Lanús vs Banfield: match statistics
Lanús vs Banfield: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Lanús played Banfield in Primera División (Argentina). The match was played on 13 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Lanús: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Banfield: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Lanús scores 1.42 and concedes 1.17 goals per match. Banfield scores 1.17 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.05 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Lanús 50%, Banfield 50%. Over 2.5: Lanús 50%, Banfield 50%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 34%.
xG, shots and style
Banfield has higher xG: 1.31 vs 1.29. Lanús: 11.1 shots per match, Banfield: 11.4.
Match halves
Lanús: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.83. Banfield: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.75.
Goals by minute
Lanús: 31-45+ (4 goals). Banfield: 46-60 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.05 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 34%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-2. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 75%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Lanús holds a clear advantage in offense and possession: at home they average 1.6 goals per game with 11.8 shots (4 on target) and 55% possession, whereas Banfield away manages only 0.8 goals with 7.4 shots (2.4 on target) and 35% possession. The quality gap is confirmed by xG — Lanús generates 1.38 xG per home match versus 0.95 xG produced by the visitors on the road. Banfield also concedes as much as 2.26 xG away compared with the 1.12 xG allowed by Lanús at home. Defensively the visitors are vulnerable: Banfield concedes 2.0 goals on average away and has 0% clean sheets, while Lanús concedes 1.0 at home and has a 40% clean sheet rate; in the last 5 matches Banfield has let in 7 goals and Lanús only 3. Additionally Banfield have lost all away matches this season (100% away defeats) and average 1.2 points per game in their last 5 fixtures versus 1.4 points for Lanús, so I tip the home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Banfield away has BTTS at 60% for the season and 60% in the last 5 matches, and simultaneously has no away clean sheets (0%), which strongly suggests they regularly concede. Lanús at home scores on average 1.43 goals and has xG 1.57, while Banfield concedes seasonally 2.00 goals and has xG against 2.26, so the hosts have a real chance to score. However, Lanús in the last 5 matches scored 7 and conceded only 3 (averages 1.4 and 0.6), and their seasonal clean sheet rate is 43% and BTTS in the last 5 is only 20%, which reduces the probability of both teams scoring. Banfield, in turn, in the last 5 matches scored 8 and conceded 7 (averages 1.6 and 1.4) and has recent offensive xG 1.51, which gives a real chance for an away goal. In summary, signals favor Lanús to find the net (due to high home xG and Banfield’s weak defense conceding 2.00) and Banfield has sufficient attacking form to respond, therefore I give BTTS 62% vs 38% and pick Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I expect a high-scoring game: calculated expected goals are 1.92 for Lanús (average xG 1.57 versus xG against Banfield 2.26) and 1.24 for Banfield (xG 0.95 versus xG against Lanús 1.53), totalling roughly 3.16 goals. Lanús averages 14.29 shots per match and 4.43 on target, has xG 1.57 and scores 1.43 goals on average; Banfield concedes 2.0 goals on the road on average, has xG against 2.26 and scores 0.8 goals per match — these disparities favour more goals. Seasonal stats confirm the trend: Lanús has 86% of matches over 1.5 goals, Banfield away 60%, and both teams have 100% of matches over 0.5 goals; a Poisson model for a total of 3.16 yields about 82% probability for over 1.5, 61% for over 2.5 and 39% for over 3.5. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 (estimated probability 82%) — supported by Lanús’ xG advantage and Banfield’s weak away defence. Over 2.5 has a moderate chance (~61%), while Over 3.5 (~39%) is less likely and less attractive as a bet.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Lanús is a clear favorite in terms of offensive and quality metrics: xG 1.57 versus 0.95 for Banfield, on average 14.29 shots and 4.43 on target versus 7.4 and 2.4 for the visitors, and average goals 1.43 vs 0.8. Banfield has defensive and away problems — concedes on average 2.26 xG per match and has 0% away wins (winPercentage_away 0.0), which increases the likelihood of the visitors losing. At Half-Time Lanús led in only 29% of matches and were trailing in 43% (leadingAtHTPercentage_home 29%, trailingAtHTPercentage_home 43%), so the HT is more often a draw or a Banfield lead. The key signal is the second half: Lanús scores on average 1.14 goals after the break and concedes 0.14, while Banfield after the break average 0.2 scored and 1.2 conceded; Lanús wins the second half in 56% of matches, Banfield in 0%, which strongly favors a turnaround. Therefore the strongest scenario is 2/1 — Banfield leads at Half-Time and Lanús turns it around to win at Full-Time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Lanús | Banfield | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Lanús is 67% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Lanús · 1.2 pts / match - Banfield
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lanús is 21% better for: goals scored per match.
1.42 goals / match - Lanús · 1.17 goals / match - Banfield
Lanús is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.17 goals / match - Lanús · 1.33 goals / match - Banfield
Lanús scores in 75% of matches (9 of 12 matches), while Banfield keeps a clean sheet in 25% (3 of 12 matches).
Banfield scores in 75% of matches (9 of 12 matches), while Lanús keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Lanús
Over / Under - Banfield
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Lanús is 23% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / match - Lanús · 1.08 pts / match - Banfield
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Lanús - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Banfield - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Lanús
Banfield
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| Lanús | Liga | Banfield | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.58 | 2.05 | ▲ 2.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 45% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 50% | 34% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 33% | 35% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 59% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 71% | ▲ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Lanús 1 - 1 - 2 Banfield. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 75% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Lanús vs Banfield?
The Primera División match finished Lanús 1:0 Banfield. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Lanús and Banfield?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Lanús won 1, Banfield won 2 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 75% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Lanús vs Banfield?
Lanús score 1.42 goals per game on average and Banfield 1.17. The Primera División average is 2.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Lanús's matches and 50% of Banfield's.
What form are Lanús and Banfield in?
Over the last 5 games Lanús have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Banfield 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lanús vs Banfield?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.