Latvia - VirsligaData current as of 06 September 2026

Liepāja vs Auda: match statistics

Liepāja crest
Liepāja
1 : 2half-time 0:1
Auda crest
Auda

Liepāja vs Auda: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Liepāja played Auda in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 8 April 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Liepāja: 2-0-2, 1.50 points/match. Auda: 3-0-1, 2.25 points/match.

Goal statistics

Liepāja scores 0.75 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Auda scores 1.50 and concedes 0.75. League average: 2.71 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Liepāja 25%, Auda 50%. Over 2.5: Liepāja 25%, Auda 50%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Auda has higher xG: 1.60 vs 1.37. Liepāja: 11.3 shots per match, Auda: 13.8.

Match halves

Liepāja: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.50. Auda: half-time lead 75%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Liepāja: 76-90+ (2 goals). Auda: 31-45+ (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 2-1-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 25%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Auda is the favorite based on clear metrics: the hosts' average xG is 1.01 versus 1.56 for the visitors, and average shots per match are 8 vs 14, giving the visitors more chances. Defensively Auda is markedly better — away they conceded 0.00 on average and have 100% clean sheets, while Liepāja concedes 1.00 at home and records an xG against of 1.42. In the last 5 matches Auda scored 8 goals (1.6 per match) versus 3 goals (0.6) for Liepāja, and the hosts have 50% of matches without scoring vs 0% for the visitors. Additionally Auda averages 52% possession and 5.5 shots on target away vs 43% and 2 on target for the hosts, suggesting higher-quality chances for the visitors. Based on these indicators I predict an Auda win (65%), a draw as a 20% probability, and a Liepāja win at 15%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Statistical analysis indicates a moderate edge for the BTTS scenario (Both Teams To Score). In the last 5 matches Auda has BTTS at 60% and scores on average 1.6 goals, while Liepāja has BTTS 20% and scores 0.6 goals, suggesting Auda is the more frequent scorer. Season xG values show both teams create similar chances: xG_for 1.63 for Liepāja versus 1.56 for Auda, and in the last 5 matches xG_for 1.44 vs 1.58, so both sides typically have around 1.5 xG per match. Auda averages 5.5 shots on target versus Liepāja’s 4.5, and Liepāja have conceded 7 goals in the last 5 matches compared to 5 conceded by Auda, which increases the likelihood of goals from both sides. Considering a league-level BTTS of 55% and an average of 2.7 goals per match, I recommend a BTTS - Yes wager as the more likely outcome (60% vs 40%).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

xG analysis projects: Liepāja ~1.40 goals (xG_for 1.63 vs xG_against Auda 1.16 → (1.63+1.16)/2 ≈1.40), Auda ~1.61 goals (xG_for 1.56 vs xG_against Liepāja 1.65 → (1.56+1.65)/2 ≈1.61), total ≈3.01 goals. Both teams average 13.5 (Liepāja) and 14.0 (Auda) shots with 4.5 and 5.5 on target; at an 11% conversion this yields 13.5*0.11≈1.49 and 14.0*0.11≈1.54 goals, which confirms the scoring potential. Seasonal stats are mixed: Liepāja has 100% of matches Over 2.5, Auda 0% seasonally, but Auda has 60% Over 2.5 in the last 5 matches, increasing uncertainty around the 2.5 line. Projected 3.01 is 0.31 goals above the league average of 2.7, so the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (expected total 3.01 >> 1.5), hence an over-side recommendation.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest signal is Auda’s lead at the break: the visitors led at half-time in 100% of their matches and average 1.0 goals by half-time with 0.0 conceded before the break. Liepāja formally led at half-time in 50% of matches, but in the last 5 only 20%, and they average 0.2 goals by half-time, which gives a clear HT-form advantage to the visitors. On full-time Auda has a 100% win rate this season versus 50% for the hosts, and across the last 5 matches the visitors average 2.6 points by half-time versus 0.8 for Liepāja; additionally Auda concedes fewer xG (1.16 vs 1.65), suggesting better defense. The hosts concede on average 1.0 goals after the break, while the visitors concede none (0.0), so the probability that Auda will hold the lead and win is high. Therefore I assign the highest probability to the 2/2 scenario (50%), with X/2 (18%) and 2/X (10%) as realistic alternatives.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
LiepājaAuda
5Shots10
LiepājaAuda
3Shots on target2
LiepājaAuda
0.75xG1.08
LiepājaAuda
5Corners4
LiepājaAuda
31Dangerous attacks43
LiepājaAuda
13Fouls19
LiepājaAuda
1Cards6
LiepājaAuda

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.75Goals scored / match1.5
LiepājaAuda
1Goals conceded / match0.75
LiepājaAuda
54%Average possession52%
LiepājaAuda
3.5Shots on target / match5
LiepājaAuda

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.25Shots per match13.75
LiepājaAuda
3.5Shots on target5
LiepājaAuda
6.7%Shot conversion10.9%
LiepājaAuda
54%Possession52%
LiepājaAuda
1.37xG for1.6
LiepājaAuda
1.34xG against1.4
LiepājaAuda

Shooting quality

Liepāja: BalancedAuda: Balanced
LiepājaAuda
Accuracy (shots on target)31%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Auda is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.5 pts / match - Liepāja · 2.25 pts / match - Auda

Liepāja
WLWL
Season result split
50% W0% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-2
1.50 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-2
1.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.37Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 25%Over 2.5: 25%
Auda
WWLW
Season result split
75% W0% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-0-1
2.25 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-1
2.25 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 away
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.5Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.60Opponent xG: 1.40BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 50%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Auda is 100% better for: goals scored per match.

