United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 10 November 2026

Lexington vs Phoenix Rising: match statistics

Lexington crest
Lexington
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Phoenix Rising crest
Phoenix Rising

Lexington vs Phoenix Rising: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lexington played Phoenix Rising in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 8 August 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Lexington: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Phoenix Rising: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lexington scores 1.59 and concedes 1.29 goals per match. Phoenix Rising scores 1.33 and concedes 1.39. League average: 2.74 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lexington 59%, Phoenix Rising 56%. Over 2.5: Lexington 59%, Phoenix Rising 44%. League level: BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Phoenix Rising has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.46. Lexington: 12.6 shots per match, Phoenix Rising: 12.6.

Match halves

Lexington: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.88. Phoenix Rising: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.89.

Goals by minute

Lexington: 76-90+ (6 goals). Phoenix Rising: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.74 goals per match, BTTS 54%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Lexington has a clear home advantage profile: they win 56% of their home matches and score an average of 1.78 goals, while Phoenix Rising win just 22% of their away games and average 1.00 goal per match. The hosts also create higher-quality chances, recording an average xG of 1.56 compared with the visitors’ 1.07, and their advantage is also evident in shots on target per game: 4.56 to 2.56. Lexington’s home defence concedes an average of 1.33 goals, slightly fewer than Phoenix do away from home (1.44), while the hosts also keep a clean sheet in 44% of matches compared with 22% for their opponents. Recent form is not entirely one-sided, however, with Lexington collecting 7 points from five matches and Phoenix 5, although the hosts conceded as many as 10 goals during that period. Home advantage, a higher volume of chances created and Phoenix’s weaker away record all point towards a Lexington victory, although the draw remains a significant risk.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes is more likely, as both teams have a season-long rate of matches with goals scored by both sides of 56%, slightly above the league average of 55%. The trend over the last five matches is even more favorable: Lexington recorded BTTS in 60% of games, while Phoenix Rising did so in as many as 80%, conceding an average of 2.0 and 1.6 goals respectively. Lexington creates a high volume of chances at home, averaging 1.93 xG, 16.44 shots, and 6.78 shots on target per match, while Phoenix keeps a clean sheet in only 22% of games. The visitors have been weaker over the course of the season, but their recent xG has risen to 1.63, while Lexington’s defense has allowed an average of 1.61 xG across its last five matches. The biggest risk to this pick is Phoenix’s away scoring average of just 1.0 goal; however, their current attacking form and the defensive issues on both sides provide stronger support for the BTTS - Yes outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Lexington creates significantly more chances: its average xG stands at 1.93, compared with the 1.37 xG conceded by Phoenix, while it also records 16.44 shots and 6.78 shots on target per match. Phoenix averages just 1.00 goal per game this season, but the hosts have conceded as many as 2.0 goals per match in their last five fixtures, with 1.61 xG allowed to opponents. At least two goals were scored in 89% of both teams’ matches, while over 2.5 goals landed in 60% of each team’s games across the last five rounds. The season-long percentage of matches finishing above 2.5 goals is 44% for both sides, making the 2.5 line more balanced than current form might suggest. The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as Lexington’s solid attacking potential and both teams’ recent defensive weaknesses should produce at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Lexington win, as both teams were level after 45 minutes in 80% of their last five matches. Across the season, Lexington led at the break in 33% of matches, compared with just 11% for Phoenix Rising, but the hosts are clearly stronger over the full 90 minutes: they average 1.67 goals from an xG of 1.93, while the visitors score 1.00 goals from an xG of 1.07. Lexington’s advantage is also evident in chance creation, averaging 16.44 shots and 6.78 on target, compared with Phoenix’s 8.78 shots and 2.56 on target. After the break, the hosts average 1.11 goals, while as many as 67% of Phoenix’s second halves have ended level, supporting a turnaround in favour of the home side after an evenly balanced opening.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
16Shots12
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
6Shots on target0
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
1.9xG1.12
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
7Corners7
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
65Dangerous attacks50
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
8Fouls11
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
1Cards3
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

LexingtonPhoenix Rising
1.59Goals scored / match1.33
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
1.29Goals conceded / match1.39
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
51%Average possession51%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
4.18Shots on target / match4.67
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.59Shots per match12.61
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
4.18Shots on target4.67
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
12.6%Shot conversion10.6%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
51%Possession51%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
1.46xG for1.5
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
1.36xG against1.27
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

Shooting quality

Lexington: BalancedPhoenix Rising: Balanced
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
Accuracy (shots on target)33%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lexington is 100% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / match - Lexington · 1 pts / match - Phoenix Rising

Lexington
WLWDW
Season result split
41% W24% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-4-6
1.47 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-1-3
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WWLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.68BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Phoenix Rising
LLWDD
Season result split
28% W39% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-7-6
1.22 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-4
Last 5 away
1-2-2
WLDLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.68Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lexington is 20% better for: goals scored per match.

