Austria - 2. LigaRed Bull ArenaData current as of 20 September 2026

Liefering vs WSPG Wels: match statistics

Liefering crest
Liefering
2 : 3half-time 1:1
WSPG Wels crest
WSPG Wels

Liefering vs WSPG Wels: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Liefering played WSPG Wels in 2. Liga (Austria). The match was played on 7 August 2026. Venue: Red Bull Arena. Final score: 2:3.

Current form

Liefering: 1-0-0, 3.00 points/match. WSPG Wels: 0-0-1, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Liefering scores 4.00 and concedes 0.00 goals per match. WSPG Wels scores 0.00 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.75 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Liefering 0%, WSPG Wels 0%. Over 2.5: Liefering 100%, WSPG Wels 0%. League level: BTTS 13%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Liefering has higher xG: 2.10 vs 0.80. Liefering: 15.0 shots per match, WSPG Wels: 3.0.

Match halves

Liefering: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 2.00. WSPG Wels: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

Liefering: 16-30 (2 goals). WSPG Wels: 0-15 (0 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

2. Liga: 2.75 goals per match, BTTS 13%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-1. Average goals 4.50, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Liefering head into this match in excellent form, having won all of their last 5 games, scoring 16 goals and conceding just 3. In the opening match of the current season, the hosts secured a 4:0 victory, while WSPG Wels began their campaign with a 0:2 defeat. The visitors have won only 2 of their last five matches, suffering 3 defeats and scoring just 4 goals—four times fewer than Liefering. The difference in attacking efficiency is clear: the hosts average 3.2 goals across their last five appearances, compared with just 0.8 for WSPG Wels. In addition, Liefering sit 3rd in the table, while their opponents are 12th, further strengthening the case for a confident home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, as WSPG Wels have scored an average of just 0.8 goals over their last five matches, while both teams scored in only 20% of their games. Liefering are in an excellent run of five consecutive victories and conceded just 3 goals during this period—an average of 0.6 per match—which limits the visitors’ chances of finding the net. The home side should still create chances, having scored an average of 3.2 goals per match with an xG of 2.00, while Wels conceded an average of 1.0 goal. The visitors do have an xG of 1.25, but their actual finishing efficiency and low BTTS percentage point more strongly towards a scenario in which at least one team—Wels in particular—fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Liefering are in excellent form, having won their last five matches and scoring an average of 3.2 goals per game, while conceding just 0.6. The hosts generated an xG of 2.00 during this period, whereas WSPG Wels have averaged only 0.8 goals per match. At least three goals were scored in four of Liefering’s last five matches, with their games producing 19 goals in total, or 3.8 per match. However, Wels have a more conservative profile, as only 20% of their last five matches went Over 2.5 goals, which limits confidence in higher goal lines. The strongest selection remains Over 1.5 goals: the hosts’ attacking superiority and a projected total of 2.90 goals provide clear grounds to expect at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is Liefering leading at the break and holding on to win, as the hosts have won all of their last five matches, while WSPG Wels have lost three of five. Liefering were ahead at half-time in 80% of these matches, scoring an average of 2.0 goals before the break while conceding just 0.4. The hosts’ advantage continues after the interval: they score an average of 1.2 goals in the second half and concede only 0.2, while the visitors have failed to score after half-time in each of their last five appearances. Across this entire period, Liefering average 3.2 goals scored and 0.6 conceded per match, compared with 0.8 and 1.0 respectively for Wels. The visitors’ seasonal data is very limited, leaving some room for surprises, but current form and the hosts’ clear advantage in both halves provide the strongest support for the 1/1 HT/FT outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

55Possession (%)45
LieferingWSPG Wels
10Shots16
LieferingWSPG Wels
3Shots on target7
LieferingWSPG Wels
1.18xG1.85
LieferingWSPG Wels
4Corners10
LieferingWSPG Wels
46Dangerous attacks49
LieferingWSPG Wels
7Fouls5
LieferingWSPG Wels
2Cards4
LieferingWSPG Wels

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

4Goals scored / match0
LieferingWSPG Wels
0Goals conceded / match2
LieferingWSPG Wels
60%Average possession53%
LieferingWSPG Wels
8Shots on target / match2
LieferingWSPG Wels

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

15Shots per match3
LieferingWSPG Wels
8Shots on target2
LieferingWSPG Wels
26.7%Shot conversion0%
LieferingWSPG Wels
60%Possession53%
LieferingWSPG Wels
2.1xG for0.8
LieferingWSPG Wels
1.92xG against1.81
LieferingWSPG Wels

Shooting quality

Liefering: DominantWSPG Wels: Balanced
LieferingWSPG Wels
Accuracy (shots on target)53%67%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.27
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.500.00

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Liefering
W
5 wins in a row
Season result split
100% W0% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 4.0Goals conceded: 0.0xG: 2.10Opponent xG: 1.92BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 100%
WSPG Wels
L
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% D100% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 0.80Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Liefering scoring profile: very strong

Liefering scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while WSPG Wels keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

WSPG Wels scoring profile: more difficult

WSPG Wels scores in 0% of matches (0 of 1 matches), while Liefering keeps a clean sheet in 100% (1 of 1 matches).

