Poland - 3 Liga Group 1Data current as of 23 July 2026

Lechia T. Mazowiecki vs Swit: match statistics

Lechia T. Mazowiecki crest
Lechia T. Mazowiecki
2 : 0half-time 1:0
Swit crest
Swit

Lechia T. Mazowiecki vs Swit: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lechia T. Mazowiecki play Swit in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The match date is 17 May 2026 at 12:00. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Lechia T. Mazowiecki: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Swit: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lechia T. Mazowiecki scores 1.88 and concedes 1.62 goals per match. Swit scores 1.50 and concedes 1.94. League average: 3.33 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lechia T. Mazowiecki 76%, Swit 59%. Over 2.5: Lechia T. Mazowiecki 68%, Swit 65%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

xG, shots and style

Lechia T. Mazowiecki has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.29. Lechia T. Mazowiecki: 11.3 shots per match, Swit: 6.9.

Match halves

Lechia T. Mazowiecki: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.85. Swit: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.79.

Goals by minute

Lechia T. Mazowiecki: 31-45+ (14 goals). Swit: 76-90+ (16 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

3 Liga Group 1: 3.33 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 66%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Lechia T. Mazowiecki holds a clear home advantage: they have scored 61 goals this season and average 2.13 goals per home match, while Swit have 47 goals this season and average 1.20 goals on the road. The hosts average 16.71 shots per match (6.71 on target) versus the visitors' 9.44 shots (3.44 on target), and their home xG is 1.88 compared to the visitors' away xG of 1.18, indicating more high-quality chances. In the last 5 matches Lechia have scored 7 goals and their form is 1-2-2 (1.0 point per match), whereas Swit have scored 11 goals and are 3-1-1 (2.0 points per match), so the visitors are recently more effective offensively. Nonetheless, Swit’s away defence is weak — they concede 2.33 goals per away match and have a negative goal difference of -17, while Lechia concede 1.47 at home and have a home goal difference of +10; the hosts also keep a clean sheet less often when away (7% of home matches without conceding vs 20% of Swit’s away matches without scoring). Given the advantage in chance creation (16.71 vs 9.44 shots), better home goal differential and superior xG efficiency (1.88 vs 1.18), I forecast a Lechia win; I assess probabilities as 60% home win, 20% draw and 20% away win.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
9Shots16
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
3Shots on target2
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
1.16xG1.65
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
3Corners4
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
51Dangerous attacks67
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
16Fouls10
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
0Cards0
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
1.88Goals scored / match1.5
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
1.62Goals conceded / match1.94
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
43%Average possession39%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
4.35Shots on target / match2.68
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.26Shots per match6.88
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
4.35Shots on target2.68
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
16.7%Shot conversion21.8%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
43%Possession39%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
1.67xG for1.29
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
1.54xG against1.64
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit

Shooting quality

Lechia T. Mazowiecki: Counter-attackingSwit: Counter-attacking
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
Accuracy (shots on target)39%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.19
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.430.56

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Swit is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Lechia T. Mazowiecki · 1.2 pts / match - Swit

Lechia T. Mazowiecki
DLWLD
Season result split
38% W24% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-8-13
1.38 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-4-6
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWLWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Swit
WWLLL
Season result split
35% W15% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-5-17
1.21 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-2-10
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.85BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lechia T. Mazowiecki is 25% better for: goals scored per match.

1.88 goals / match - Lechia T. Mazowiecki · 1.5 goals / match - Swit

Lechia T. Mazowiecki is 20% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.62 goals / match - Lechia T. Mazowiecki · 1.94 goals / match - Swit

Lechia T. Mazowiecki scoring profile: very strong

Lechia T. Mazowiecki scores in 88% of matches (30 of 34 matches), while Swit keeps a clean sheet in 21% (7 of 34 matches).

Swit scoring profile: very strong

Swit scores in 79% of matches (27 of 34 matches), while Lechia T. Mazowiecki keeps a clean sheet in 15% (5 of 34 matches).

64Goals scored (season)51
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
55Goals conceded (season)66
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
3.5Average goals in match3.44
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
6Goals scored (last 5)9
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
9Goals conceded (last 5)10
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal79%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
44%2 goals41%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
29%3 goals24%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
12%4 goals6%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal79%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
50%2 goals53%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
21%3 goals35%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
6%4 goals15%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

76%
Lechia T. Mazowiecki - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.26 of 34 matches
62%
League average

Goal patterns

35%BTTS at half-time24%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
6%BTTS in both halves9%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
29%Scored in both halves24%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit

BTTS and goal count

62%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
60%BTTS - last 560%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
56%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time32%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lechia T. Mazowiecki is 35% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.59 pts / match - Lechia T. Mazowiecki · 1.18 pts / match - Swit

Lechia T. Mazowiecki - half-time state
38% leading44% draw18% trailing
Swit - half-time state
26% leading38% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.59Points per match (1st half)1.18
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
1.03Goals scored (1st half)0.59
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
0.53Goals conceded (1st half)0.88
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
1.56Average goals (1st half)1.47
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
53%Clean sheet before half-time44%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
35%No goal before half-time56%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit

After half-time (2nd half)

1.09Points per match (2nd half)1.29
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
0.85Goals scored (2nd half)0.79
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
1.09Goals conceded (2nd half)0.97
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
1.94Average goals (2nd half)1.76
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
29%Clean sheet after half-time41%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit
47%No goal after half-time47%
Lechia T. MazowieckiSwit

Lechia T. Mazowiecki - second-half results

26% W29% R44% P
54
Half-time points
35
Half-time goals
+17
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.59
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.6

Concedes 0.6 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Swit - second-half results

35% W24% R41% P
40
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
-10
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.18
PPG before half-time
Lead holding135%

Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Lechia T. Mazowiecki - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.21.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Swit - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.60
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match0.61.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-3+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lechia T. Mazowiecki
ScoredConceded
12
6
0-15
9
7
16-30
14
5
31-45
13
13
46-60
4
14
61-75
12
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (14 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Swit
ScoredConceded
9
8
0-15
7
10
16-30
8
15
31-45
8
11
46-60
3
10
61-75
16
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (16 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.47
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
68%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-42%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
70%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lechia T. Mazowiecki

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.38
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Swit

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
107%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.01
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).

Teams vs league

Lechia T. MazowieckiLigaSwit
Average goals in match 3.503.33 3.44
Both teams scored 76%62% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 68%66% 65%
Clean sheets 15%20% 21%
Goal before half-time 76%74% 76%
Goal after half-time 85%83% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.33
Average goals per match
62%
Both teams scored
66%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.82
Home goals / match
1.51
Away goals / match
+21%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
28%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Lechia T. Mazowiecki 0 - 1 - 0 Swit. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Swit
1 : 1
Lechia T. Mazowiecki

FAQ

What was the result of Lechia T. Mazowiecki vs Swit?

The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Lechia T. Mazowiecki 2:0 Swit. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lechia T. Mazowiecki vs Swit?

Lechia T. Mazowiecki score 1.88 goals per game on average and Swit 1.50. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 66% of games. Both teams score in 76% of Lechia T. Mazowiecki's matches and 59% of Swit's.

What form are Lechia T. Mazowiecki and Swit in?

Over the last 5 games Lechia T. Mazowiecki have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Swit 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lechia T. Mazowiecki vs Swit?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Lechia T. Mazowiecki vs Swit: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.