0.75 goals / match - Liepāja · 1.5 goals / match - Auda

Auda is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Liepāja · 0.75 goals / match - Auda

Liepāja scoring profile: mixed

Liepāja scores in 50% of matches (2 of 4 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 50% (2 of 4 matches).

Auda scoring profile: very strong

Auda scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Liepāja keeps a clean sheet in 25% (1 of 4 matches).

3Goals scored (season)6
LiepājaAuda
4Goals conceded (season)3
LiepājaAuda
1.75Average goals in match2.25
LiepājaAuda
3Goals scored (last 5)6
LiepājaAuda
4Goals conceded (last 5)3
LiepājaAuda

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal100%
LiepājaAuda
25%2 goals50%
LiepājaAuda
0%3 goals0%
LiepājaAuda
0%4 goals0%
LiepājaAuda

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal50%
LiepājaAuda
25%2 goals25%
LiepājaAuda
0%3 goals0%
LiepājaAuda
0%4 goals0%
LiepājaAuda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time25%
LiepājaAuda
0%BTTS in both halves0%
LiepājaAuda
25%Scored in both halves50%
LiepājaAuda

BTTS and goal count

25%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
LiepājaAuda
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
LiepājaAuda
25%BTTS - last 550%
LiepājaAuda

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
LiepājaAuda
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time25%
LiepājaAuda
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
LiepājaAuda

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
LiepājaAuda
25%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
LiepājaAuda
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
LiepājaAuda

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Auda is 150% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Liepāja · 2.5 pts / match - Auda

Liepāja - half-time state
25% leading25% draw50% trailing
Auda - half-time state
75% leading25% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)2.5
LiepājaAuda
0.25Goals scored (1st half)1
LiepājaAuda
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.25
LiepājaAuda
0.75Average goals (1st half)1.25
LiepājaAuda
50%Clean sheet before half-time75%
LiepājaAuda
75%No goal before half-time0%
LiepājaAuda

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per match (2nd half)1.25
LiepājaAuda
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
LiepājaAuda
0.5Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
LiepājaAuda
1Average goals (2nd half)1
LiepājaAuda
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
LiepājaAuda
50%No goal after half-time50%
LiepājaAuda

Liepāja - second-half results

25% W50% R25% P
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Auda - second-half results

25% W50% R25% P
10
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 75% of matches and wins 75%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Liepāja - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.25
Goals scored / match0.30.5
Goals conceded / match0.50.5
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal75%75%
2 goals0%25%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet50%50%
No goal75%50%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 25% leading - 25% draw - 50% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 50% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Auda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.501.25
Goals scored / match1.00.5
Goals conceded / match0.30.5
Average goals in match1.31.0
1 goal100%75%
2 goals25%25%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet75%50%
No goal0%50%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 75% leading - 25% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 50% draw - 25% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 25% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Liepāja
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Auda
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
3
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
74%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
38%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
0%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Liepāja

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.03
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.28
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.62
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
60%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
68%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
67% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
67%

Auda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.65
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.5
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

LiepājaLigaAuda
Average goals in match 1.752.71 2.25
Both teams scored 25%57% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 25%48% 50%
Clean sheets 25%21% 50%
Goal before half-time 75%86% 100%
Goal after half-time 75%81% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.71
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.24
Home goals / match
1.48
Away goals / match
+-16%
Home attack advantage
+-19%
Home defence advantage
+-10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LiepājaYellow cardKirils Iljins
  2. AudaYellow cardWally Fofana
  3. AudaSubstitutionOn: Eduards DaskevicsOff: Wally Fofana
  4. AudaSubstitutionOn: Ralfs KragliksOff: Youba Traore
  5. LiepājaSubstitutionOn: Danila PatijčuksOff: Kyvon Leidsman
  6. AudaYellow cardMoussa Ouedraogo
  7. AudaYellow cardDeniss Melniks
  8. LiepājaSubstitutionOn: Djibril GueyeOff: Chovanie Amatkarijo
  9. AudaSubstitutionOn: Meleye DiagneOff: José Mendieta
  10. AudaYellow cardMeleye Diagne
  11. LiepājaSubstitutionOn: Ivans PatrikejevsOff: Fellipe Vieira Cardoso
  12. AudaYellow cardRalfs Kragliks

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (4): Liepāja 2 - 1 - 1 Auda. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 25% matches.

FK Auda Riga
1 : 2
FK Liepāja
FK Liepāja
2 : 0
FK Auda Riga
FK Liepāja
0 : 0
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
3 : 0
FK Liepāja

FAQ

What was the result of Liepāja vs Auda?

The Virsliga match finished Liepāja 1:2 Auda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Liepāja and Auda?

In the last 4 head-to-head matches Liepāja won 2, Auda won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 25% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Liepāja vs Auda?

Liepāja score 0.75 goals per game on average and Auda 1.50. The Virsliga average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 25% of Liepāja's matches and 50% of Auda's.

What form are Liepāja and Auda in?

Over the last 5 games Liepāja have a 2-0-2 record (1.50 points per game) and Auda 3-0-1 (2.25 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Liepāja vs Auda?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Liepāja vs Auda: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.