Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 06 September 2026

Lahti vs SJK: match statistics

Lahti crest
Lahti
2 : 3half-time 1:1
SJK crest
SJK

Lahti vs SJK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lahti played SJK in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 13 June 2026. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

Lahti: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. SJK: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lahti scores 1.33 and concedes 1.11 goals per match. SJK scores 0.89 and concedes 1.56. League average: 2.42 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lahti 56%, SJK 44%. Over 2.5: Lahti 44%, SJK 44%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 40%.

xG, shots and style

SJK has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.34. Lahti: 11.6 shots per match, SJK: 13.7.

Match halves

Lahti: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.33. SJK: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Lahti: 0-15 (4 goals). SJK: 76-90+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.42 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 40%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the home win (1). Lahti averages 12 shots and 4.4 on target per home match, translating to 1.8 goals per game and a 15% conversion rate, whereas SJK away averages 9.25 shots, 3.5 on target and only 0.5 goals per game with a 5% conversion. Defensively Lahti concedes 1.0 goals at home on average (xG against 1.03), while SJK concedes 2.0 away with xG against 1.82, indicating greater risk from the visitors on goal-scoring situations. In the last 5 matches Lahti scored 10 goals and averages 1.4 points per game, while SJK scored 9 goals in their last 5 but only 0.6 points per game and have 75% of away matches without scoring. Key home advantages are superior conversion rate (15% vs 5%), more shots on target (4.4 vs 3.5) and lower xG against (1.03 vs 1.82); therefore I rate Lahti’s chances higher.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal against the BTTS - Yes option is that SJK fails to score in 75% of matches season-to-date and averages only 0.5 goals per game, while Lahti averages 1.2 goals and fails to score in 20% of fixtures. Lahti creates significantly more opportunities: 17.2 shots and 5.6 on target per match versus SJK’s 9.25/3.5, and Lahti’s xG is 1.98 compared to SJK’s average xG conceded of 1.82, indicating a home advantage in chance creation. In the short term SJK has improved — BTTS in the last 5 matches is 60% for both teams, with SJK averaging 1.8 goals and xG 2.13 in that sample, so SJK’s scoring probability rises. Considering the greater weight of season-long figures (seasonal BTTS Lahti 60% vs SJK 25% and SJK’s high share of matches without a goal at 75%) and SJK’s low conversion rate (around 5%), the No Goal scenario appears more likely; therefore I assess 30% for Yes and 70% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Lahti has a clear advantage in chance creation: the home side’s xG is 1.98 versus the xG that SJK concedes of 1.82, and Lahti averages 17.2 shots and 5.6 on target per match compared to SJK’s 9.25 and 3.5. Although Lahti scores 1.2 goals per season on average, relatively low finishing (conversion 7.0%) warrants adjustment and I project 1.62 goals for the hosts. SJK has an xG of 1.21, scores 0.5 goals seasonally and has a conversion of 5.0%, so I project 0.98 goals for the visitors, giving a total of 2.60. Additionally, 80% of Lahti’s matches and 75% of SJK’s matches this season have finished over 1.5 goals, and in the last 5 fixtures both teams frequently exceeded the 2.5 line (last 5: Lahti 60% over 2.5, SJK 80% over 2.5). Therefore the strongest and most likely pick is Over 1.5; Over 2.5 has moderate support (58%), while Over 3.5 remains unlikely (22%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

I select the 2/1 scenario (Lahti trailing at Half-Time but winning at Full-Time) as the most likely outcome. Lahti average only 0.2 goals scored and concede 1.0 goal by the break, and were behind at halftime in 4 of 5 home matches (80%), so being down after the first 45 minutes is common. After the break the hosts are markedly stronger: they score an average of 1.0 goal in second halves, have accumulated 11 points in second halves (an average of 2.2 points per second half) and have won 60% of matches decided after the break, whereas SJK score only 0.25 goals after halftime and average 0.25 points in second halves. Additionally Lahti have higher xG (1.98 vs 1.21), more shots on target (5.6 vs 3.5) and a season goals-per-game average of 1.2 versus 0.5 for SJK, while the visitors concede 2.0 goals per match on average, which confirms the hosts’ advantage in chance creation and the possibility of a turnaround; therefore 2/1 is assigned the highest probability (35%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

62Possession (%)38
LahtiSJK
17Shots10
LahtiSJK
6Shots on target7
LahtiSJK
1.9xG1.34
LahtiSJK
8Corners2
LahtiSJK
56Dangerous attacks29
LahtiSJK
14Fouls7
LahtiSJK
3Cards1
LahtiSJK

