Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 11 September 2026

Lahti vs VPS: match statistics

Lahti crest
Lahti
1 : 1half-time 1:1
VPS crest
VPS

Lahti vs VPS: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lahti played VPS in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 18 May 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Lahti: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. VPS: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lahti scores 0.83 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. VPS scores 0.83 and concedes 0.67. League average: 2.30 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lahti 50%, VPS 33%. Over 2.5: Lahti 33%, VPS 17%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

VPS has higher xG: 1.37 vs 1.32. Lahti: 11.7 shots per match, VPS: 11.3.

Match halves

Lahti: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.17. VPS: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

Lahti: 31-45+ (2 goals). VPS: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.30 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

VPS enters this match as a slight favorite due to better form and a solid defense: in the last 5 matches the visitors have 4 wins and 1 draw, scoring 21 goals (avg. 4.2 per game) and averaging 2.6 points per match, while Lahti in the same period has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss with 10 goals (2.0 per game) and 2.0 points per match. Seasonal stats show Lahti controls play at home (55% possession), averages 11.67 shots per game with 3.67 on target and converts at 9% efficiency, translating to 1.00 goals at home (xG 1.32), but concedes 1.33 goals per game and has yet to keep a clean sheet (0%). VPS away averages 10 shots and 4.0 on target, has xG 1.27 and — crucially — concedes only 0.33 goals on the road and has kept a clean sheet in 67% of away matches, indicating strong defensive resilience. The xG comparison (1.32 vs 1.27) and shot volumes suggest similar chance production, but VPS’s advantage in limiting conceded goals and current form (2.6 vs 2.0) gives the visitors a tangible edge, hence the prediction: VPS to win, likely with a low score.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Statistical analysis supports a BTTS scenario: Lahti has a season BTTS rate of 67% and 80% in the last 5 matches, while VPS has 0% seasonally but 60% in the last 5, suggesting an increase in both-teams-to-score for the visitors. Offensively Lahti scored 10 goals in the last 5 matches (2.0 per match), and VPS as many as 21 goals in the last 5 (4.2 per match); average goals conceded in that period are 1.2 (Lahti) and 0.8 (VPS), so both teams regularly create and concede goals. Combined offensive xG is 1.48 (Lahti) + 1.27 (VPS) = 2.75, above the league average of 2.3; Lahti converts 11% of shots vs 3% for VPS, and shots on target 4.33 vs 4.0 confirm access to chances. Counter signals come from seasonal clean sheets: VPS has 67% clean sheets seasonally vs 33% for Lahti and concedes 0.33 goals per match seasonally (VPS) vs 1.0 (Lahti), but VPS’s last 5 matches (21 goals scored and 4 conceded) indicate increased instability. Considering Lahti’s 67% BTTS, 80% in the last 5 at home, VPS 60% in the last 5, combined xG 2.75 and VPS’s 21 goals in 5 matches, I assess BTTS probability at 70% vs 30% and select BTTS - Yes as the strongest signal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Analysis based primarily on the last 5 matches yields xG: Lahti 1.91, VPS 2.13, while their xG conceded in this sample are 0.91 (Lahti) and 0.74 (VPS). Calculating expected goals as the average of the attacking xG and opponent xG gives for Lahti (1.91+0.74)/2 = 1.33 and for VPS (2.13+0.91)/2 = 1.52, totaling ~2.85 goals. Seasonal data are mixed – Lahti scores 1.33 goals at home on average and has 67% of matches over 1.5, whereas VPS scores only 0.33 away and has 67% clean sheets, which dampens the seasonal signal for Over. Nevertheless, the last 5 fixtures show Lahti scored 10 and VPS 21, and 60% of both teams’ matches exceed 2.5 goals, which is a strong signal for at least two goals. Therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (high probability ~82%), while Over 2.5 remains moderately likely (~60%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Lahti led at half-time in 2 of 3 matches this season (67%) and scores an average of 1.33 goals by half-time versus 0.33 for VPS; season xG is 1.48 for Lahti and 1.27 for VPS. However, the hosts concede an average of 1.0 goals after the break and have only a 33% win rate for the season with 67% draws, indicating that leads at the break often do not convert into wins. VPS has a low season shot conversion (3% versus the hosts’ 11%) and lower xG, but in the last 5 matches the visitors won 80% of games and led at the break in 100% of those, so a turnaround after half-time is realistic. On that basis the strongest signal is HT/FT 1/X (Lahti leads at the break, match ends level) at approximately 41% probability; further options are 1/1 (23%) and X/X (20%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

