France - Ligue 2Data current as of 11 September 2026

Le Mans vs Clermont: match statistics

Le Mans crest
Le Mans
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Clermont crest
Clermont

Le Mans vs Clermont: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Le Mans played Clermont in Ligue 2 (France). The match was played on 17 April 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Le Mans: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match. Clermont: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Le Mans scores 1.50 and concedes 0.97 goals per match. Clermont scores 1.13 and concedes 1.37. League average: 2.45 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Le Mans 50%, Clermont 60%. Over 2.5: Le Mans 40%, Clermont 50%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 46%.

xG, shots and style

Le Mans has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.16. Le Mans: 11.2 shots per match, Clermont: 10.6.

Match halves

Le Mans: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.77. Clermont: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

Le Mans: 76-90+ (13 goals). Clermont: 46-60 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligue 2: 2.45 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 46%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Le Mans is the favorite in this match: they sit 3rd in the table, win 53% of home games, concede only 0.47 goals per game at home and keep a clean sheet in 67% of matches. The hosts are in very good form — in the last 5 matches they recorded 4 wins and 1 draw, scoring 15 goals (3.0 per game) and collecting 13 points from five fixtures. Clermont are 14th, have only a 20% win rate away, haven’t won in their last 5 (0-2-3), scored 5 goals (1.0 per game) and gathered just 2 points, and concede on average 1.6 goals away. At home Le Mans averages 12.07 shots and 4.2 shots on target with an xG of 1.41, while Clermont on the road average 9.73 shots, 2.93 on target and xG 1.03, which indicates more chances and higher expected opportunities for the hosts. Considering the superior defense (0.47 vs 1.6 goals conceded), the xG advantage (1.41 vs 1.03) and form (13 vs 2 points from the last 5), I back a Le Mans win; a draw or Clermont victory are considerably less likely.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS indicators strongly favor the “Yes” option: Le Mans have 67% of matches with both teams scoring, Clermont 53%, versus a league average of 51%. Goal stats show Le Mans score 1.13 and concede 1.13 per game, while Clermont score 1.13 and concede 1.6, meaning Clermont concedes more (1.6). xG and form confirm home pressure — Le Mans xG_for 1.30 vs Clermont xG_for 1.03, and in the last 5 matches Le Mans have xG_for 1.69 and average 3.0 goals scored vs Clermont 1.23 xG and 1.0 goals. Additionally Le Mans generate 11.47 shots with 3.87 on target compared to Clermont’s 9.73 and 2.93, and Le Mans have only 7% clean sheets vs Clermont 27%, all increasing the likelihood of both teams finding the net (BTTS - Yes).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I calculated expected goals by averaging the offense xG and the opponent’s defensive xG: Le Mans has xG 1.30 versus Clermont’s xG against 1.55, yielding an expected 1.43 goals for the home side; Clermont has xG 1.03 versus xG against Le Mans 1.26, yielding 1.15 goals for the visitors, for a total of 2.58 goals. Seasonal rates show Le Mans has 67% of matches over 1.5 goals and Clermont 60%, while for the 2.5 line the figures are close (47%/53%), suggesting a moderate chance for Over 2.5. Le Mans scored 15 goals in the last 5 matches (3.0 per game) with last-5 xG of 1.69, whereas Clermont scored 5 (1.0 per game) with xG 1.23 and conceded 8 (1.6) in the last 5, which increases the probability of a higher goals tally. The difference in shots on target (3.87 vs 2.93) and the high share of matches with goals (Le Mans 67%, Clermont 53%) point to a strong likelihood of at least 2 goals. Therefore I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (~73% chance), while the 2.5 line remains more balanced (~48% Over).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Le Mans appears to be the favorite: in the last 5 matches they have won 4 times (80%), while Clermont have not won any (0%) and lost 3 of 5 (60%). Le Mans led at the break in 3 of the last 5 fixtures (60%), and the average first-half goals in those matches is 1.6 for Le Mans versus 0.2 for Clermont, which suggests a home advantage already after 45 minutes. Quality-of-chance metrics confirm Le Mans’ edge: xG 1.30 versus 1.03 for Clermont, on average 3.87 shots on target versus 2.93 and fewer xG conceded (1.26 vs 1.55), favoring the maintenance of a lead. Le Mans have averaged 3.0 goals per match in the last 5, versus Clermont’s 1.0, so I assign the highest probability to the scenario of leading at half-time and winning the match for the home side (1/1 — 36%), with additional signals for X/1 (16%) and X/X (16%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

58Possession (%)42
Le MansClermont
13Shots10
Le MansClermont
6Shots on target1
Le MansClermont
1.65xG0.85
Le MansClermont
6Corners4
Le MansClermont
55Dangerous attacks20
Le MansClermont
24Fouls8
Le MansClermont
1Cards1
Le MansClermont

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.5Goals scored / match1.13
Le MansClermont
0.97Goals conceded / match1.37
Le MansClermont
49%Average possession52%
Le MansClermont
4.23Shots on target / match3.4
Le MansClermont

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.17Shots per match10.6
Le MansClermont
4.23Shots on target3.4
Le MansClermont
13.4%Shot conversion10.7%
Le MansClermont
49%Possession52%
Le MansClermont
1.32xG for1.16
Le MansClermont
1.1xG against1.41
Le MansClermont

Shooting quality

Le Mans: Efficient finishingClermont: Balanced
Le MansClermont
Accuracy (shots on target)38%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Le Mans is 550% better for: last-5 form.

