Latvia - VirsligaStadions DaugavaData current as of 06 September 2026

Liepāja vs Tukums: match statistics

Liepāja crest
Liepāja
3 : 0half-time 2:0
Tukums crest
Tukums

Liepāja vs Tukums: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Liepāja played Tukums in Virsliga (Latvia). The match was played on 30 May 2026. Venue: Stadions Daugava. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Liepāja: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Tukums: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Liepāja scores 1.20 and concedes 1.53 goals per match. Tukums scores 1.93 and concedes 1.80. League average: 3.05 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Liepāja 67%, Tukums 93%. Over 2.5: Liepāja 53%, Tukums 73%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 56%.

xG, shots and style

Liepāja has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.36. Liepāja: 11.9 shots per match, Tukums: 10.9.

Match halves

Liepāja: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.80. Tukums: half-time lead 27%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Liepāja: 76-90+ (6 goals). Tukums: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 3.05 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 56%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 2-3-0. Average goals 3.40, BTTS 80%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back the home win because Liepāja (5th) shows a stronger home defense: they concede 1.14 goals on average at home versus Tukums (8th) conceding 2.14 away. Attacks are similar in efficiency – both teams average 1.57 goals (Liepāja 18 goals this season, Tukums 29), with average xG of 1.32 for the hosts and 1.33 for the visitors; additionally Tukums scored 12 goals in their last 5 matches compared to Liepāja’s 8. The hosts control the game more often (52% possession vs 45%) and register a similar number of shots on target (4.43 vs 4.29), which, together with a 43% home win rate, gives them an edge over the visitors who have no away wins (0% win% away). In the last 5 matches both teams have conceded 11 goals, but Liepāja has a higher PPG in that period (1.4 vs 1.0), indicating greater result stability. Considering the hosts’ better defense and Tukums’ lack of away victories, I assign Liepāja roughly a 60% chance, draw 25% and the visitors 15%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The scenario of both teams scoring (BTTS - Yes / Goal/Goal) is the most likely outcome: Liepāja has a season BTTS rate of 88% and Tukums 100%, with the last 5 matches showing 80% and 100% respectively. Both sides regularly score and concede — hosts average 2.25 goals for and 1.5 conceded per match, visitors 1.57 goals for and 2.14 conceded; over the last 5 fixtures both teams have conceded on average 2.2 goals. xG and shooting metrics confirm threat from both ends: Liepāja has xG_for 1.39 with 11 shots (5.13 on target, conversion 20%), Tukums xG_for 1.33 with 10.71 shots (4.29 on target, conversion 15%). Clean sheets are rare — Liepāja keep a clean sheet in only 13% of matches, Tukums 0%, while the league clean sheet average is 41%, which increases the likelihood of BTTS. Additionally, the league average goals is 3.07, and the percentage of matches over 2.5 goals for home and away teams is 75% and 71%; the Over2.5 + BTTS combination (63% and 71%) further supports a 'yes' selection.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams produce a lot of goals: Liepāja scores on average 2.25 goals per match and concedes 1.50, while Tukums scores 1.57 and concedes 2.14; BTTS is 88% for Liepāja and 100% for Tukums. Based on xG, averaging the team’s xG-for and the opponent’s xG-against gives ~1.51 xG for Liepāja [(1.39+1.62)/2] and 1.43 for Tukums [(1.33+1.53)/2], totaling about 2.94 goals. Seasonal metrics show Over 2.5 in 75% of home matches and 71% of away matches, and in the last 5 games both teams had Over 2.5 in 80% of cases, which strengthens the signal for Over. The Over 1.5 line is virtually certain (100% for both teams seasonally), while Over 3.5 is less consistent (50% vs 43%), so the optimal and strongest pick is Over 2.5. Therefore I recommend playing the over on the 2.5 line, as the expected total goals (~2.94) and seasonal indicators (75%/71% and 80% in the last 5) provide an edge above that line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistical analysis indicates Liepāja holds a quality edge: they score on average 2.25 goals per match versus Tukums’ 1.57, with xG of 1.39 versus 1.33 and a higher shot conversion rate (20% vs 15%). First halves tend to be balanced — 88% of home matches and 100% of away matches saw a goal in the first half, and in the last five fixtures the home side led at the break in 40% (2 of 5) and trailed in 60% (3 of 5), which increases the likelihood of a draw at half-time. Crucially, second-half numbers favour Liepāja: they average 1.25 goals after the break versus Tukums’ 0.71 and have 7 goals in minutes 76–90 compared to 3 for the visitors, demonstrating the hosts’ ability to produce a turnaround after half-time. Additionally, more shots on target (5.13 vs 4.29) and higher xG confirm the hosts will dominate the latter stages. For these reasons the most reliable scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Liepāja win (X/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
LiepājaTukums
14Shots16
LiepājaTukums
7Shots on target6
LiepājaTukums
1.74xG1.7
LiepājaTukums
8Corners4
LiepājaTukums
51Dangerous attacks38
LiepājaTukums
10Fouls8
LiepājaTukums
2Cards3
LiepājaTukums

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.2Goals scored / match1.93
LiepājaTukums
1.53Goals conceded / match1.8
LiepājaTukums
53%Average possession44%
LiepājaTukums
4Shots on target / match4.73
LiepājaTukums

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.93Shots per match10.87
LiepājaTukums
4Shots on target4.73
LiepājaTukums
10.1%Shot conversion17.8%
LiepājaTukums
53%Possession44%
LiepājaTukums
1.45xG for1.36
LiepājaTukums
1.41xG against1.57
LiepājaTukums

Shooting quality

Liepāja: BalancedTukums: Counter-attacking
LiepājaTukums
Accuracy (shots on target)34%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.41

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Liepāja is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Liepāja · 1 pts / match - Tukums

Liepāja
LWWLD
Season result split
33% W27% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-6
1.27 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-2-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
LDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.66Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Tukums
WDDLL
Season result split
13% W47% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-7-6
0.87 pts / match · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-4-3
Last 5 away
0-3-2
DLDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 1.44BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tukums is 61% better for: goals scored per match.

