United States - USL ChampionshipData current as of 20 September 2026

Lexington vs Phoenix Rising: match statistics

Lexington crest
Lexington
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Phoenix Rising crest
Phoenix Rising

Lexington vs Phoenix Rising: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lexington played Phoenix Rising in USL Championship (United States). The match was played on 8 August 2026. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Lexington: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Phoenix Rising: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lexington scores 1.57 and concedes 1.43 goals per match. Phoenix Rising scores 1.44 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.79 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lexington 64%, Phoenix Rising 56%. Over 2.5: Lexington 64%, Phoenix Rising 50%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Phoenix Rising has higher xG: 1.49 vs 1.43. Lexington: 12.2 shots per match, Phoenix Rising: 12.4.

Match halves

Lexington: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.86. Phoenix Rising: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Lexington: 0-15 (5 goals). Phoenix Rising: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

USL Championship: 2.79 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-0. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Lexington has a clear home advantage profile: they win 56% of their home matches and score an average of 1.78 goals, while Phoenix Rising win just 22% of their away games and average 1.00 goal per match. The hosts also create higher-quality chances, recording an average xG of 1.56 compared with the visitors’ 1.07, and their advantage is also evident in shots on target per game: 4.56 to 2.56. Lexington’s home defence concedes an average of 1.33 goals, slightly fewer than Phoenix do away from home (1.44), while the hosts also keep a clean sheet in 44% of matches compared with 22% for their opponents. Recent form is not entirely one-sided, however, with Lexington collecting 7 points from five matches and Phoenix 5, although the hosts conceded as many as 10 goals during that period. Home advantage, a higher volume of chances created and Phoenix’s weaker away record all point towards a Lexington victory, although the draw remains a significant risk.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

BTTS - Yes is more likely, as both teams have a season-long rate of matches with goals scored by both sides of 56%, slightly above the league average of 55%. The trend over the last five matches is even more favorable: Lexington recorded BTTS in 60% of games, while Phoenix Rising did so in as many as 80%, conceding an average of 2.0 and 1.6 goals respectively. Lexington creates a high volume of chances at home, averaging 1.93 xG, 16.44 shots, and 6.78 shots on target per match, while Phoenix keeps a clean sheet in only 22% of games. The visitors have been weaker over the course of the season, but their recent xG has risen to 1.63, while Lexington’s defense has allowed an average of 1.61 xG across its last five matches. The biggest risk to this pick is Phoenix’s away scoring average of just 1.0 goal; however, their current attacking form and the defensive issues on both sides provide stronger support for the BTTS - Yes outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Lexington creates significantly more chances: its average xG stands at 1.93, compared with the 1.37 xG conceded by Phoenix, while it also records 16.44 shots and 6.78 shots on target per match. Phoenix averages just 1.00 goal per game this season, but the hosts have conceded as many as 2.0 goals per match in their last five fixtures, with 1.61 xG allowed to opponents. At least two goals were scored in 89% of both teams’ matches, while over 2.5 goals landed in 60% of each team’s games across the last five rounds. The season-long percentage of matches finishing above 2.5 goals is 44% for both sides, making the 2.5 line more balanced than current form might suggest. The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as Lexington’s solid attacking potential and both teams’ recent defensive weaknesses should produce at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Lexington win, as both teams were level after 45 minutes in 80% of their last five matches. Across the season, Lexington led at the break in 33% of matches, compared with just 11% for Phoenix Rising, but the hosts are clearly stronger over the full 90 minutes: they average 1.67 goals from an xG of 1.93, while the visitors score 1.00 goals from an xG of 1.07. Lexington’s advantage is also evident in chance creation, averaging 16.44 shots and 6.78 on target, compared with Phoenix’s 8.78 shots and 2.56 on target. After the break, the hosts average 1.11 goals, while as many as 67% of Phoenix’s second halves have ended level, supporting a turnaround in favour of the home side after an evenly balanced opening.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
-1Shots-1
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
-1Shots on target-1
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
0xG0
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
-1Corners-1
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
0Dangerous attacks0
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
-1Fouls-1
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
-1Cards-1
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

LexingtonPhoenix Rising
1.57Goals scored / match1.44
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
1.43Goals conceded / match1.5
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
51%Average possession50%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
4.36Shots on target / match4.75
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.21Shots per match12.38
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
4.36Shots on target4.75
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
12.9%Shot conversion11.6%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
51%Possession50%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
1.43xG for1.49
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
1.34xG against1.31
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

Shooting quality

Lexington: BalancedPhoenix Rising: Balanced
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
Accuracy (shots on target)36%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lexington is 125% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Lexington · 0.8 pts / match - Phoenix Rising

Lexington
LWWWL
Season result split
36% W21% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-6
1.29 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-3
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Phoenix Rising
LDLLW
Season result split
31% W31% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-5-6
1.25 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-4
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WWLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.67Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lexington is 9% better for: goals scored per match.

