Norway - EliteserienData current as of 23 July 2026

Lillestrøm vs FK Bodo - Glimt: match statistics

Lillestrøm crest
Lillestrøm
0 : 2half-time 0:1
FK Bodo - Glimt crest
FK Bodo - Glimt

Lillestrøm vs FK Bodo - Glimt: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Lillestrøm play FK Bodo - Glimt in Eliteserien (Norway). The match date is 26 April 2026 at 19:15. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Lillestrøm: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. FK Bodo - Glimt: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Lillestrøm scores 1.62 and concedes 0.92 goals per match. FK Bodo - Glimt scores 2.38 and concedes 0.85. League average: 2.95 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Lillestrøm 38%, FK Bodo - Glimt 31%. Over 2.5: Lillestrøm 46%, FK Bodo - Glimt 62%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 57%.

xG, shots and style

FK Bodo - Glimt has higher xG: 2.25 vs 1.48. Lillestrøm: 12.7 shots per match, FK Bodo - Glimt: 17.1.

Match halves

Lillestrøm: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 1.08. FK Bodo - Glimt: half-time lead 69%, second-half goals 1.31.

Goals by minute

Lillestrøm: 76-90+ (8 goals). FK Bodo - Glimt: 16-30 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Eliteserien: 2.95 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 57%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-0-2. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Lillestrøm benefit from an outstanding home record: 100% wins, averaging 3 goals scored per game, 5 shots on target and 60% possession at home, with 0% of matches without scoring. Bodo-Glimt have a higher away xG (1.89 vs hosts' 1.48) and sustain 72% possession on the road, but that converts to only 1.33 goals per game and an 11% shot conversion rate, while Lillestrøm converts 25% of attempts. Defensively the hosts concede on average 1 goal per home game, whereas the visitors concede 2 goals per away game and have shipped 7 goals in the last 5 matches, indicating greater defensive vulnerability at Bodo. Over the last 5 meetings both teams show similar records (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss each) and identical 2 points per game in that span, which reduces a form advantage and emphasizes efficiency differences. Considering the hosts’ 100% home efficiency, higher shot effectiveness (25% vs 11%) and the visitors’ weaker defense, I favor Lillestrøm — probabilities: home 60%, draw 25%, Bodo-Glimt 15%.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
10Shots10
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
1Shots on target4
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
1.15xG1.34
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
5Corners4
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
62Dangerous attacks59
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
8Fouls10
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
0Cards0
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
1.62Goals scored / match2.38
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
0.92Goals conceded / match0.85
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
52%Average possession65%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
4.54Shots on target / match6.54
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.69Shots per match17.15
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
4.54Shots on target6.54
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
12.7%Shot conversion13.9%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
52%Possession65%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
1.48xG for2.25
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
1.48xG against0.98
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt

Shooting quality

Lillestrøm: BalancedFK Bodo - Glimt: Dominant
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
Accuracy (shots on target)36%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

FK Bodo - Glimt is 44% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Lillestrøm · 2.6 pts / match - FK Bodo - Glimt

Lillestrøm
WLLWW
Season result split
62% W8% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-1-4
1.92 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-0-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.51Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
FK Bodo - Glimt
WWDWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
69% W15% R15% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-2-2
2.23 pts / match · goal difference +20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-1-0
2.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-1
Last 5 away
3-2-0
DWWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.08Opponent xG: 0.74BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FK Bodo - Glimt is 47% better for: goals scored per match.

1.62 goals / match - Lillestrøm · 2.38 goals / match - FK Bodo - Glimt

FK Bodo - Glimt is 8% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.92 goals / match - Lillestrøm · 0.85 goals / match - FK Bodo - Glimt

Lillestrøm scoring profile: mixed

Lillestrøm scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while FK Bodo - Glimt keeps a clean sheet in 54% (7 of 13 matches).

FK Bodo - Glimt scoring profile: very strong

FK Bodo - Glimt scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while Lillestrøm keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 matches).

21Goals scored (season)31
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
12Goals conceded (season)11
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
2.54Average goals in match3.23
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
8Goals scored (last 5)12
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
6Goals conceded (last 5)4
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal85%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
54%2 goals69%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
31%3 goals46%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
8%4 goals23%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal46%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
31%2 goals15%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
0%3 goals8%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
0%4 goals8%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time15%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
0%BTTS in both halves8%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
38%Scored in both halves69%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS23%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS38%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
60%BTTS - last 560%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time54%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
8%Min. 3 goals after half-time15%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FK Bodo - Glimt is 87% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.15 pts / match - Lillestrøm · 2.15 pts / match - FK Bodo - Glimt

Lillestrøm - half-time state
23% leading46% draw31% trailing
FK Bodo - Glimt - half-time state
69% leading8% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.15Points per match (1st half)2.15
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
0.54Goals scored (1st half)1.08
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
0.54Goals conceded (1st half)0.54
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
1.08Average goals (1st half)1.62
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
54%Clean sheet before half-time62%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
62%No goal before half-time23%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt

After half-time (2nd half)

1.92Points per match (2nd half)2.15
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
1.08Goals scored (2nd half)1.31
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
0.38Goals conceded (2nd half)0.31
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
1.46Average goals (2nd half)1.62
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
62%Clean sheet after half-time77%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt
31%No goal after half-time23%
LillestrømFK Bodo - Glimt

Lillestrøm - second-half results

54% W31% R15% P
15
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding270%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 62%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

FK Bodo - Glimt - second-half results

62% W31% R8% P
28
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
+13
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.15
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 69% of matches and wins 69%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Lillestrøm - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.01.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
FK Bodo - Glimt - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.601.80
Goals scored / match1.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.81.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal0%20%
Goal difference+5+3
Half-time: 80% leading - 20% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Lillestrøm
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
2
2
16-30
1
1
31-45
3
3
46-60
3
0
61-75
8
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

FK Bodo - Glimt
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
8
1
16-30
6
4
31-45
3
0
46-60
7
2
61-75
7
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.88
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
35%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+108%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Lillestrøm

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.70
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.56
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
91%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
79%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

FK Bodo - Glimt

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.26
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
205%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
47%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eliteserien).

Teams vs league

LillestrømLigaFK Bodo - Glimt
Average goals in match 2.542.95 3.23
Both teams scored 38%55% 31%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%57% 62%
Clean sheets 38%24% 54%
Goal before half-time 69%82% 100%
Goal after half-time 85%78% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.95
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
57%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.79
Home goals / match
1.16
Away goals / match
+54%
Home attack advantage
+35%
Home defence advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Lillestrøm 0 - 0 - 2 FK Bodo - Glimt. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FK Bodo - Glimt
5 : 2
Lillestrøm
Lillestrøm
0 : 5
FK Bodo - Glimt

FAQ

What was the result of Lillestrøm vs FK Bodo - Glimt?

The Eliteserien match finished Lillestrøm 0:2 FK Bodo - Glimt. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Lillestrøm and FK Bodo - Glimt?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Lillestrøm won 0, FK Bodo - Glimt won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 6.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Lillestrøm vs FK Bodo - Glimt?

Lillestrøm score 1.62 goals per game on average and FK Bodo - Glimt 2.38. The Eliteserien average is 2.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Lillestrøm's matches and 31% of FK Bodo - Glimt's.

What form are Lillestrøm and FK Bodo - Glimt in?

Over the last 5 games Lillestrøm have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and FK Bodo - Glimt 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Lillestrøm vs FK Bodo - Glimt?

The statistical background for Lillestrøm vs FK Bodo - Glimt — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.