Belgium - First Division BData current as of 12 September 2026

Lierse Kempenzonen vs RFC Seraing: match statistics

155%(2.08)
X30%(3.55)
215%(3.60)

Lierse Kempenzonen clearly outperforms RFC Seraing in the context of home matches. The hosts boast a 40% win rate at home, scoring an average of 1.4 goals per match and maintaining a positive goal difference (+1). RFC Seraing has not won any away match this season (0% Win%), conceding an average of 1.64 goals per meeting and recording a balance of -12 in away games. Additionally, the guests failed to score in 64% of away matches, making their offense very ineffective. Despite the hosts' weaker recent form (0.2 PPG in the last 5 matches), the home advantage and the guests' fatal away statistics speak for a Lierse Kempenzonen victory. A draw remains possible due to RFC Seraing's tendency to draw (45% of away matches), but a home win is the most probable scenario.

Lierse Kempenzonen vs RFC Seraing: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lierse Kempenzonen played RFC Seraing in First Division B (Belgium). The match was played on 13 February 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Lierse Kempenzonen: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. RFC Seraing: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lierse Kempenzonen scores 1.09 and concedes 1.32 goals per match. RFC Seraing scores 0.95 and concedes 1.55. League average: 2.73 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lierse Kempenzonen 45%, RFC Seraing 55%. Over 2.5: Lierse Kempenzonen 41%, RFC Seraing 50%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Lierse Kempenzonen has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.39. Lierse Kempenzonen: 11.9 shots per match, RFC Seraing: 12.6.

Match halves

Lierse Kempenzonen: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.45. RFC Seraing: half-time lead 5%, second-half goals 0.68.

Goals by minute

Lierse Kempenzonen: 31-45+ (7 goals). RFC Seraing: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.73 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Lierse Kempenzonen clearly outperforms RFC Seraing in the context of home matches. The hosts boast a 40% win rate at home, scoring an average of 1.4 goals per match and maintaining a positive goal difference (+1). RFC Seraing has not won any away match this season (0% Win%), conceding an average of 1.64 goals per meeting and recording a balance of -12 in away games. Additionally, the guests failed to score in 64% of away matches, making their offense very ineffective. Despite the hosts' weaker recent form (0.2 PPG in the last 5 matches), the home advantage and the guests' fatal away statistics speak for a Lierse Kempenzonen victory. A draw remains possible due to RFC Seraing's tendency to draw (45% of away matches), but a home win is the most probable scenario.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

57Possession (%)43
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
18Shots14
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
5Shots on target3
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
2xG1.35
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
2Corners3
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
71Dangerous attacks35
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
4Fouls5
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
1Cards0
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
1.09Goals scored / match0.95
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
1.32Goals conceded / match1.55
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
48%Average possession42%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
3.59Shots on target / match3.91
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.95Shots per match12.55
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
3.59Shots on target3.91
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
9.1%Shot conversion7.6%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
48%Possession42%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
1.4xG for1.39
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
1.61xG against1.47
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing

Shooting quality

Lierse Kempenzonen: BalancedRFC Seraing: Balanced
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
Accuracy (shots on target)30%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

RFC Seraing is 400% better for: last-5 form.

0.2 pts / match - Lierse Kempenzonen · 1 pts / match - RFC Seraing

Lierse Kempenzonen
LLDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
27% W27% D45% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-10
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-3
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWWDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 2.31BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
RFC Seraing
WDDLL
Season result split
14% W36% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-8-11
0.77 pts / match · goal difference -13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-5-6
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.46Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lierse Kempenzonen is 15% better for: goals scored per match.

1.09 goals / match - Lierse Kempenzonen · 0.95 goals / match - RFC Seraing

Lierse Kempenzonen is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.32 goals / match - Lierse Kempenzonen · 1.55 goals / match - RFC Seraing

Lierse Kempenzonen scoring profile: very strong

Lierse Kempenzonen scores in 64% of matches (14 of 22 matches), while RFC Seraing keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).

RFC Seraing scoring profile: strong

RFC Seraing scores in 59% of matches (13 of 22 matches), while Lierse Kempenzonen keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).

