Greece - Super League 2Data current as of 04 October 2026

Larissa vs PAOK II: match statistics

Larissa crest
Larissa
1 : 0half-time 1:0
PAOK II crest
PAOK II

Larissa vs PAOK II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Larissa played PAOK II in Super League 2 (Greece). The match was played on 27 September 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Larissa: 2-1-0, 2.33 points/match. PAOK II: 1-1-1, 1.33 points/match.

Goal statistics

Larissa scores 2.00 and concedes 0.33 goals per match. PAOK II scores 1.00 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.25 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Larissa 33%, PAOK II 67%. Over 2.5: Larissa 33%, PAOK II 33%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 42%.

xG, shots and style

Larissa has higher xG: 1.35 vs 1.04. Larissa: 11.3 shots per match, PAOK II: 7.7.

Match halves

Larissa: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 1.33. PAOK II: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Larissa: 61-75 (2 goals). PAOK II: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League 2: 2.25 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 42%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Larissa remain unbeaten this season, with 2 wins and 1 draw, having conceded just 1 goal, while PAOK II have recorded 1 win, 1 draw and 1 defeat. At home, the hosts average 1 goal scored and concede just 0.5 per match, keeping a clean sheet in 50% of such fixtures. PAOK II have lost every away game, failed to score in any of them and concede an average of 2 goals per match. Larissa’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created: their average home xG stands at 1.22, compared with PAOK II’s away xG of 0.80, while their xG against at home is higher at 1.38. The visitors are in decent overall form, winning 3 of their last 5 matches, but their extremely poor away numbers clearly point towards a Larissa victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest signal is PAOK II’s performance away from home: the team has yet to score, averaging 0.0 goals per match, with 100% of games ending without scoring. The visitors also create very few chances, averaging 0.80 xG, 4.0 shots and just 1.0 shot on target per match, while Larissa limit opponents to only 0.92 xG. Larissa should have a clear attacking advantage, as they score 1.5 goals per home match while PAOK II concede 2.0, but a one-sided home win would still fulfill the BTTS No scenario. The visitors’ last five matches were more goal-heavy, averaging 1.6 goals scored and BTTS in 80% of games, but these figures conflict with their very poor away numbers. With the league-wide BTTS average at 46%, it is more likely that at least one team—above all PAOK II—will fail to find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Larissa has a clearer attacking potential at home: they score an average of 1.5 goals, while PAOK II concede 2.0 goals per away match. At the same time, the visitors have yet to score in their away data, generating just 0.8 xG and averaging only 1 shot on target, which limits their projection to 0.95 goals. The chance-quality estimates also point to a moderate total, with Larissa’s xG at 1.27 and the average xG against PAOK II at 1.38. In their last five matches, both teams conceded an average of 1.2 goals, but games with at least 4 goals have not occurred in either Larissa’s or PAOK II’s season results. With 2.30 expected goals, the strongest selection is Under 3.5, as a four-or-more-goal scenario would require a clear deviation from both teams’ current profile.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Larissa averages 1.5 goals at home and has not lost a single match, while PAOK II have collected 0 points away from home, failed to score, and concede an average of 2.0 goals. The hosts create significantly more chances: their average xG stands at 1.27 compared with the opponents’ 0.80, while their number of shots on target is 4.5 against just 1.0 for PAOK II. In previous matches under these conditions, Larissa led at the break in 50% of games and conceded no goals before half-time, whereas PAOK II were behind at half-time in 100% of their away fixtures. The visitors’ last five matches look better in terms of results, but Larissa’s first-half advantage remains clear: they average 0.6 goals scored before the break and concede only 0.2. The most likely scenario is therefore that the hosts take the lead before half-time and maintain it until the final whistle, making the HT/FT 1/1 outcome the most probable.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
LarissaPAOK II
11Shots4
LarissaPAOK II
6Shots on target0
LarissaPAOK II
1.4xG0.69
LarissaPAOK II
0Corners5
LarissaPAOK II
39Dangerous attacks59
LarissaPAOK II
20Fouls13
LarissaPAOK II
0Cards0
LarissaPAOK II

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2Goals scored / match1
LarissaPAOK II
0.33Goals conceded / match1.33
LarissaPAOK II
50%Average possession54%
LarissaPAOK II
4.33Shots on target / match3.33
LarissaPAOK II

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.33Shots per match7.67
LarissaPAOK II
4.33Shots on target3.33
LarissaPAOK II
17.6%Shot conversion13%
LarissaPAOK II
50%Possession54%
LarissaPAOK II
1.35xG for1.04
LarissaPAOK II
0.88xG against1.15
LarissaPAOK II

Shooting quality

Larissa: Efficient finishingPAOK II: Efficient finishing
LarissaPAOK II
Accuracy (shots on target)38%43%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.460.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Larissa is 75% better for: last-5 form.

