Las Vegas Lights vs Colorado Springs: match statistics
Las Vegas Lights vs Colorado Springs: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Las Vegas Lights played Colorado Springs in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 24 May 2026. Venue: Cashman Field. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Las Vegas Lights: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Colorado Springs: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Las Vegas Lights scores 1.56 and concedes 2.11 goals per match. Colorado Springs scores 2.13 and concedes 1.88. League average: 2.76 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Las Vegas Lights 89%, Colorado Springs 88%. Over 2.5: Las Vegas Lights 67%, Colorado Springs 75%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
xG, shots and style
Colorado Springs has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.21. Las Vegas Lights: 9.4 shots per match, Colorado Springs: 14.1.
Match halves
Las Vegas Lights: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.89. Colorado Springs: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 1.50.
Goals by minute
Las Vegas Lights: 31-45+ (3 goals). Colorado Springs: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL Championship: 2.76 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 55%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 0-3-3. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a Las Vegas Lights win; their home record is strong (67% wins, 0% losses) and they concede only 0.67 goals per home game. Colorado Springs have been in good overall form recently (12 goals in last 5 matches, 2.4 per game and 1.8 points per game), but have yet to win away (0% wins) and concede 2.25 goals per away match. The offensive edge is marginal: Las Vegas score 1.33 at home with xG 1.24, while Colorado score 1.75 away with xG 1.25, with higher shot conversion for the visitors (16% vs 13%). The hosts create more high-quality chances (4 shots on target at home vs 2.75 for their opponents) and have never finished a home game goalless (FTS 0%), which offsets Las Vegas’s weaker recent form (6 scored and 10 conceded in last 5). Given the lower xG against the hosts (1.15 vs 1.55 for Colorado) and home defensive stability, I give the hosts the better chance, though I expect an open game with scoring potential for the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Clear signal for BTTS: Las Vegas Lights have a season BTTS 100% and Colorado Springs 75%, with last 5 matches at 80% and 60% respectively. Offensively Las Vegas averages 2.5 goals per game with xG 1.94 and 5.25 shots on target, while Colorado scores 1.75 goals with xG 1.25 and 2.75 shots on target — both sides create goal-scoring opportunities. Seasonally Las Vegas concedes 1.5 goals on average, Colorado 2.25, and in the last 5 matches conceded 2.0 (Las Vegas) and 1.4 (Colorado), indicating goals for both teams are likely. Additionally both teams have over 2.5 goals in 75% of matches and a combined Over2.5+BTTS in 75%, while the league average BTTS is 56% — here the teams clearly exceed the league level. In light of the 100%/75% season BTTS, 80%/60% last-5 and support from xG and shot stats, the best pick is BTTS - Yes (Goal/Goal).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model forecasts 1.75 xG for Las Vegas and 1.06 xG for Colorado Springs, yielding a combined 2.81 expected goals. Seasonal metrics show Las Vegas scores 2.5 goals at home on average, Colorado scores 1.75 on the road; both teams have 75% of matches Over 2.5 goals, while Las Vegas has 100% of matches Over 1.5 and Colorado 75%. The home side averages 16.75 shots (5.25 on target) versus the visitors’ 11.0 (2.75 on target), and BTTS is 100% for Las Vegas and 75% for Colorado, supporting a both-teams-to-score scenario. Consequently the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (recommendation); Over 2.5 also carries high probability (~78%) given the seasonal 75% Over 2.5 and total xG of 2.81, whereas Over 3.5 is less confident since expected goals are below 3.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistics show the home side led at the break in 25% of matches and were level at half-time in 50% of cases, while the away team registered no leads at the break (0%), which strongly supports a draw at Half-Time. After the break Las Vegas dominates — they won the second half in 75% of matches and average 1.75 goals after the break while conceding 1.0, whereas the visitors average 1.25 scored and 1.75 conceded in second halves. xG also favors the hosts (1.94 xG vs 1.25 xG for the visitors), and the hosts average 2.0 points per match versus 0.5 for the away side; the advantage is confirmed by shots on target 5.25 vs 2.75. As a result, the strongest signal is a Half-Time draw and a home win Full-Time (X/1) — I assign it a 30% probability, the second most likely is 1/1 at 21%, and a full-time draw I assess at 13%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Las Vegas Lights | Colorado Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 27% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.45 | 0.55 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Colorado Springs is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Las Vegas Lights · 1.2 pts / match - Colorado Springs
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Colorado Springs is 37% better for: goals scored per match.
1.56 goals / match - Las Vegas Lights · 2.13 goals / match - Colorado Springs
Colorado Springs is 12% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.11 goals / match - Las Vegas Lights · 1.88 goals / match - Colorado Springs
Las Vegas Lights scores in 100% of matches (9 of 9 matches), while Colorado Springs keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 8 matches).
Colorado Springs scores in 88% of matches (7 of 8 matches), while Las Vegas Lights keeps a clean sheet in 11% (1 of 9 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Las Vegas Lights
Over / Under - Colorado Springs
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Colorado Springs is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.89 pts / match - Las Vegas Lights · 1.13 pts / match - Colorado Springs
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Las Vegas Lights - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 22%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Colorado Springs - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.9 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Las Vegas Lights
Colorado Springs
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Las Vegas Lights | Liga | Colorado Springs | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.67 | 2.76 | ▲ 4.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 89% | 56% | ▲ 88% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 55% | ▲ 75% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 11% | 27% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 68% | ▼ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 78% | 81% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): Las Vegas Lights 0 - 3 - 3 Colorado Springs. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Las Vegas Lights vs Colorado Springs?
The USL Championship match finished Las Vegas Lights 2:0 Colorado Springs. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Las Vegas Lights and Colorado Springs?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Las Vegas Lights won 0, Colorado Springs won 3 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Las Vegas Lights vs Colorado Springs?
Las Vegas Lights score 1.56 goals per game on average and Colorado Springs 2.13. The USL Championship average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 89% of Las Vegas Lights's matches and 88% of Colorado Springs's.
What form are Las Vegas Lights and Colorado Springs in?
Over the last 5 games Las Vegas Lights have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Colorado Springs 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Las Vegas Lights vs Colorado Springs?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.