Belgium - First Division BData current as of 12 September 2026

Lierse Kempenzonen vs Patro Eisden: match statistics

135%(3.80)
X35%(3.50)
230%(1.96)

Statistical analysis indicates evenly matched chances for both teams, making a draw the most probable result. Patro Eisden occupies a higher position in the table (5th place) and has a better away record with a +4 goal difference, whereas Lierse Kempenzonen sits at a -1 goal difference at home. Form over the last five matches favors the hosts (1.8 points per game versus the visitors' 1.0), which could offset Patro Eisden's class advantage. Both teams share an identical shot conversion rate (9%) and similar average xG, suggesting an evenly matched attacking potential. Patro Eisden's high away draw percentage (36%) and the visitors' poor form in recent fixtures (only 1 win in their last 5 matches) further support the shared points scenario.

Lierse Kempenzonen vs Patro Eisden: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lierse Kempenzonen played Patro Eisden in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 13 March 2026. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Lierse Kempenzonen: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Patro Eisden: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lierse Kempenzonen scores 1.15 and concedes 1.33 goals per match. Patro Eisden scores 1.36 and concedes 1.18. League average: 2.77 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lierse Kempenzonen 48%, Patro Eisden 54%. Over 2.5: Lierse Kempenzonen 44%, Patro Eisden 43%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Patro Eisden has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.41. Lierse Kempenzonen: 12.1 shots per match, Patro Eisden: 15.0.

Match halves

Lierse Kempenzonen: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.44. Patro Eisden: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.75.

Goals by minute

Lierse Kempenzonen: 31-45+ (9 goals). Patro Eisden: 76-90+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.77 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates evenly matched chances for both teams, making a draw the most probable result. Patro Eisden occupies a higher position in the table (5th place) and has a better away record with a +4 goal difference, whereas Lierse Kempenzonen sits at a -1 goal difference at home. Form over the last five matches favors the hosts (1.8 points per game versus the visitors' 1.0), which could offset Patro Eisden's class advantage. Both teams share an identical shot conversion rate (9%) and similar average xG, suggesting an evenly matched attacking potential. Patro Eisden's high away draw percentage (36%) and the visitors' poor form in recent fixtures (only 1 win in their last 5 matches) further support the shared points scenario.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
7Shots25
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
1Shots on target13
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0.81xG2.93
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
2Corners5
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
40Dangerous attacks63
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
18Fouls12
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
5Cards4
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
1.15Goals scored / match1.36
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
1.33Goals conceded / match1.18
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
47%Average possession37%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
3.89Shots on target / match5.07
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.11Shots per match14.96
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
3.89Shots on target5.07
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
9.5%Shot conversion9.1%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
47%Possession37%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
1.41xG for1.65
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
1.66xG against1.08
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

Shooting quality

Lierse Kempenzonen: BalancedPatro Eisden: Attacking
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
Accuracy (shots on target)32%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Lierse Kempenzonen is 80% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Lierse Kempenzonen · 1 pts / match - Patro Eisden

Lierse Kempenzonen
LLWWW
Season result split
33% W22% D44% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-6-12
1.22 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-5
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
DLLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.45Opponent xG: 1.89BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Patro Eisden
WLLDD
Season result split
43% W32% D25% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-9-7
1.61 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-5-4
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WDWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 0.99BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Patro Eisden is 18% better for: goals scored per match.

1.15 goals / match - Lierse Kempenzonen · 1.36 goals / match - Patro Eisden

Patro Eisden is 13% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.33 goals / match - Lierse Kempenzonen · 1.18 goals / match - Patro Eisden

Lierse Kempenzonen scoring profile: strong

Lierse Kempenzonen scores in 67% of matches (18 of 27 matches), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 32% (9 of 28 matches).

Patro Eisden scoring profile: strong

Patro Eisden scores in 71% of matches (20 of 28 matches), while Lierse Kempenzonen keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 matches).