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.33Goals scored / match0.89
LahtiSJK
1.11Goals conceded / match1.56
LahtiSJK
54%Average possession55%
LahtiSJK
4.11Shots on target / match4.67
LahtiSJK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.56Shots per match13.67
LahtiSJK
4.11Shots on target4.67
LahtiSJK
11.5%Shot conversion6.5%
LahtiSJK
54%Possession55%
LahtiSJK
1.34xG for1.64
LahtiSJK
1.21xG against1.38
LahtiSJK

Shooting quality

Lahti: BalancedSJK: Balanced
LahtiSJK
Accuracy (shots on target)36%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.19

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lahti is 150% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Lahti · 0.4 pts / match - SJK

Lahti
LDDLW
Season result split
33% W22% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-4
1.22 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
LWDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.04BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
SJK
DDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
11% W33% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-5
0.67 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-3
Last 5 away
0-1-3
LLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.76Opponent xG: 1.33BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lahti is 49% better for: goals scored per match.

1.33 goals / match - Lahti · 0.89 goals / match - SJK

Lahti is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.11 goals / match - Lahti · 1.56 goals / match - SJK

Lahti scoring profile: very strong

Lahti scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while SJK keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 matches).

SJK scoring profile: strong

SJK scores in 56% of matches (5 of 9 matches), while Lahti keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 matches).

12Goals scored (season)8
LahtiSJK
10Goals conceded (season)14
LahtiSJK
2.44Average goals in match2.44
LahtiSJK
8Goals scored (last 5)4
LahtiSJK
5Goals conceded (last 5)8
LahtiSJK

How often they score at least...

78%1 goal56%
LahtiSJK
22%2 goals22%
LahtiSJK
11%3 goals11%
LahtiSJK
11%4 goals0%
LahtiSJK

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal78%
LahtiSJK
33%2 goals44%
LahtiSJK
0%3 goals33%
LahtiSJK
0%4 goals0%
LahtiSJK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

22%BTTS at half-time11%
LahtiSJK
0%BTTS in both halves11%
LahtiSJK
11%Scored in both halves22%
LahtiSJK

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS22%
LahtiSJK
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS22%
LahtiSJK
60%BTTS - last 560%
LahtiSJK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

89%Min. 1 goal before half-time89%
LahtiSJK
44%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
LahtiSJK
22%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
LahtiSJK

2nd half

56%Min. 1 goal after half-time78%
LahtiSJK
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
LahtiSJK
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
LahtiSJK

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lahti is 179% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.56 pts / match - Lahti · 0.56 pts / match - SJK

Lahti - half-time state
44% leading22% draw33% trailing
SJK - half-time state
11% leading22% draw67% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.56Points per match (1st half)0.56
LahtiSJK
1Goals scored (1st half)0.22
LahtiSJK
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.89
LahtiSJK
1.56Average goals (1st half)1.11
LahtiSJK
56%Clean sheet before half-time22%
LahtiSJK
33%No goal before half-time78%
LahtiSJK

After half-time (2nd half)

0.89Points per match (2nd half)1.33
LahtiSJK
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
LahtiSJK
0.56Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
LahtiSJK
0.89Average goals (2nd half)1.33
LahtiSJK
56%Clean sheet after half-time56%
LahtiSJK
78%No goal after half-time44%
LahtiSJK

Lahti - second-half results

11% W56% R33% P
14
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding75%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

SJK - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.56
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 11%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Lahti - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match1.20.4
Goals conceded / match0.80.2
Average goals in match2.00.6
1 goal100%40%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 6
SJK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-40
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lahti
ScoredConceded
4
0
0-15
2
1
16-30
3
4
31-45
1
1
46-60
2
3
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

SJK
ScoredConceded
0
5
0-15
1
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
2
5
46-60
1
0
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.45
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
44%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lahti

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.7
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

SJK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.26
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.93
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.75
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
92%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

LahtiLigaSJK
Average goals in match 2.442.42 2.44
Both teams scored 56%50% 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%40% 44%
Clean sheets 22%28% 22%
Goal before half-time 89%74% 89%
Goal after half-time 56%74% 78%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.42
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.45
Home goals / match
0.97
Away goals / match
+49%
Home attack advantage
+33%
Home defence advantage
+32%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LahtiYellow cardMamodou Sarr
  2. SJKYellow cardMarkus Arsalo
  3. LahtiSubstitutionOn: Erik AnderssonOff: Otso Koskinen
  4. LahtiYellow cardYohan Cassubie
  5. LahtiSubstitutionOn: Justus OjanenOff: Amir Belabid
  6. LahtiYellow cardRomaric Yapi

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Lahti vs SJK?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Lahti 2:3 SJK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lahti vs SJK?

Lahti score 1.33 goals per game on average and SJK 0.89. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.42 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Lahti's matches and 44% of SJK's.

What form are Lahti and SJK in?

Over the last 5 games Lahti have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and SJK 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lahti vs SJK?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Lahti vs SJK: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.