59Possession (%)41
LahtiVPS
8Shots6
LahtiVPS
2Shots on target4
LahtiVPS
1.05xG0.9
LahtiVPS
4Corners1
LahtiVPS
54Dangerous attacks32
LahtiVPS
13Fouls14
LahtiVPS
2Cards2
LahtiVPS

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.83Goals scored / match0.83
LahtiVPS
1.17Goals conceded / match0.67
LahtiVPS
53%Average possession43%
LahtiVPS
3.67Shots on target / match4.17
LahtiVPS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.67Shots per match11.33
LahtiVPS
3.67Shots on target4.17
LahtiVPS
7.1%Shot conversion7.4%
LahtiVPS
53%Possession43%
LahtiVPS
1.32xG for1.37
LahtiVPS
1.23xG against1.3
LahtiVPS

Shooting quality

Lahti: BalancedVPS: Balanced
LahtiVPS
Accuracy (shots on target)31%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.20

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

VPS is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Lahti · 1.6 pts / match - VPS

Lahti
LLWLD
Season result split
33% W17% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-3
1.17 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 at home
1-1-1
LWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
VPS
DLWWD
Season result split
33% W50% D17% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-1
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 away
1-1-1
DLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 1.22BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

VPS is 75% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.17 goals / match - Lahti · 0.67 goals / match - VPS

Lahti scoring profile: mixed

Lahti scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while VPS keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 matches).

VPS scoring profile: strong

VPS scores in 50% of matches (3 of 6 matches), while Lahti keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

5Goals scored (season)5
LahtiVPS
7Goals conceded (season)4
LahtiVPS
2Average goals in match1.5
LahtiVPS
4Goals scored (last 5)5
LahtiVPS
7Goals conceded (last 5)4
LahtiVPS

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal50%
LahtiVPS
17%2 goals17%
LahtiVPS
0%3 goals17%
LahtiVPS
0%4 goals0%
LahtiVPS

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal50%
LahtiVPS
33%2 goals17%
LahtiVPS
0%3 goals0%
LahtiVPS
0%4 goals0%
LahtiVPS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
LahtiVPS
0%BTTS in both halves0%
LahtiVPS
0%Scored in both halves0%
LahtiVPS

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS17%
LahtiVPS
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
LahtiVPS
60%BTTS - last 540%
LahtiVPS

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
LahtiVPS
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
LahtiVPS
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
LahtiVPS

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time50%
LahtiVPS
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time17%
LahtiVPS
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
LahtiVPS

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

VPS is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / match - Lahti · 2 pts / match - VPS

Lahti - half-time state
50% leading17% draw33% trailing
VPS - half-time state
50% leading50% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per match (1st half)2
LahtiVPS
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.83
LahtiVPS
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0
LahtiVPS
1Average goals (1st half)0.83
LahtiVPS
67%Clean sheet before half-time100%
LahtiVPS
50%No goal before half-time50%
LahtiVPS

After half-time (2nd half)

0.5Points per match (2nd half)0.5
LahtiVPS
0.17Goals scored (2nd half)0
LahtiVPS
0.83Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
LahtiVPS
1Average goals (2nd half)0.67
LahtiVPS
33%Clean sheet after half-time50%
LahtiVPS
83%No goal after half-time100%
LahtiVPS

Lahti - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
10
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding66%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

VPS - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
12
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding66%

Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 33%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lahti - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.40
Goals scored / match0.60.2
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.01.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference+1-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
VPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.200.40
Goals scored / match1.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.8
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference+5-4
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lahti
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
2
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
1
3
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

VPS
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
3
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
76%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lahti

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.43
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.49
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
62%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

VPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.54
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.63
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
50%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.8
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 40% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

LahtiLigaVPS
Average goals in match 2.002.30 1.50
Both teams scored 50%49% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%35% 17%
Clean sheets 17%29% 50%
Goal before half-time 83%77% 50%
Goal after half-time 67%74% 50%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.30
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
0.98
Away goals / match
+36%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+25%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. VPSGoalLuka Smyth
  2. LahtiYellow cardMartim Augusto Ferreira
  3. LahtiYellow cardRomaric Yapi
  4. VPSYellow cardLassana Mané

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Lahti vs VPS?

The Veikkausliiga match finished Lahti 1:1 VPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lahti vs VPS?

Lahti score 0.83 goals per game on average and VPS 0.83. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Lahti's matches and 33% of VPS's.

What form are Lahti and VPS in?

Over the last 5 games Lahti have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and VPS 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lahti vs VPS?

The statistical background for Lahti vs VPS — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.