31Goals scored (season)38
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
36Goals conceded (season)33
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
2.48Average goals in match2.54
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
7Goals scored (last 5)6
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
7Goals conceded (last 5)9
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal71%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
30%2 goals39%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
15%3 goals14%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
4%4 goals11%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal68%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
44%2 goals36%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
11%3 goals7%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
7%4 goals7%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

48%
Lierse Kempenzonen - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.13 of 27 matches
53%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time18%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
11%BTTS in both halves7%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
22%Scored in both halves21%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
60%BTTS - last 580%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

74%Min. 1 goal before half-time61%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
26%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

2nd half

70%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
41%Min. 2 goals after half-time43%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
7%Min. 3 goals after half-time21%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lierse Kempenzonen - half-time state
37% leading37% draw26% trailing
Patro Eisden - half-time state
36% leading46% draw18% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.48Points per match (1st half)1.54
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0.7Goals scored (1st half)0.61
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.36
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
1.26Average goals (1st half)0.96
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
59%Clean sheet before half-time64%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
48%No goal before half-time57%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

After half-time (2nd half)

0.85Points per match (2nd half)1.25
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0.44Goals scored (2nd half)0.75
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
0.78Goals conceded (2nd half)0.82
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
1.22Average goals (2nd half)1.57
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
41%Clean sheet after half-time43%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden
63%No goal after half-time50%
Lierse KempenzonenPatro Eisden

Lierse Kempenzonen - second-half results

11% W52% D37% L
40
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding89%

Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 33%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Patro Eisden - second-half results

29% W39% D32% L
43
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.54
PPG before half-time
Lead holding119%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Lierse Kempenzonen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.200.60
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+3-3
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Patro Eisden - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.60
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.21.6
Average goals in match0.82.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2-5
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lierse Kempenzonen
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
6
5
16-30
9
7
31-45
4
4
46-60
3
6
61-75
5
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

Patro Eisden
ScoredConceded
6
3
0-15
4
4
16-30
7
3
31-45
5
8
46-60
6
6
61-75
10
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.51
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
51%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lierse Kempenzonen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.58
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

Patro Eisden

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.57
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.39
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.29
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.10
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
84%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.61
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

Lierse KempenzonenLigaPatro Eisden
Average goals in match 2.482.77 2.54
Both teams scored 48%53% 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%51% 43%
Clean sheets 30%27% 32%
Goal before half-time 74%71% 61%
Goal after half-time 70%78% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.77
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.40
Home goals / match
1.38
Away goals / match
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Patro EisdenYellow cardKjetil Borry
  2. Lierse KempenzonenGoalAlexandre Stanic
  3. Lierse KempenzonenYellow cardHugo Masaki Muadi-Dado
  4. Patro EisdenGoalLéandro Rousseau
  5. Lierse KempenzonenYellow cardVincent De Vos
  6. Lierse KempenzonenYellow cardWout Debuyser
  7. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Raymond AsanteOff: Ridwane M'Barki
  8. Lierse KempenzonenYellow cardWout Debuyser
  9. Lierse KempenzonenSubstitutionOn: Elton YeboahOff: Emmanuel Matuta La Nkenda Nosa
  10. Patro EisdenGoalLéandro RousseauAssist: Stef Peeters
  11. Lierse KempenzonenSubstitutionOn: Toni Lun BončinaOff: Noam Mayoka-Tika
  12. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Raphaël Boakye SarfoOff: Milan Robberechts
  13. Lierse KempenzonenYellow cardHugo Masaki Muadi-Dado
  14. Patro EisdenYellow cardLéandro Rousseau
  15. Lierse KempenzonenSubstitutionOn: Daan De PeuterOff: Victor Daguin
  16. Patro EisdenSubstitutionOn: Denys PrychynenkoOff: Léandro Rousseau
  17. Patro EisdenYellow cardDenys Prychynenko
  18. Patro EisdenYellow cardRaymond Asante

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Michiel AllaertsMatches officiated: 11
5.36Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 236%Home wins27%Draws36%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Lierse Kempenzonen 0 - 0 - 1 Patro Eisden. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Patro Eisden Maasmechelen
2 : 1
KSK Lierse Kempenzonen

FAQ

What was the result of Lierse Kempenzonen vs Patro Eisden?

The First Division B match finished Lierse Kempenzonen 1:2 Patro Eisden. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lierse Kempenzonen vs Patro Eisden?

Lierse Kempenzonen score 1.15 goals per game on average and Patro Eisden 1.36. The First Division B average is 2.77 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Lierse Kempenzonen's matches and 54% of Patro Eisden's.

What form are Lierse Kempenzonen and Patro Eisden in?

Over the last 5 games Lierse Kempenzonen have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Patro Eisden 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lierse Kempenzonen vs Patro Eisden?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Lierse Kempenzonen vs Patro Eisden: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.