Poland - 3 Liga Group 1Data current as of 18 September 2026

Lechia T. Mazowiecki vs Swit: match statistics

Lechia T. Mazowiecki crest
Lechia T. Mazowiecki
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Swit crest
Swit

Lechia T. Mazowiecki vs Swit: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lechia T. Mazowiecki played Swit in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The match was played on 17 May 2026. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Lechia T. Mazowiecki: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Swit: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lechia T. Mazowiecki scores 1.97 and concedes 1.68 goals per match. Swit scores 1.52 and concedes 1.87. League average: 3.36 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lechia T. Mazowiecki 81%, Swit 58%. Over 2.5: Lechia T. Mazowiecki 71%, Swit 65%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

Lechia T. Mazowiecki has higher xG: 1.70 vs 1.21. Lechia T. Mazowiecki: 11.8 shots per match, Swit: 6.2.

Match halves

Lechia T. Mazowiecki: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.87. Swit: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.81.

Goals by minute

Lechia T. Mazowiecki: 31-45+ (14 goals). Swit: 76-90+ (15 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

3 Liga Group 1: 3.36 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Lechia T. Mazowiecki holds a clear home advantage: they have scored 61 goals this season and average 2.13 goals per home match, while Swit have 47 goals this season and average 1.20 goals on the road. The hosts average 16.71 shots per match (6.71 on target) versus the visitors' 9.44 shots (3.44 on target), and their home xG is 1.88 compared to the visitors' away xG of 1.18, indicating more high-quality chances. In the last 5 matches Lechia have scored 7 goals and their form is 1-2-2 (1.0 point per match), whereas Swit have scored 11 goals and are 3-1-1 (2.0 points per match), so the visitors are recently more effective offensively. Nonetheless, Swit’s away defence is weak — they concede 2.33 goals per away match and have a negative goal difference of -17, while Lechia concede 1.47 at home and have a home goal difference of +10; the hosts also keep a clean sheet less often when away (7% of home matches without conceding vs 20% of Swit’s away matches without scoring). Given the advantage in chance creation (16.71 vs 9.44 shots), better home goal differential and superior xG efficiency (1.88 vs 1.18), I forecast a Lechia win; I assess probabilities as 60% home win, 20% draw and 20% away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

A strong signal for BTTS - Yes comes from the league and recent form: the league records 62% of matches finishing with both teams scoring, Lechia has 63% season BTTS and 100% BTTS in the last 5 matches, while Świt has 53% season BTTS and 60% BTTS in the last 5. Goals and form stats show both teams can score and concede: Lechia averages 1.81 goals per match this season (7 goals in the last 5) and concedes 1.44 this season (11 conceded in the last 5, i.e. 2.2 per match), whereas Świt has 1.20 goals this season but 2.2 in the last 5 (11 goals) and concedes 2.33 this season (9 conceded in the last 5, i.e. 1.8 per match). xG and efficiency also support BTTS: Lechia has xG 1.23 at home (1.77 in the last 5) and a high conversion rate of 22%, while Świt has xG 1.18 this season (1.11 in the last 5) but xG against of 1.75 this season and 1.9 in the last 5, indicating chance creation from both sides. Additionally, clean sheets are rare (Lechia 19%, Świt 27%) and the league averages 3.34 goals per match, so the most likely scenario is Goal/Goal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Calculated from xG: Lechia has xG_for 1.23 versus Swit’s xG_against 1.75, implying an expected 1.49 goals for the home side; Swit has xG_for 1.18 versus Lechia’s xG_against 1.57, implying 1.38 expected away goals, totaling 2.87 xG. Over the season Lechia averages 1.81 goals scored and concedes 1.44, while Swit scores 1.20 and concedes 2.33, which supports both teams’ tendency toward goalful matches. Over percentages: Over 1.5 occurred in 75% of Lechia’s matches and 87% of Swit’s matches (avg ~81%), therefore I forecast 82% for Over 1.5; Over 2.5 is 63%/67% (avg ~65%) — I assign 66% to Over 2.5; Over 3.5 is 44%/40% (avg ~42%) — I assign 42% to Over 3.5. Additionally, both teams saw BTTS in 63% of Lechia’s matches and 53% of Swit’s matches, and Lechia’s shot conversion is high at 22% versus Swit’s 12%, increasing the likelihood of goals above expected xG. In summary, the strongest signal is Over 1.5: expected 2.87 goals, high incidence of Over 1.5 (~81%) and Lechia’s superior conversion (22%) make Over 1.5 the best line to play.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

At half-time I expect a draw: the home side score an average of 0.94 goals by the break versus just 0.36 for the visitors, while Lechia keep a clean sheet at half-time in 50% of matches compared with Swit conceding an average of 1.29 goals before the break. For the full-time result I favour Lechia — the hosts average 1.81 goals per match versus 1.20 for the away team and have a higher points-per-match average (1.50 vs 1.13), whereas Swit concedes 2.33 goals per match on average. Additionally, Lechia are far more efficient (conversion rate 22% versus 12% for the visitors) and possess a slightly better xG (1.23 vs 1.18), suggesting they will convert their chances more effectively. The hosts frequently decide matches after the break (81% of games feature at least one second-half goal) and have scored 10 goals in minutes 76–90, so the Half-Time/Full-Time scenario of draw at the break and home win (X/1) is the most likely in my view and I assign it a 30% probability, with strong alternatives of 1/1 (20%) and X/X (15%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
9Shots16
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
3Shots on target2
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
1.16xG1.65
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
3Corners4
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
51Dangerous attacks67
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
16Fouls10
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
0Cards0
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
1.97Goals scored / match1.52
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
1.68Goals conceded / match1.87
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
43%Average possession38%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
4.65Shots on target / match2.42
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.77Shots per match6.23
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
4.65Shots on target2.42
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
16.7%Shot conversion24.4%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
43%Possession38%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
1.7xG for1.21
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
1.53xG against1.64
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit

Shooting quality

Lechia T. Mazowiecki: Counter-attackingSwit: Counter-attacking
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
Accuracy (shots on target)40%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.19
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.420.63

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Swit is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Lechia T. Mazowiecki · 2 pts / match - Swit

Lechia T. Mazowiecki
DWLDL
Season result split
39% W23% D39% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-7-12
1.39 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-3-6
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.77Opponent xG: 1.39BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Swit
DWLWW
Season result split
39% W16% D45% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-5-14
1.32 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-8
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LLLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.11Opponent xG: 1.90BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lechia T. Mazowiecki is 30% better for: goals scored per match.

1.97 goals / match - Lechia T. Mazowiecki · 1.52 goals / match - Swit

Lechia T. Mazowiecki is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.68 goals / match - Lechia T. Mazowiecki · 1.87 goals / match - Swit

Lechia T. Mazowiecki scoring profile: very strong

Lechia T. Mazowiecki scores in 90% of matches (28 of 31 matches), while Swit keeps a clean sheet in 23% (7 of 31 matches).

Swit scoring profile: very strong

Swit scores in 81% of matches (25 of 31 matches), while Lechia T. Mazowiecki keeps a clean sheet in 10% (3 of 31 matches).

61Goals scored (season)47
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
52Goals conceded (season)58
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
3.65Average goals in match3.39
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
7Goals scored (last 5)11
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
11Goals conceded (last 5)9
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit

How often they score at least...

90%1 goal81%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
45%2 goals39%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
32%3 goals26%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
13%4 goals6%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit

How often they concede at least...

90%1 goal77%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
52%2 goals48%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
19%3 goals32%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
6%4 goals16%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

81%
Lechia T. Mazowiecki - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.25 of 31 matches
62%
League average

Goal patterns

39%BTTS at half-time26%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
6%BTTS in both halves10%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
29%Scored in both halves26%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit

BTTS and goal count

65%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
100%BTTS - last 560%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

77%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
61%Min. 2 goals before half-time52%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit

2nd half

87%Min. 1 goal after half-time84%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
58%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time32%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lechia T. Mazowiecki is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.61 pts / match - Lechia T. Mazowiecki · 1.26 pts / match - Swit

Lechia T. Mazowiecki - half-time state
39% leading45% draw16% trailing
Swit - half-time state
29% leading39% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.61Points per match (1st half)1.26
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
1.1Goals scored (1st half)0.65
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
0.55Goals conceded (1st half)0.87
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
1.65Average goals (1st half)1.52
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
52%Clean sheet before half-time45%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
32%No goal before half-time52%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per match (2nd half)1.29
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
0.87Goals scored (2nd half)0.81
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
1.13Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
2Average goals (2nd half)1.81
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
26%Clean sheet after half-time42%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
48%No goal after half-time45%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit

Lechia T. Mazowiecki - second-half results

26% W29% D45% L
50
Half-time points
34
Half-time goals
+17
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.61
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Swit - second-half results

35% W23% D42% L
39
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
-7
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.26
PPG before half-time
Lead holding134%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lechia T. Mazowiecki - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.00
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.81.4
Average goals in match1.42.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3
Swit - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.00
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.21.6
Average goals in match1.02.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lechia T. Mazowiecki
ScoredConceded
11
5
0-15
9
7
16-30
14
5
31-45
13
13
46-60
4
13
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (14 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Swit
ScoredConceded
7
4
0-15
7
9
16-30
8
14
31-45
7
11
46-60
3
9
61-75
15
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.52
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
70%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-43%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
73%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lechia T. Mazowiecki

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Swit

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.43
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.68
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).

Teams vs league

Lechia T. MazowieckiLigaSwit
Average goals in match 3.653.36 3.39
Both teams scored 81%62% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 71%66% 65%
Clean sheets 10%21% 23%
Goal before half-time 77%74% 77%
Goal after half-time 87%84% 84%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.36
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.86
Home goals / match
1.50
Away goals / match
+24%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
55%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
11%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Mateusz Kempski⚽ 2

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Lechia T. MazowieckiGoalMateusz Kempski
  2. Lechia T. MazowieckiGoalMateusz Kempski

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Lechia T. Mazowiecki 0 - 1 - 0 Swit. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Swit
1 : 1
Lechia T. Mazowiecki

FAQ

What was the result of Lechia T. Mazowiecki vs Swit?

The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Lechia T. Mazowiecki 2:0 Swit. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lechia T. Mazowiecki vs Swit?

Lechia T. Mazowiecki score 1.97 goals per game on average and Swit 1.52. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.36 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 81% of Lechia T. Mazowiecki's matches and 58% of Swit's.

What form are Lechia T. Mazowiecki and Swit in?

Over the last 5 games Lechia T. Mazowiecki have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Swit 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lechia T. Mazowiecki vs Swit?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Lechia T. Mazowiecki vs Swit: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.