24Goals scored (season)21
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
29Goals conceded (season)34
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
2.41Average goals in match2.5
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
7Goals scored (last 5)6
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
11Goals conceded (last 5)6
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal59%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
27%2 goals27%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
14%3 goals9%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
5%4 goals0%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing

How often they concede at least...

68%1 goal82%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
45%2 goals50%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
9%3 goals14%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
9%4 goals5%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

45%
Lierse Kempenzonen - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.10 of 22 matches
53%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time23%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
9%BTTS in both halves5%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
18%Scored in both halves14%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing

BTTS and goal count

41%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
80%BTTS - last 560%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing

2nd half

68%Min. 1 goal after half-time73%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time41%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lierse Kempenzonen is 106% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.32 pts / match - Lierse Kempenzonen · 0.64 pts / match - RFC Seraing

Lierse Kempenzonen - half-time state
32% leading36% draw32% trailing
RFC Seraing - half-time state
5% leading50% draw45% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.32Points per match (1st half)0.64
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
0.64Goals scored (1st half)0.27
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
0.59Goals conceded (1st half)0.82
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
1.23Average goals (1st half)1.09
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
59%Clean sheet before half-time41%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
55%No goal before half-time73%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing

After half-time (2nd half)

0.91Points per match (2nd half)1.09
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)0.68
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.73
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
1.18Average goals (2nd half)1.41
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
45%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing
64%No goal after half-time55%
Lierse KempenzonenRFC Seraing

Lierse Kempenzonen - second-half results

14% W50% D36% L
29
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
20
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.32
PPG before half-time
Lead holding84%

Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 27%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

RFC Seraing - second-half results

23% W41% D36% L
14
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding280%

Leads at half-time in 5% of matches and wins 14%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Lierse Kempenzonen - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.60
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match1.21.0
Average goals in match2.01.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
RFC Seraing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.60
Goals scored / match0.21.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-3+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lierse Kempenzonen
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
5
3
16-30
7
7
31-45
3
2
46-60
3
5
61-75
4
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

RFC Seraing
ScoredConceded
3
4
0-15
1
6
16-30
2
8
31-45
4
4
46-60
5
4
61-75
6
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.46
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
38%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lierse Kempenzonen

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
78%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.89
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

RFC Seraing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.08
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.44
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
112%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

Lierse KempenzonenLigaRFC Seraing
Average goals in match 2.412.73 2.50
Both teams scored 45%53% 55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 41%51% 50%
Clean sheets 32%27% 18%
Goal before half-time 73%71% 64%
Goal after half-time 68%78% 73%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.73
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.34
Away goals / match
+4%
Home attack advantage
+4%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
32%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
21%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. RFC SeraingSubstitutionOn: Serigne Saliou FayeOff: Abdoulaye Agne Ba
  2. Lierse KempenzonenSubstitutionOn: Dylan DemuynckOff: Toni Lun Bončina
  3. RFC SeraingSubstitutionOn: Djibril DiarraOff: Diego Duarte
  4. Lierse KempenzonenYellow cardElton Yeboah
  5. RFC SeraingSubstitutionOn: Oussmane KébéOff: Emmanuel Mutela Tshimbalanga
  6. RFC SeraingSubstitutionOn: Nabil Bouchentouf IdrissOff: Thiago Paulo da Silva
  7. Lierse KempenzonenSubstitutionOn: Yassin Hidraoui AkacharOff: Alexandre Stanic

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Tim De KeyzerMatches officiated: 15
4.6Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 233%Home wins33%Draws33%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Lierse Kempenzonen 0 - 1 - 0 RFC Seraing. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

RFC Seraing
1 : 1
KSK Lierse Kempenzonen

FAQ

What was the result of Lierse Kempenzonen vs RFC Seraing?

The First Division B match finished Lierse Kempenzonen 0:1 RFC Seraing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Lierse Kempenzonen vs RFC Seraing?

Lierse Kempenzonen score 1.09 goals per game on average and RFC Seraing 0.95. The First Division B average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 45% of Lierse Kempenzonen's matches and 55% of RFC Seraing's.

What form are Lierse Kempenzonen and RFC Seraing in?

Over the last 5 games Lierse Kempenzonen have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and RFC Seraing 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lierse Kempenzonen vs RFC Seraing?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Lierse Kempenzonen vs RFC Seraing: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.