Lausanne Sport vs Grasshopper: match statistics
Lausanne Sport vs Grasshopper: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Lausanne Sport played Grasshopper in Super League (Switzerland). The match was played on 16 May 2026. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Lausanne Sport: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Grasshopper: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Lausanne Sport scores 1.41 and concedes 1.73 goals per match. Grasshopper scores 1.22 and concedes 1.97. League average: 3.28 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Lausanne Sport 68%, Grasshopper 59%. Over 2.5: Lausanne Sport 73%, Grasshopper 57%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 67%.
xG, shots and style
Lausanne Sport has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.42. Lausanne Sport: 14.4 shots per match, Grasshopper: 12.6.
Match halves
Lausanne Sport: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.76. Grasshopper: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.65.
Goals by minute
Lausanne Sport: 46-60 (11 goals). Grasshopper: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Super League: 3.28 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 67%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-1. Average goals 3.67, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Lausanne Sport sit 9th in the table, Grasshopper 11th; hosts have scored 52 goals this season versus guests' 45, which numerically already indicates an offensive edge. At home Lausanne averages 1.78 goals and xG 1.73 with 15.67 shots per match (5.28 on target), while Grasshopper away averages 1.06 goals and xG 1.41 with 12.44 shots (4.61 on target) — a clear superiority in quality and quantity of chances for the hosts. Defensively the hosts concede 1.67 goals at home on average (xG against 1.37), and the visitors concede 2.17 away (xG against 1.68), suggesting greater susceptibility of Grasshopper to conceding. Both teams are poor in the last 5 matches (1 win and 4 losses each, averaging 0.6 points), but Grasshopper have worse efficiency — 8% conversion and 39% of away matches without a goal versus Lausanne’s 11% conversion and 17% of matches without scoring. Considering Lausanne’s advantage in xG, shots and lower average goals conceded (1.67 vs 2.17), I predict a home win; I assess probabilities as 60% for Lausanne, 20% draw and 20% for a Grasshopper win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I project BTTS (Both Teams To Score) as the most likely outcome for this match. Lausanne records a season BTTS rate of 68% versus Grasshopper’s 50%, with the league BTTS at 66%, confirming a trend toward both-sided scoring. Both teams concede frequently: Lausanne 1.79 goals per game, Grasshopper 2.17, and in the last 5 matches both sides have conceded an average of 2.0 goals, so a clean sheet is unlikely. Offensive xG are nearly identical (1.42 vs 1.41), with xG against of 1.56 and 1.68 respectively, suggesting an exchange of goal-scoring opportunities. Additionally, shots 12.74 vs 12.44 and shots on target 4.11 vs 4.61, combined with better conversion for Lausanne (11% vs 8% for Grasshopper), increase the probability of goals from both teams. Based on this I assess BTTS at 72% vs 28% No Goal and recommend backing 'BTTS - Yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Lausanne scores an average of 1.37 goals per match, Grasshopper 1.06; team xG is 1.42 for Lausanne and 1.41 for Grasshopper, while xG against is 1.56 and 1.68 respectively. Averaging each team’s attacking xG with the opponent’s defensive xG yields an expected 1.55 goals for Lausanne and 1.49 for Grasshopper, totaling 3.04 goals. Season percentages >1.5 are 84% for Lausanne and 72% for Grasshopper, giving an average ~78% probability for Over 1.5 in this match. Additionally, the league averages 3.28 goals and 66% BTTS, and both teams register ~12–13 shots and over 4 on target per game (Lausanne 12.74/4.11, Grasshopper 12.44/4.61), which further supports a scoring scenario; therefore I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Statistics indicate a slight edge for Lausanne Sport: they average 1.37 goals per match versus Grasshopper’s 1.06 and concede 1.79 compared to the visitors’ 2.17, giving them a better defensive record. At half-time Lausanne Sport average 0.63 goals scored and 0.79 conceded, while Grasshopper average 0.5 scored and 1.0 conceded, so a draw at the break or a minimal lead for the hosts is realistic. Lausanne Sport have an xG of 1.42 versus the visitors’ 1.41 and a higher shot conversion rate of 11% against Grasshopper’s 8%, and in the second half the hosts score on average 0.74 goals compared to 0.56 for the visitors, which supports goals for the hosts after the break. In the last five matches Lausanne Sport led at the break in 40% of games and conceded on average 0.2 goals before half-time, while the visitors also led in 40% of games but conceded 0.6, therefore I project a Half-Time/Full-Time result of draw at the break and Lausanne Sport to win after 90 minutes (HT/FT X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Lausanne Sport | Grasshopper | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Grasshopper is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / match - Lausanne Sport · 1.2 pts / match - Grasshopper
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lausanne Sport is 16% better for: goals scored per match.
1.41 goals / match - Lausanne Sport · 1.22 goals / match - Grasshopper
Lausanne Sport is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.73 goals / match - Lausanne Sport · 1.97 goals / match - Grasshopper
Lausanne Sport scores in 76% of matches (28 of 37 matches), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 14% (5 of 37 matches).
Grasshopper scores in 70% of matches (26 of 37 matches), while Lausanne Sport keeps a clean sheet in 16% (6 of 37 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Lausanne Sport
Over / Under - Grasshopper
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Lausanne Sport - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 30%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Grasshopper - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 19%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -8 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (20). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (19). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Lausanne Sport
Grasshopper
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Lausanne Sport | Liga | Grasshopper | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 3.14 | 3.28 | • 3.19 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 68% | 66% | ▼ 59% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 73% | 67% | ▼ 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 16% | 19% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 68% | 76% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | • 84% | 84% | • 84% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- GrasshopperSubstitutionOn: Gabriel GonzalezOff: Demis Fiechter
- GrasshopperYellow cardGabriel Gonzalez
- GrasshopperGoalChristian Nsonga Fopossi KouamAssist: Nahom Tesfom
- GrasshopperYellow cardChristian Nsonga Fopossi Kouam
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Lausanne Sport 1 - 1 - 1 Grasshopper. Average goals 3.67, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Lausanne Sport vs Grasshopper?
The Super League match finished Lausanne Sport 1:3 Grasshopper. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Lausanne Sport and Grasshopper?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Lausanne Sport won 1, Grasshopper won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Lausanne Sport vs Grasshopper?
Lausanne Sport score 1.41 goals per game on average and Grasshopper 1.22. The Super League average is 3.28 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 68% of Lausanne Sport's matches and 59% of Grasshopper's.
What form are Lausanne Sport and Grasshopper in?
Over the last 5 games Lausanne Sport have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Grasshopper 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lausanne Sport vs Grasshopper?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


