United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 23 July 2026

Lexington vs Brooklyn FC: match statistics

Lexington crest
Lexington
3 : 0half-time 0:0
Brooklyn FC crest
Brooklyn FC
155%(1.61)
X30%(3.80)
215%(5.20)

Lexington appears to have the upper hand in this match, despite their lowly table position. The hosts' home record shows 50% draws and 50% losses, but crucially – they keep a clean sheet in 50% of those games and have a positive xG differential (0.98 vs 0.25 per match). Brooklyn FC are in dreadful form on the road – 100% losses, a 0% goal-scoring rate in away matches, and an average of 3 goals conceded per game. The visitors' shot conversion rate is 0% away from home, highlighting severe issues in finishing. Despite averaging 57% possession, Brooklyn fails to translate this into goals on their travels. Considering that Lexington has a better expected goals record at home (0.98 vs Brooklyn's 1.04 xG For away) and the fact the hosts have scored a total of 12 goals in their last 5 matches overall, I expect a home victory. However, the slight advantage of a draw must be factored in due to Lexington's tendency to share the points at home.

Lexington vs Brooklyn FC: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lexington play Brooklyn FC in USL Championship (United States). The match date is 26 March 2026 at 00:00. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Lexington: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Brooklyn FC: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lexington scores 1.57 and concedes 1.43 goals per match. Brooklyn FC scores 1.13 and concedes 1.73. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lexington 64%, Brooklyn FC 47%. Over 2.5: Lexington 64%, Brooklyn FC 60%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

xG is very similar for both teams. Lexington: 12.2 shots per match, Brooklyn FC: 11.1.

Match halves

Lexington: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.86. Brooklyn FC: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 0.60.

Goals by minute

Lexington: 0-15 (5 goals). Brooklyn FC: 61-75 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Match description

Lexington appears to have the upper hand in this match, despite their lowly table position. The hosts' home record shows 50% draws and 50% losses, but crucially – they keep a clean sheet in 50% of those games and have a positive xG differential (0.98 vs 0.25 per match). Brooklyn FC are in dreadful form on the road – 100% losses, a 0% goal-scoring rate in away matches, and an average of 3 goals conceded per game. The visitors' shot conversion rate is 0% away from home, highlighting severe issues in finishing. Despite averaging 57% possession, Brooklyn fails to translate this into goals on their travels. Considering that Lexington has a better expected goals record at home (0.98 vs Brooklyn's 1.04 xG For away) and the fact the hosts have scored a total of 12 goals in their last 5 matches overall, I expect a home victory. However, the slight advantage of a draw must be factored in due to Lexington's tendency to share the points at home.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
3 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
20Shots10
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
9Shots on target3
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
2.05xG1.19
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
4Corners2
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
22Dangerous attacks47
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
11Fouls21
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
3Cards4
LexingtonBrooklyn FC

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

LexingtonBrooklyn FC
1.57Goals scored / match1.13
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
1.43Goals conceded / match1.73
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
51%Average possession50%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
4.36Shots on target / match4.73
LexingtonBrooklyn FC

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.21Shots per match11.13
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
4.36Shots on target4.73
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
12.9%Shot conversion10.2%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
51%Possession50%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
1.43xG for1.43
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
1.34xG against1.64
LexingtonBrooklyn FC

Shooting quality

Lexington: BalancedBrooklyn FC: Balanced
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
Accuracy (shots on target)36%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lexington is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Lexington · 1.2 pts / match - Brooklyn FC

Lexington
LWWWL
Season result split
36% W21% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-6
1.29 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Brooklyn FC
DDLWD
Season result split
20% W27% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-8
0.87 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-4
Last 5 away
1-3-1
LDDWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.55Opponent xG: 1.48BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lexington is 39% better for: goals scored per match.

1.57 goals / match - Lexington · 1.13 goals / match - Brooklyn FC

Lexington is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.43 goals / match - Lexington · 1.73 goals / match - Brooklyn FC

Lexington scoring profile: very strong

Lexington scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Brooklyn FC keeps a clean sheet in 20% (3 of 15 matches).

Brooklyn FC scoring profile: strong

Brooklyn FC scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while Lexington keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).

22Goals scored (season)17
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
20Goals conceded (season)26
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
3Average goals in match2.87
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
12Goals scored (last 5)8
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
9Goals conceded (last 5)8
LexingtonBrooklyn FC

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal67%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
36%2 goals40%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
29%3 goals7%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
14%4 goals0%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal80%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
43%2 goals60%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
21%3 goals27%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
7%4 goals7%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time20%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
0%BTTS in both halves13%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
21%Scored in both halves20%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
80%BTTS - last 560%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time53%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
64%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lexington is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.36 pts / match - Lexington · 1.13 pts / match - Brooklyn FC

Lexington - half-time state
36% leading29% draw36% trailing
Brooklyn FC - half-time state
27% leading33% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per match (1st half)1.13
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.53
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.87
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.4
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
64%Clean sheet before half-time40%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
57%No goal before half-time60%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC

After half-time (2nd half)

1.07Points per match (2nd half)1.07
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)0.6
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
0.86Goals conceded (2nd half)0.87
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.47
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
36%Clean sheet after half-time47%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC
43%No goal after half-time53%
LexingtonBrooklyn FC

Lexington - second-half results

21% W43% R36% P
19
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Brooklyn FC - second-half results

27% W27% R47% P
17
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding74%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Lexington - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match1.01.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.62.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Brooklyn FC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match1.20.4
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lexington
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
3
3
31-45
3
1
46-60
4
6
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Brooklyn FC
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
3
4
16-30
2
6
31-45
3
3
46-60
5
3
61-75
1
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.93
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
56%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lexington

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Brooklyn FC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
6% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
6%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

LexingtonLigaBrooklyn FC
Average goals in match 3.002.79 2.87
Both teams scored 64%58% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 64%52% 60%
Clean sheets 29%26% 20%
Goal before half-time 71%67% 80%
Goal after half-time 79%80% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

FAQ

What was the result of Lexington vs Brooklyn FC?

The USL Championship match finished Lexington 3:0 Brooklyn FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lexington vs Brooklyn FC?

Lexington score 1.57 goals per game on average and Brooklyn FC 1.13. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Lexington's matches and 47% of Brooklyn FC's.

What form are Lexington and Brooklyn FC in?

Over the last 5 games Lexington have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Brooklyn FC 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lexington vs Brooklyn FC?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.