Leopards vs APS Bomet: match statistics
The Leopards present decidedly better form than APS Bomet, confirmed by a season record of 6 wins, 6 draws, and only 1 loss, accompanied by a positive goal difference of 14:9. The hosts' form in the last five matches is particularly impressive (3 wins, 2 draws, zero losses), along with an excellent home run featuring 50% wins and 50% clean sheets with an average of just 0.5 conceded goals per match. APS Bomet holds a weaker overall record (3-4-7) and a negative goal difference of 13:18, while their away form is unstable with just 33% wins and an average of 1.67 goals conceded per match. Possession advantage (50% vs 41%), superior xG efficiency (0.72 vs 0.79), and an impressive 2.2 points per match in the last five games give the Leopards a clear edge. Considering all statistics, a home victory is the most probable scenario for this encounter.
Leopards vs APS Bomet: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Leopards played APS Bomet in Kenyan Premier League (Kenya). The match was played on 17 January 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Leopards: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. APS Bomet: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Leopards scores 1.25 and concedes 0.63 goals per match. APS Bomet scores 1.00 and concedes 1.25. League average: 1.91 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Leopards 38%, APS Bomet 50%. Over 2.5: Leopards 31%, APS Bomet 38%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 30%.
xG, shots and style
Leopards has higher xG: 1.26 vs 1.15. Leopards: 7.8 shots per match, APS Bomet: 6.6.
Match halves
Leopards: half-time lead 6%, second-half goals 0.44. APS Bomet: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.19.
Goals by minute
Leopards: 0-15 (11 goals). APS Bomet: 0-15 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Kenyan Premier League: 1.91 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 30%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The Leopards present decidedly better form than APS Bomet, confirmed by a season record of 6 wins, 6 draws, and only 1 loss, accompanied by a positive goal difference of 14:9. The hosts' form in the last five matches is particularly impressive (3 wins, 2 draws, zero losses), along with an excellent home run featuring 50% wins and 50% clean sheets with an average of just 0.5 conceded goals per match. APS Bomet holds a weaker overall record (3-4-7) and a negative goal difference of 13:18, while their away form is unstable with just 33% wins and an average of 1.67 goals conceded per match. Possession advantage (50% vs 41%), superior xG efficiency (0.72 vs 0.79), and an impressive 2.2 points per match in the last five games give the Leopards a clear edge. Considering all statistics, a home victory is the most probable scenario for this encounter.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Leopards | APS Bomet | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.16 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.49 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Leopards is 100% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Leopards · 1 pts / match - APS Bomet
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Leopards is 25% better for: goals scored per match.
1.25 goals / match - Leopards · 1 goals / match - APS Bomet
Leopards is 98% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.63 goals / match - Leopards · 1.25 goals / match - APS Bomet
Leopards scores in 69% of matches (11 of 16 matches), while APS Bomet keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).
APS Bomet scores in 56% of matches (9 of 16 matches), while Leopards keeps a clean sheet in 50% (8 of 16 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Leopards
Over / Under - APS Bomet
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Leopards is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / match - Leopards · 0.88 pts / match - APS Bomet
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Leopards - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 6% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
APS Bomet - second-half results
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Leopards
APS Bomet
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Kenyan Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Leopards | Liga | APS Bomet | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 1.88 | 1.91 | ▲ 2.25 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 38% | 41% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 31% | 30% | ▲ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 50% | 38% | ▼ 25% |
| Goal before half-time | • 31% | 32% | ▼ 19% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 38% | 34% | ▲ 38% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
FAQ
What was the result of Leopards vs APS Bomet?
The Kenyan Premier League match finished Leopards 2:1 APS Bomet. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Leopards vs APS Bomet?
Leopards score 1.25 goals per game on average and APS Bomet 1.00. The Kenyan Premier League average is 1.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 30% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Leopards's matches and 50% of APS Bomet's.
What form are Leopards and APS Bomet in?
Over the last 5 games Leopards have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and APS Bomet 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Leopards vs APS Bomet?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.