

What form are Lahti and HJK in?

Over the last 5 games Lahti have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and HJK 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lahti vs HJK?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Lahti vs HJK: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.