1.57 goals / match - Lexington · 1.44 goals / match - Phoenix Rising

Lexington is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.43 goals / match - Lexington · 1.5 goals / match - Phoenix Rising

Lexington scoring profile: very strong

Lexington scores in 79% of matches (11 of 14 matches), while Phoenix Rising keeps a clean sheet in 25% (4 of 16 matches).

Phoenix Rising scoring profile: very strong

Phoenix Rising scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Lexington keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).

22Goals scored (season)23
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
20Goals conceded (season)24
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
3Average goals in match2.94
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
12Goals scored (last 5)8
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
9Goals conceded (last 5)12
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal81%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
36%2 goals38%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
29%3 goals25%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
14%4 goals0%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal75%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
43%2 goals50%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
21%3 goals19%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
7%4 goals6%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

58%
League average

Goal patterns

7%BTTS at half-time13%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
0%BTTS in both halves6%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
21%Scored in both halves19%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

BTTS and goal count

57%Min. 3 goals and BTTS31%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS19%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
80%BTTS - last 580%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
43%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
64%Min. 2 goals after half-time63%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time13%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lexington is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.36 pts / match - Lexington · 1.19 pts / match - Phoenix Rising

Lexington - half-time state
36% leading29% draw36% trailing
Phoenix Rising - half-time state
25% leading44% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.36Points per match (1st half)1.19
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
0.71Goals scored (1st half)0.44
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.69
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.13
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
64%Clean sheet before half-time56%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
57%No goal before half-time63%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

After half-time (2nd half)

1.07Points per match (2nd half)1.5
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)1
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
0.86Goals conceded (2nd half)0.81
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
1.71Average goals (2nd half)1.81
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
36%Clean sheet after half-time50%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising
43%No goal after half-time38%
LexingtonPhoenix Rising

Lexington - second-half results

21% W43% D36% L
19
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.36
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Phoenix Rising - second-half results

38% W38% D25% L
19
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.19
PPG before half-time
Lead holding124%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lexington - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.40
Goals scored / match1.01.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.62.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%100%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+2+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 5
Phoenix Rising - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.42.0
Average goals in match0.83.2
1 goal40%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lexington
ScoredConceded
5
2
0-15
2
3
16-30
3
3
31-45
3
1
46-60
4
6
61-75
5
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Phoenix Rising
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
1
2
16-30
3
6
31-45
2
8
46-60
6
2
61-75
8
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.97
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-49%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
64%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lexington

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
102%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
114%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.51
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Phoenix Rising

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
97%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.45
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
35% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
35%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).

Teams vs league

LexingtonLigaPhoenix Rising
Average goals in match 3.002.79 2.94
Both teams scored 64%58% 56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 64%52% 50%
Clean sheets 29%26% 25%
Goal before half-time 71%67% 69%
Goal after half-time 79%80% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.25
Away goals / match
+23%
Home attack advantage
+19%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Phoenix RisingYellow cardJohn Scearce
  2. LexingtonSubstitutionOn: Tarik ScottOff: Elio Nicolas Firmino
  3. LexingtonSubstitutionOn: Macielo TschantretOff: Blaine Ferri
  4. LexingtonSubstitutionOn: Joseph HaffertyOff: Jacob Greene
  5. Phoenix RisingSubstitutionOn: Gunnar StudenthofftOff: Jean Eric Moursou
  6. Phoenix RisingRed cardLuke Biasi
  7. LexingtonYellow cardAaron Molloy

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Lexington 2 - 0 - 0 Phoenix Rising. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Lexington SC
2 : 0
Phoenix Rising FC
Phoenix Rising FC
0 : 1
Lexington SC

FAQ

What was the result of Lexington vs Phoenix Rising?

The USL Championship match finished Lexington 1:0 Phoenix Rising. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Lexington and Phoenix Rising?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Lexington won 2, Phoenix Rising won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Lexington vs Phoenix Rising?

Lexington score 1.57 goals per game on average and Phoenix Rising 1.44. The USL Championship average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Lexington's matches and 56% of Phoenix Rising's.

What form are Lexington and Phoenix Rising in?

Over the last 5 games Lexington have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Phoenix Rising 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lexington vs Phoenix Rising?

The statistical background for Lexington vs Phoenix Rising — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.