1.2 goals / match - Liepāja · 1.93 goals / match - Tukums

Liepāja is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.53 goals / match - Liepāja · 1.8 goals / match - Tukums

Liepāja scoring profile: very strong

Liepāja scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 15 matches).

Tukums scoring profile: very strong

Tukums scores in 100% of matches (15 of 15 matches), while Liepāja keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 15 matches).

18Goals scored (season)29
LiepājaTukums
23Goals conceded (season)27
LiepājaTukums
2.73Average goals in match3.73
LiepājaTukums
8Goals scored (last 5)12
LiepājaTukums
11Goals conceded (last 5)11
LiepājaTukums

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal100%
LiepājaTukums
33%2 goals33%
LiepājaTukums
7%3 goals27%
LiepājaTukums
7%4 goals13%
LiepājaTukums

How often they concede at least...

93%1 goal93%
LiepājaTukums
33%2 goals60%
LiepājaTukums
13%3 goals27%
LiepājaTukums
7%4 goals0%
LiepājaTukums

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time40%
LiepājaTukums
0%BTTS in both halves13%
LiepājaTukums
20%Scored in both halves33%
LiepājaTukums

BTTS and goal count

47%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
LiepājaTukums
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
LiepājaTukums
80%BTTS - last 5100%
LiepājaTukums

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

87%Min. 1 goal before half-time93%
LiepājaTukums
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
LiepājaTukums
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
LiepājaTukums

2nd half

93%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
LiepājaTukums
47%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
LiepājaTukums
13%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
LiepājaTukums

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Liepāja is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / match - Liepāja · 1.07 pts / match - Tukums

Liepāja - half-time state
33% leading13% draw53% trailing
Tukums - half-time state
27% leading27% draw47% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per match (1st half)1.07
LiepājaTukums
0.4Goals scored (1st half)0.93
LiepājaTukums
0.73Goals conceded (1st half)1.07
LiepājaTukums
1.13Average goals (1st half)2
LiepājaTukums
47%Clean sheet before half-time33%
LiepājaTukums
67%No goal before half-time33%
LiepājaTukums

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1.4
LiepājaTukums
0.8Goals scored (2nd half)1
LiepājaTukums
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.73
LiepājaTukums
1.6Average goals (2nd half)1.73
LiepājaTukums
27%Clean sheet after half-time33%
LiepājaTukums
40%No goal after half-time33%
LiepājaTukums

Liepāja - second-half results

33% W33% R33% P
17
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tukums - second-half results

33% W40% R27% P
16
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.07
PPG before half-time
Lead holding48%

Leads at half-time in 27% of matches and wins 13%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Liepāja - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.60
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match1.62.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-4+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
Tukums - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.60
Goals scored / match1.01.4
Goals conceded / match1.40.8
Average goals in match2.42.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-2+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Liepāja
ScoredConceded
3
6
0-15
0
2
16-30
3
3
31-45
5
4
46-60
1
3
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Tukums
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
2
9
16-30
8
3
31-45
4
4
46-60
1
5
61-75
10
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.23
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
80%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+5%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
73%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Liepāja

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.37
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.25
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
110%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Tukums

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.57
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
139%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
34% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
34%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

LiepājaLigaTukums
Average goals in match 2.733.05 3.73
Both teams scored 67%60% 93%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%56% 73%
Clean sheets 7%21% 7%
Goal before half-time 87%78% 93%
Goal after half-time 93%86% 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.05
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.66
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+-4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
44%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. TukumsYellow cardBogdans Samoilovs
  2. TukumsYellow cardMartins Štāls
  3. LiepājaSubstitutionOn: Ivans PatrikejevsOff: Danila Patijčuks
  4. LiepājaGoalKyvon Leidsman
  5. LiepājaYellow cardFellipe Vieira Cardoso
  6. LiepājaGoalDjibril GueyeAssist: Andrii Korobenko
  7. TukumsYellow cardRudolfs Reingolcs
  8. LiepājaYellow cardAbiodun Omojesu Ogunniyi
  9. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Daniils PutrānsOff: Bogdans Samoilovs

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (5): Liepāja 2 - 3 - 0 Tukums. Average goals 3.40, both teams scored in 80% matches.

Tukums
2 : 2
Liepāja
FK Liepāja
4 : 1
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
1 : 3
FK Liepāja
FK Tukums 2000
2 : 2
FK Liepāja
FK Liepāja
0 : 0
FK Tukums 2000

FAQ

What was the result of Liepāja vs Tukums?

The Virsliga match finished Liepāja 3:0 Tukums. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Liepāja and Tukums?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Liepāja won 2, Tukums won 0 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 3.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Liepāja vs Tukums?

Liepāja score 1.20 goals per game on average and Tukums 1.93. The Virsliga average is 3.05 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Liepāja's matches and 93% of Tukums's.

What form are Liepāja and Tukums in?

Over the last 5 games Liepāja have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Tukums 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Liepāja vs Tukums?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.