1.59 goals / match - Lexington · 1.33 goals / match - Phoenix Rising

Lexington is 8% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.29 goals / match - Lexington · 1.39 goals / match - Phoenix Rising

Lexington scoring profile: very strong

Lexington scores in 76% of matches (13 of 17 matches), while Phoenix Rising keeps a clean sheet in 28% (5 of 18 matches).

Phoenix Rising scoring profile: strong

Phoenix Rising scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while Lexington keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 matches).

27Goals scored (season)24
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
22Goals conceded (season)25
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
2.88Average goals in match2.72
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
10Goals scored (last 5)8
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
7Goals conceded (last 5)10
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal78%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
41%2 goals33%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
29%3 goals22%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
12%4 goals0%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal72%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
41%2 goals44%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
18%3 goals17%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
6%4 goals6%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

54%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time17%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
0%BTTS in both halves6%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
24%Scored in both halves17%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS28%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
60%BTTS - last 580%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time39%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
18%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
59%Min. 2 goals after half-time56%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lexington is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.29 pts / match - Lexington · 1.17 pts / match - Phoenix Rising

Lexington - half-time state
29% leading41% draw29% trailing
Phoenix Rising - half-time state
22% leading50% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.29Points per match (1st half)1.17
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.44
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.11
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
65%Clean sheet before half-time56%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
59%No goal before half-time61%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)1.44
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
0.88Goals scored (2nd half)0.89
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
0.71Goals conceded (2nd half)0.72
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
1.59Average goals (2nd half)1.61
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
47%Clean sheet after half-time56%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
41%No goal after half-time44%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

Lexington - second-half results

29% W41% D29% L
22
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.29
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Phoenix Rising - second-half results

33% W44% D22% L
21
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Lexington - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match1.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.81.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
Phoenix Rising - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.61.4
Average goals in match1.22.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lexington
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
3
4
16-30
4
3
31-45
4
1
46-60
5
6
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Phoenix Rising
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
1
2
16-30
4
6
31-45
2
8
46-60
6
2
61-75
8
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.80
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-46%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lexington

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
22% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
22%

Phoenix Rising

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
111%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

LexingtonLigaPhoenix Rising
Average goals in match▲ 2.882.74• 2.72
Both teams scored▲ 59%54%▲ 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 59%50%▼ 44%
Clean sheets▲ 35%27%• 28%
Goal before half-time• 65%66%• 67%
Goal after half-time▼ 76%79%▼ 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.74
Average goals per match
54%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.20
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Phoenix RisingYellow cardJohn Scearce
  2. LexingtonSubstitutionOn: Tarik ScottOff: Elio Nicolas Firmino
  3. LexingtonSubstitutionOn: Macielo TschantretOff: Blaine Ferri
  4. LexingtonSubstitutionOn: Joseph HaffertyOff: Jacob Greene
  5. Phoenix RisingSubstitutionOn: Gunnar StudenthofftOff: Jean Eric Moursou
  6. Phoenix RisingRed cardLuke Biasi
  7. LexingtonYellow cardAaron Molloy

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Lexington 2 - 0 - 0 Phoenix Rising. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Lexington SC
2 : 0
Phoenix Rising FC
Phoenix Rising FC
0 : 1
Lexington SC

FAQ

What was the result of Lexington vs Phoenix Rising?

The USL Championship match finished Lexington 1:0 Phoenix Rising. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Lexington and Phoenix Rising?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Lexington won 2, Phoenix Rising won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Lexington vs Phoenix Rising?

Lexington score 1.59 goals per game on average and Phoenix Rising 1.33. The USL Championship average is 2.74 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Lexington's matches and 56% of Phoenix Rising's.

What form are Lexington and Phoenix Rising in?

Over the last 5 games Lexington have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Phoenix Rising 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lexington vs Phoenix Rising?

The statistical background for Lexington vs Phoenix Rising — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.