2.33 pts / match - Larissa · 1.33 pts / match - PAOK II

Larissa
DWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
67% W33% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 at home
1-1-0
DW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.3xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 0.88BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 33%
PAOK II
DLW
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-1
1.33 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-1
1.33 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 away
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.3xG: 1.04Opponent xG: 1.15BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 33%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Larissa is 100% better for: goals scored per match.

2 goals / match - Larissa · 1 goals / match - PAOK II

Larissa is 303% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.33 goals / match - Larissa · 1.33 goals / match - PAOK II

Larissa scoring profile: very strong

Larissa scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while PAOK II keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

PAOK II scoring profile: mixed

PAOK II scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while Larissa keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 matches).

6Goals scored (season)3
LarissaPAOK II
1Goals conceded (season)4
LarissaPAOK II
2.33Average goals in match2.33
LarissaPAOK II
6Goals scored (last 5)3
LarissaPAOK II
1Goals conceded (last 5)4
LarissaPAOK II

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal67%
LarissaPAOK II
33%2 goals33%
LarissaPAOK II
33%3 goals0%
LarissaPAOK II
33%4 goals0%
LarissaPAOK II

How often they concede at least...

33%1 goal100%
LarissaPAOK II
0%2 goals33%
LarissaPAOK II
0%3 goals0%
LarissaPAOK II
0%4 goals0%
LarissaPAOK II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
LarissaPAOK II
0%BTTS in both halves0%
LarissaPAOK II
33%Scored in both halves33%
LarissaPAOK II

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
LarissaPAOK II
33%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
LarissaPAOK II
33%BTTS - last 567%
LarissaPAOK II

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
LarissaPAOK II
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
LarissaPAOK II
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
LarissaPAOK II

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
LarissaPAOK II
67%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
LarissaPAOK II
33%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
LarissaPAOK II

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Larissa is 75% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.33 pts / match - Larissa · 1.33 pts / match - PAOK II

Larissa - half-time state
67% leading33% draw0% trailing
PAOK II - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.33Points per match (1st half)1.33
LarissaPAOK II
0.67Goals scored (1st half)0.33
LarissaPAOK II
0Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
LarissaPAOK II
0.67Average goals (1st half)0.67
LarissaPAOK II
100%Clean sheet before half-time67%
LarissaPAOK II
33%No goal before half-time67%
LarissaPAOK II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.67Points per match (2nd half)0.67
LarissaPAOK II
1.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
LarissaPAOK II
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)1
LarissaPAOK II
1.67Average goals (2nd half)1.67
LarissaPAOK II
67%Clean sheet after half-time0%
LarissaPAOK II
33%No goal after half-time33%
LarissaPAOK II

Larissa - second-half results

33% W67% D0% L
7
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

PAOK II - second-half results

0% W67% D33% L
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Larissa - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.331.67
Goals scored / match0.71.3
Goals conceded / match0.00.3
Average goals in match0.71.7
1 goal67%67%
2 goals0%67%
3 goals0%33%
Clean sheet100%67%
No goal33%33%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 67% leading - 33% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 67% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
PAOK II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.330.67
Goals scored / match0.30.7
Goals conceded / match0.31.0
Average goals in match0.71.7
1 goal67%100%
2 goals0%67%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet67%0%
No goal67%33%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 33% leading - 33% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 67% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Larissa
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

PAOK II
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.33
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Larissa

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.65
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.55
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
155%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
34%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

PAOK II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
103%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
67% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
67%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League 2).

Teams vs league

LarissaLigaPAOK II
Average goals in match• 2.332.25• 2.33
Both teams scored▼ 33%46%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 33%42%▼ 33%
Clean sheets▲ 67%31%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 67%63%▲ 67%
Goal after half-time• 67%67%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.25
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.29
Home goals / match
0.96
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+41%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Michailakis Bousis⚽ 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LarissaGoalMichailakis Bousis

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Larissa vs PAOK II?

The Super League 2 match finished Larissa 1:0 PAOK II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Larissa vs PAOK II?

Larissa score 2.00 goals per game on average and PAOK II 1.00. The Super League 2 average is 2.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 42% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Larissa's matches and 67% of PAOK II's.

What form are Larissa and PAOK II in?

Over the last 5 games Larissa have a 2-1-0 record (2.33 points per game) and PAOK II 1-1-1 (1.33 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Larissa vs PAOK II?

The statistical background for Larissa vs PAOK II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.