Lierse Kempenzonen vs Club Brugge II: match statistics
Lierse Kempenzonen has a clear advantage as the host in this clash. Despite weak form in the last five matches (1 victory), the home team presents solid home statistics with a 33% win rate and only 33% of matches without scoring a goal at their own stadium. Club Brugge II, on the other hand, has disastrous away results – merely 8% of matches won, as many as 75% losses, and a goal difference of -7 in away matches. The visitors concede an average of 1.83 goals per away match, which, with an average xG Against of 1.53, confirms their defensive problems. Club Brugge II's high possession (59%) does not translate into efficiency, as evidenced by a low shot conversion rate (11%). Taking into account the home field advantage and Lierse's clearly better record in home matches, the hosts have a real chance of securing three points.
Lierse Kempenzonen vs Club Brugge II: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Lierse Kempenzonen played Club Brugge II in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 7 March 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Lierse Kempenzonen: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Club Brugge II: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Lierse Kempenzonen scores 1.12 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Club Brugge II scores 1.04 and concedes 1.81. League average: 2.77 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Lierse Kempenzonen 48%, Club Brugge II 58%. Over 2.5: Lierse Kempenzonen 44%, Club Brugge II 58%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
Lierse Kempenzonen has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.35. Lierse Kempenzonen: 11.9 shots per match, Club Brugge II: 12.0.
Match halves
Lierse Kempenzonen: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.44. Club Brugge II: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.81.
Goals by minute
Lierse Kempenzonen: 31-45+ (9 goals). Club Brugge II: 61-75 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
First Division B: 2.77 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Lierse Kempenzonen has a clear advantage as the host in this clash. Despite weak form in the last five matches (1 victory), the home team presents solid home statistics with a 33% win rate and only 33% of matches without scoring a goal at their own stadium. Club Brugge II, on the other hand, has disastrous away results – merely 8% of matches won, as many as 75% losses, and a goal difference of -7 in away matches. The visitors concede an average of 1.83 goals per away match, which, with an average xG Against of 1.53, confirms their defensive problems. Club Brugge II's high possession (59%) does not translate into efficiency, as evidenced by a low shot conversion rate (11%). Taking into account the home field advantage and Lierse's clearly better record in home matches, the hosts have a real chance of securing three points.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Lierse Kempenzonen | Club Brugge II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Lierse Kempenzonen is 8% better for: goals scored per match.
1.12 goals / match - Lierse Kempenzonen · 1.04 goals / match - Club Brugge II
Lierse Kempenzonen is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.4 goals / match - Lierse Kempenzonen · 1.81 goals / match - Club Brugge II
Lierse Kempenzonen scores in 64% of matches (16 of 25 matches), while Club Brugge II keeps a clean sheet in 12% (3 of 26 matches).
Club Brugge II scores in 69% of matches (18 of 26 matches), while Lierse Kempenzonen keeps a clean sheet in 28% (7 of 25 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Lierse Kempenzonen
Over / Under - Club Brugge II
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Lierse Kempenzonen is 77% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.36 pts / match - Lierse Kempenzonen · 0.77 pts / match - Club Brugge II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Lierse Kempenzonen - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 28%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Club Brugge II - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 15%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -4 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (9 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Lierse Kempenzonen
Club Brugge II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| Lierse Kempenzonen | Liga | Club Brugge II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.52 | 2.77 | • 2.85 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 48% | 53% | ▲ 58% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 51% | ▲ 58% |
| Clean sheets | • 28% | 27% | ▼ 12% |
| Goal before half-time | • 72% | 72% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 72% | 78% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Lierse Kempenzonen 1 - 0 - 0 Club Brugge II. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Lierse Kempenzonen vs Club Brugge II?
The First Division B match finished Lierse Kempenzonen 2:1 Club Brugge II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Lierse Kempenzonen vs Club Brugge II?
Lierse Kempenzonen score 1.12 goals per game on average and Club Brugge II 1.04. The First Division B average is 2.77 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Lierse Kempenzonen's matches and 58% of Club Brugge II's.
What form are Lierse Kempenzonen and Club Brugge II in?
Over the last 5 games Lierse Kempenzonen have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Club Brugge II 1-0-4 (0.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lierse Kempenzonen vs Club Brugge II?
The statistical background for Lierse Kempenzonen vs Club Brugge II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.