4Goals scored (season)0
LieferingWSPG Wels
0Goals conceded (season)2
LieferingWSPG Wels
4Average goals in match2
LieferingWSPG Wels
4Goals scored (last 5)0
LieferingWSPG Wels
0Goals conceded (last 5)2
LieferingWSPG Wels

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal0%
LieferingWSPG Wels
100%2 goals0%
LieferingWSPG Wels
100%3 goals0%
LieferingWSPG Wels
100%4 goals0%
LieferingWSPG Wels

How often they concede at least...

0%1 goal100%
LieferingWSPG Wels
0%2 goals100%
LieferingWSPG Wels
0%3 goals0%
LieferingWSPG Wels
0%4 goals0%
LieferingWSPG Wels

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
LieferingWSPG Wels
0%BTTS in both halves0%
LieferingWSPG Wels
100%Scored in both halves0%
LieferingWSPG Wels

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
LieferingWSPG Wels
100%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
LieferingWSPG Wels
0%BTTS - last 50%
LieferingWSPG Wels

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time0%
LieferingWSPG Wels
100%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
LieferingWSPG Wels
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
LieferingWSPG Wels

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
LieferingWSPG Wels
100%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
LieferingWSPG Wels
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
LieferingWSPG Wels

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Liefering is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

3 pts / match - Liefering · 1 pts / match - WSPG Wels

Liefering - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing
WSPG Wels - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

3Points per match (1st half)1
LieferingWSPG Wels
2Goals scored (1st half)0
LieferingWSPG Wels
0Goals conceded (1st half)0
LieferingWSPG Wels
2Average goals (1st half)0
LieferingWSPG Wels
100%Clean sheet before half-time100%
LieferingWSPG Wels
0%No goal before half-time100%
LieferingWSPG Wels

After half-time (2nd half)

3Points per match (2nd half)0
LieferingWSPG Wels
2Goals scored (2nd half)0
LieferingWSPG Wels
0Goals conceded (2nd half)2
LieferingWSPG Wels
2Average goals (2nd half)2
LieferingWSPG Wels
100%Clean sheet after half-time0%
LieferingWSPG Wels
0%No goal after half-time100%
LieferingWSPG Wels

Liefering - second-half results

100% W0% D0% L
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 100%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

WSPG Wels - second-half results

0% W0% D100% L
1
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+2.0

Concedes 2.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Liefering - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.003.00
Goals scored / match2.02.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.0
Average goals in match2.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%100%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
WSPG Wels - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.02.0
Average goals in match0.02.0
1 goal0%100%
2 goals0%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Liefering
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

WSPG Wels
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
3.0 : 0.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
0%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+50%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
0%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Liefering

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+3.82
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+1.90
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+1.92
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
290%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
0%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

WSPG Wels

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.99
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.80
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.19
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
0%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
145%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (2. Liga).

Teams vs league

LieferingLigaWSPG Wels
Average goals in match 4.002.75 2.00
Both teams scored 0%13% 0%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%50% 0%
Clean sheets 100%44% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%88% 0%
Goal after half-time 100%75% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.75
Average goals per match
13%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
44%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defence advantage
+-12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
13%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. WSPG WelsGoalTolgahan SahinAssist: Oliver Kregar
  2. LieferingGoalMiha MatjašecAssist: Julian Hussauf
  3. WSPG WelsYellow cardNikolas Freund
  4. WSPG WelsSubstitutionOn: Isa DrammehOff: Marek Švec
  5. LieferingYellow cardMayker Palacios Mosquera
  6. LieferingYellow cardMayker Palacios Mosquera
  7. WSPG WelsSubstitutionOn: Yasin MankanOff: Christopher Wernitznig
  8. LieferingSubstitutionOn: Said NisicOff: Jakob Zangerl
  9. WSPG WelsGoalIsa DrammehAssist: Tolgahan Sahin
  10. WSPG WelsYellow cardLuca Tischler
  11. LieferingGoalJulian HussaufAssist: Lassina Traoré
  12. WSPG WelsYellow cardIsa Drammeh
  13. WSPG WelsYellow cardStefan Haudum

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Liefering 0 - 1 - 1 WSPG Wels. Average goals 4.50, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FC Liefering
2 : 5
WSPG HOGO Wels
WSPG HOGO Wels
1 : 1
FC Liefering

FAQ

What was the result of Liefering vs WSPG Wels?

The 2. Liga match finished Liefering 2:3 WSPG Wels. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Liefering and WSPG Wels?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Liefering won 0, WSPG Wels won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 4.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Liefering vs WSPG Wels?

Liefering score 4.00 goals per game on average and WSPG Wels 0.00. The 2. Liga average is 2.75 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Liefering's matches and 0% of WSPG Wels's.

What form are Liefering and WSPG Wels in?

Over the last 5 games Liefering have a 1-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and WSPG Wels 0-0-1 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Liefering vs WSPG Wels?

The statistical background for Liefering vs WSPG Wels — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.