Lecce vs Como: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lecce played Como in Serie A (Italy). The match was played on 27 December 2025. Final score: 0:3.

Current form

Lecce: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Como: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lecce scores 0.73 and concedes 1.27 goals per match. Como scores 1.27 and concedes 0.80. League average: 2.33 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lecce 33%, Como 40%. Over 2.5: Lecce 33%, Como 27%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.

xG, shots and style

Como has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.14. Lecce: 10.3 shots per match, Como: 13.8.

Match halves

Lecce: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.33. Como: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.80.

Goals by minute

Lecce: 16-30 (3 goals). Como: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie A: 2.33 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 44%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

38Possession (%)62
LecceComo
11Shots12
LecceComo
5Shots on target6
LecceComo
1.4xG1.44
LecceComo
4Corners6
LecceComo
49Dangerous attacks36
LecceComo
10Fouls24
LecceComo
2Cards4
LecceComo

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.73Goals scored / match1.27
LecceComo
1.27Goals conceded / match0.8
LecceComo
45%Average possession60%
LecceComo
2.73Shots on target / match4.93
LecceComo

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.27Shots per match13.8
LecceComo
2.73Shots on target4.93
LecceComo
7.1%Shot conversion9.2%
LecceComo
45%Possession60%
LecceComo
1.14xG for1.54
LecceComo
1.36xG against1.23
LecceComo

Shooting quality

Lecce: BalancedComo: Balanced
LecceComo
Accuracy (shots on target)27%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lecce
DLWLW
Season result split
27% W27% D47% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-4-7
1.07 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-3
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DLDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.21Opponent xG: 1.31BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Como
DWWLL
Season result split
40% W40% D20% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-3
1.60 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.66Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Como is 74% better for: goals scored per match.

0.73 goals / match - Lecce · 1.27 goals / match - Como

Como is 59% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.27 goals / match - Lecce · 0.8 goals / match - Como

Lecce scoring profile: mixed

Lecce scores in 53% of matches (8 of 15 matches), while Como keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).

Como scoring profile: mixed

Como scores in 60% of matches (9 of 15 matches), while Lecce keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).

11Goals scored (season)19
LecceComo
19Goals conceded (season)12
LecceComo
2Average goals in match2.07
LecceComo
3Goals scored (last 5)7
LecceComo
5Goals conceded (last 5)6
LecceComo

How often they score at least...

53%1 goal60%
LecceComo
20%2 goals40%
LecceComo
0%3 goals13%
LecceComo
0%4 goals7%
LecceComo

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal60%
LecceComo
47%2 goals7%
LecceComo
13%3 goals7%
LecceComo
7%4 goals7%
LecceComo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

13%BTTS at half-time20%
LecceComo
7%BTTS in both halves0%
LecceComo
7%Scored in both halves27%
LecceComo

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS20%
LecceComo
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
LecceComo
20%BTTS - last 520%
LecceComo

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
LecceComo
27%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
LecceComo
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
LecceComo

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
LecceComo
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
LecceComo
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
LecceComo

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Como is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.2 pts / match - Lecce · 1.4 pts / match - Como

Lecce - half-time state
20% leading60% draw20% trailing
Como - half-time state
27% leading60% draw13% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.2Points per match (1st half)1.4
LecceComo
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.47
LecceComo
0.4Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
LecceComo
0.8Average goals (1st half)0.8
LecceComo
67%Clean sheet before half-time67%
LecceComo
67%No goal before half-time53%
LecceComo

After half-time (2nd half)

0.8Points per match (2nd half)1.47
LecceComo
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.8
LecceComo
0.87Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
LecceComo
1.2Average goals (2nd half)1.27
LecceComo
40%Clean sheet after half-time67%
LecceComo
73%No goal after half-time60%
LecceComo

Lecce - second-half results

13% W40% D47% L
18
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Como - second-half results

40% W27% D33% L
21
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding148%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 40%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lecce - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match0.61.0
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Como - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.8
Average goals in match0.81.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lecce
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
3
2
16-30
1
4
31-45
1
3
46-60
1
6
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Como
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
1
1
16-30
2
1
31-45
3
3
46-60
4
1
61-75
5
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.04
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
37%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
32%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
19%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lecce

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.22
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.32
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
57%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
120%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Como

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.31
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
63%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).

Teams vs league

LecceLigaComo
Average goals in match 2.002.33 2.07
Both teams scored 33%47% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 33%44% 27%
Clean sheets 40%32% 40%
Goal before half-time 53%64% 60%
Goal after half-time 67%75% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.33
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.27
Home goals / match
1.06
Away goals / match
+20%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LecceYellow cardRiccardo Sottil
  2. ComoYellow cardIvan Smolčić
  3. ComoSubstitutionOn: Ignace Van Der BremptOff: Ivan Smolčić
  4. ComoYellow cardJean Butez
  5. ComoYellow cardMaximo Perrone
  6. LecceYellow cardYlber Ramadani
  7. ComoSubstitutionOn: Martin BaturinaOff: Mërgim Vojvoda
  8. LecceSubstitutionOn: Olaf GorterOff: Ylber Ramadani

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Matteo MarchettiMatches officiated: 11
4Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 227%Home wins27%Draws45%Away wins

FAQ

What was the result of Lecce vs Como?

The Serie A match finished Lecce 0:3 Como. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lecce vs Como?

Lecce score 0.73 goals per game on average and Como 1.27. The Serie A average is 2.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Lecce's matches and 40% of Como's.

What form are Lecce and Como in?

Over the last 5 games Lecce have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Como 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lecce vs Como?

The statistical background for Lecce vs Como — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.