2.6 pts / match - Le Mans · 0.4 pts / match - Clermont

Le Mans
WWWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
47% W40% D13% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-12-4
1.80 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-5-2
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 0.87BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Clermont
LLLDD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
23% W30% D47% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-9-14
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-4-8
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LLWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Le Mans is 33% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - Le Mans · 1.13 goals / match - Clermont

Le Mans is 41% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.97 goals / match - Le Mans · 1.37 goals / match - Clermont

Le Mans scoring profile: very strong

Le Mans scores in 80% of matches (24 of 30 matches), while Clermont keeps a clean sheet in 17% (5 of 30 matches).

Clermont scoring profile: strong

Clermont scores in 70% of matches (21 of 30 matches), while Le Mans keeps a clean sheet in 43% (13 of 30 matches).

45Goals scored (season)34
Le MansClermont
29Goals conceded (season)41
Le MansClermont
2.47Average goals in match2.5
Le MansClermont
15Goals scored (last 5)5
Le MansClermont
5Goals conceded (last 5)8
Le MansClermont

How often they score at least...

80%1 goal70%
Le MansClermont
40%2 goals33%
Le MansClermont
20%3 goals7%
Le MansClermont
10%4 goals3%
Le MansClermont

How often they concede at least...

57%1 goal83%
Le MansClermont
27%2 goals37%
Le MansClermont
10%3 goals10%
Le MansClermont
3%4 goals7%
Le MansClermont

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

50%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time20%
Le MansClermont
17%BTTS in both halves3%
Le MansClermont
30%Scored in both halves10%
Le MansClermont

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
Le MansClermont
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Le MansClermont
40%BTTS - last 560%
Le MansClermont

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time57%
Le MansClermont
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time27%
Le MansClermont
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Le MansClermont

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Le MansClermont
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
Le MansClermont
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Le MansClermont

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Le Mans is 70% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.7 pts / match - Le Mans · 1 pts / match - Clermont

Le Mans - half-time state
37% leading60% draw3% trailing
Clermont - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.7Points per match (1st half)1
Le MansClermont
0.73Goals scored (1st half)0.4
Le MansClermont
0.27Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
Le MansClermont
1Average goals (1st half)1.07
Le MansClermont
77%Clean sheet before half-time53%
Le MansClermont
50%No goal before half-time70%
Le MansClermont

After half-time (2nd half)

1.37Points per match (2nd half)1.3
Le MansClermont
0.77Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
Le MansClermont
0.7Goals conceded (2nd half)0.7
Le MansClermont
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.43
Le MansClermont
50%Clean sheet after half-time40%
Le MansClermont
40%No goal after half-time50%
Le MansClermont

Le Mans - second-half results

30% W47% D23% L
51
Half-time points
22
Half-time goals
+14
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.70
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Clermont - second-half results

33% W30% D37% L
30
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
39
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Le Mans - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.20
Goals scored / match1.61.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match2.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+5+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 8
Clermont - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.40
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.01.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-30
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Le Mans
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
9
4
16-30
10
2
31-45
4
9
46-60
6
4
61-75
13
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Clermont
ScoredConceded
3
7
0-15
6
4
16-30
3
9
31-45
9
5
46-60
6
6
61-75
7
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.48
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
101%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Le Mans

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.31
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
118%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.80
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

Clermont

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 2).

Teams vs league

Le MansLigaClermont
Average goals in match 2.472.45 2.50
Both teams scored 50%50% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 40%46% 50%
Clean sheets 43%31% 17%
Goal before half-time 53%65% 57%
Goal after half-time 73%71% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.45
Average goals per match
50%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.27
Home goals / match
1.18
Away goals / match
+8%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ClermontYellow cardEl Hadj Koné
  2. Le MansYellow cardNoa Boissé
  3. Le MansSubstitutionOn: Théo EyoumOff: Noa Boissé
  4. ClermontSubstitutionOn: Adrien HunouOff: Ibrahim Moriba Coulibaly

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Mickaël LeleuMatches officiated: 16
3.56Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 238%Home wins44%Draws19%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Le Mans 0 - 1 - 0 Clermont. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Clermont Foot 63
1 : 1
Le Mans FC

FAQ

What was the result of Le Mans vs Clermont?

The Ligue 2 match finished Le Mans 1:0 Clermont. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Le Mans vs Clermont?

Le Mans score 1.50 goals per game on average and Clermont 1.13. The Ligue 2 average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Le Mans's matches and 60% of Clermont's.

What form are Le Mans and Clermont in?

Over the last 5 games Le Mans have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Clermont 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Le Mans vs Clermont?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.